A Discourse Analysis of Social Media Voices on Turkey’s FATIH Project

Yıl 2019, , 785 - 806, 05.04.2019

Ayşe Aydın Akkurt Hakan Yıldırım , H. Mustafa Dönmez

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.554542

Öz

FATIH project of Turkey is one of the largest
educational technology projects in the world that aims to ensure equality in
education and to improve technological infrastructure at schools. Ekşi Sözlük,
one of the most popular social media platforms in Turkey, has been an important
agent in interpreting and reproducing information as a new public sphere. This
study aims to explore the topics presented within the discourses in Ekşi Sözlük
regarding FATIH project. A total of 307 entries posted between 2010 and 2017
were analyzed using the method of discourse analysis. The results showed that
FATIH project has been discussed in public sphere in terms of technological,
political-ideological and project design dimensions rather than the educational
dimension.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

FATIH Project, New Media, Discourse Analysis

Kaynakça

• Akgül, M. (2013). FATIH Project: Problems, Risks and Concerns [FATIH Projesi: Sorunlar, Riskler ve Endişeler]. http://dergi.bmo.org.tr/egitim/FATIH-projesi-sorunlar-riskler-ve-endiseler Accessed on May 5, 2017. Akgün, E., Yılmaz, E.O., and Seferoğlu, S.S. (2011). Vision 2023 strategy document and the movement to increase opportunities and improve technology (FATİH) project: A comparative review [Vizyon 2023 strateji belgesi ve fırsatları artırma ve teknolojiyi iyileştirme hareketi (FATİH) projesi: Karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme]. Akademik Bilişim, 2(4), 115-122. Atabek, Ü. (2005). New Communication Technologies and Media [Yeni İletişim Teknolojileri ve Medya]. İstanbul: IPS İletişim Vakfı Yayınları Armağan, A. and Deniz, Ş. (2012). Representation of child abuse on social networking platforms: presentation of children staying in Pozanti juvenile hall on ekşi sözlük. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5(7). Alexa (2018) http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/eksisozluk.com, Web, accessed in February 15, 2018. Ayvacı, H.Ş., Bakırcı, H., and Başak, M.H. (2014). The evaluation of problems emerging during the implementation process of fatih project by administrators, teachers and students. YYU J. Educ. Faculty, 9, 21-47. Bozkurt, A. (2014). Network society and knowledge. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 28(4), 510-525. Coruk, A., and Tutkun, T. (2018). Teacher Concerns towards the Fatih Project in Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(4), 42-53. Çelik, H. and Ekşi, H. (2008). Discourse analysis. Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, (27), 99-117. Çiftçi, S., Musa Taşkaya, S., and Alemdar, M. (2013). The opinions of classroom teachers about Fatih Project. Ilkogretim Online, 12(1). Demir, F. (2011). The role of negotiation in public policy making process and the democratization of public policy process [Kamu politikası oluşturma sürecinde “müzakere” nin rolü ve kamu politikası sürecinin demokratikleştirilmesi], (Ed. Alican Kaptı) Kamu Politika Süreci. Seçkin, Ankara. Doğan, D., Çınar, M. and Seferoğlu, S.S. (2016). “One Laptop per Child” projects and FATIH project: A comparative examination. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 3(1), 1-26. Donmuş Kaya, V., & Pepeler, E. (2018). An investigation of some variables in terms of teacher’s competencies about using interactive whiteboard. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences, 28(2). Dursun, Ö.Ö., Kuzu, A., Kurt, A.A., Güllüpınar, F., and Gültekin, M. (2013). Views of school administrators’ on Fatih projects pilot implementation process. Trakya University Journal of Education, 3(1), 100-113. Ekici, S. and Yılmaz, B. (2013). An evaluation on Fatih project. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 27(2), 317-339. Elliott, R. (1996). Discourse analysis: exploring action, function and conflict in social texts. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 14, 6, 65. García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2016, September). A brief introduction to TACCLE 3—coding European project. In Computers in Education (SIIE), 2016 International Symposium on (pp. 1-4). IEEE. Gökmen, Ö.F., Duman, İ., and Akgün, Ö.E. (2018). Teachers' Views about the Use of Tablet Computers Distributed in Schools as Part of the Fatih Project. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 21-37. Friedland, L.A., Hove, T., & Rojas, H., (2006). The Networked Public Sphere. Javnost-The Public/European Institute for Communication & Culture, 13(4), 5-26. Forester, J. (2010). Theories of Mass Communication [Kitle İletişim Kuramları] (Ed. Mutlu). Ankara: Ütopya. Information Society Strategy and Action Plan (2006–2010), http://www.edevlet.gov.tr/2015/10/13/2006-2010-bilgi-toplumu-stratejisi-ve-eylem-plani/ Web, accessed on April 12, 2018. Kirbas, A. (2018). Student Views on Using Smart Boards in Turkish Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(5), 1040-1049. Ministry of Development Information Society Department. (2015, March). 2015 - 2018 Information Society Strategy and Action Plan. Information Society Strategy Project and Participation Portal: http://www.bilgitoplumustratejisi.org/tr/doc/8a9481984680deca014bea4232490005 Website, accessed on November 4, 2017. Ministry of Development (2013). Tenth Development Plan (2014-2018) http://www.kalkinma.gov.tr/Pages/KalkinmaPlanlari.aspx accessed in May 5, 2017. Ministry of Education, (2015) 2015-2019 Strategic Plan, MNE Strategy Development Unit, Ankara. (T. C. Ministry of Development Information Society Department, 2015) Ministry of Education (2017) About FATIH Project in Education. http://FATIHprojesi.meb.gov.tr/proje-hakkinda/ accessed on May 5, 2017. Öçal, M.F. and Şimşek, M. (2017). Mathematics teacher candidates' views on FATIH project and the use of technology in mathematics education. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 91-121. Pamuk, S., Cakir, R., Ergun, M., Yilmaz, H.B., and Ayas, C. (2013). The use of tablet PC and interactive board from the perspectives of teachers and students: Evaluation of the FATİH Project. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 1815-1822. Postman, N. (2004). Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. Penguin. Sözen, E. (1999). Discourse: uncertainty, exchange, knowledge, power and reflexivity [Söylem: belirsizlik, mübadele, bilgi, güç ve refleksivite]. İstanbul: Paradigma. Taşdemir, B. and Çevik, R. (2013). Dominant Design and Sourtimes Dictionary: Understanding the Transformation of Internet. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 1(37). Timisi, N. (2003). New Communication Technologies and Democracy [Yeni İletişim Teknolojileri ve Demokrasi]. Ankara: Dost. Turkish Statistical Institute (2016), "Youth in Statistics" http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24648 accessed in May 12, 2017. Uçkan, Ö. (2003). E-government, e-democracy and Turkey [E-Devlet, E-Demokrasi ve Türkiye]. İstanbul: Literatür. Van Dijk, T. (Ed.) (1997). Discourse as structure and process (Vol. 1). London: Sage. Van Dijk, T. (2005). Söylemin yapıları ve iktidarın yapıları. Der: Mehmet Küçük, Medya İktidar İdeoloji, Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Van Dijk, T. (2006). The Network Society: Social Aspects Of New Media. London: Sage Publications. Volkmer, I. (2003). The Global Network Society and Global PublicSphere, Society for International Development: Thematic Section, 46(1), 9-16. Yaşaroğlu, C. (2018). The investigation of teachers’ expectations and recommendations on Fatih project. Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8(15), 147-159 Yengin, D. (2012). Critical Review of New Media, New Media and … [Yeni Medyaya Eleştirel Bakış, Yeni Medya ve…], İstanbul: Anahtar Kitaplar. Yolcu, H., and Bayram, A. (2016). Usage of technology in education: a critical view on the Fatih project. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 2111-2143. Yükselbaba, Ü. (2008). Public sphere models and context of these models. İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 66(2), 227-271