ELEKTRİK ENERJİSİ ÜRETİM SEKTÖRÜNDE UYGULANAN TEŞVİKLERİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMEYE ETKİLERİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEKLEMİNDE AMPİRİK BİR ANALİZ

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 1295 - 1314, 02.08.2023

Feti Erbaş , Yaşar Köse , Rıza Bayrak

https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1220129

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de elektrik enerjisi üretim sektöründe uygulanan yatırım teşviklerinin ekonomik büyümeye etkilerini analiz etmektir. Çalışmada kullanılan veriler 2005-2019 yılları arasındaki 60 çeyrek dönemi kapsamaktadır. Çalışmanın bağımlı değişkeni gayrisafi yurtiçi hâsıla, bağımsız değişkenleri ise istihdam oranı, gayrisafi sabit sermaye Oluşumu ve verilen teşvik miktarıdır. Verilerin analizinde zaman serileri analizi yöntemlerinden FMOLS, DOLS ve CCR uzun dönem tahmincileri kullanılmıştır. Analiz bulguları çerçevesinde; istihdam ve gayrisafi sabit sermaye oluşumunun büyüme üzerindeki etkisi pozitif yönde gözlenirken; teşviklerin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisinin ise negatif yönde olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bunula birlikte istihdamın büyüme üzerindeki etkisi, teşviklere göre daha büyüktür. Bu noktada karar vericilere, özel sektör yatırımlarının dışlanmasını önlemek amacıyla, büyümeyi uyaran teşviklerin optimum değerinin tespit edilmesinin uygun olacağı tavsiye edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Elektrik Enerjisi Yatırım Teşvikleri, FMOLS, DOLS, CCR, Ekonomik Büyüme

Destekleyen Kurum

-----

Proje Numarası

----

Teşekkür

---

THE EFFECTS OF INCENTIVES APPLIED IN THE ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION SECTOR ON ECONOMIC GROWTH: AN EMPIRİCAL ANALYSIS IN THE SAMPLE OF TURKEY

Öz

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of investment incentives in the electricity sector on economic growth in Turkey. The data used in the study cover 60 quarters between 2005-2019. The dependent variable of the study is the gross domestic product, and the independent variables are the employment rate, gross fixed capital formation, and incentive amount. FMOLS, DOLS and CCR long-term estimators were used for the analysis of the data. According to the results of the analysis, the effects of employment and gross fixed capital formation on economic growth are observed positively; whereas the effect of incentives on economic growth is negative. The effect of employment on growth seemed to be greater than that of incentives. Therefore, it has been suggested to the policy-makers that it would be appropriate to determine the optimum amount of incentives triggering growth to prevent the crowding out of private-sector investments.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Electricity Investment Incentives, FMOLS, DOLS, CCR, Economic Growth

