Maliyet Yapışkanlığının Geçerliliğinin Test Edilmesi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği-Testing of The Validity of The Cost Stickiness: The Example of Borsa İstanbul

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 15, 31 - 42, 13.06.2016

Feyyaz Zeren , Erkan Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.20875/sb.05076

Cited By: 13

Öz

Bu çalışmada Borsa İstanbul (BIST) imalat sanayinde faaliyet gösteren 76 şirket için maliyet yapışkanlığının geçerliliği test edilmiştir. Bu bağlamda; çalışmada, satışlar ile satışların maliyeti (SM) ve satışlar ile toplam yönetim giderleri (TY) arasındaki asimetrik maliyet davranışı ilişkisi panel saklı eşbütünleşme tekniği yardımı ile araştırılmıştır. Bu teknik sayesinde, incelenen maliyet değişkenlerinin uzun dönemdeki pozitif ve negatif şoklarının asimetrik davranış farklılıkları ortaya konulmuştur. 2007’nin ilk çeyreğinden 2015’in ikinci çeyreğine kadar olan dönemi kapsayan çalışmanın sonucunda; hem faaliyet hacmindeki artış, hem de faaliyet hacmindeki azalış durumlarında maliyet yapışkanlığının varlığına dair kanıtlara ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar incelendiğinde, satışlar – toplam yönetim giderleri eşleşmesi için test edilen maliyet yapışkanlığının, satışlar – satışların maliyeti eşleşmesi için test edilen maliyet yapışkanlığından daha uzun süre kalıcı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, eşbütünleşme ilişkisinin negatif şoklar durumunda daha uzun süre kalıcı olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Borsa İstanbul, Maliyet Yapışkanlığı, Asimetrik Maliyet Davranışı, Panel Saklı Eşbütünleşme

