Heritage as a Shape-Shifting Future-Making Tool

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 765 - 776, 30.08.2023

Gülce Güleycan Okyay Bayazit

https://doi.org/10.26835/my.1196522

Öz

Heritage studies and the forming discourse are the focus of various transformations. These transformations can be interpreted as a paradigm shift, affecting the broadening realm of meaning and action in contemporary times. Likewise, global threats such as climate change, increasing urbanization, migration, war, energy crisis, as well as the rapidly changing social and economic conjuncture have significant effects on the understanding and interpretation of heritage. It can be argued that this situation necessitates repositioning conservation theory and practice in the context of prominent current issues and the pursuit of building a shared future.This article aims to discuss the possibility of creating a future intertwined with the past and present, based on the metamorphosis that the field has been going through. The instrumentalization of heritage for a purposeful, systematic future-making process and its parallels with the forming principles, sustainable development in particular, constitute the main basis of this discussion. The study traces the significant points and rising trends in the transformation of the field while identifying capacity building among the key tools within the process. The possibilities offered by innovative and interdisciplinary initiatives are also examined in the creation of an inclusive and pluralistic heritage paradigm that does not leave anyone behind.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Heritage, Shape-Shifting, Future-Making, Capacity Building

Biçim Değiştiren Bir Gelecek İnşa Aracı Olarak Miras

Öz

Miras çalışmaları ve bu çalışmaları biçimlendiren koruma diskuru, günümüzde genişleyen anlam ve eylem sahasıyla bağlantılı şekilde, kimi zaman belirgin birer paradigma değişimi halini alan çeşitli dönüşümlerin odağı konumundadır. Aynı biçimde, iklim değişimi, artan kentleşme, göç, savaş, enerji krizi gibi küresel sorunlar ve hızla değişen sosyal ve ekonomik konjonktür, mirasın ele alınışı ve yorumlanışı üzerinde önemli etkiler yaratmaktadır. Bu durumun, koruma kuram ve pratiğinin, öne çıkan güncel meseleler ve arzu edilen ortak geleceğe ulaşma sorunsalı bağlamında yeniden konumlanmasına yönelik bir gereksinim doğurduğunu öne sürmek olanaklıdır. Bu makale, koruma disiplininin geçirmekte olduğu başkalaşımdan hareketle, geçmiş ve günümüzle bağlantılı bir gelecek inşası düşüncesini tartışmaya açmaktadır. Amaca dönük, sistematik bir gelecek inşa sürecinde mirasın açımladığı olanaklılık ve korumanın bilhassa sürdürülebilir kalkınma olmak üzere gelecek biçimlendirici ilkeler ile kurduğu paralellik bu tartışmanın esas mesnetlerini oluşturmaktadır. Alanın geçirdiği dönüşümdeki belirgin kırılma noktalarının ve öne çıkan akımların izlerini süren çalışma, aynı zamanda, kapasite geliştirme yaklaşımını bu süreçteki önemli anahtar araçlar arasına konumlamaktadır. Bu sayede, kimseyi geride bırakmayan, kapsayıcı ve çoğulcu bir miras paradigmasının yaratımında, yenilikçi ve disiplinlerarası açılımların sunduğu olanakların da irdelendiğini ifade etmek mümkündür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Miras, Biçim Değiştirme, Gelecek İnşası, Kapasite Geliştirme