Proje Numarası

----

Kaynakça

• Akuru, U. B. ve Okoro, O. I. (2014). Renewable energy investment in Nigeria: A review of the renewable energy master plan. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 25(3), 67-73.
• Alanne, K. ve Cao, S. (2017). Zero-energy hydrogen economy (ZEH2E) for buildings and communities including personal mobility. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, 71(C), 697-711.
• Apak, S., Atay, E. ve Tuncer, G. (2017). Renewable hydrogen energy and energy efficiency in Turkey in the 21st century. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(4), 2446–2452. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.
• Apergis, N. ve Payne, J. E. (2010). A Panel Study of Nuclear Energy Consumption and Economic Growth. Energy Economics, 32, 545–549.
• Armey, R. K. (1995). Caveat emptor: the case against the national sales tax. Policy Review, 73, 31-36.
• Ayele, S. (2005). The industry and location impacts of investment incentives on SMEs start-up in Ethiopia. Journal of International Development, 18(1), 1–13. doi:10.1002/jid.1186
• Bartik, T. J. (1992). The effects of state and local taxes on economic development: A review of recent research. Economic Development Quarterly, 6(1), 102-110.
• Bayraç, H. N. ve Çildir, M. (2017). AB Yenilenebilir Enerji Politikalarının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisi, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, ICMEB17 Özel Sayısı, 201-212.
• Bean, P., Blazquez, J. ve Nezamuddin, N. (2017). Assessing the cost of renewable energy policy options – A Spanish wind case study. Renewable Energy, 103, 180–186.
• Beck, F. ve Martinot, E. (2004). Renewable Energy Policies and Barriers. Encyclopedia of Energy, 5, 365-383.
• Behrens, P., Rodrigues, J. F. D., Brás, T. ve Silva, C. (2016). Environmental, economic, and social impacts of feed-in tariffs: A Portuguese perspective 2000–2010. Applied Energy, 173, 309–319.
• Bhattacharya, M., Paramati, S. R., Ozturk, I. ve Bhattacharya, S. (2016). The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries. Applied Energy, 162, 733–741.
• Bilgili, F. ve Ozturk, I. (2015). Biomass energy and economic growth nexus in G7 countries: Evidence from dynamic panel data. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 132–138.
• Bolton, P. ve Dewatripont, M. (2005). Contract theory. ULB Institutional Repository, 2013/9543, ULB-Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
• Bondonio, D. ve Greenbaum, R. T. (2007). Do local tax incentives affect economic growth? What mean impacts miss in the analysis of enterprise zone policies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 121-136.
• Borello J. A. (1995). Regional development and industrial promotion in Argentina: A review of events and writings. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 19(4), 576-592.
• Bowden, N. ve Payne, J. E. (2010). Sectoral analysis of the causal relationship between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real output in the US. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 5(4), 400–408.
• Bronzini, R. ve de Blasio, G. (2006). Evaluating the Impact of Investment Incentives: The Case of the Italian Law 488/1992. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(2), 327-349.
• Brown, R. L., Durbin, J. ve Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships over Time. Royal Statistical Society, 37(2), 149-192.
• Carley, S. (2009). State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Policy, 37,3071-3081.
• Carmen, M. P. (2007). The impact of structural funds policy on European regions growth: A theoretical and empirical approach, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2, 179-208.
• Cerqua, A. ve Pellegrini, G. (2014). Beyond the SUTVA: How policy evaluations change when we allow for interactions among firms. Sapienza University of Rome, DISS Working Papers No. 2/14
• Chu, H. ve Chang, T. (2012). Nuclear energy consumption, oil consumption and economic growth in G-6 countries: Bootstrap panel causality test. Energy Policy, 48, 762-769. doi:10.1016/j.enpol
• Clements, B. J., Rodríguez, H. ve Schwartz, G. (1998). Economic determinants of government subsidies. International Monetary Fund.
• Cowan, W. N., Chang, T., Inglesi-Lotz, R. ve Gupta, R. (2014). The nexus of electricity consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries. Energy Policy, 66, 359–368. doi:10.1016/j.enpol
• Cucchiella, F., Gastaldi, M. ve Trosini, M. (2017). Investments and cleaner energy production: A portfolio analysis in the Italian electricity market. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(1), 121-132.
• Çatal, F. (2010). Devlet teşvikleri ve Erzurum’ da tarihsel bir uygulama örneği. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(4), 289-296.
• Dağ, M. ve Çelik, M. (2018). Yatırım teşvikleri nedir? Kavram ve kapsamı üzerine bir değerlendirme. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 863-875.
• Del Rio, P. ve Burguillo, M. (2008). Assessing the impact of renewable energy deployment on local sustainability: Towards a theoretical framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(5), 1325–1344.
• Duran, M. S. (2003). Teşvik politikaları ve doğrudan sermaye yatırımları. Hazine Müsteşarlığı Ekonomik Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü. Ankara.
• Ecer, F. (2021). A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110916. doi:10.1016/j.rser
• Eid, C., Codani, P., Perez, Y., Reneses, J. ve Hakvoort, R. (2016). Managing electric flexibility from distributed energy resources: A review of incentives for market design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 237–247.
• Enders, W. (1995). Applied Econometric Time Series:Wiley Series in Probability and Mathemathical Statistics, New York: John Wiley Inc.
• EPDK. (2021). Electricity generation capacity projections. Erişim adresi https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-66/elektrikuretim-kapasite-projeksiyonlari#
• Falconett, I. ve Nagasaka, K. (2010). Comparative analysis of support mechanisms for renewable energy technologies using probability distributions. Renewable Energy, 35(6), 1135-1144.
• Fisher, P. S. ve Peters, A. H. (1997). Tax and spending incentives and enterprise zones, New England Economic Review, 109-130.
• Ganoulis, I. ve Martin, R. (2001). State aid control in the European Union: Rationale, stylised facts and determining factors. Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, 36(6), 289-297.
• Getzner, M. (2007). Empirical tests of the political economy of regional state aid. International Journal of Applied Economics, 4(2), 33-45.
• Gonzalo, J. (1994). Five Alternative Methods Of Estimating Long-Run Equilibrium Relationship, Journal of Econometrics, 60, 203-233.
• Goss, E. P. ve Phillips, J. M. (1999). Do business tax incentives contribute to a divergence in economic growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 13(3), 217-228.
• Greene, W. H. (1997). Ekonometric Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
• Gujarati, D. N. (1999). Temel Ekonometri, (Çevirenler: Ümit Şenesen, Gülay Günlük Şenesen), İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık.
• Gujarati, D. N. ve Porter, D. (2009). Basic Econometrics, Mc Graw-Hill International Edition.
• Haas, R., Panzer, C., Resch, G., Ragwitz, M., Reece, G. ve Held, A. (2011). A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(2), 1003–1034.
• Harris R. (1995). Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modelling, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Prentice Hall
• Harris, R. ve Trainor, M. (2005). Capital subsidies and their impact on total factor productivity: Firm-level evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Regional Science, 45(1), 49–74.
• Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2016). The impact of renewable energy consumption to economic growth: A panel data application. Energy Economics, 53, 58–63.
• Ingram, W. D. ve Pearson, S. R. (1981). The impact of investment concessions on profitability of selected firms in Ghana. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 29, 831- 839.
• İnce, M. G. (2008). Yatırım teşviklerinin yatırım kararlarına olan etkisi ve Türkiye uygulaması. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Kaplan, R. (2021). Türkiye ve OECD ülkelerinde yenilenebilir enerji teşvik politikalarının analizi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Akdeniz Üniversitesi.
• Kılınç-Ata, N. (2016). The evaluation of renewable energy policies across EU countries and US states: An econometric approach. Energy for Sustainable Development, 31, 83- 90.
• Kitzing, L., Mitchell, C. ve Morthorst, P. E. (2012). Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging?. Energy Policy, 51, 192–201.
• Koç, E. ve Şenel, M. C. (2013). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de enerji durumu–genel değerlendirme. Mühendis ve Makina Dergisi, 54(639), 32-44.
• Kowalska-Pyzalska, A. (2018). What makes consumers adopt to innovative energy services in the energy market? A review of incentives and barriers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 3570–3581.
• Kök, R. ve N. Şimşek (2006). Endüstri-içi dış ticaret, patentler ve uluslararası teknolojik yayılma. Erişim adresi http://www.deu.edu.tr/userweb/recep.kok/dosyalar/eidtpatent yayilma.pdf
• Kök, R., İspir, M. S. ve Arı, A. A. (2010). An essay on the necessity of the mechanism of resource transfer from rich countries to underdeveloped countries and on the universal distribution parameter, Erişim adresi http://kisi.deu.edu.tr/recep.kok/Zengin_ispir.pdf
• Laumanns, U. ve Uh, D. (2006). Renewable energy: A global review of technologies. Policies and Markets. Earthscan, UK.
• Lee, C. W. ve Zhong, J. (2015). Financing and risk management of renewable energy projects with a hybrid bond. Renewable Energy, 75, 779-787.
• Loh, E. S. (1995). The effects of jobs-targeted development incentive programs. Journal of Urban and Regional Policy, 24, 365-383.
• Lütkepohl, H. (1993). Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis, Berlin: Springer –Verlag.
• Marino, C., Nucara, A., Pietrafesa, M. ve Pudano, A. (2013). An energy self-sufficient public building using integrated renewable sources and hydrogen storage. Energy, 57, 95–105.
• Menegaki, A. N. (2011). Growth and renewable energy in Europe: A random effect model with evidence for neutrality hypothesis. Energy Economics, 33(2), 257–263.