Kaynakça

• Abu – Serdaneh, Jamal (2014), “The Asymmetrical Behavior of Cost: Evidence from Jordan”, International Business Research, Cilt.7, Sayı.8, (113 – 122).
• Anderson, Mark - Banker, Rajiv - Janakiraman, Surya (2003), “Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?”, Journal of Accounting Research, Cilt.41, Sayı.1, (47 – 63).
• Anderson, Mark - Banker, Rajiv - Huang, Rong - Janakiraman, Surya (2007), “Cost Behavior and Fundamental Analysis of SG&A Costs”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Cilt.22, Sayı.1, (1 – 28).
• Anderson, Mark - Asdemir, Ozer - Tripathy, Arindam (2013), “Use of Precedent and Antecedent Information in Strategic Cost Management”, Journal of Business Research, Cilt.66, Sayı.5, (643 – 650).
• Balakrishnan, Ramji - Petersen, Michael - Soderstorm, Naomi (2004), “Does Capacity Utilization Affect the “Stickiness” of Cost?”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, Cilt.19, Sayı.3, (283 – 300).
• Balakrishnan, Ramji - Gruca, Thomas (2008), “Cost Stickiness and Core Competency: A Note”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Cilt.25, Sayı.4, (993 – 1006).
• Balakrishnan, Ramji - Labro, Eva - Soderstorm, Naomi (2014), “Cost Structure and Sticky Costs”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Cilt.26, Sayı.2, (91 – 116).
• Banker, Rajiv - Byzalov, Dmitri - Plehn-Dujowich, Jose (2010), “Sticky Cost Behavior: Theory and Evidence”, Working paper, No: 19122, Temple University, Philadelphia, SSRN Electronic Journal 02/2011; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1659493.
• Banker, Rajiv - Basu, Sudipta - Byzalov, Dmitri - Chen, Janice (2015), “The Confounding Effect of Cost Stickiness on Conservatism Estimates”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.07.001 (05.04.2016).
• Breusch, Trevor - Pagan Adrian (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies, Cilt.47, Sayı.1, (239-253).
• Calleja, Kenneth - Steliaros, Michael - Thomas, Dylan (2006), “A Note on Cost Stickiness: Some International Comparisons”, Management Accounting Research, Cilt.17, Sayı.2, (127 – 140).
• Cannon, James (2014), “Determinants of ‘‘Sticky Costs’’: An Analysis of Cost Behavior Using United States Air Transportation Industry Data”, The Accounting Review, Cilt.89, Sayı.5, (1645 – 1672).
• Chen, Clara Xiaoling - Lu, Hai - Sougiannis, Theodore (2012), “The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Cilt.29, Sayı.1, (252 – 282).
• Cooper, Robin - Kaplan, Robert (1998), The Design of Cost Management Systems: Text, Cases and Readings, Prentice Hall, ABD.
• Çelik, Muhsin - Kök, Dündar (2013), “Türkiye’de Maliyet Yapışkanlığının Geçerliliği: İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası (IMKB) Örneğinde Panel Veri Analizi”, Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt.4, Sayı.4, (37 – 48).
• Hatemi-J, Abdulnasser (2011). “Hidden Panel Cointegration”, MPRA Working Paper Series, No: 31604, https://core.ac.uk/download/files/153/6592006.pdf (05.04.2016).
• He, Doaping - Teruya, Jenny - Shimizu, Takashi (2010), “Sticky Selling, General, And Administrative Cost Behavior and Its Changes in Japan”, Global Journal of Business Research, Cilt.4, Sayı.4, (1 – 10).
• Horngren, Charles - Datar, Srikant - Rajan Madhav (2011), Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis, 14th Edition, Prentice Hall, ABD.
• Im, Kyung So - Pesaran, Hashem - Shin, Yongcheol (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115 (revise version of 1997’s work), (53 – 74).
• Kama, Itay - Weiss, Dan (2013), “Do Earnings Targets and Managerial Incentives Affect Sticky Costs?”, Journal of Accounting Research, Cilt.51, Sayı.1, (201 – 224).
• Kao, Chilhwa (1999), “Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data”, Journal of Econometrics, Sayı.90, (1 – 44).
• Kokotakis, Vasileios - Mantalis, Georgios - Garefalakis, Alexandros - Zanidakis, Nikolaos Galifianakis, George (2013), “The Sticky Cost on Greek Food, Beverages and Tobacco Limited Companies”, International Journal of Economics & Business Administration, Cilt.1, Sayı.2, (49 – 58).
• Koo, Jeong-Ho - Song, Seungah - Paik, Tae-Young (2015), “Earning Management and Cost Stickiness”, Advanced Science and Technology Letters, Sayı.84, (40 – 44).
• Malik, Mahfuja (2012), “A Review and Synthesis of “Cost Stickiness” Literature”, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2276760 (05.04.2016)
• Medeiros, Otavio Riberio de - Costa, Patricia de Souza (2004), “Cost Stickiness in Brazilian Firms”, Working paper, Universidade de Brasilia, http://ssrn.com/abstract=632365 (02.04.2016)
• Noreen, Eric (1991), “Conditions Under Which Activity – Based Cost Systems Provide Relevant Costs”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Sayı.3 , (159 – 168).
• Noreen, Eric - Soderstorm, Naomi (1997), “The Accuracy of Proportional Cost Models: Evidence from Hospital Service Departments”, Review of Accounting Studies, Cilt.2, Sayı.1, (89 – 114).
• Pervan, Maja - Pervan, Ijica (2012), “Analysis of Sticky Costs: Croatian Evidence”, Recent Researches in Business and Economics, http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2012/Porto/AEBD/AEBD-23.pdf (03.12.2015).
• Pesaran, Hashem - Ullah, Aman - Yamagata Takashi (2008), “A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error CrossSection Independence”, Econometrics Journal, Sayı.11, (105-127).
• Uy, Arnel Onesimo (2011), “Modelling Cost Behavior: Linear Models for Cost Stickiness”, Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, Cilt.15, Sayı.1, (25 – 34).
• Via, Nicola Dalla - Perego, Paolo (2014), “Sticky Cost Behaviour: Evidence from Small and Medium Sized Companies”, Accounting and Finance, cilt.54, Sayı.3, (753 – 778).
• Venieris, George - Naoum, Vasilious Christos - Vlismas, Orestes (2015), “Organisation Capital and Sticky Behaviour of Selling, Generaland Administrative Expenses”, Management Accounting Research, Sayı.26, (54 – 82).
• Warganegara, Dezie - Tamara, Dewi (2014), “The Impacts of Cost Stickiness on the Profitability of Indonesian Firms”, International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, Cilt.8, Sayı.11, (3471 – 3474).
• Yasukata, Kenji - Kajwara, Takehisa (2011), “Are “Sticky Cost” The Result of Deliberate Decision of Managers?”, Working paper, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1444746 (03.12.2015).
• Yükçü, Süleyman - Özkaya, Hahan (2011), “Cost Behavior in Turkish Firms: Are Selling, General and Administrative Costs and Total Operating Costs “Sticky” ?”, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt.13, Sayı.3, (1 – 27).