Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2024, , 57 - 71, 29.01.2024
https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1378450

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Adaş, S. & Konuralp, E. (2020a). Sırp Milliyetçiliği Fay Hattında Bosna-Hersek Siyasetinin Krizi. Barış Araştırmaları ve Çatışma Çözümleri Dergisi, 8(2), 102-126.
  • Adaş, S., & Konuralp, E. (2020b). Eski Yugoslavya’da Sırp Milliyetçiliğinin Tarihsel Temelleri ve Yugoslavya Sosyalist Federal Cumhuriyeti'nin Dağılmasına Etkileri. Anadolu ve Balkan Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(6), 107-139.
  • Akdemir, E. (2018). European Union Perception of Bosnia and Herzegovina's People. Balkan Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1) , 1-30. DOI: 10.30903/Balkan.444557
  • Anholt, R. M. (2016). Understanding sexual violence in armed conflict: cutting ourselves with Occam’s razor. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 1, 1-10.
  • Bam, N., Shrestha, R., & Maharjan, R. K. (2020). Importance of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Training in Armed Police Force, Nepal. Journal of APF Command and Staff College, 3(1), 106–119. DOI: 10.3126/japfcsc.v3i1.27532
  • Bennett, C. (1995). Yugoslavia’s Bloody Collapse: Causes, Course and Consequences. New York University Press.
  • Benson, S. A. (2020). Fragmentation or Coherence? Does international Dispute Settlement Achieve Comprehensive Justice?. International Journal of Law and Public Administration, 3(1), 77-88.
  • Bilić, B. (2011). (Post-)Yugoslav anti-war engagement: A research topic awaiting attention. Filozofija I Drustvo, 22, 83-107.
  • Bolton, M. & Jeffrey, A. (2008), The politics of NGO registration in international protectorates: the cases of Bosnia and Iraq. Disasters, 32, 586-608. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01056.x
  • Bulatović, S. (2019). The role of orthographic and phonetic distances in mutual intelligibility between Montenegrin and Bulgarian. Logos & Littera: Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, 6(1), 49-66. DOI: 10.31902/LL.2019.6.1.3
  • Cassese, A. (2005). International Law. Oxford University Press.
  • Choi, S. (2022). The Multidirectional memory connecting the Holocaust and French decolonization. Journal of Student Research, 11(3), 1-8. DOI: 10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.2932
  • Cohen-Almagor, R. (2020). Taking Profound Offence Seriously: Freedom of Speech v. Human Dignity. Journal of Hate Studies, 16(1), 1–11. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3757329
  • Cryer, R. (2010). Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime. Cambridge University Press.
  • Daalder, I. H. (1998). Decision to Intervene: How the War in Bosnia Ended. Foreign Service Journal, 75(12), 24-31.
  • Dag Hammarskjöld Library. (2020). Courts & Tribunals - UN International Law Documentation. Research. https://research.un.org/en/docs/law/courts
  • De la Vega, C. (2013). Dictionary of international human rights law. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Des Forges, A. (1999). Leave none to tell the story. Human Rights Watch.
  • Milošević Đorđević, J., Di Napoli, F. & Đurić, Ž. (2022). Endorsement and Social Role of the Ethos of Conflict in Serbia. Politička misao, 59 (4), 192-214. DOI: 10.20901/pm.59.4.09
  • Doswald-Beck, L. (2011). Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism. Oxford University Press.
  • Farer, T. (2006). Rumo a uma ordem legal internacional efetiva: da coexistência ao consenso?. Sur. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, 3, 156-177.
  • Fleck, D. (Ed.). (2008). The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Galli, V. (2018). Paul Wehr’s Conflict Mapping: The Bosnian War. Conflict Analysis Research Centre. https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/carc/2018/04/02/conflict-mapping-of-the-bosnian-war/
