Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kutsal Metin ve Otorite: Tarihsel-Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 64 - 76, 29.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.324214

Öz
















Kutsal metinler ve otorite arasındaki ilişki sorunu, genel olarak, kökenci ve tarihsel
yakla
şımlar
içinde birbirine ilk elde zıt görünen formlarda ele alınmaktadır. Ancak bu ili
şki
içinde asıl sorun, kutsal metinlerin otoritesini bir imge veya maskeye dönü
ştürerek
kendisini gizleyen yorum geleneklerinin veya stratejilerinin otoriter karaktere
bürünmesiyle ortaya çıkmaktadır
.    

Kaynakça

  • Barlas, Asma. “Text, Tradition, and Reason: Qur’anic Hermeneutics and Sexual Politics” Cardozo Law School, Yeshiva University, October 10-12, 2004. http://rojavaplan.com/uploads/library/gender/hermeneutics_recovery.pdf (26.06.2017).
  • Engelke, Matthew. A Problem of Presence: Beyond Scripture in an African Church, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2007.
  • Foucault, Michel. Bu bir Pipo Değildir, Çev. Selahattin Hilav, YKY: İstanbul, 2016.
  • Kim, Donghyun, Reason, Tradition, and Authority: A Comparative Study of Habermas and Gadamer, http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2812/1/2011KIMphd.pdf (26.06.2017).
  • Nejjar, Fauzi M. “Islam and Modern Democracy” The Review of Politics, Vol. 20, No. 2 (Apr., 1958), ss. 164-180 https://edocs.uis.edu/Departments/LIS/Course_Pages/LIS411/readings/Najjar_Islam_and_Modern_Democracy.pdf (26.06.2017).

The Sacred Text and Authority: A Historical-Phenomenological Analysis

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 64 - 76, 29.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.324214

Öz




















The authority that
has been accepted as a sacred phenomenon by many
The problem of relationship between sacred texts and authority is
generally explored within two seemingly opposite approaches: Genetic and
historical. However, the essential problem, which can be grasped within these
approaches, reveals itself when interpretive traditions or strategies of
interpretation of sacred texts transform themselves into an authoritarian
character which hides itself behind the politics of turning sacred texts to an
image or mask under the label of ‘sacred authority’
.

Kaynakça

  • Barlas, Asma. “Text, Tradition, and Reason: Qur’anic Hermeneutics and Sexual Politics” Cardozo Law School, Yeshiva University, October 10-12, 2004. http://rojavaplan.com/uploads/library/gender/hermeneutics_recovery.pdf (26.06.2017).
  • Engelke, Matthew. A Problem of Presence: Beyond Scripture in an African Church, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2007.
  • Foucault, Michel. Bu bir Pipo Değildir, Çev. Selahattin Hilav, YKY: İstanbul, 2016.
  • Kim, Donghyun, Reason, Tradition, and Authority: A Comparative Study of Habermas and Gadamer, http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2812/1/2011KIMphd.pdf (26.06.2017).
  • Nejjar, Fauzi M. “Islam and Modern Democracy” The Review of Politics, Vol. 20, No. 2 (Apr., 1958), ss. 164-180 https://edocs.uis.edu/Departments/LIS/Course_Pages/LIS411/readings/Najjar_Islam_and_Modern_Democracy.pdf (26.06.2017).
Toplam 5 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Burhanettin Tatar

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Haziran 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi 29 Haziran 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

ISNAD Tatar, Burhanettin. “Kutsal Metin Ve Otorite: Tarihsel-Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”. Milel ve Nihal 14/1 (Haziran 2017), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.324214.