Factors affecting the entrepreneurial orientation: A research in Technoparks

Yıl 2022, , 143 - 164, 01.06.2022

Osman Akarsu , Musa Said Döven

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1093800

Cited By: 7

Öz

In this study, the factors affecting the entrepreneurial orientation were examined by considering the situation of the entrepreneurs in the technoparks of our country. The variables filtered from the Upper Echelon theory were examined by grouping them as individual, organizational, environmental and social status factors, and the variables of age, total experience and education level within the individual variables, the age of enterprise within the organizational variables, and the perceived environmental uncertainty level within the environmental variables. It has been found that there is a statistically significant effect on entrepreneurial orientation. It has been concluded that environmental and social status factors, which are considered as external factors, affect entrepreneurship orientation more than individual and organizational factors considered as internal factors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Orientation, Upper Echelon Theory

Girişimcilik Yönelimini Etkileyen Faktörler: Teknoparklarda bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu çalışmada, girişimcilik yönelimini etkileyen faktörler ülkemiz teknoparklarında yer alan girişimcilerin durumu ele alınarak incelenmiştir. Üst Yönetim Kuramından süzülen değişkenler bireysel, örgütsel, çevresel ve sosyal statü faktörleri olarak gruplandırılarak irdelenmiş ve bireysel değişkenler içerisinde yer alan yaş, toplam deneyim ve eğitim düzeyi, örgütsel değişkenler içerisinde yer alan girişimin kuruluş yaşı ve çevresel değişkenler içerisinde yer alan algılanan çevresel belirsizlik düzeyi değişkenlerinin girişimcilik yönelimi üzerinde istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı etkide bulunduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Dış faktörler olarak ele alınan çevresel ve sosyal statü faktörleri, iç faktörler olarak değerlendirilen bireysel ve örgütsel faktörlerden daha fazla girişimcilik yönelimini etkilediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Girişimcilik, Girişimcilik Yönelimi, Üst Yönetim Kuramı

Kaynakça

• Akarsu, O. (2021). Girişimcilik yönelimini etkileyen faktörler nelerdir? Teknoparklarda bir araştırma [Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi]. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi.
• Akkoç, İ., Çalışkan, A., & Turunç, Ö. (2012). Gelişim ve Rasyonel Alt Kültürlerinin Girişimci Davranışa Etkisi: Algılanan Çevresel Belirsizliğin Aracılık Rolü. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(4).
• Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. Sage.
• Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks: The art and science of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Ballinger.
• Aldrich, H. E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual review of sociology, 2(1), 79-105.
• Algina, J., & Olejnik, S. (2003). Sample size tables for correlation analysis with applications in partial correlation and multiple regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38(3), 309-323.
• Aydemir, M. (2019). Türkiye'de Üst Yönetim Ekipleri. Altınbaş Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Meta-Analytic Review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12095
• Basso, O., Fayolle, A., & Bouchard, V. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation: The making of a concept. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 10(4), 313-321.
• Brinckmann, J. (2008). Competence of top management teams and success of new technology-based firms. Springer.
• Byrnes, W. G., & Chesterton, B. K. (1973). Decisions strategies and new ventures: modern tools for top management. Allen and Unwin.
• Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management journal, 44(3), 533-545.
• Cooper, A. C., & Bruno, A. V. (1977). Success among high-technology firms. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
• Covin, J. G., & Covin, T. J. (1990). Competitive aggressiveness, environmental context, and small firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(4), 35-50.
• Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation Theory and Research: Reflections on a Needed Construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855-872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00482.x
• Covin, J. G., & Miller, D. (2014). International entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual considerations, research themes, measurement issues, and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 11-44.
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.
• Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2019). Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines. In: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
• Davis, J. L. (2007). Firm-level entrepreneurship and performance: An examination and extension of relationships and measurements of the entrepreneurial orientation construct.
• Dess, G. G., Pinkham, B. C., & Yang, H. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation: Assessing the construct's validity and addressing some of its implications for research in the areas of family business and organizational learning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 1077-1090.
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160.
• Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. Academy of Management journal, 42(4), 389-402.
• Finkelstein, S., Cannella, S., Hambrick, D., & Cannella, A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards: Oxford University Press. In: USA.
• Frank, H., Matlay, H., Korunka, C., Lueger, M., & Mugler, J. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and education in Austrian secondary schools. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(2), 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000510594647
• Ginzel, L. E., Kramer, R. M., & Sutton, R. I. (2004). Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organizational audience. Organizational identity, 223-261.
• Guth, W. D., & Ginsberg, A. (1990). Guest editors' introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 5-15.
• Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2016). Research methods in social sciences: Philosophy-method-analysis. In: Ankara: Seckin Publication.
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. In: Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.
• Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), 401-418.
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
• Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003
• Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00098-8
• Khandwalla, P. N. (1977). The design of organizations.
• Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Michael, S. C. (2007). Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1187-1212.
• Kourilsky, M. L., & Walstad, W. B. (1998). Entrepreneurship and female youth: Knowledge, attitudes, gender differences, and educational practices. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(1), 77-88.
• Lumpkin, & Dess. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429-451.
• MacMillan, I. C., & Day, D. L. (1987). Corporate ventures into industrial markets: Dynamics of aggressive entry. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 29-39.
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations John Wiley & Sons. New York.
• Marques, C. S., Santos, G., Galvão, A., Mascarenhas, C., & Justino, E. (2018). Entrepreneurship education, gender and family background as antecedents on the entrepreneurial orientation of university students. International Journal of Innovation Science.
• Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195-245.
• Meyer, G. D., & Heppard, K. A. (2000). Entrepreneurship as strategy: Competing on the entrepreneurial edge. Sage Publications.
• Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management science, 29(7), 770-791.
• Miller, D. (2011). Miller (1983) revisited: A reflection on EO research and some suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 873-894.
• Onstenk, J. (2003). Entrepreneurship and vocational education. European educational research journal, 2(1), 74-89.
• Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 163-182.
• Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 485-501.
• Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of Past Research and Suggestions for the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761-787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x
• Russ, G. (1991). Symbolic Communication and Image Management in Organisations' in R. Giacalone and P. Rosenfeld (eds), Applied Impression Management: How Image-Making Affects Managerial Decisions, 219±40. In: Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
• Sharma, P., & Chrisman, S. J. J. (2007). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. In Entrepreneurship (pp. 83-103). Springer.
• Stopford, J. M., & Baden‐Fuller, C. W. (1994). Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 521-536.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
• Thomas, K. M. (2007). Diversity resistance in organizations. Psychology Press.
• Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management science, 35(8), 942-962.
• Vora, D., Vora, J., & Polley, D. (2012). Applying entrepreneurial orientation to a medium sized firm. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(3), 352-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551211227738
• Waldman, D. A., Ramirez, G. G., House, R. J., & Puranam, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 134-143.
• Walter, S. G., & Block, J. H. (2016). Outcomes of entrepreneurship education: An institutional perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(2), 216-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.10.003