Evaluation of seasonal population fluctuation of plants bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae) on cotton plants of Amik Plain

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 3, 485 - 492, 01.12.2022

Nihat Demirel

https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1106312

Cited By: 1

Öz

Aims: Evaluation of seasonal population fluctuation of plants bugs (Lygus gemellatus (HerrichSchäffer), Lygus pratensis Linnaeus, and Creontiades pallidus (Rambur) (Hemiptera: Miridae) on cotton plants of Amik Plain.

Methods and Results: The studies were carried out at fifty cotton fields located in Kırıkhan, Reyhanlı, Kumlu, Demirköprü and Uydukent districts of Amik Plain in Hatay province. Each of district contained 10 different cotton fields. The samplings were weekly taking by using a 45-cm diameter sweep-net, taking 25 (back-forth) sweep samples per site. The adults and nymphs of plant bugs were sorted out from plants materials, counted and recorded for each of the sampling locality and cotton field. A total of 1855 of plant bugs were caught by sweep-net at five (fifty cotton fields) sampled districts. The largest number of plants bugs were recorded in Demirköprü, followed by Reyhanlı, Uydukent, Kumlu and Kırıkhan. In addition, the highest mean of plant bugs were recorded on 8 October comparing to others sampling dates. Moreover, the largest amount of plants bugs were recorded in September, followed in October, August and July. In general, population density of plant bugs in Demirköprü, Reyhanlı, Uydukent and Kumlu districts were significantly higher than in Kırıkhan district.

Conclusions: The highest number of plants bugs (Lygus gemellatus (HerrichSchäffer), Lygus pratensis Linnaeus, and Creontiades pallidus (Rambur) were recorded in Demirköprü, followed by Reyhanlı, Uydukent, Kumlu and Kırıkhan districts. Moreover, the largest number of plants bugs were recorded in September, followed in October, August and July.

Significance and Impact of the Study: A total of 1855 of plant bugs were caught by sweep-net at five sampled districts. The highest number of plants bugs were recorded in Demirköprü, followed by Reyhanlı, Uydukent, Kumlu and Kırıkhan districts. Moreover, the largest amount of plants bugs were recorded in September, followed in October, August and July. In general, population density of plant bugs in Demirköprü, Reyhanlı, Uydukent and Kumlu districts were significantly higher than in Kırıkhan district.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Plants bugs (Hemiptera:Miridae), Cotton, Amik plain

Amik Ovasındaki pamuk bitkilerinde bitki tahtakurularının (Hemiptera: Miridae) mevsimsel popülasyon dalgalanmalarının değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Amik Ovası pamuk bitkilerinde bitki tahtakuruları (Lygus gemellatus (HerrichSchäffer), Lygus pratensis Linnaeus ve Creontiades pallidus (Rambur)) (Hemiptera: Miridae)’nın mevsimsel popülasyon dalgalanmasının değerlendirilmesi.

Yöntem ve Bulgular: Çalışmalar Hatay İli Amik Ovasının Kırıkhan, Reyhanlı, Kumlu, Demirköprü ve Uydukent İlçelerinde bulunan elli pamuk tarlasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Her ilçeden 10 farklı pamuk tarlası seçilmiştir. Örneklemeler haftalık olarak her pamuk tarlasından 45 cm çapında atrapla 25 (ileri-geri) şeklinde alınmıştır. Her bir örnekleme yeri ve pamuk tarlası için bitki taktakurularının erginleri ve nimfleri bitki materyallerinden ayıklanmış, sayılmış ve kaydedilmiştir. Örneklenen beş ilçede (elli pamuk tarlası) toplam 1855 adet bitki taktakurusu atrap ile yakalanmıştır. En fazla bitki taktakurusu Demirköprü’de kaydedilirken, onu Reyhanlı, Uydukent, Kumlu ve Kırıkhan izlemiştir. Diğer örnekleme tarihlerine kıyasla en yüksek bitki taktakurusu ortalaması 8 Ekim'de kaydedilmiştir. Ayrıca, en büyük miktarda bitki taktakurusu Eylül ayında kaydedilmiş, bunu Ekim, Ağustos ve Temmuz ayları takip etmiştir. Genel olarak, Demirköprü, Reyhanlı, Uydukent ve Kumlu İlçelerinde bitki taktakurusu popülasyon yoğunluğu Kırıkhan İlçesine göre önemli ölçüde yüksek bulunmuştur.

