Kamu Sektöründe Yenilikçilik: Literatür Araştırmasına Dayalı Bir Değerlendirme

Yıl 2021, , 539 - 567, 31.12.2021

Oktay Koç , Cihan Necmi Günal

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1041312

Öz

Yenilikçilik yeni veya farklı olanı uygulama kapasitesi olarak tanımlanabilir. Özel sektör için literatürde oldukça geniş bir yer bulan bu kavramın kamu yönetimi açısından detaylı bir incelemesinin yeterince yapılmadığı ifade edilebilir. Yeni dönemde ortaya çıkan kamu değeri veya para için değer gibi veyahut yeni kamu yönetimi sonrası gibi kavram ve uygulamalar, bir noktada yenilik kadar yenilikçilik açısından da kamu yönetiminin sorumluluk üstlenmesini gerekli kılmaktadır. Yenilikçilik, kamu sektörü örgütleri tarafından anlaşılması ve uygulanması özellikle zor kavramlardan ve niteliklerden biriymiş gibi de görünmektedir. Bu nedenle mevcut çalışma, yenilikçiliğin bir yandan yenilik temelinde etraflı bir takdimini yaparken, bir yandan da bir araştırma gündemi oluşturma bakımından mesafe almaya yönelmiştir. Bu kapsamda yenilikçiliğin kavramsal karşılıkları, onu teşvik eden ve engelleyen etmenler ile ölçülmesi gibi konularda literatür incelemesine dayalı olarak etraflı enformasyon sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yenilik, Yenilikçilik, yenilikçiliği teşvik eden ve engelleyen etmenler, Yenilikçiliğin ölçümü

Kaynakça

• ARC (2013). Innovation in the Public Sector: State-of-the-Art Report . ARC Group: Sofia
• Bartos, S. (2003). “Creating and Sustaining Innovation". Australian Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 62(1). ss. 9-14
• Bason C. (2010). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society. Policy Press: Bristol
• Birleşmiş Milletler/UN (2012). Innovations in the Public Sector. https://publicadministration.un.org/publications/content/PDFs/E-Library%20Archives/2005%20Innovations%20in%20the%20Public%20Sector%20Compendium%20of%20Best%20Practices.pdf (12/04/2020)
• Bloch, C. (2011). Measuring public innovation in the Nordic countries (MEPIN).
• www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:707193/FULLTEXT01.pdf (05/04/2020)
• