Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strengths of Different Fiber Post Systems Bonded with Resin Cement

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 70 - 78, 30.04.2024

Merve Gürses , Ali Rıza Çetin , Oğuz Kaan Tüysüz , Ali Kamuran Özkan

https://doi.org/10.51122/neudentj.2024.90

Öz

Aim: This study compares the push-out bond strengths of 3 different fiber post systems bonded with resin cement to root canal dentin.
Material and Methods: The study used 15 extracted single-rooted mandibular canine teeth. After the endodontic treatment of the teeth, they were randomly divided into three groups to apply different post-systems(n=5). Reforpost glass-fiber, Polydentia glass-fiber, and AAA Transparent fiber post systems were used in this study. The posts have adhered to the root canal with Panavia F2.0. A total of 6 slices of 1 mm thickness in the transversal direction were obtained, two from each of the coronal, middle, and apical sections of the prepared samples. The push-out test was performed from apical to coronal at a 0.5 mm/min speed. ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical analysis(p<0.05).
Results: The highest push-out binding values were observed in the Polydentia(5.04±0.54); the lowest was seen in the Reforpost(1.5±1.03). There was no statistical difference between the push-out binding values of the samples' apical, middle, and coronal regions for the Reforpost and Transparent groups. In the Polydentia group, the push-out binding values of the coronal region samples were significantly higher than those in the middle region. When the post groups were compared, the difference between the push-out binding values of all groups was statistically significant.
Conclusion: The surface properties of the posts can affect the push-out bonding values. Polydentia showed the highest push-out binding values. In addition, the push-out attachment values of the posts may vary in different root canal regions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

fiber post systems, push-out test, resin cement

Rezin simanla yapıştırılan farklı fiber post sistemlerin push-out bağlanma dayanımlarının karşılaştırılması

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, rezin simanla kök kanal dentinine bağlanan üç farklı fiber post sisteminin push-out bağlanma dayanımları karşılaştırmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmada 15 adet çekilmiş tek köklü kanin diş kullanıldı. Dişlere endodontik tedavi yapıldıktan sonra farklı post sistemi kullanılmak üzere rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı (n=5). Çalışmada, Reforpost cam fiber post, Polydentia cam fiber post ve AAA Transparent fiber post sistemleri kullanıldı. Postlar kanal içine Panavia F2.0 ile üretici firmanın talimatları doğrultusunda yapıştırıldı. Hazırlanan örnekler %100 nemde 24 saat 37 °C'de 1 gün bekletildikten sonra her bir diş kökünün postu içeren kısmının koronal, orta ve apikal bölümlerinin her birinden 2’şer adet olmak üzere, 1 mm kalınlıkta transversal yönde toplam 6 kesit elde edildi. Push-out testi, 0,5 mm/dk hızla apikalden koronale doğru yapıldı. Verilerin istatistiksel analizi için ANOVA ve Tukey HSD testleri uygulandı (p<0.05).
Bulgular: En yüksek push-out bağlanma değerleri Polydentia grubunda (5.04±0.54) görülürken; en düşük değerler reforpost grubununda (1.5±1.03) görüldü. Reforpost ve AAA Tranparent gruplarının apikal orta ve koronal bölge örneklerinin push-out bağlanma değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak farklılık görülmedi (p>0.05). Polydentia grubunda ise; koronal bölge örneklerinin push-out bağlanma değerleri orta bölgedeki örneklerden anlamlı olarak daha yüksek bulundu (p=0.006). Post grupları birbirleriyle karşılaştırıldığında; tüm grupların push-out bağlanma değerleri arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p<0.05).
Sonuç: Postların yüzey özellikleri push-out bağlanma değerlerini etkilemektedir. Polydentia en yüksek push-out bağlanma değerlerini göstermiştir. Ayrıca postların push-out bağlanma değerleri kökün farklı bölgelerinde değişkenlik gösterebilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

fiber post sistemler, push-out test, rezin siman

Etik Beyan

Etik kurul raporu dosyalar bölümünde eklenmiştir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Çalışma herhangi bir kurum tarafından desteklenmemiştir.

Teşekkür

Teşekkür yazısı yoktur.