Kaynakça

• Ahvenharju, S., Minkkinen, M. & Lalot F. (2018). The Five Dimensions of Futures Consciousness. Futures, 104, 1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.010.
• Appadurai, A. (2013). The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition. In The Future as Cultural Fact Essays on the Global Condition (p.179-194). London and New York: Verso.
• Bandarin, F. (2016). New Approaches and New Tools for Urban Conservation, İdealkent Journal of Urban Studies, Issue 19, Volume 7, 341-346.
• Bouchenaki, M. (2003). The Interdependency of the Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage, In: 14th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium: ‘Place, memory, meaning: preserving intangible values in monuments and sites’, 27 – 31 oct 2003, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe.
• Byrne, D. (2008). Heritage as Social Action. G. Fairclough et al. (Ed.), in The Heritage Reader (p. 149-173). London & New York: Routledge.
• Council of Europe. (2005). Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (Faro Convention).
• De Saussure, F. (1959). Course in General Linguistics. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye (Ed.) New York: The Philosophical Library, Inc. (First published in 1916).
• Eade, D. (1997). Capacity-Building: An Approach to People-Centred Development. UK and Ireland: OXFAM.
• English Heritage. (2008). Conservation Principles, Policies, and Guidance for the Sustainable Management of the Historic Environment.
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2022). Strengthening Cultural Heritage Resilience for Climate Change: Where The European Green Deal Meets Cultural Heritage. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Haldrup, M. & Bærenholdt, J. O. (2015). Heritage as Performance. E. Waterton and S. Watson (Ed.), in The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research (p. 52-64). UK&US: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Harrison, R. (2013). Forgetting to Remember, Remembering to Forget: Late Modern Heritage Practices, Sustainability and the ‘Crisis’ of Accumulation of the Past. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19:6, 579-595. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2012.678371
• Harrison, R. (2020). Heritage as Future-Making Practices. In Heritage Futures Comparative Approaches to Natural and Cultural Heritage Practices (p. 20-50). UCL Press.
• Harvey, D. C. (2001). Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, Meaning and the scope of Heritage Studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7:4, 319-338. doi: 10.1080/13581650120105534.
• Holtorf, C. (2020). Conservation and Heritage as Creative Processes of Future-Making. International Journal of Cultural Property, 27(2), 277-290. doi:10.1017/S0940739120000107.
• Holtorf, C. & Högberg, A. (2013). Heritage Futures and the Future of Heritage. S. Bergerbrant & S. Sabatini (Ed.), in Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen (p. 739-746). England: Archaeopress.
• ICCROM, ICOMOS & IUCN. (2017). “Our Common Dignity Initiative” on Rights-based approaches in World Heritage: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Amund Sinding-Larsen and Peter Bille Larsen (Ed.).
• ICOMOS. (2011). The Paris Declaration On Heritage as a Driver of Development.
• ICOMOS. (2014). The Florence Declaration on Heritage and Landscape as Human Values.
• ICOMOS. (2017). The Delhi Declaration on Heritage and Democracy.
• ICOMOS Australia. (1999/2013). The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance.
• ICOMOS CIF. (1993). The Guidelines for Education and Training in the Conservation of Monuments, Ensembles and Sites, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
• ICOMOS CIF. (2013). Principles for Capacity Building through Education and Training in Safeguarding and Integrated Conservation of Cultural Heritage.
• ICOMOS Climate Change and Heritage Working Group. (2017). The Future of Our Pasts: Engaging Cultural Heritage in Climate Action, Heritage and Climate Change Outline.
• Kaplan, A. (1999). The Developing of Capacity. Community Development Resource Association.
• Kaplan, A. (2001). Organisational Capacity, A Different Perspective. Community Development Resource Association.
• Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. USA: The University of Chicago Press. (First edition: 1962).
• Kyriakidis, E. (2020). A Community Empowerment Approach to Heritage Management: From Values Assessment to Local Engagement. London and New York: Routledge.
• Labadi, S., Giliberto, F., Rosetti, I., Shetabi, L. & Yıldırım, E. (2021). Heritage and the Sustainable Development Goals: Policy Guidance for Heritage and Development Actors. Paris: ICOMOS.
• Land, T., Keijzer, N., Kruiter, A., Hauck, V., Baser, H. & Morgan, P. (2008). Capacity Change and Performance: Implications for Development Cooperation, Policy Management Brief No:21, ECDPM.
• Logan, W., Kockel, U. & Crait, M. N. (2015). The New Heritage Studies: Origins and Evolution, Problems and Prospects. W. Logan, M. N. Craith & U. Kockel (Ed.), in A Companion to Heritage Studies (p. 1-25). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Lusthaus, C., Adrien, M. H., Perstinger M. (1999). Capacity Development: Definitions, Issues and Implications for Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation. Universalia Occasional Paper No. 35.
• Morel, H., Megarry, W., Potts, A., Hosagrahar, J., Roberts, D.C., Arikan, Y., Brondizio, E., Cassar, M., Flato, G., Forgesson, S., Jigyasu, R., Mason-Delmotte, V., Oumarou, Ibrahim, H., Pörtner, H.-O., Sengupta, S., Sherpa, P.-D. & Veillon, R. (2022). Global Research and Action Agenda on Culture, Heritage and Climate Change. Charenton-le-Pont & Paris, France: ICOMOS & ICSM CHC.
• Okyay, G. G. (2022). Çok Katmanlı Kültürel Mirasın Korunmasında Kapasite Geliştirme Yaklaşımı ve Katılım: Bergama (Pergamon) Kenti. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Okyay G. G, Binan D. (2020). Capacity Building, Heritage and Community Participation: Examining The Gap Between Global Approaches and Local Needs. ICONARCH IV_ International Congress of Architecture and Planning, 997-1010.
• Özaslan, N. (2010). Mimari Koruma Düşüncesinin Tarihsel Gelişimi. Mimari Korumada Güncel Konular içinde (ss. 2-16). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
• Riegl, A. (1997). The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Essence and Its Development, in Readings in Conservation: Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage (p. 69-83). (First published in 1903).
• Samuels, K. L. (2015). Introduction: Heritage as Persuasion. K. L. Samuels & T. Rico (Ed), in Heritage Keywords: Rhetoric and Redescription in Cultural Heritage (p. 3-28). University Press of Colorado.
• Sen, A. (2004). Özgürlükle Kalkınma. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Smith, L. (2006). The Authorized Heritage Discourse and its Use. In Uses of Heritage (p. 29-34). London and New York: Routledge.
• UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
• UNDP. (2005). A Systematic Capacity Assesment Tool.
• UNDP. (2008). Capacity Assessment Methodology User‟s Guide, Capacity Development Group Bureau for Development Policy.
• UNDP. (2009). Capacity Development Glossary, Capacity Development: A UNDP Primer. New York.
• UNESCO. (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.
• UNESCO. (2002). Budapest Declaration on World Heritage, World Heritage Committee 26th Session, Romania.
• UNESCO. (2007). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, World Heritage Committee, 31st Session, New Zealand.
• UNESCO. (2011). World Heritage Capacity Building Strategy, Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, World Heritage Committee 35th Session, Brazil.
• UNESCO. (2012). The Kyoto Vision.
• UNESCO. (2015). Policy Document for the Integration of a Sustainable Development Perspective into the Processes of the World Heritage Convention.
• Waterton, E. & Smith, L. (2009). There is No Such Thing as Heritage. E. Waterton & L. Smith (Ed.), in Taking Archeology out of Heritage (p. 11-27). UK: Cambridge Scholars.
• Winter, T. (2014). Heritage Studies and the Privileging of Theory. International Journal of Heritage Studies, Vol. 20, No. 5, 556–572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2013.798671.