Reflexivity in qualitative research: The role of the researcher

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 770 - 788, 25.06.2024

Nihan Demirkasımoğlu , Sevim Bezen

https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1464026

Öz

The study examines reflexivity in qualitative research, underscoring its vital role in allowing researchers to critically explore their influence and the interplay between their subjectivity and the research process. A thorough literature review within the article reveals a variety of definitions and applications of reflexivity across disciplines, highlighting its complexity and the need for a nuanced application in research practices. Addressing the inherent challenges and ethical considerations in qualitative research, the article champions reflexivity as a means to enhance the validity and authenticity of research findings. It advocates for the integration of reflexive practices throughout the research process, from conceptualization to data analysis, to promote accountability and transparency. In conclusion, the paper provides the researchers clear examples and guidelines that could facilitate a more effective and impactful application of reflexivity, ultimately enriching the research process and contributing to more nuanced and credible research outcomes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Reflectivity, Research Subjectivity, Researcher Effect

Nitel araştırmalarda yansıtıcılık: Araştırmacının rolü

Öz

Bu çalışma, nitel araştırmada yansıtıcılığı incelemekte ve araştırmacıların kendi etkilerini ve öznellikleri ile araştırma süreci arasındaki etkileşimi eleştirel bir şekilde keşfetmelerine olanak sağlamadaki hayati rolünün altını çizmektedir. Makalede yapılan kapsamlı literatür taraması, yansıtıcılığın disiplinler arasında çeşitli tanım ve uygulamalarını ortaya koymakta, karmaşıklığını ve araştırma uygulamalarında farklılaşabilen nüanslara duyulan ihtiyacı vurgulamaktadır. Nitel araştırmanın doğasında var olan zorlukları ve etik hususları ele alan çalışmada, araştırma bulgularının geçerliliğini ve özgünlüğünü artırmanın bir yolu olarak yansıtıcılığın önemini vurgulamaktadır. Hesap verebilirliği ve şeffaflığı teşvik etmek için kavramsallaştırmadan veri analizine kadar araştırma süreci boyunca yansıtıcılığın uygulamalara entegre edilmesini savunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak çalışma, araştırmacılara yansıtıcılığın daha etkili bir şekilde uygulanmasını kolaylaştırabilecek, nihayetinde araştırma sürecini zenginleştirecek ve daha incelikli ve güvenilir araştırma sonuçlarına katkıda bulunacak açık örnekler ve kılavuzlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yansıtıcılık, Araştırma Öznelliği, Araştırmacı Etkisi

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmada yazarlar araştırma ve bilim etiğine uygun davranmışlardır. Derleme türü olduğundan etik kurul izni gerekmemektedir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Bulunmuyor

