Examining the Role of the World Health Organization in the Fight Against COVID-19 Pandemic According to the International Regime Theory

Yıl 2024, , 653 - 675, 01.11.2024

Merve Sönmez , Elif Toprak

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1493506

Öz

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which first emerged in China at the end of 2019 and rapidly spread worldwide, have been seen both nationally and internationally. The research focuses on the COVID-19 pandemic, which has social, economic and political effects. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global health regimes and the role of the World Health Organization (WHO) in fighting against the global crisis caused by the pandemic are examined. The findings show that the WHO was inadequate in the context of controlling the spread of the pandemic in question. The limited impact of WHO in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic process shows that the role the organization plays in crisis management must be enhanced especially with the involvement of epistemic communities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

COVID-19, Pandemic, International Regime Theory, International Health Regimes, World Health Organisation

COVID-19 Pandemisiyle Mücadelede Dünya Sağlık Örgütü’nün Rolünün Uluslararası Rejim Kuramına Göre İncelenmesi

Öz

İlk kez 2019 yılı sonunda Çin’de ortaya çıkan ve hızla dünya çapında yayılan COVID-19 salgınının etkileri gerek ulusal gerekse uluslararası düzeyde görülmüştür. Araştırmada sosyal, ekonomik ve siyasi yönden etkileri olan COVID-19 pandemisi ele alınmıştır. COVID-19 pandemisinin küresel sağlık rejimlerine etkisi ve özellikle Dünya Sağlık Örgütü’nün (DSÖ) pandeminin yol açtığı küresel krizle mücadeledeki rolü incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular çerçevesinde DSÖ’nün söz konusu pandeminin kontrol altına alınması bağlamında yetersiz kaldığı çıkarımına ulaşılmıştır. COVID-19 pandemi sürecinin yönetiminde DSÖ’nün etkisinin sınırlılığı, örgütün kriz yönetiminde oynadığı rolün özellikle epistemik toplulukların da katılımıyla geliştirilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

COVID-19, Pandemi, Uluslararası Rejim Teorisi, Uluslararası Sağlık Rejimleri, Dünya Sağlık Örgütü

