EVOLUTION AND LEVEL OF AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT IN TURKEY AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 195 - 216, 25.12.2013

Özlem T. Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.107

Öz

The developments of agricultural support policies in Turkey and in the European Union are different from each other. When the EU was applying protectionist policies, Turkey was on the way of liberalising its economy in 1980s. After Uruguay Round (1995), developed countries took steps for reducing protectionist policies in agriculture for the first time. As Turkey and European Union were signatories of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, they reduced their support levels. Despite the successful reforms and WTO (World Trade Organization) commitments, support level in the European Union remained high. Only in the last years, producer support estimate had a decreasing trend. Instead, Turkey increased the support policy that requires production and so producer support estimate increased after 2000. While the support level is not as high as in the EU, producer support estimate is at EU and OECD levels in the last years. This paper, so as to contribute to the literature, examines the agricultural support policies and levels in Turkey and in the European Union for better understanding the differences between them. In this regard, the aim of the paper is to develop an approach to comment on the differences in agricultural policies by comparing them and on the protection levels between Turkey and European Union by using Producer Support Estimate of OECD.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Agricultural Support Policies, Producer Support Estimate, Protection

TÜRKİYE’DE VE AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NDE TARIMSAL DESTEKLERİN GELİŞİMİ VE SEVİYESİ

Öz

Türkiye'de ve Avrupa Birliği'nde uygulanan tarım destek politikalarının gelişmeleri birbirinden çok farklıdır. 1980'li yıllarda AB korumacı politikaları uygularken, Türkiye ekonomisi liberalleşme yolundaydı. Uruguay Turu (1995) sonrası, gelişmiş ülkelerde ilk kez tarımda korumacı politikaları azaltmak için adımlar atıldı. Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği Uruguay Turu Tarım Anlaşmasını imzalayan taraflar olduğu için, destek seviyelerini zaman içinde azalttılar. Ancak başarılı reformlar ve DTÖ taahhütlerine rağmen, Avrupa Birliği'ndeki destek seviyesi yüksek kaldı. Sadece son yıllarda, üretici desteği tahmininde azalan bir eğilim vardı. Bunun aksine, Türkiye üretimle bağlantılı destek seviyesini artırırken, 2000 yılından sonra üretici destek tahmini de yükselme eğilimindeydi. Türkiye’deki destek seviyesi AB'deki kadar yüksek olmasa da, üretici desteği tahmini son yıllarda AB ve OECD seviyelerindedir. Bu makale, literatüre katkı sağlamak amacıyla Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği’ndeki tarımsal destek politikalarını ve destek seviyesini incelemektedir. Bu bağlamda, çalışmanın amacı Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye’de uygulanan tarımsal destek politikalarının gelişimindeki ve OECD’nin Üretici Destek Eşdeğeri ölçümü yardımıyla destek seviyelerindeki farklılıkları inceleyip, yorumlamaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tarımsal Destek Politikaları, Üretici Destek Tahmini, Korumacılık

