Evcimenlik Kültünden Çalışan Anneye: Annelik İdeolojileri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Yıl 2019, , 17 - 36, 03.06.2019

Eda Kılıç

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.595096

Cited By: 1

Öz

Anneliğin toplumsal inşası
üzerinde hâkim olan yaklaşım, kadınların yaşamını özel alanla sınırlandıran
evcimenlik kültüdür. Bu ideoloji, farklı ideolojiler ile sentezlenerek yoğun
annelik ideolojisine dönüşmüştür. 0-14 yaş arası çocuğu olan annelerin istihdam
oranlarının OECD ortalamasının son elli yılda iki katına çıkması ise tam
zamanlı anneliği savunan yoğun annelik ideolojisinin dönüşüme uğradığının bir
göstergesidir. Bu çalışmada, ilgili dönüşüm, anneliğin inşasında etkili
ideolojiler ve OECD verileri incelenerek değerlendirmeye tabi tutulmuştur.
Bulgular yaşanan dönüşümün temelinde, çalışma hayatının annelik ile uyumlu hale
getirilmesine olanak tanıyan yasal düzenlemeler ve çocuk bakım hizmetlerinin
genişlemesi gerektiğini göstermiştir. Değerlendirme sonuçları,  geçmiş
yıllarda birçok toplumda etkisi hissedilen yoğun annelik ideolojisinin aşınarak
annelik ve çalışma hayatının bir arada yürütüldüğü yeni bir dengeye doğru
evirildiğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evcimenlik Kültü, Yoğun Annelik