Kaynakça

• 1. Lemos Martins Sicuro S, Gabardo MCL, Castiglia Gonzaga C, Dias Morais N, Baratto-Filho F, Correr Nolasco GM et al. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to different root perforation materials. J Endod. 2016; 42: 1819–21.
• 2. Bonfante EA, Pegoraro LF, de Góes MF, Carvalho RM. SEM observation of the bond integrity of fiber-reinforced composite posts cemented into root canals. Dent Mater. 2008; 24: 483–91.
• 3. Coelho CS de M, Biffi JCG, Silva GR da, Abrahão A, Campos RE, Soares CJ. Finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with composite resin and posts. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28: 671–8.
• 4. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int. 2008; 39: 117–29.
• 5. Amarnath GS, Swetha MU, Muddugangadhar BC, Sonika R, Garg A, Rao TRP. Effect of post material and length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars: an in-vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2015; 7: 22–8.
• 6. Gallo JR 3rd, Miller T, Xu X, Burgess JO. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts. J Prosthodont. 2002; 11: 25–9.
• 7. Uzun I, Keskin C, Özsu D, Güler B, Aydemir H. Push-out bond strength of oval versus circular fiber posts irradiated by erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 425–30.
• 8. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 1999; 27: 275–8.
• 9. Bitter K, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strengths of various luting agents to tooth-colored posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 302–10.
• 10. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 199–205.
• 11. Lamichhane A, Xu C, Zhang F-Q. Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6: 60–5.
• 12. Novais VR, Rodrigues RB, Simamoto Júnior PC, Lourenço C-S, Soares CJ. Correlation between the mechanical properties and structural characteristics of different fiber posts systems. Braz Dent J. 2016; 27: 46–51.
• 13. Bosso K, Gonini Júnior A, Guiraldo RD, Berger SB, Lopes MB. Stress generated by customized glass fiber posts and other types by photoelastic analysis. Braz Dent J. 2015; 26: 222–7.
• 14. Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Pereira-Cenci T. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent. 2014; 39: 31–44.
• 15. Kim YK, Kim SK, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Degree of conversion of dual-cured resin cement light-cured through three fibre posts within human root canals: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 667–74.
• 16. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 809–18.
• 17. da Silva NR, Raposo LHA, Versluis A, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Soares CJ. The effect of post, core, crown type, and ferrule presence on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated bovine anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104: 306–17.
• 18. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000; 13: 15B–8B.
• 19. Novais VR, Quagliatto PS, Bona AD, Correr-Sobrinho L, Soares CJ. Flexural modulus, flexural strength, and stiffness of fiber-reinforced posts. Indian J Dent Res. 2009; 20: 277–81.
• 20. Tsintsadze N, Margvelashvili-Malament M, Natto ZS, Ferrari M. Comparing survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored either with glass-fiber-reinforced or metal posts: A systematic review and meta-analyses. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; S0022-3913: 00047-6.
• 21. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J. 2011; 56 Suppl1: 77–83.
• 22. Lassila LVJ, Tanner J, Le Bell A-M, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 29–36.
• 23. Coniglio I, Magni E, Cantoro A, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Push-out bond strength of circular and oval-shaped fiber posts. Clin Oral Investig. 2011; 15: 667–72.
• 24. Carek A, Dukaric K, Miler H, Marovic D, Tarle Z, Par M. Post-Cure Development of the Degree of Conversion and Mechanical Properties of Dual-Curing Resin Cements. Polymers. 2022; 14: 3649.
• 25. Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 218–23.
• 26. Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten-Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104: 605–11.
• 27. D’Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D’Amario M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98: 193–8.
• 28. Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater. 2002; 18: 495–502.
• 29. Erdemir U, Mumcu E, Topcu FT, Yildiz E, Yamanel K, Akyol M. Micro push-out bond strengths of 2 fiber post types luted using different adhesive strategies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110: 534–44.
• 30. Montanari M, Prati C, Piana G. Differential hydrolytic degradation of dentin bonds when luting carbon fiber posts to the root canal. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16: e411–7.
• 31. Lopes GC, Ballarin A, Baratieri LN. Bond strength and fracture analysis between resin cements and root canal dentin. Aust Endod J. 2012; 38: 14–20.
• 32. Pereira JR, Pamato S, Santini MF, Porto VC, Ricci WA, Só MVR. Push-out bond strength of fiberglass posts cemented with adhesive and self-adhesive resin cements according to the root canal surface. Saudi Dent J. 2021; 33: 22–6.
• 33. Reginato CF, Oliveira AS, Kaizer MR, Jardim PS, Moraes RR. Polymerization efficiency through translucent and opaque fiber posts and bonding to root dentin. J Prosthodont Res. 2013; 57: 20–3.
• 34. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 963–71.
• 35. Bazzo JF, Pedriali MBBP, Guiraldo RD, Berger SB, Moura SK, de de Carvalho RV. Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. J Conserv Dent. 2016; 19: 583–6.
• 36. Calixto LR, Bandéca MC, Clavijo V, Andrade MF, Vaz LG, Campos EA. Effect of resin cement system and root region on the push-out bond strength of a translucent fiber post. Oper Dent. 2012; 37: 80–6.
• 37. Rocha AT, Gonçalves LM, Vasconcelos AJ de C, Matos Maia Filho E, Nunes Carvalho C, De Jesus Tavarez RR. Effect of Anatomical Customization of the Fiber Post on the Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement. Int J Dent. 2017; 2017: 5010712.
• 38. Zorba YO, Erdemir A, Turkyilmaz A, Eldeniz AU. Effects of different curing units and luting agents on push-out bond strength of translucent posts. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1521–5.
• 39. Giachetti L, Grandini S, Calamai P, Fantini G, Scaminaci Russo D. Translucent fiber post cementation using light- and dual-curing adhesive techniques and a self-adhesive material: push-out test. J Dent. 2009; 37: 638–42.
• 40. Kececi AD, Ureyen Kaya B, Adanir N. Micro push-out bond strengths of four fiber-reinforced composite post systems and 2 luting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105: 121–8.