MECHANISMS OF SCHUMPETERIAN COMPETITION IN TURKISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES -TÜRKIYE İMALAT SANAYİİNDE SCHUMPETER’İN REKABET MEKANİZMALARI

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 121 - 135, 30.12.2020

Maya Moalla

Öz

Schumpeter’in rekabeti, firmaların rakiplerine göre rekabet avantajı elde etmelerini sağlayan yenilik sürecidir. Schumpeter tarafından iki rekabet modeli sunulmaktadır. Birincisi (1934) Mark I olarak; ikincisi ise (1950) Mark II modeli olarak bilinmektedir. Mark I modelinde, yenilik mevcut firmalar yerini yeni giren firmalar tarafından getirilmektedir. Aksine, Mark II modelinde yenilikler, yeni giren firmalar değil, mevcut olan firmalar tarafından getirilmektedir. Schumpeter’in Mark I ve Mark II modelleri arasındaki ayrım, endüstrilerin dinamiklerini belirlemek için bir ikilem olarak kullanılmıştır. Türkiye imalat sanayilerinde (2010-2015) döneminde Schumpeter’in rekabet mekanizmalarını tespit etme amacıyla Price'in ayrıştırma tekniği kullanılmaktadır. Başka bir deyişle, bu çalışma emek üretkenliğinin (ΔZ) artışını ekonomik seçim, yenilik ve net giriş etkileri ile ayrıştırarak incelemektedir. Schumpeter’in Mark I firmaları güçlü giriş etkisiyle karakterize edilirken, Mark II firmaları güçlü inovasyon ile karakterize edilmektedir. Türkiye İstatistik Enstitüsünün (TSI) 2010-2015 dönemi için Türkiye imalat sanayi NACE (Avrupa Topluluğundaki Ekonomik Faaliyetlerin İstatistiksel Sınıflaması, revize 2) dört haneli alt sektör verileri kullanılmıştır. Türkiye imalat sanayinde emek üretkenliği 2010-2015 dönemi için yirmi bir alt-sektörde pozitif büyüme göstermiştir. Son olarak, sonuçlar imalat endüstrilerinin neredeyse çoğunun, Schumpeter’in Mark II rekabet modelini takip ettiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Schumpeter’in Rekabeti, yenilik, ekonomik seçim

Kaynakça

• Akkemik, K. (2006). Patterns of industrialisation, structural changes and productivity in Turkish manufacturing (1970-2000). Journal of Economic Cooperation, 27(1), 71-88.
• Andersen, E. S. (2004). Population thinking, Price’s equation and the analysis of economic evolution. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 1(1):127–148.
• Andersson, L. F. (2006). Företagsdynamik och Tilvaxt. ITPS rapport A2006:016. Institut för Tilvaxtpolitiske Studier, Östersund.
• Baily, M., Hulten, C., & Campbell, D,. (1992). Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Establishments, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 187-249.
• Baily, M. N., Bartelsman, E. J. & Haltiwanger, J. (1996), “ Downsizing and productivity growth: myth or reality?” Small Business Economics, 8, pp. 259-278.
• Castellacci, F. (2007), ‘Technological Regimes and Sectoral Differences in Productivity Growth’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 16, pp. 1105-1145
• Celasun, M. (1983). Sources of Industrial Growth and Structural Change: The Case of Turkey. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
• Disney, R., Haskel, J., and Heden. Y. (2003). Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing. Econ J 113 (489), 666–694.
• Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Krizan, C. J. (1998). Aggregate productivity growth: Lessons from microeconomic evidence. NBER Working Paper Series, 6803.
• Frank, S. A. (1995). George Price’s contribution to evolutionary genetics. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 175(3):373–388.
• Griliches, Z. & Regev, H., 1995. Firm productivity in Israeli industry 1979–1988. Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), pp.175-203.
• Holm, J. R. (2009). Mechanisms Of Schumpeterian Competition. Paper had been presented at the Summer Conference 2009 CBS - Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg . Frederiksberg, Denmark.
• Holm, J. R. (2014). The Significance of Structural Transformation to Productivity Growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24, 1009–1036.
• Kruger, J. (2008). The sources of aggregate productivity growth: US manufacturing industries, 1958-1996. Bull Econ Res 60(4), 405–427.
• Malerba, F. (2005), ‘Sectoral Systems: How and Why Innovation Differs across Sectors’ in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 380-406.
• Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (1996), ‘Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation are Technology-Specific’, Research Policy, vol. 25, pp. 451-478.
• Metcalfe, J. S. (1997). Labour markets and competition as an evolutionary process. In Arestis, P., Palma, G., and Sawyer, M., editors, Markets, Employment and Economic Policy: Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt, pages 328–343. Routledge, London.
• Metcalfe, J. S. (2007). Replicator dynamics. In Hanusch, H. and Pyka, A., editors, The Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics, pages 440– 452. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton.
• Metcalfe, J. S. & Ramlogan, R. (2006). Creative destruction and the measurement of productivity change. Revue de l’OFCE, 97(5):373–397.
• Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London.
• Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. (2002). Evolutionary theorizing in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2):23–46.
• Rodrik, D. (2010). Structural Transformation and Economic Development, TEPAV, ISBN: 978-9944-927-42-0. Retrieved from https://www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/12935384464.Yapisal_Donusum_ve_Iktisadi_Kalkinma.pdf
• Rosenberg, N. (1963). Capital goods, technology, and economic growth. In: Hagemann, H., Landesmann, M., Scazzieri, R. (Eds.),. The Economics of Structural Change, Vol. I, Critical Writings. Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
• Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press,.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers, New York, 3rd edition.
• Schumpeter, J. (1989). Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles and capitalism. (e. b. RV, Ed.) New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publisher.
• Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Campbell, R.H., Skinner, A.S., Todd, W.B. (Eds.): Clarendon Press, Oxford.
• Tuncer, İ. & Moalla, M., (2020a). Structural Change And Aggregate Labour Productivity In The Turkish Non-Farm Business Industries. In Hatirli, S., Koç, Ş. Demirel, O.,Theoretical And Applied Studies On Turkish Economy, IJOPEC, 1, pp.155-173.
• Tuncer, İ. & Moalla, M., (2020b). Structural Change and Growth Prospects in the Turkish Manufacturing Industry. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 5(1), pp.1-20.