  • Gourevitch, P. (1999). We wish to inform you that tomorrow we will be killed with our families: stories from Rwanda. Picador.
  • Ginieczki, T. (2020). Constructions of Identity and War: A Reciprocal Relationship in Former Yugoslavia. Undergraduate Research Journal, 17, 19-28.
  • Gunawan, Y., Refisyanti, S. W., Mufida, A., Takarub, K. D., & Nur, A. (2020). Jurisdiction of International Court of Justice (ICJ) Over the Genocide Violations: with Special References to Rohingya Case. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(4), 313-336.
  • Hall, J., Kovras, I., Stefanovic, D., & Loizides, N. (2018). Exposure to violence and attitudes towards transitional justice. Political Psychology, 39(2), 345-363.
  • Heffes, E. (2022). Documents and Resolutions. In Detention by Non-State Armed Groups under International Law. Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108862561.003
  • International Criminal Court. (2020). Understanding the International Criminal Court. International Criminal Court.
  • Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research Ethics for Social Scientists. Sage Publications.
  • Kennedy, D. (2006). Of War and Law. Princeton University Press.
  • Konuralp, E. (2018). Kimliğin Etni ve Ulus Arasında Salınımı: Çokkültürcülük mü Yeniden Kabilecilik mi?. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 13 (2), 133-146. DOI: 10.17153/oguiibf.400350a
  • Konuralp, E. & Adaş, S. (2020). Makedonya’da İsim Sorunu: Yunan ve Makedon Milliyetçiliklerinin Kıskacında Kimlik İnşası. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (21), 311-344.
  • Korać, S. (2022). Entangled in the continuum of violence: how do women experience war?. The Review of International Affairs, 73(1185), 27-50.
  • Ktori, M., & Baranhan, G. (2018). Development and future perspectives of a humanitarian forensic programme: the committee on missing persons in Cyprus example. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 8(1), 1-12.
  • Kulkova, M. (2019). From Negative to Positive Peace in Western Balkans: A Case for Eclectic Theory. Central European Journal of International & Security Studies, 13(3), 26-47.
  • Malešević, S. (2020). Is it easy to kill in war? Emotions and violence in the combat zones of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (1991-1995). European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 61(2), 301-331.
  • Mamdani, M. (2020). When victims become killers: Colonialism, nativism, and the genocide in Rwanda. Princeton University Press.
  • Meron, T. (2006). The Humanization of International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Moon, P. (2018). Reconstructions of Serbian National Identity in the Post-Yugoslav Era: A Thematic Survey. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 13(4), 1069–1089. DOI: 10.21301/eap.v13i4.8.
  • Moor, G. A. (1994). The Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Article 51: Inherent Rights and Unmet Responsibilities. Fordham Int'l LJ, 18, 870.
  • Mulaj, K. (2008). Forced displacement in Darfur, Sudan: Dilemmas of classifying the crimes. International Migration, 46(2), 27-48.
  • Neumann, M. (2012). Modelling the dynamics of securitizing national identities. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 10(1), 28-49.
  • Özdil, M. A. (2021). The effect of clothing as a marker on identity. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi, 14(33), 117-130.
  • Petrović, B., Međedović, J., Radović, O., & Lovrić, S. R. (2019). Conspiracy mentality in post-conflict societies: Relations with the ethos of conflict and readiness for reconciliation. Europe's journal of psychology, 15(1), 59-81.
  • Power, S. (2002). A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. Basic Books.
