Üç Boyutlu Yazıcılar ve Protetik Diş Tedavisinde Kullanımı

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 119 - 130, 30.04.2024

Gizem Erdaş , Nuran Yanıkoğlu

https://doi.org/10.51122/neudentj.2024.95

Öz

Son yıllarda rutinde kullanılan geleneksel yöntemlerin dışında bilgisayar destekli tasarım ve bilgisayar destekli üretim (CAD/CAM) kullanımı oldukça artmaktadır. CAD/CAM teknolojisinin birçok avantajı vardır. Fakat bu avantajlarına rağmen malzeme israfı gibi oldukça önemli bir dezavantajı bulunmaktadır. Günümüzde bu sorunun üstesinden gelen teknoloji ise üç boyutlu yazıcılar ile eklemeli üretim yöntemidir. Bu yöntem protetik diş tedavilerinde son zamanlarda geleneksel eksiltmeli bilgisayar destekli tasarım ve üretim teknolojisinin yerini almaktadır. 3 boyutlu yazıcıların kullanımı üretim kolaylığı, zaman tasarrufu ve malzeme tasarrufu, tasarım özgürlüğü, hatasız ve daha hızlı üretim gibi avantajlarından dolayı son yıllarda gittikçe artmaktadır. Ayrıca gelecek dönemde de bu teknolojinin kullanımının gittikçe artacağı ve dijital üretim için ana yöntem olacağı öngörülmektedir. Bu derlemenin amacı ise 3 boyutlu yazıcıların üretim yöntemleri, protetik diş tedavisinde kullanım alanları, 3 boyutlu üretim yöntemlerinin avantajları ve dezavantajları ile ilgili değerlendirme yapmak ve protetik diş hekimliğindeki kullanım amaçlarını, kullanılan malzemeleri ve gelişmeleri gözden geçirmektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Protez, eklemeli üretim, 3 boyutlu yazıcı

3D printers and their use in prosthetic dentistry

Öz

In recent years, the use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) has increased considerably in addition to the traditional methods used in routine. CAD/CAM technology has many advantages. However, despite these advantages, it has a very important disadvantage such as material waste. Today, the technology that overcomes this problem is the additive manufacturing method with three-dimensional printers. This method has recently replaced the traditional subtractive computer-aided design and manufacturing technology in prosthodontics. The use of 3D printers has been increasing in recent years due to its advantages such as ease of production, time saving and material saving, freedom of design, error-free and faster production. It is also predicted that the use of this technology will increase in the future and will be the main method for digital manufacturing. The aim of this review is to evaluate the production methods of 3D printers, the areas of use in prosthodontics, the advantages and disadvantages of 3D production methods, and to review the purposes of use, materials used and developments in prosthodontics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Prosthesis, Additive Manufacturing, Three-Dimensional Printer.