Kaynakça

• Acar, M., (2006), DTÖ ve AB Işığında Türk Tarımının Geleceği. Ankara: Orion Yayınevi.
• Anderson, K. & Swinnen, J., (2008), Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe’s Transition Economies. Washington: World Bank.
• Andreasso-O’Callaghan, B., (2003), The Economics of European Agriculture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Baldwin, R. & Wyplosz, C., (2009), The Economics of European Integration. United Kingdom: The McGraw Hill Companies, Third Edition.
• Burrell, A. M., & Arie J. O., (2005), Turkey in the European Union: implications for agriculture, food and structural policy. United Kingdom: CABI Publishing.
• Cioffi, A., Santeramo, F.G. and Vitale, C.D., (2011), The price stabilization effects of the EU entry price scheme for fruit and vegetables. Agricultural Economics, 42 (3), pp. 405-418. Çakmak, E. H. & Kasnakoğlu, H. (2000). Turkey, Valdes, A. (2000), Agricultural Support Policies in Transition Economies. Washington: World Bank Technical Paper No: 470.
• Çakmak, E. H., (2003), “Evaluation of the Past and Future Agricultural Policies in Turkey: Are They able to Achieve Sustainability?”, Options Méditerranéennes, A (52), pp. 1551
• Çakmak, E. H., (2007), “Trade Liberalisation and Turkish Agriculture: Threat or Opportunity”, Barcelona: Cal-Med Workshop III.
• Çakmak, E. H. & Dudu, H., (2010), Agricultural Support Policy Reform Program of Turkey: Lessons Learned and Assessment. OECD background paper. Ankara.
• Daugbjerg, C., (1999), Reforming the CAP: Policy Networks and Broader Institutional Structures. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (3), pp. 407-428.
• Daugbjerg, C. & Swinbank, A., (2007), “The Politics of CAP Reform: Trade Negotiations, Institutional Settings and Blame Avoidance”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45 (1),pp. 1-22.
• El-Obeid, A. & Beghin, J., (2006), “Multilateral Trade and Agricultural Policy Reforms in Sugar Markets”, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, pp. 23–48.
• Eraktan, G., Abay, C., Miran, B., & Olhan, E., (2004), Türkiye’de Tarımın Teşvikinde Doğrudan Gelir Desteği Sistemi ve Sonuçları. İstanbul: İstanbul Ticaret Odası Yayın No: 2004Ertuğrul, C., (2004), Tarımda Küreselleşme, Uruguay Görüşmeleri ve Sonrası. Ankara: Odak Yayınevi.
• European Commission (1992), Agriculture in Europe; Development, Constraints and Perspectives. Luxemburg.
• European Commission (2008), The Common Agricultural Policy Explained. Brussels.
• European Commission (2009), “Health Check" of the Common Agricultural Policy. Brussels. European Commission (2013a), The Common Agricultural Policy after 2013; Public debate. Brussels.
• European Commission (2013b), Political agreement on new direction for common agricultural policy. Brussels.
• GEIE (Groupement Européen d’Intérêt Economique) Agrosynergie (2008), Evaluation of the system of entry prices and export refunds in the fruit and vegetables sector. Italy (study financed by the European Commission).
• Goodwin, B. K. & Mishra, A. K., (2006), “Are ‘decoupled’ farm program payments really decoupled? An empirical evaluation”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88 (1), pp. 73-89.
• Gürkan, A. A. & Kasnakoğlu, H., (1991), “The political economics of agricultural price support in Turkey: An empirical assessment”, Public Choice 70 (3), pp. 277-298.
• Hill, B., (2012), Understanding the Common Agricultural policy. London: Earthscan.
• İnan, H., Gaytancıoğlu, O., Erbay, R. & Yılmaz, F., (2003), Gelişmiş Ülkelerde Tarım Piyasalarının Organizasyonu. İstanbul: İstanbul Ticaret Odası Yayın No: 2003-53.
• Knutson, R., Penn, JB., Flinchbaugh, B. & Outlaw, J., (2007), Agricultural and Food Policy. Ohio: Pearson Prentice Hall, Sixth Edition.
• OECD (2009). The PSE Manual. Retrieved: March, 29 2010, from http://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural-policies/psemanual.htm.
• OECD (2012). 2012 Producer Support Estimate by country. Retrieved: April 15, 2013, from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MON20123_1.
• OECD (2012). OECD Countries: Composition of Producer Support Estimate by country. Retrieved April 15, 2013, from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MON20123_1.
• Santeramo F.G. & Cioffi, A., (2012), “The entry price threshold in EU agriculture: Deterrent or barrier?”, Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 34(5), pp. 691-704.
• Screening Chapter 11: Agriculture and Rural Development (23 – 26 January 2006). Agenda Item 1: Turkish Agricultural Policy. Avrupa Birliği Genel Sekreterliği (ABGS). Ankara.
• Yılmaz, Ö., (2012), “Agricultural Support Policies for Olive Oil, Wheat, Milk, Sugar in Turkey with Reference to CAP”, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, İstanbul: Marmara University.