  • Putra, I. E., Selvanathan, H. P., Mashuri, A., & Montiel, C. J. (2021). Aung San Suu Kyi’s defensive denial of the Rohingya massacre: A rhetorical analysis of denial and positive-image construction. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(2), 353-369.
  • Qureshi, A., Michell, P., Copeland, P., Chang, F., Scott, C. M. & Kalajdzic, J. (1994). A Memorial for Bosnia: Framework of Legal Arguments Concerning the Lawfulness of the Maintenance of the United Nations Security Council's Arms Embargo on Bosnia and Herzegovina. SSRN. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1661863
  • Ramet, S. P. (2006). The Three Yugoslavias: State-Building and Legitimation, 1918–2005. Indiana University Press.
  • Rangelov, I. (2006). EU conditionality and transitional justice in the former Yugoslavia. Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy, 2(1), 365-375.
  • Rawski, T. (2021). The persistence of national victimhood: Bosniak post-war memory politics of the Srebrenica mass killings. Sprawy Narodowościowe, (53), 1-23.
  • Sancaktar, C. (2018, July 31). Bosna-Hersek’te siyasal ve ekonomik yeniden yapılanma. Balkan Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 211 -237.
  • Sell, L. (2003). Slobodan Milosevic and the destruction of Yugoslavia. Duke University Press.
  • Schabas, W. A. (2006). An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Shuangyun, Y., & Hongxia, L. (2021). Ethnic Identity and Acculturation Orientation of Chinese Yi Villagers in the Context of Social Media. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(4), 109-127.
  • Snyder, J., & Vinjamuri, L. (2003). Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice. International Security, 28(3), 5-44.
  • Taylor, M. L. (2019). Combating disinformation and foreign interference in democracies: Lessons from Europe. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/combating-disinformation-and-foreign-interference-in-democracies-lessons-from-europe/
  • Tepšić, G., & Džuverović, N. (2018). Bosnia and Herzegovina. In Giessmann, H. J., Mac Ginty, R., Austin, B., & Seifert, C. (Eds.), The Elgar Companion to Post-Conflict Transition (pp. 27-48). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • United Nations. (1991). Resolution 713 (1991) / adopted by the Security Council at its 3009th meeting, on 25 September 1991. UN Document S/RES/713(1991). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/126827
  • United Nations. (1993a). Resolution 808 (1993) / adopted by the Security Council at its 3175th meeting, on 22 February 1993. UN Document S/RES/808(1993). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/243008
  • United Nations. (1993b). Resolution 827 (1993) / adopted by the Security Council at its 3217th meeting, on 25 May 1993. UN Document S/RES/819(1993). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/164939
  • United Nations. (1993c). Resolution 819 (1993) / adopted by the Security Council at its 3199th meeting, on 16 April 1993. UN Document S/RES/827(1993). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/166567
  • United Nations. (1999). Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations During the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda. UN Document S/1999/1257. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un-documents/document/poc-s19991257.php
  • Vomlela, L. (2016). Changes of American Foreign Policy towards the Countries of the Former Yugoslavia between 1991 and 1995. Central European Papers, 4(1), 63-81.
  • Vučinić Nešković, V. (2023). Emerging subdisciplines in ethnology and anthropology of Serbia: research trends at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 7(1), 5.
  • Whittle, D. (2015). The Limits of Legality and the United Nations Security Council: Applying the Extra-Legal Measures Model to Chapter VII Action. European Journal of International Law, 26(3), 671-698.