• Mir-Artigues, P. ve del Río, P. (2014). Combining tariffs, investment subsidies and soft loans in a renewable electricity deployment policy. Energy Policy, 69, 430–442.
• Mohl, P. ve Tabias H. (2010). Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40, 353-365.
• Newbold, P. ve Granger, C. W. J. (1974). Spurious Regressions in Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–120.
• Neven, D. (1994). The political economy of state aids in the European Community: Some econometric evidence, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 945, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
• Nicolini, M., Scarpa, C. ve Valbonesi, P. (2010). On the determinants of state aid to car manufacturers, Erişim adresi http://sie.univpm.it/incontri/rsa51/Relazioni/Nicolini-Scarpa-Valbonesi. pdf
• Nicolini, M. ve Tavoni, M. (2017). Are renewable energy subsidies effective? Evidence from Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 412–423.
• Niesten, E., Jolink, A. ve Chappin, M. (2018). Investments in the Dutch onshore wind energy industry: A review of investor profiles and the impact of renewable energy subsidies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2519–2525.
• Olateju, B., Monds, J. ve Kumar, A. (2014). Large scale hydrogen production from wind energy for the upgrading of bitumen from oil sands. Applied Energy, 118, 48–56.
• Ozcan, B. ve Ari, A. (2015). Nuclear energy consumption-economic growth nexus in OECD: A Bootstrap Causality Test. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 586-597.
• Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully-Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels, Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93-130.
• Perera, P., Hewage, K., Alam, M. S., Mèrida, W. ve Sadiq, R. (2018). Scenario-based economic and environmental analysis of clean energy incentives for households in Canada: Multi criteria decision making approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 170–186.
• Polzin, F., Migendt, M., Täube, F. A. ve von Flotow, P. (2015). Public policy influence on renewable energy investments - A panel data study across OECD countries. Energy Policy, 80, 98-111.
• Pose, R. A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development?. Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047.
• Ram, M., Child, M., Aghahosseini, A., Bogdanov, D., Lohrmann, A. ve Breyer, C. (2018). A comparative analysis of electricity generation costs from renewable, fossil fuel and nuclear sources in G20 countries for the period 2015-2030. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 687–704.
• Rauch, J. N. (2014). Price and risk reduction opportunities in the New England electricity generation portfolio. The Electricity Journal, 27(8), 27-36.
• Sadorsky, P. (2009). Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy, 37(10), 4021–4028.
• Schalk, H. J. ve Untiedt, G. (2000). Regional investment incentives in Germany: Impacts on factor and growth. Annals of Regional Science, 34, 173-195.
• Shrimali, G. ve Kneifel, J. (2011). Are government policies effective in promoting deployment of renewable electricity resources?. Energy Policy, 39(9), 4726-4741.
• Sithole, H., Cockerill, T. T., Hughes, K. J., Ingham, D. B., Ma, L., Porter, R. T. J., Pourkashanian, M. (2016). Developing an optimal electricity generation mix for the UK 2050 future. Energy, 100, 363-373.
• Squalli, J. (2007). Electricity consumption and economic growth: bounds and causality analyses of OPEC countries. Energy Economics, 29, 1192–1205.
• Steckel, J. C. ve Jakob, M. (2018). The role of financing cost and de-risking strategies for clean energy investment. International Economics, 155, 19–28.
• Tarı, R. (2012). Ekonometri, Kocaeli.: Umuttepe Kitapevi
• Tatlı, H. ve Lebe, F. (2017). Türkiye’de doğalgaz tüketimi, sermaye ve istihdamın ekonomik büyümeyle ilişkisi: Eşbütünleşme ve nedensellik analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 1-28.
• TEİAŞ. (2021). Turkey electricity production transmission statistics, Erişim adresi https://www.teias.gov.tr/tr-tr/turkiye-elektrik-uretim-iletim-istatistikleri
• Toman, M. ve Jemelkova, B. (2003). Energy and economic development: An assessment of the state of Knowledge. The Energy Journal, 24(4), 93-112.
• Tugcu, C. T., Ozturk, I. ve Aslan, A. (2012). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth relationship revisited: Evidence from G7 countries. Energy Economics, 34(6), 1942–1950.
• Wüstenhagen, R. ve Menichetti, E. (2012). Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research. Energy Policy, 40, 1–10.
• Van Buiren, K. ve Brouwer, E. (2010). Determinants of state aid, TILEC Discussion Paper No: 2010-005. Erişim adresi https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1547802
• Yavan, N. (2011). Teşviklerin sektörel ve bölgesel analizi: Türkiye örneği, Maliye Hesap Uzmanları Vakfı Yayınları, 181, 1-246.
• Zhu, Y., Tong, Q., Yan, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Li, Y. ve Huang G. (2020). Optimal design of multi-energy complementary power generation system considering fossil energy scarcity coefficient under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122732.