Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

‘Sacred Space: A Phenomenological Approach

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 8 - 22, 28.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.377607

Öz

Relationship between spaces and human beings is shaped in terms of

passages between perspectives and not in terms of spatial (geometric and

geographic) differences or divisibility. Accordingly, the distinctive aspect

of ‘sacred space’ is the existence of representation which paves a way to a

consciousness of sacred as ‘the nearest and most distant’ at the same time.

Hence sacred space reveals itself as an experience of temporality of passages

between virtually limitless perspectives of this event of representation

Kaynakça

  • Bürge, S. R.. “Angels, Ritual and Sacred Space in Islam”, Comparative Islamic Studies, 221-245 https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/podzim2014/SAN215/um/43687364/Burge_2009.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Heidegger, Martin. “Letter on Humanism”, trans. Frank A. Capuzzi, http://pacificinstitute.org/pdf/Letter_on_%20Humanism.pdf
  • Houlgate, Stephen. “Hegel’s Critique of Kant”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume LXXXIX, s. 21-39, http://onlinelibrary.
  • wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2015.00242.x/epdf (09.12.2017)
  • Kaern, Michael (trans.). “The Bridge and The Door By Georg Simmel”, Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1994, ss. 407-412. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02393338.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Lang, Uwe Michael. “What Makes Architecture “Sacred”?” Logos 17:4 Fall 2014, ss. 45-49.
  • Nicholson, Graeme. “The Ontological Difference” American Philosophical Quarterly,, Vol. 33/4, 1996,ss. 357-374, https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20009875.pdf (09.12.2017)
  • Rots, Aike P. “The “Rediscovery of “Sacred Space” in Contemporary Japan: Intrinsic Quality or Discursive Strategy?” http://publications.nichibun.ac.jp/region/d/NSH/series/symp/2014-03-31/s001/s010/pdf/article.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Tarizzo, Davide. “The Door”, ss. 131-145, https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofskivestnik/article/.../4227 (09.12.2017).

‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 8 - 22, 28.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.377607

Öz

İnsanlarla mekanlar arasındaki ilişki alansal (geometrik ve coğrafi) ayrımlar

değil, perspektifler arasındaki geçişlilik şeklinde tezahür etmektedir.

Kutsal mekan diye anlaşılan yerin ayırt edici vasfı, kutsalın aynı anda hem

çok yakın hem çok uzak oluşuna dair bilince yol açan bir temsilin varlığı

ve bu temsili oluşturan sonsuz denebilecek perspektifler arasındaki pasaj

durumudur.

Kaynakça

  • Bürge, S. R.. “Angels, Ritual and Sacred Space in Islam”, Comparative Islamic Studies, 221-245 https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/podzim2014/SAN215/um/43687364/Burge_2009.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Heidegger, Martin. “Letter on Humanism”, trans. Frank A. Capuzzi, http://pacificinstitute.org/pdf/Letter_on_%20Humanism.pdf
  • Houlgate, Stephen. “Hegel’s Critique of Kant”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume LXXXIX, s. 21-39, http://onlinelibrary.
  • wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2015.00242.x/epdf (09.12.2017)
  • Kaern, Michael (trans.). “The Bridge and The Door By Georg Simmel”, Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1994, ss. 407-412. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02393338.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Lang, Uwe Michael. “What Makes Architecture “Sacred”?” Logos 17:4 Fall 2014, ss. 45-49.
  • Nicholson, Graeme. “The Ontological Difference” American Philosophical Quarterly,, Vol. 33/4, 1996,ss. 357-374, https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20009875.pdf (09.12.2017)
  • Rots, Aike P. “The “Rediscovery of “Sacred Space” in Contemporary Japan: Intrinsic Quality or Discursive Strategy?” http://publications.nichibun.ac.jp/region/d/NSH/series/symp/2014-03-31/s001/s010/pdf/article.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Tarizzo, Davide. “The Door”, ss. 131-145, https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofskivestnik/article/.../4227 (09.12.2017).
Toplam 9 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Burhanetti Tatar

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Aralık 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Eylül 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

ISNAD Tatar, Burhanetti. “‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”. Milel ve Nihal 14/2 (Aralık 2017), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.377607.