Ethnic Tensions and Global Response: Disentangling the Complexities of the Bosnian War

Yıl 2024, , 57 - 71, 29.01.2024
https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1378450

Öz

This article critically examines the Bosnian War within the broader framework of international law, with a specific focus on understanding its role in managing ethnic conflicts. The aim is to analyze the effectiveness of international law in addressing the complex dynamics of ethnic strife, particularly in the context of post-Cold War Yugoslavia. The key hypothesis guiding this research posits that international legal mechanisms, while crucial, faced significant challenges and limitations in effectively resolving the ethnic conflicts that characterized the Bosnian War. The study delves into the historical and socio-political factors fueling ethnic tensions in Yugoslavia, highlighting how nationalism and ethnic separatism culminated in widespread violence. The article critically evaluates the international response to the conflict, including the effectiveness of UN Peacekeeping Forces and the Dayton Peace Agreement, and discusses the broader implications for global peace and security. Furthermore, the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) is explored as a key development in international law. The study assesses the impact of the ICTY on promoting accountability and justice, and its role in facilitating reconciliation efforts post-conflict. The findings of this study have significant relevance for contemporary international law, offering insights into its potential in preventing and resolving ethnic conflicts in a rapidly changing global landscape.

Kaynakça

  • Adaş, S. & Konuralp, E. (2020a). Sırp Milliyetçiliği Fay Hattında Bosna-Hersek Siyasetinin Krizi. Barış Araştırmaları ve Çatışma Çözümleri Dergisi, 8(2), 102-126.
  • Adaş, S., & Konuralp, E. (2020b). Eski Yugoslavya’da Sırp Milliyetçiliğinin Tarihsel Temelleri ve Yugoslavya Sosyalist Federal Cumhuriyeti'nin Dağılmasına Etkileri. Anadolu ve Balkan Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(6), 107-139.
  • Akdemir, E. (2018). European Union Perception of Bosnia and Herzegovina's People. Balkan Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1) , 1-30. DOI: 10.30903/Balkan.444557
  • Anholt, R. M. (2016). Understanding sexual violence in armed conflict: cutting ourselves with Occam’s razor. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 1, 1-10.
  • Bam, N., Shrestha, R., & Maharjan, R. K. (2020). Importance of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Training in Armed Police Force, Nepal. Journal of APF Command and Staff College, 3(1), 106–119. DOI: 10.3126/japfcsc.v3i1.27532
  • Bennett, C. (1995). Yugoslavia’s Bloody Collapse: Causes, Course and Consequences. New York University Press.
  • Benson, S. A. (2020). Fragmentation or Coherence? Does international Dispute Settlement Achieve Comprehensive Justice?. International Journal of Law and Public Administration, 3(1), 77-88.
  • Bilić, B. (2011). (Post-)Yugoslav anti-war engagement: A research topic awaiting attention. Filozofija I Drustvo, 22, 83-107.
  • Bolton, M. & Jeffrey, A. (2008), The politics of NGO registration in international protectorates: the cases of Bosnia and Iraq. Disasters, 32, 586-608. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01056.x
  • Bulatović, S. (2019). The role of orthographic and phonetic distances in mutual intelligibility between Montenegrin and Bulgarian. Logos & Littera: Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, 6(1), 49-66. DOI: 10.31902/LL.2019.6.1.3
  • Cassese, A. (2005). International Law. Oxford University Press.
  • Choi, S. (2022). The Multidirectional memory connecting the Holocaust and French decolonization. Journal of Student Research, 11(3), 1-8. DOI: 10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.2932
  • Cohen-Almagor, R. (2020). Taking Profound Offence Seriously: Freedom of Speech v. Human Dignity. Journal of Hate Studies, 16(1), 1–11. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3757329
  • Cryer, R. (2010). Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime. Cambridge University Press.
  • Daalder, I. H. (1998). Decision to Intervene: How the War in Bosnia Ended. Foreign Service Journal, 75(12), 24-31.
  • Dag Hammarskjöld Library. (2020). Courts & Tribunals - UN International Law Documentation. Research. https://research.un.org/en/docs/law/courts
  • De la Vega, C. (2013). Dictionary of international human rights law. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Des Forges, A. (1999). Leave none to tell the story. Human Rights Watch.
  • Milošević Đorđević, J., Di Napoli, F. & Đurić, Ž. (2022). Endorsement and Social Role of the Ethos of Conflict in Serbia. Politička misao, 59 (4), 192-214. DOI: 10.20901/pm.59.4.09