Kaynakça

• Aksoy, S. Z. (2015). Rejim Teorileri. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 12(46), 56-77.
• Amnesty International. (2021). (rep.). A Double Dose of Inequality Pharma Companies and the COVID-19 Vaccines Crisis. London, UK.
• Assefa, Y., Woldeyohannes, S., Cullerton, K., Gilks, C. F., Reid, S., & Van Damme, W. (2022). Attributes of National Governance for an Effective Response to Public Health Emergencies: Lessons from the Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Global Health, 12.
• Bakanliği, T. S. (2020). COVID-19 (SARS-CoV2 Enfeksiyonu) Rehberi. Erişim: https://covid19bilgi. saglik. gov.tr/depo/rehberler/COVID-19_Rehberi.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 16.07. 2020).
• Bieber, F. (2022). Global Nationalism in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nationalities Papers, 50(1), 13-25. Clift, C. (2013). The Role of the World Health Organization in the International System.
• Creswell, J. W. (2017). Araştırma Deseni Nitel, Nicel ve Karma Yöntem Yaklaşımları, çev. Selçuk Beşir Demir. Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
• Doğan, N. & Şeyşane, V. (2018). International Organization and Global Governance. Sağsen, İ., Demirel, M., & Cavlak, Ç. (Eds.). States and Global Governance (s.200-202). Anadolu University Publication, Eskişehir.
• Fazal, T. M. (2020). Health Diplomacy in Pandemical Times. International Organization, 74(S1), E78-E97.
• Feldbaum, H., Lee, K., & Michaud, J. (2010). Global Health and Foreign Policy. Epidemiologic Reviews, 32(1), 82-92. Fidler, D. P. (2010). The Challenges of Global Health Governance.
• Grieco, J. M. (1988). Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal institutionalism. International Organization, 42(3), 485-507.
• Haggard, S., & Simmons, B. A. (1987). Theories of International Regimes. International Organization, 41(3), 491-517.
• Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., & Rittberger, V. (2000). Integrating Theories of International Regimes. Review of International Studies, 26(1), 3-33.
• Hoffman, S. J. (2010). The Evolution, Etiology and Eventualities of the Global Health Security Regime. Health Policy and Planning, 25(6), 510-522.
• Jervis, R. (1999). Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security, 24(1), 42-63.
• Karakaş, M. (2020). COVID-19 Salgınının Çok Boyutlu Sosyolojisi ve Yeni Normal Meselesi. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 40(1), 541-573.
• Kaya, F. (2020). Pandemi Sonrası Değişen Uluslararası Sistem ve Küreselleşme. Gaziantep Unıversity Journal of Social Sciences, 261-273.
• Kelle, A. (2007). Securitization of International Public Health: Implications for Global Health Governance and the Biological Weapons Prohibition Regime. Global Governance, 13, 217.
• Keohane, R. O., &; Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and Interdependence. Longman.
• Kickbusch, I., & Liu, A. (2022). Global Health Diplomacy—Reconstructing Power and Governance. The Lancet.
• Kickbusch, I., Nikogosian, H., Kazatchkine, M., & Kökény, M. (2021). A Guide to Global Health Diplomacy. Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. Global Health Centre, 2021-02.
• Kickbusch, I., Silberschmidt, G., & Buss, P. (2007). Global Health Diplomacy: The Need for New Perspectives, Strategic Approaches and Skills in Global Health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85, 230-232.
• Koç, E. (2021). COVID-19 Krizinin Diplomasiye Etkisi ve Uluslararası Sistemde Artan Belirsizlikler. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi, 4(1), 108-121.
• Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185-205.
• Kuriakose, S. (2020). Global Health: Global Health Diplomacy. Journal of Global Health, 10(2).
• Little, R. (2001). International Regimes. J. Baylis, & S. Smith (Ed), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introductional Relations içinde (s. 299-316). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Macar, O. D., & Asal, U. Y. (2020). COVID-19 ile Uluslararası İlişkileri Yeniden Düşünmek: Tarih, Ekonomi ve Siyaset Ekseninde Bir Değerlendirme. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(37), 222-239.
• Mustajib, S., & Alam, F. (2021). Pandemic Experiences and the Possibility of Global Health Diplomacy. Millenium Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1).
• Özbey, K. (2021). COVID-19 ve Sınırlar: Küresel Salgın Döneminde Sınırların Değişen Anlamı. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 17(Pandemi Özel Sayısı), 3698-3726.
• Ruger, J. P., & Yach, D. (2009). The Global Role of the World Health Organization. Global Health Governance: The hasencScholarly Journal for the New Health Security Paradigm, 2(2), 1.
• SAM, (2020). COVID-19 Sonrası Küresel Sistem: Eski Sorunlar Yeni Trendler. Dışişleri Bakanlığı Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi SAM Yayınları, Ankara http://sam. gov.tr/tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/sam-covid-kitap.pdf.
• Singh, B., & Chattu, V. K. (2021). Prioritizing ‘Equity’in COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution Through Global Health Diplomacy. Health Promotion Perspectives, 11(3), 281.
• Stein, A. A. (1982). Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World. International Organization, 36(2), 299-324.
• Şeker, M., Özer, A., & Korkut, C. (Eds.). (2020). Küresel Salgının Anatomisi: İnsan ve Toplumun Geleceği. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi.
• Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (2012). International Relations Theory. Rowman & Littlefield.
• WHO. (2020). (rep.). Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report.
• World Health Organization. (1995). Constitution of the World Health Organization.
• World Health Organization. (2014). Decision-making for Guideline Development at WHO. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, 201-14.
• Young, O. R. (1982). Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 277-297.
• Young, O. R. (1986). International Regimes: A New Theory of Institutions. World Politics, 39(1), 104-122.
• COVID-19 Epidemiological Update (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-epidemiological-update---22-december-2023) (Erişim Tarihi: 17.05.2024)
• https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66494/pandemi.html; (Erişim Tarihi: 06.12.2022)
• https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/30/world/world-leaders-covid-treaty-intl/index.html; (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2022)
• https://indianexpress.com/article/india/who-urges-experts-to-join-scientific-advisory-group-on-origins-of-novel-pathogens-7501838/; (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2022)
• https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/ministry/news/lauterbach-g7-health-ministers-to-discuss-pandemic-pact.html; (Erişim Tarihi: 24.11.2022)
• https://www.devex.com/news/covid-19-in-2020-a-timeline-of-the-coronavirus-outbreak-99634; (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2022)
• https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/What-you-need-to-know-about-the-COVID-19-vaccine; (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2022)
• https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2023/05/09/fact-sheet-end-of-the-covid-19-public-health-emergency.html (Erişim Tarihi: 17.05.2024)
• https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/pfizer-biontech-and-moderna-making-1000-profit-every-second-while-worlds-poorest; (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2022)
• https://www.prevention.com/health/health-conditions/a60701402/flirt-new-covid-variants/ (Erişim Tarihi: 17.05.2024)
• https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/14/coronavirus-trump-halts-funding-to-world-health-organization; (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2022)
• https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/covid-pandemic-is-no-longer-a-global-health-emergency-says-who9tkn9nc9m? gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwgJyyBhCGARIsAK8LVLPxzwD1EX56kF2TG2MpOlJLcrBeKH77snH8AIrfiHvLx8YgCZPyUAUaAupXEALw_wcB (Erişim Tarihi: 17.05.2024)
• https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/covax-facility-will-deliver-its-65-millionth-vaccine-dose-week-it-shouldve-been; (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2022)
• https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/09/24/global-covid-19-summit-ending-the-pandemic-and-building-back-better/; (Erişim Tarihi:23.11.2022)
• https://www.who.int/about; (Erişim Tarihi: 27.05.2021)
• https://www.who.int/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants (Erişim Tarihi: 17.05.2024)
• https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#!; (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2022)
• https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#event126; (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2022)
• https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#!; (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2022)
• https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#event-238; (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2022)
• https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#event-319; (Erişim Tarihi:23.11.2022)
• https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#event-199; (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2022)
• https://www.who.int/initiatives/act-accelerator/about (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2023)
• https://www.who.int/news/item/20-05-2022-covax-calls-for-urgent-action-to-close-vaccine-equity-gap; (Erişim Tarihi 24.11.2022)
• https://www.who.int/news/item/22-01-2021-covax-announces-new-agreement-plans-for-first-deliveries; (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2022)
• https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---22-february-2023 (Erişim Tarihi: 16.05.2023)
• https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---30-august-2023 (Erişim Tarihi: 17.05.2024)
• https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ (Erişim Tarihi: 16.05.2024)
• https://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/health-diplomacy/index.html (Erişim Tarihi: 14.08.2024)
• https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/05/1136367 (Erişim Tarihi: 14.08.2024)
• https://www.who.int/about/who-we-are (Erişim Tarihi: 14.08.2024)
• https://www.who.int/initiatives/pandemic-influenza-preparedness-framework (Erişim Tarihi: 14.08.2024)