Genel Yorum: En fazla bitki taktakurusu Demirköprü'de kaydedilirken, onu Reyhanlı, Uydukent, Kumlu ve Kırıkhan İlçeleri izlemiştir. Ayrıca, en fazla sayıda bitki taktakurusu Eylül ayında kaydedilirken, bunu Ekim, Ağustos ve Temmuz ayları takip etmiştir.

Çalışmanın Önemi ve Etkisi: Örneklenen beş bölgede toplam 1855 adet bitki taktakurusu atrap tarafından yakalanmıştır. En fazla bitki taktakurusu Demirköprü'de kaydedilirken, onu Reyhanlı, Uydukent, Kumlu ve Kırıkhan İlçeleri izlemiştir. Ayrıca, en büyük miktarda bitki taktakurusu Eylül ayında kaydedilmiş, bunu Ekim, Ağustos ve Temmuz ayları takip etmiştir. Genel olarak, Demirköprü, Reyhanlı, Uydukent ve Kumlu İlçelerinde bitki taktakurusunun popülasyon yoğunluğu Kırıkhan İlçesine göre önemli ölçüde yüksek bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bitki taktakurusu (Hemiptera: Miridae),, Pamuk, Amik ovası

Kaynakça

• Ateş N (2018) Determination of population chances of Miridae (Hemiptera) species and their natural enemies in different cultivated plants in Aydın province by different sampling methods. Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı. 101 p.
• Bailey JC (1982) Influence of plant bug and leafhopper populations on glabrous and nectariless cotton. Environmental Entomology. 11 (5): 1011-1013.
• Capinera JL (2002) Handbook of Vegetable Pests. Academic Press. San Diego, San Francisco, New York, Boston, London, Sydney, Tokyo 729p.
• Cranshaw W, Demirel N (2006) Early Season Sampling of Three Pests of Oilseed Brassicas (False Chinch Bug, Phyllotreta Flea Beetles, Lygus Bugs) on Cultivated and Non-Cultivated Crops. Colo. Agric. Expt. Stn. Bull. TB06–02. 18p.
• Demirel N (2009) Determination of Heteroptera Species on Canola Plants in Hatay Province of Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 4(11):1226-1233.
• Demirel N, Cranshaw W (2006) Surveys of Lygus spp. and their movement on cultivated crops and non-cultivated habitats throughout growing season in Colorado. Pakistan. J. Biol. Sci. 9: 197–200.
• Demirel N, Cranshaw W (2007). Evaluation of Plant Yield Responses to Artificial Infestations of Lygus elisus (Van Duzee) and Nysius raphanus (Howard) on Spring Canola. J. Entomol. 4: 225–230.
• Demirel N, Cranshaw W, Norton A (2005) Survey of Lygus spp. and an associated parasitoid, Leiophron uniformis (Gahan), in Colorado. Southwestern Entomol. 30: 9–15.
• Efil L, Bayram A (2009) Factors affecting the distribution of two mirid bugs, Creontiades pallidus (Rambur) and Campylomma diversicornis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae) and notes on the parasitoid Leiophron decifiens Ruthe (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Entomologica Fennica 20: 9-17.
• Efil L, İlkan A (2003) “Determination of population alteration of harmful insect Creontiades pallidus Rmb. (Hemiptera: Miridae) in cotton in Harran Plain, 395-397”. Proceeding of Third GAP Agriculture Congress (2-3 October 2003, Şanlıurfa, Turkey), 686 pp.
• Gerber GH, Wise IL (1995) Seasonal occurrence and number of generations of Lygus lineolaris and Lygus borealis (Heteroptera: Miridae) in southern Manitoba. Can. Entomol. 127: 543–559.
• Hake SJ, Hake KD, Kerby TA (1996) “Prebloom Decisions, 29-50”. In: Cotton Production Manual (Eds. S. J. Hake, T. A. Kerby & K. D. Hake). University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California, U.S.A., 417 pp.
• Hanny BW, Cleveland TC, Meredith, Jr. WR (1977) Effects of tarnished plant bug (Lygus lineolaris) infestation on pre-squaring cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Environ. Entomol. 6: 460-462.
• Holman EM , Oosterhuis DM (1999) Cotton photosynthesis and carbon partitioning in response to floral bud loss due to insect damage. Crop Sci. 39: 1347-1351.
• Holopainen JK, Varis AL (1991) Host plants of the European tarnished plant bug Lygus rugulipennis Poppius (Het., Miridae). J. Appl. Entomol. 111: 484-498.
• Jay CN, Cross JV, Burgess C (2004) The relationship between populations of European tarnished plant bug (Lygus rugulipennis) and crop losses due to fruit malformation in everbearer strawberries. Crop Prot. 23: 825–834.
• Karsavuran Y (2004) Pamuk zararlılarına karşı savaş yöntemlerinin uygulanmasında dikkat edilmesi gereken ana konular. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 41 (1):191–200.
• Kelton LA (1975) The Lygus bugs (Genus Lygus Hahn) of North America (Heteroptera. Miridae). Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 95:1–101.
• Layton MB (2000) Biology and damage of the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris, in cotton. Southwestern Entomological Society, Supplement, 23: 7-20.
• Leight TF, Kerby TA, Wynholds, PF (1988) Cotton square damage by the plant bug, Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae), and abscission rates. Journal of Economic Entomology, 81: 1328-1337.
• Musayev DM, Kholmatov BR, Sattarov NR, Amirov IBU, Musayeva MK, Mamatmurotovich AS (2020) Cotton shredder bug Creontiades pallidus (Rambur, 1839) damage to cotton crop in Surkhandara region of South Uzbekistan. Eurasia J Biosci 14: 4683-4687.
• Nordlund DA (2000) The Lygus problem. Southwestern Entomologist. Suppl. No. 23. pp. 1–5.
• Önder F, Karsavuran Y, Tezcan S, Fent M (2006) Türkiye Heteroptera Insecta Katalou. Meta Basım Matbaacılık Hizmetleri. Bornova- ZMR. 164p.
• Özgür O, Atakan E, Pehlivan S (2019) Investigation of the damage of Miridae species on cotton in Çukurova Region of Turkey. Türk. entomol. derg., 43 (2): 143-156.
• Pedigo LP (1999) Entomology and Pest Management. Third Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 691p
• Rosentheim JA, Goeriz,RE, Thacher EF (2004) Omnivore or herbivore? Field observations of foraging by Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae). Environ. Entomol. 35: 1362-1370. SAS Institute (1990) User's Guide, version 6. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
• Schuh RT (1995) Plant Bugs of the World (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae): Systematic Catalog, Distributions, Host List and Bibliography. New York Entomological Society, New York, NY, 1329 pp.
• Schuh RT, Slater JA (1995) True Bugs of the World (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Classification and Natural History. Comstock Pub. Associates. Ithaca, NY. 336p.
• Teague TG , Coy S, Tugwell NP, Villavaso EJ (2002) Comparison of cotton plant response to square loss following manual removal or tarnished plant bug feeding: Results from field trials in 2001. In Proceedings, Beltwide Cotton Conferences, National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN.
• Teague TG, Tugwell NP, Villavaso EJ (2001) Comparison of cotton plant response to square loss following manual removal or tarnished plant bug feeding results from field trials in 2000, pp. 1149-1156. In Proceedings, Beltwide Cotton Conferences, National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN.
• Tugwell PS, Young SC, Dumas BA, Phillips JR (1976) Plant bugs in cotton: Importance of infestation time, types of cotton injury, and significance of wild hosts near cotton. Ark. Agric. Expt. Stn. Rept. Tech. Bull. 227. 24 pp.
• Wheeler AG Jr (2000) Plant Bugs (Miridae) as Plant Pests. Pp. 37–83. In. C.W. Schaefer, and A. R. Panizzi (eds). Heteroptera of Economic Importance. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington, D.C. 828p.
• Wheeler AG Jr (2001) Biology of the Plant Bugs (Hemiptera. Miridae). Pests, Predators, Opportunists. Comstock Publishing Associates. Cornell University Press. Ithaca and London 507p.