  • Doswald-Beck, L. (2011). Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism. Oxford University Press.
  • Farer, T. (2006). Rumo a uma ordem legal internacional efetiva: da coexistência ao consenso?. Sur. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, 3, 156-177.
  • Fleck, D. (Ed.). (2008). The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Galli, V. (2018). Paul Wehr’s Conflict Mapping: The Bosnian War. Conflict Analysis Research Centre. https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/carc/2018/04/02/conflict-mapping-of-the-bosnian-war/
  • Gourevitch, P. (1999). We wish to inform you that tomorrow we will be killed with our families: stories from Rwanda. Picador.
  • Ginieczki, T. (2020). Constructions of Identity and War: A Reciprocal Relationship in Former Yugoslavia. Undergraduate Research Journal, 17, 19-28.
  • Gunawan, Y., Refisyanti, S. W., Mufida, A., Takarub, K. D., & Nur, A. (2020). Jurisdiction of International Court of Justice (ICJ) Over the Genocide Violations: with Special References to Rohingya Case. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(4), 313-336.
  • Hall, J., Kovras, I., Stefanovic, D., & Loizides, N. (2018). Exposure to violence and attitudes towards transitional justice. Political Psychology, 39(2), 345-363.
  • Heffes, E. (2022). Documents and Resolutions. In Detention by Non-State Armed Groups under International Law. Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108862561.003
  • International Criminal Court. (2020). Understanding the International Criminal Court. International Criminal Court.
  • Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research Ethics for Social Scientists. Sage Publications.
  • Kennedy, D. (2006). Of War and Law. Princeton University Press.
  • Konuralp, E. (2018). Kimliğin Etni ve Ulus Arasında Salınımı: Çokkültürcülük mü Yeniden Kabilecilik mi?. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 13 (2), 133-146. DOI: 10.17153/oguiibf.400350a
  • Konuralp, E. & Adaş, S. (2020). Makedonya’da İsim Sorunu: Yunan ve Makedon Milliyetçiliklerinin Kıskacında Kimlik İnşası. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (21), 311-344.
  • Korać, S. (2022). Entangled in the continuum of violence: how do women experience war?. The Review of International Affairs, 73(1185), 27-50.
  • Ktori, M., & Baranhan, G. (2018). Development and future perspectives of a humanitarian forensic programme: the committee on missing persons in Cyprus example. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 8(1), 1-12.
  • Kulkova, M. (2019). From Negative to Positive Peace in Western Balkans: A Case for Eclectic Theory. Central European Journal of International & Security Studies, 13(3), 26-47.
  • Malešević, S. (2020). Is it easy to kill in war? Emotions and violence in the combat zones of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (1991-1995). European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 61(2), 301-331.
  • Mamdani, M. (2020). When victims become killers: Colonialism, nativism, and the genocide in Rwanda. Princeton University Press.
  • Meron, T. (2006). The Humanization of International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Moon, P. (2018). Reconstructions of Serbian National Identity in the Post-Yugoslav Era: A Thematic Survey. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 13(4), 1069–1089. DOI: 10.21301/eap.v13i4.8.
  • Moor, G. A. (1994). The Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Article 51: Inherent Rights and Unmet Responsibilities. Fordham Int'l LJ, 18, 870.
  • Mulaj, K. (2008). Forced displacement in Darfur, Sudan: Dilemmas of classifying the crimes. International Migration, 46(2), 27-48.
  • Neumann, M. (2012). Modelling the dynamics of securitizing national identities. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 10(1), 28-49.
  • Özdil, M. A. (2021). The effect of clothing as a marker on identity. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi, 14(33), 117-130.
  • Petrović, B., Međedović, J., Radović, O., & Lovrić, S. R. (2019). Conspiracy mentality in post-conflict societies: Relations with the ethos of conflict and readiness for reconciliation. Europe's journal of psychology, 15(1), 59-81.
  • Power, S. (2002). A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. Basic Books.
  • Putra, I. E., Selvanathan, H. P., Mashuri, A., & Montiel, C. J. (2021). Aung San Suu Kyi’s defensive denial of the Rohingya massacre: A rhetorical analysis of denial and positive-image construction. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(2), 353-369.
  • Qureshi, A., Michell, P., Copeland, P., Chang, F., Scott, C. M. & Kalajdzic, J. (1994). A Memorial for Bosnia: Framework of Legal Arguments Concerning the Lawfulness of the Maintenance of the United Nations Security Council's Arms Embargo on Bosnia and Herzegovina. SSRN. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1661863