Kaynakça

• Ahn, N. ve Mira, P. (2002). A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. Journal of Population Economics, 15(4), 667-682. Erişim Adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20007839 Badinter, E. (2011). Kadınlık mı annelik mi. A. Ekmekçi (Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Bassin, D., Honey, M. ve Kaplan, M. M. (Ed.). (1996). Representations of motherhood. Yale University Press. Blau, F. D. ve Kahn L. M. (2007). Changes in the labor supply behavior of married women: 1980-2000. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(3), 393-438. Blundell, R., Bozio, A. ve Laroque, G. (2011). Extensive and intensive margins of labour supply: Working hours in the US, UK and France. IFS Working Paper 01. Institute for Fiscal Studies. Erişim Adresi: https://www.ifs.org.uk/docs/bozio_0311.pdf Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment. New York: Basic Books. Brewer, M., Cattan, S. ve Crawford, C. (2014). The IFS Green Budget. Institute for Fiscal Studies. Coulter, M. (2010). Essentialism and mothering. A. O'Reilly (Ed.), Encyclopedia of motherhood içinde (s. 358-360). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Cristia, J. P. (2008). The effect of a first child on female labor supply: evidence from women seeking fertility services. Journal of Human Resources, 43(3), 487-510. doi: 10.3368/jhr.43.3.487 Dainton, M. (1993). The myths and misconceptions of the stepmother identity: Descriptions and prescriptions for identity management. Family Relations, 42(1), 93-98. doi: 10.2307/584928 Del Boca, D. ve Locatelli, M. (2006). The determinants of motherhood and work status: A survey. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 2414, Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Erişim adresi: http://anon-ftp.iza.org/dp2414.pdf Dillaway, H. ve Paré, E. (2008). Locating mothers: How cultural debates about stay-at-home versus working mothers define women and home. Journal of Family Issues, 29(4), 437-464. doi: 10.1177/0192513X07310309 DiQuinzio, P. (1999). The impossibility of motherhood: Feminism, individualism, and the problem of mothering. New York: Routledge. Douglas, S. J. ve Michaels, M. W. (2004). The mommy myth: The idealization of motherhood and how it has undermined women. New York, NY: Free Press. Fagan, C. and Norman, H. (2012). Trends and social divisions in maternal employment patterns following maternity leave in the UK. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(9/10), 544-560. doi: 10.1108/01443331211257643 Finley, L. M. (1986). Transcending equality theory: A way out of the maternity and the workplace debate. Columbia Law Review, 86(6), 1118-1182. doi: 10.2307/1122655 Garey, A. I. (2008). Motherhood. J. O'Brien (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gender and society içinde (s. 583-588). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Glenn, E. N. (1994). Social construction of mothering: A thematic overview. E. N. Glenn, G. Chang ve L. R. Forcey (Ed.), Mothering: Ideology, experience and agency içinde (s. 1-29). New York & London: Routledge. Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, educa¬tion, and family. American Economic Review, 96(2), 1-21. doi: 10.1257/000282806777212350 Goldin, C. ve Katz, L. F. (2002). The power of the pill: Oral contraceptives and women’s career and marriage decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 730-770. doi: 10.1086/340778 Green, F. J. (2010). Mask of motherhood. A. O'Reilly (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Motherhood içinde (s. 692-693). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Hall, C. (1992). White, male, and middle-class: Explorations in feminism and history. New York: Routledge. Haynes, K. (2008). Transforming identities: Accounting professionals and the transition to motherhood. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(5), 620-642. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2006.10.003 Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Johnston, D. D. ve Swanson, D. H. (2006). Constructing the “good mother”: The experience of mothering ideologies by work status. Sex Roles, 54(7-8), 509-519. doi: 0.1007/s11199-006-9021-3 Joshi, H., Macran, S. ve Dex, S. (1996). Employment after childbearing and women’s subsequent labour force participation: Evidence from the British 1958 birth cohort. Journal of Population Economics, 9(3), 325-348. doi: 10.1007/BF00176691 Joshi, H., Paci, P. ve Waldfogel, J. (1999). The wages of motherhood: Better or worse?. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(5), 543-564. doi: 10.1093/cje/23.5.543 Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press. Lewis, S. (1991). Motherhood and employment: The impact of social and organizational values. A. Phoenix, A. Woollett ve E. Lloyd (Ed.), Motherhood: meanings, practices and ideologies içinde (s. 195-215). London: Sage Publications, Inc. Lundborg, P., Plug, E. ve Rasmussen, A. W. (2014). Fertility effects on female labor supply: IV evidence from IVF treatments. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 8609, Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Erişim adresi: http://anon-ftp.iza.org/dp8609.pdf Lupton, D. (2000). ‘A love/hate relationship’: The ideals and experiences of first-time mothers. Journal of Sociology, 36(1), 50-63. doi: 10.1177/144078330003600104 McGlynn, C. (2000). Ideologies of motherhood in European community sex equality law. European Law Journal, 6(1), 29-44. doi: 10.1111/1468-0386.00094 Miller, T. (2005). Making sense of motherhood: A narrative approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. Miller, T. (2007). “Is this what motherhood is all about?”: Weaving experiences and discourse through transition to first-time motherhood. Gender & Society, 21(3), 337-358. doi: 10.1177/0891243207300561 Hallstein, D. L. O. (2010). Public choices, private control: How mediated mom labels work rhetorically to dismantle the politics of choice and white second wave feminism successes. S. Hayden ve D. L. O. Hallstein (Ed.), Contemplating maternity in an era of choice: Explorations into discourses of reproduction içinde (s. 5-26). New York: Lexington Books. O’Reilly, A. (Ed.) (2007). Maternal theory: Essential readings. Toronto: Demeter Press. OECD (2017). Starting Strong 2017: Key OECD Indicators on Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264276116-en OECD (2018a). OECD Family Database. Paris: OECD Erişim adresi: http://www.oecd.org/social/family/database.htm Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018b). OECD Employment Database. Paris: OECD. Erişim adresi: http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm Pickert, K. (2012). The man who remade motherhood. Time, 179(20), 32-39. Rich, A. (1977). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. London: Virago. Risman, B. J. (1998). Gender as structure. Gender vertigo: American families in transition içinde (s. 292-299). Erişim adresi: http://users.clas.ufl.edu/kristinjoos/sum03/wst3015/risman.pdf Rothman, B. K. (1989). Recreating motherhood: Ideology and technology in a patriarchal society. New York: WW Norton &Company. Rothman, B. K. (1994). Beyond mothers and fathers: Ideology in a patriarchal society. N. E. Glenn, G. Chang, ve R. L. Forcey (Ed.), Mothering: Ideology, Experience, and Agency içinde (s. 139-157). New York and London: Routledge. Walby, S. (1990). Theorising patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.