Analysis of Deep Perceptions of Distance Education System Within The Framework of The Phenomenology of Gender

Yıl 2019, , 349 - 373, 31.12.2019

Başak Kalkan , Gülfem Gürses

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.672858

Cited By: 1

Öz

This study, which was intended to measure the metaphorical perception levels of the female and male students enrolled to the Open University System, was structured according to the ZMET technique. In view of the research findings, ZMET test’s deep metaphors of balance, transformation, journey, container, control were analyzed according to the students’ variables of gender and place of residence. The chosen metaphors and in-depth analyses, on the other hand, reveal that, both women’s and men’s learning is re-structured also within the dichotomy of practice and theory. The theory-centric responses received from the women, and men’s responses oriented to application and distribution of knowledge put forth the necessity to take the gender difference into consideration while designing the educational contents.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gender, Metaphor Analysis

Kaynakça

• Balmer J.M.T. (1998). Corporate Identity and the Advent of Corporate Marketing, Journal of Marketing Management.Accessed.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1362/026725798784867536?needAccess=true. 07/08/2019. Chodorow, N. (2012). Family Structure and Femine Personality, Feminist TheoraticalInsights. Accessed. http://www.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=RjdsdXRYvOkC&oi=fnd&pg=PA81&dq=chodorow&ots=PKwEWLApjU&sig=sd2x104_-H3hySgC4CdGhEEW99s&rediresc=y#v=onepage&q=chodorow&f=false. 20/09/2019. Coulter, R. A. & Zaltman, G. & Coulter, K. S. (2001). Interpreting Consumer Perceptions of Advertising: An Application of the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique, Journal of Advertising, Volume XXX, Number. Demiray, E. & Curabay, S. (2000). Distance Education for Women’s Development: A Case Study at Anadolu University, Turkey. ss.23-33. Malaysia, December-2000, Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 2(2), ISSN 1511-6433. Güloğlu, B. & Karaırmak, Ö. (2012). Metafor: Danışan ve Psikolojik Danışman Arasındaki Köprü, Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi 2012, 4 (37), 122-135. Gürses, G. & Kalkan, B.(2013). "Towards The Field of a Transformative Education:An Evaluation of The Second University Students at Anadolu University in Terms Of Gender" wojde.org (International Women Online Journal of Distance Education) ISSN 2147-0367, Volume 2, Number 2, Artical:06, pp.67-81 April. Gürses, G. & Adar, B. (2017). “Reading Open Education In The Age Of Mankind: Reproduciton Of Meaning In The Derridean Sense” Eskişehir/Turkey, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE January 2017 ISSN 1302-6488 Volume: 18 Number: 1: Anadolu University. İşman, A. (2011). Uzaktan Eğitim, Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Levi-Strauss, C. (1996). Yaban Düşünce, Translate: T. Yüksel, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları Karaahmet, B. (2012). Kurumsal İletişimde Metafor. İstanbul: Beta Basım. Karadeniz, A.(2017). Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenmede Cinsiyet Boyutu. Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenmede Bireysel Farklılıklar. Ed. T. Volkan Yüzer. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yaınları. pp.136-147. Keneş, Ç. H. (2016). Metaforun Ayrımcı Hegemonyanın İnşasındaki Rolü: Suriyelilerin Haberleştirilmesinde Metafor Kullanımı, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences (http://jss.gantep.edu.tr) 2016 15(2):253-280 ISSN: 2149-5459.
• Melewar, T. C. (2003). “Determinants of the corporate identity construct: a review of the literature’’, Journal of Marketing Communications, Sayı: 9, s. 195-220, (2003). Çeviren: Araş. Gör. Zeliha Hepkon, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi. Accessed.http://acikerisim.ticaret.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11467/228/M00059.pdf?sequence=1 07/08/2019. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Patterson, N. (2009). Distance Education: A Perspective from Women’s Studies, Accessed. http://journals.sfu.ca/thirdspace/index.php/journal/issue/view/9-1 10/09/2019. Onur, B. (2012). Psikanaliz Kuramda Kadın. Accessed. http:// dergiler.ankara. edu.tr/dergiler/ 40/ /6077 .pdf. 01/04/2018. Savran, G. A. (2002). Özel/Kamusal, Yerel/Evrensel: İkilikleri Aşan Bir Feminizme Doğru, Praksis 8, pp. 255-306, 2002. Accessed. http://www.praksis.org/wp content/uploads/2011/07/008-09.pdf. 07/08/2019. Oppermann, S. (2008). Doğa Yazınında Beden Politikası. Accessed. http://www.littera.hacettepe.edu.tr/TURKCE/18_cilt/6.pdf. 10/09/2019. Spronk, B. & Radtke, D. (1988). Problems and Possibilities: Canadian Native Women in Distance Education. In Karlene Faith, ed. Toward New Horizons for Women in Distance Education: International Perspectives. New York: Routledge. Özbudun, S. & Şafak, B. (2005). Antropoloji: Kuramlar/ Kuramcılar, Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları, pp. 317-318. Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastirma Yontemleri. [Qualitative Analysis for Social Science] Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik. Zaltman, G. & L. Zaltman. (2008). Marketing Metaphoria: What seven deep metaphors reveal about the minds of consumers, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Publishing. Zaltman, G. & L. Zaltman. (2008). Pazarlama Metaforları, Pazarlamanın Yeni Çağında Tüketicinin Zihnini Anlamak, Çev. Ümit Şensoy, İstanbul: Optimist Yayım Dağıtım. Accessed. file:///C:/Users/pc/Downloads/2018_T107%20(1).pdf. 10/09/2019.