  • Ramet, S. P. (2006). The Three Yugoslavias: State-Building and Legitimation, 1918–2005. Indiana University Press.
  • Rangelov, I. (2006). EU conditionality and transitional justice in the former Yugoslavia. Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy, 2(1), 365-375.
  • Rawski, T. (2021). The persistence of national victimhood: Bosniak post-war memory politics of the Srebrenica mass killings. Sprawy Narodowościowe, (53), 1-23.
  • Sancaktar, C. (2018, July 31). Bosna-Hersek’te siyasal ve ekonomik yeniden yapılanma. Balkan Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 211 -237.
  • Sell, L. (2003). Slobodan Milosevic and the destruction of Yugoslavia. Duke University Press.
  • Schabas, W. A. (2006). An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Shuangyun, Y., & Hongxia, L. (2021). Ethnic Identity and Acculturation Orientation of Chinese Yi Villagers in the Context of Social Media. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(4), 109-127.
  • Snyder, J., & Vinjamuri, L. (2003). Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice. International Security, 28(3), 5-44.
  • Taylor, M. L. (2019). Combating disinformation and foreign interference in democracies: Lessons from Europe. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/combating-disinformation-and-foreign-interference-in-democracies-lessons-from-europe/
  • Tepšić, G., & Džuverović, N. (2018). Bosnia and Herzegovina. In Giessmann, H. J., Mac Ginty, R., Austin, B., & Seifert, C. (Eds.), The Elgar Companion to Post-Conflict Transition (pp. 27-48). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • United Nations. (1991). Resolution 713 (1991) / adopted by the Security Council at its 3009th meeting, on 25 September 1991. UN Document S/RES/713(1991). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/126827
  • United Nations. (1993a). Resolution 808 (1993) / adopted by the Security Council at its 3175th meeting, on 22 February 1993. UN Document S/RES/808(1993). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/243008
  • United Nations. (1993b). Resolution 827 (1993) / adopted by the Security Council at its 3217th meeting, on 25 May 1993. UN Document S/RES/819(1993). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/164939
  • United Nations. (1993c). Resolution 819 (1993) / adopted by the Security Council at its 3199th meeting, on 16 April 1993. UN Document S/RES/827(1993). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/166567
  • United Nations. (1999). Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations During the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda. UN Document S/1999/1257. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un-documents/document/poc-s19991257.php
  • Vomlela, L. (2016). Changes of American Foreign Policy towards the Countries of the Former Yugoslavia between 1991 and 1995. Central European Papers, 4(1), 63-81.
  • Vučinić Nešković, V. (2023). Emerging subdisciplines in ethnology and anthropology of Serbia: research trends at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 7(1), 5.
  • Whittle, D. (2015). The Limits of Legality and the United Nations Security Council: Applying the Extra-Legal Measures Model to Chapter VII Action. European Journal of International Law, 26(3), 671-698.
Toplam 66 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Uluslararası Hukuk
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Aslihan Igdır Akaras 0000-0002-3211-696X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Ocak 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Ekim 2023
Kabul Tarihi 31 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024

Kaynak Göster

APA Igdır Akaras, A. (2024). Ethnic Tensions and Global Response: Disentangling the Complexities of the Bosnian War. Lectio Socialis, 8(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1378450

Lectio Socialis is a prestigious, international, and peer-reviewed journal that aims to provide a platform for scholars and researchers to share their work and ideas on policy-relevant topics related to social sciences. The journal welcomes high-quality articles from a wide range of disciplines, including economics, political science, public administration, business administration, international relations, urban planning, sociology, psychology, history, jurisprudence, and philosophy. The primary objective of Lectio Socialis is to maintain a vibrant, independent, and unbiased environment for scholars and researchers from different parts of the world to present their research, exchange ideas, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their respective fields.

Creative Commons License
Lectio Socialis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.