Mimari Anlatım Teknikleri Dersinde Öğrencilerin Öğrenme Stilleri ve Kişilik Tipleri Üzerine Bir Analiz

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 793 - 810, 16.12.2023

Saliha Türkmenoğlu Berkan , Saniye Karaman Öztaş

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1331736

Cited By: 1

Öz

Öğrencilerin öğrenme stillerinin ders müfredatının oluşturma sürecinde belirlenmesi mimarlık eğitiminin gelişimi açısından önemlidir. Bu çalışma birinci sınıf mimarlık öğrencilerinin öğrenme stili ile “Mimari Anlatım Teknikleri” dersindeki başarı performansı ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesini; öğrenme stilleri-cinsiyet ile öğrenme stilleri-dersin müfredatı arasındaki ilişkinin tartışılmasını amaçlamıştır. Çalışmada Kolb ve Briggs Myers öğrenme stili envanterleri kullanılmıştır. Değiştiren stiline sahip olan öğrencilerin büyük paya sahip oldukları, ve cinsiyet, ders başarısı ve Kolb öğrenme stili arasında anlamlı bir ilişki kurulamadığı tespit edilmiştir. Briggs Myers envanteri öğrencilerin cinsiyet faktörü bağlamında değerlendirildiğinde “Sezgisel”, “Hisseden” ve “Algılayan” profillerindeki puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı farklılıklar saptanmıştır. Üç boyutun dahil edildiği çalışmalarda başarı oranının artması ders izlencesinin üç boyutlu uygulamalar ile geliştirilmesinin önemini belirtmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mimarlık eğitimi, öğrenme stilleri, kişilik tipleri, Kolb, Briggs Myers

An Analysis on Learning Styles and Personality Types of Students in the Techniques of Architectural Presentation Course

Öz

Determining the learning styles of the students in the process of constructing curricula is significant for the development of architectural education. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the learning style of first-year architecture students and their successful performance in "The Techniques of Architectural Presentation" course and to discuss the relationship between learning styles-gender and learning styles-course curriculum. Kolb and Briggs Myers learning style inventories were used in the study. It was determined that the students with a diverging style had a large share of participants, and no significant relationship was established between gender, course success, and Kolb’s learning style. According to the MBTI inventory, it was determined that the differences in the mean scores of the students' genders in the "Intuition", "Feeling," and "Perception" profiles were significant. An increase in success rate in 3D studies indicates the importance of the development of syllabi with 3D applications.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Architecture education, Learning styles, Personality types, Kolb, Briggs Myers

Teşekkür

The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics Committee approval in the study, Ethics Committee of the University of Gebze Technical University dated 13.04.2023 and E-100822 numbered.

Kaynakça

• Architect Magazine. (2011). Myers-Briggs Architect: A Difficult Character. Access Address (10.08.2023): https://www.architectmagazine.com/practice/myers-briggs-architect-a-difficult-character_o
• Brown, R. D., Hallett, M. E. & Stoltz, R. R. (1994). Student learning styles in landscape architecture education. Landscape and Urban Planning, 30 (3), 151-157.
• Coffield, F., Ecclestone, K., Moseley, D. & Hall, E. (2004). Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post 16 Education: A Critical and Systematic Review. Learning & Skills Research Centre, London, UK.
• Demirbas Ö. O. & Demirkan H. (2003). Focus on architectural design process through learning styles. Design Studies, 24(5), 437-456. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00013-9
• Demirkan, H. & Demirbaş, Ö. O. (2010). The effects of learning style and gender on the academic performance of interior architecture students. Procedia Social and Behaviour Sciences, 2(2), 1390-1394. Access Address (10.08.2023): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.205
• Dunn, R. (1983). Learning style and its relation to exceptionality at both ends of the spectrum. Exceptional Children, 49(6), 496–506. doi:10.1177/001440298304900602
• Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approach for grades 7-12. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Durling, D., Cross, N. & Johnson. J. (2019). Personality and learning preferences of students in design and design-related disciplines. IDATER 1996 Conference, Loughborough: Loughborough University. Access Address (10.08.2023): https://hdl.handle.net/2134/1477
• Halpern, D. F. & Collaer, M. L. (2005). Sex differences in visuospatial abilities: More than meets the eye. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, Cambridge University Press, pp. 170-212.
• Hemdan, J., Taha, D. S. & Cherif, I. A. (2023). Relationship between personality types and creativity: A study on novice architecture students. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 65. 847-857. 10.1016/j.aej.2022.09.041.
• Hodgkinson, K. (1994). Course guides for flexible learning. In Wade, W. et al. (Eds.). Flexible learning in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.
• Jung, C. G. (1991). Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. London: Routledge.
• Keirsey, D. & Bates, M. (1974) Please understand me. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis Book Company.
• Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In Chickering, A. W. And Associates (Eds.) The Modern American College. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2013). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory 4.0: A Comprehensive Guide to the Theory. Psychometrics, Research on Validity and Educational Applications. Boston, MA: Hay Resources.
• Kolsal, F. & Kandemir, Ö. (2021). A research on learning styles - an introduction to architectural design studio. Megaron, 16(4), 659-670. DOI: 10.14744/MEGARON.2021.42713
• Kvan, T. & Jia, Y. (2005). Students' learning styles and their correlation with performance in architectural design studio. Design Studies, 26, 19-34. Access Address (10.08.2023): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.004.
• Labib, A. E., Canos, J. H. & Penades, M. C. (2017). On the way to learning style models integration: A Learner's Characteristics Ontology. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 433-445. Access Address (10.08.2023): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.054
• Myers, I. B. & Myers, P. B. (1980). Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type. Davies-Black Publishing, California.
• Myers, I. B. & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). MBTI Manual: a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Myers, I. B. & McCaulley, M. H. (1998). A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
• Özdemir, E. E. (2016). Mimarlık eğitiminde temel tasarım dersinde öğrencilerin başarıları ve öğrenme stilleri ilişkisi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 0(17), 139-156. DOI: 10.18603/std.00998
• Poursafar, Z., Devi, N.R., & Rodrigues, L.L. (2015). Evaluation of myers-briggs personality traits in offices and its effects on productivity of employees: an empirical study. International journal of current research and review, 7(21), 53-58.
• Russ, R. R. & Weber, M. (1995). Personality types of interior design students: Implications for education. Journal of Interior Design, 21, 30-38. DOI:10.1111/J.1939-1668.1995.TB00206.X
• Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. London, UK: Temple-Smith.
• Tucker, R. (2007). Southern drift: The learning styles of first and third year students of the built environment. Architectural Science Review, 50 (3), 246-255.
• Tucker, R. (2008). Learning style drift: correlation between built environment students’ learning styles and the learning styles of their teachers, Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 3:1, 68-79, DOI: 10.11120/jebe.2008.03010068
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Yazıcı, Y. E. (2014). Mimarlık öğrencilerinin perspektif çizme başarısı ile öğrenme stilleri arasındaki ilişki. Gazi Üniversitesi, Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi, Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 1(13), 155-168. Access Address (10.08.2023): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sanatvetasarim/issue/20654/220364
• Yazıcı, Y. E. (2021). Mimarlık Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Stillerinin Mimari Tasarım Derslerindeki Akademik Başarılarına Etkisi. Yapı Dergisi, 463, 40-45.
• Yurtgün, H. & Çınar, H. (2023). A new approach to the space design process in the interior architecture basic design studio. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8 (1), 290-300. DOI: 10.30785/mbud.1194031