Kaynakça

• 1. Kodama H. Automatic method for fabricating a three-dimensional plastic model with photo-hardening polymer. Review of Scientific Instruments. 1981;52:1770.
• 2. Hull CW, Arcadia C. United States Patent Hull apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography
• 3. Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Published online 2015.
• 4. Comparison of Five-Axis Milling and Rapid Prototyping for Implant Surgical Templates. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 29:374–83
• 5. R.Ishengoma F, Mtaho AB. 3D Printing: Developing Countries Perspectives. Int J Comput Appl. 2014;104:30-4.
• 6. Özer, Gökhan . "Eklemeli Üretim Teknolojileri Üzerine Bir Derleme". Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 9 / 1 2020:606-21 .
• 7. Badiru AB. From traditional manufacturing to additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing Handbook. 2018:3-30.
• 8. Additive manufacturing: Innovations, Advances, and Applications. CRC PRESS; 2020.
• 9. Brown GB, Currier GF, Kadioglu O, Kierl JP. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154:733-9.
• 10. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem. 2014;86:3240-53.
• 11. Kamran, Medhavi; saxena, Abhishek. A comprehensive study on 3D printing technology. MIT Int J Mech Eng, 2016;.2:63-9.
• 12. Groth C, Kravitz ND, Jones PE, Graham JW, Redmond WR. Three-dimensional printing technology. J Clin Orthod. 2014;48:475-85.
• 13. Revilla-León M, Meyer MJ, Zandinejad A, Özcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies for processing zirconia in dental applications. Int J Comput Dent. 2020;23:27-37.
• 14. Negi DP, Jaikaria DA, Kukreja DrS. Rapid Prototyping in Dentistry. 2019.
• 15. Methani MM, Revilla-León M, Zandinejad A. The potential of additive manufacturing technologies and their processing parameters for the fabrication of all‐ceramic crowns: A review. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 2019;32:182-92.
• 16. Sciences H, Demiralp E, Dogru G, Yilmaz H. Additive Manufacturing (3D PRINTING) Methods and Applications in Dentistry. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021;11:182-90.
• 17. Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. British Dental Journal 2015;219:521-9.
• 18. Cebeci NÖ, Tokmakcıoğlu HH. Protetik Diş Tedavisinde Ekleme Yöntemi ile Üretim. Sağlık Akademisi Kastamonu 2018;3:66-86.
• 19. Gali, Sivaranjani, and Sharad Sirsi. "3D Printing: the future technology in prosthodontics." Journal of Dental and Orofacial Research 2015:37-40.
• 20. Lekurwale S, Karanwad T, Banerjee S. Selective laser sintering (SLS) of 3D printlets using a 3D printer comprised of IR/red-diode laser. Annals of 3D Printed Medicine. 2022;6:100054.
• 21. KALELİ, Necati, and Duygu SARAÇ. "Protetik diş tedavisinde lazer sinterleme sistemleri." Ondokuz mayıs üniversitesi diş hekimliği fakültesi dergisi 2014.
• 22. Kessler, A., R. Hickel, and M. Reymus. "3D printing in dentistry—State of the art." Operative dentistry 2020:30-40.
• 23. Borgianni, Yuri, et al. "An investigation into the current state of education in Design for Additive Manufacturing." Journal of Engineering Design 2022 461-90.
• 24. Ponader S, Von Wilmowsky C, Widenmayer M, et al. In vivo performance of selective electron beam-melted Ti-6Al-4V structures. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92:56-62.
• 25. Ayşe Gözde Türk, Mine Dündar Çömlekoğlu, M. Erhan Çömlekoğlu. Additive Computer Aided Manufacturing Methods. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2022;43:85-94
• 26. Li, S., Zhang, X., Xia, W., & Liu, Y. Effects of surface treatment and shade on the color, translucency, and surface roughness of high-translucency self-glazed zirconia materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2022:218;217
• 27. Parupelli, SantoshKumar, and Salil Desai. "A comprehensive review of additive manufacturing (3d printing): Processes, applications and future potential." American journal of applied sciences 2019
• 28. Lakhdar Y, Tuck C, Binner J, Terry A, Goodridge R. Additive manufacturing of advanced ceramic materials. Prog Mater Sci 2021;116.
• 29. Shahzad K, Deckers J, Kruth JP, Vleugels J. Additive manufacturing of alumina parts by indirect selective laser sintering and post processing. J Mater Process Technol 2013;213:1484-94.
• 30. Jeong YG, Lee WS, Lee KB. Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:245.
• 31. Adresi Y, Can A, Kırıkkale B, et al. Düşük Maliyetli, Üç Boyutlu Bir Yazıcı Kullanılarak Oluşturulan Diş Modellerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2020;22:461-9.
• 32. Chen H, Yang X, Chen L, Wang Y, Sun Y. Application of FDM three-dimensional printing technology in the digital manufacture of custom edentulous mandible trays. Sci Rep 2016;6.
• 33. Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Al-Wazzan K, Rifaiy M Al, Al Jabbari YS. Selective Laser Melting Technique of Co-Cr Dental Alloys: A Review of Structure and Properties and Comparative Analysis with Other Available Techniques. Journal of Prosthodontics 2015;24:303-12.
• 34. Murat, Sema. "Assessment of the Accuracy of Obturator Bulbs that are Produced by Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Stereolithography in Maxilloctemy Defects: An Ex Vivo Study." 2018.
• 35. Peng CC, Chung KH, Ramos V. Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns using Different Measurement Techniques. Journal of Prosthodontics 2020;29:87-93.
• 36. Mai HN, Lee KB, Lee DH. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:208-15
• 37. Revilla-León M, Meyers MJ, Zandinejad A, Özcan M. A review on chemical composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing work flow of additively manufactured current polymers for interim dental restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:51-7.
• 38. Mârțu I, Murariu A, Baciu ER, et al. An Interdisciplinary Study Regarding the Characteristics of Dental Resins Used for Temporary Bridges. Medicina 2022;58:811.
• 39. Giannetti L, Apponi R, Mordini L, Presti S, Breschi L, Mintrone F. The occlusal precision of milled versus printed provisional crowns. J Dent 2022;117.
• 40. Bibb R, Brown R. The application of computer aided product development techniques in medical modeling topic: rehabilitation and prostheses. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation 2000;36:319–24.
• 41. Prpić V, Schauperl Z, Ćatić A, Dulčić N, Čimić S. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed, CAD/CAM, and Conventional Denture Base Materials. Journal of Prosthodontics 2020;29:524-8.
• 42. Chen H, Wang H, Lv P, Wang Y, Sun Y. Quantitative Evaluation of Tissue Surface Adaption of CAD-Designed and 3D Printed Wax Pattern of Maxillary Complete Denture. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015.
• 43. Alharbi N, Alharbi A, Osman R. Mode of Bond Failure Between 3D-Printed Denture Teeth and Printed Resin Base Material: Effect of Fabrication Technique and Dynamic Loading. An In Vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont 2021;34:763-74.
• 44. Lo Russo L, Guida L, Zhurakivska K, Troiano G, Chochlidakis K, Ercoli C. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2023;129:131-9.
• 45. Khanlar, L.N.; Salazar Rios, A.; Tahmaseb, A.; Zandinejad, A. Additive Manufacturing of Zirconia Ceramic and Its Application in Clinical Dentistry: A Review. Dent. J 2021;9: 104.
• 46. Kortes, J., et al. "A novel digital workflow to manufacture personalized three-dimensional-printed hollow surgical obturators after maxillectomy." International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2018;47:1214-8.