Teşekkür

Bulunmuyor

Kaynakça

• Altheide, D., & Johnson, M. (1998). Criteria for accessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Collecting & Interpreting Qualitative Material. Sage, 283-312.
• Akom, A. A. (2008). Black metropolis and mental life: Beyond the “burden of ‘acting white’” toward a third wave of critical racial studies. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 39(3), 247–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.l548-1492.2008.00020.x.
• Anderson, G. (1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 249–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170182
• Barrett, A, Kajamaa, A., & Johnston, J. (2020). How to ... be reflexive when conducting qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher, 17(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13133.
• Baskoro, F., Suprianto, B., Anifah, L., & Indriyani, Y. A. (2023). Beyond Smart Devices: Fostering Critical, Communication and Collaborative Thinking in IoT-Based Sensor and Actuator Competence Learning Outcomes. TEM Journal, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM124-52
• Beals, F., Kidman, J., & Funaki, H. (2020). Insider and outsider research: Negotiating self at the edge of the emic/etic divide. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(6), 593-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419843950
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2016). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin Books Ltd
• Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative research, 15(2), 219-234.
• Bieler, P., Bister, M. D., Hauer, J., Klausner, M., Niewöhner, J., Schmid, C., & von Peter, S. (2021). Distributing reflexivity through co-laborative ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 50(1), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241620968271
• Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?. Qualitative health research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
• Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism. Routledge.
• Burns, E., Fenwick, J., Schmied, V., & Sheehan, A. (2012). Reflexivity in midwifery research: the insider/outsider debate. Midwifery, 28(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.018
• Colyar, J. (2009). Becoming writing, becoming writers. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(2), 421–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408318280
• Cunliffe, A. L. (2009). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity-A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507608099315
• Darawsheh, W. (2014). Reflexivity in research: promoting rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 21(12), 560-568. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.12.560
• Deggs, D., & Hernandez, F. (2018). Enhancing the value of qualitative field notes through purposeful reflection. The Qualitative Report, 23(10), 2552-2560. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Enhancing-the-Value-of-Qualitative-Field-Notes-Deggs-Hernandez/859881f21a9a6cac546c4d76d08fa4a2838e8126?p2df
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
• Dodgson, J. E. (2019). Reflexivity in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(2), 220-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419830990
• Dowling, M. (2006). Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research. Nurse researcher, 13(3), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2006.04.13.3.7.c5975
• Eide, P., & Kahn, D. (2008). Ethical issues in the qualitative researcher—participant relationship. Nursing Ethics, 15(2), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733007086018
• Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). The Handbook of Qualitative Research, 733-768. Sage.
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic field notes. The University of Chicago Press.
• Finefter-Rosenbluh, I. (2017). Incorporating Perspective Taking in Reflexivity: A Method to Enhance Insider Qualitative Research Processes. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917703539
• Finlay, L. (2002a). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
• Finlay, L. (2002b). "Outing" the researcher: The provenance, process and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052
• Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (Eds.). (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470776094
• Finlay, L. (2017). Championing “reflexivities”. Qualitative Psychology, 4(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000075
• Gentles, S. J., Jack, S. M., Nicholas, D. B., & McKibbon, K. A. (2014). Critical Approach to Reflexivity in Grounded Theory. The Qualitative Report, 19(44), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1109
• Gewirtz, S., & Cribb, A. (2006). What to do about values in social research: The case for ethical reflexivity in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(2), 141–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690600556081
• Gordon, J. (2005). White on white: Researcher reflexivity and the logics of privilege in white schools undertaking reform. The Urban Review, 37(4), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-005-0015-1
• Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative inquiry, 10(2), 261-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360.
• Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon press. Haraway, D. (2016). ‘Situated Knowledges: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective'. In Space, gender, knowledge: Feminist readings (pp. 53-72). Routledge.
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Cornell University Press.
• Henwood, K. (2008). Qualitative research, reflexivity and living with risk: Valuing and practicing epistemic reflexivity and centering marginality. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880701863575
• Hinz, S. E. (2016). Upwardly mobile: Attitudes toward the class transition among first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 57(3), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0033
• Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher positionality - A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research - A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
• Jootun, D., McGhee, G., & Marland, G. R. (2009). Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research. Nursing Standard, 23(23), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2009.02.23.23.42.c6800
• Kleinsasser, A. M. (2000). Researchers, reflexivity, and good data: Writing to unlearn. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_6
• Koch, T., & Harrington, A. (1998). Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity. Journal of advanced nursing, 28(4), 882–890. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00725.x
• Kom, C., Sharpe, D., & Owens, M. (2023). Reflexivity in context: Navigating the challenges of conducting qualitative research in international business. In: BAM2023 Conference proceedings. British Academy of Management.
• Koopman, W. J., Watling, C. J., & LaDonna, K. A. (2020). Autoethnography as a strategy for engaging in reflexivity. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 7, 2333393620970508. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393620970508
• Kuehner, A., Ploder, A., & Langer, P. C. (2016). Introduction to the Special Issue: European Contributions to Strong Reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416658069
• Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00112.x
• Leggatt-Cook, C., Sheridan, J., Madden, H., Cain, T., Munro, R., Tse, S. C., Jeon, H., & Chamberlain K. (2011). Collective Reflexivity: Researchers in Play, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8(3), 223-246, https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880903370064
• Linabary, J. R., Corple, D. J., & Cooky, C. (2021). Of wine and whiteboards: Enacting feminist reflexivity in collaborative research. Qualitative Research, 21(5), 719-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120946988
• Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17, 26–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051202
• Macbeth, D. (2001). On “reflexivity” in qualitative research: Two readings, and a third. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 35–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700103
• Malterud K. (2001). Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet (London, England), 358(9280), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
• Marcus, G. E. (1994). What comes (just) after “post”? The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 563–574). Sage.
• Mruck, K., & Mey, G. (2019). Grounded theory methodology and self-reflexivity in the qualitative research process. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory. Sage, 470–496.
• Moss, P. A. (2005). Toward “epistemic reflexivity” in educational research: A response to scientific research in education. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00453.x
• Naidu, T., & Sliep, Y. (2011). Contextual Reflexivity: Towards Contextually Relevant Research with South African HIV/AIDS Home-Based Care Volunteers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(4), 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000409
• Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
• Olmos-Vega, F. M., Dolmans, D. H., Guzmán-Quintero, C., Stalmeijer, R. E., & Teunissen, P. W. (2018). Unravelling residents' and supervisors' workplace interactions: an intersubjectivity study. Medical education, 52(7), 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13603
• Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical teacher, 45(3), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
• Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93-96. https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
• Pillow, W. S. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure: The use of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
• Pillow, W. S. (2010). Dangerous reflexivity: Rigour, responsibility and reflexivity in qualitative research. The Routledge Doctoral Student’s Companion. Routledge.
• Rees C. E., Crampton P. E. S., & Monrouxe L. V. (2020). Re-visioning academic medicine through a constructionist lens. Academic Medicine, 95(6), 846–850. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003109.
• Reid, A. M., Brown, J. M., Smith, J. M., Cope, A. C., & Jamieson, S. (2018). Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2
• Rettke, H., Pretto, M., Spichiger, E., Anna Frei, I., & Spirig, R. (2018). Using reflexive thinking to establish rigor in qualitative research. Nursing Research, 67(6), 490-497. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000307.
• Russell, G. M., & Kelly, N. H. (2002). Research as interacting dialogic processes: Implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.3.831
• Salim, H., Susilawati, S., & Hanif, M. (2021). Reflective writing in the pandemic period: A university students’ reflection. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 56-65. http://doi.org/10.31681/ jetol.834129
• Schwandt, T. A. (2014). The sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Sage.
• Tuval-Mashiach, R. (2017). Raising the curtain: The importance of transparency in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 4, 126–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/qup0000062
• Smith, S. (2006). Encouraging the use of reflexivity in the writing up of qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 13(5), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2006.13.5.21377
• Van Maanen, J. (1989). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press.
• Varpio, L., & MacLeod, A. (2020). Philosophy of science series: Harnessing the multidisciplinary edge effect by exploring paradigms, ontologies, epistemologies, axiologies, and methodologies. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 686–689. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003142
• Varpio, L., O’Brien, B., Rees, C. E., Monrouxe, L., Ajjawi, R., & Paradis, E. (2021). The applicability of generalisability and bias to health professions education’s research. Medical Education, 55(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14348
• Wacquant, L. J., & Bourdieu, P. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Polity.
• Walsh, R. (2003). The methods of reflexivity. The Humanistic Psychologist, 31(4), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2003.9986934
• Wasserfall, R. (1997). Reflexivity, feminism, and difference. In R. Hertz (Ed.). Reflexivity and voice. Sage.
• Wilkinson, S. (1988). The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11, 493–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(88)90024-6
• Williams, A. (1990). Reading feminism in fieldnotes. In L. Stanley (Ed.). Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory, & Epistemology in Feminist Sociology. Routledge.
• Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Open University Press.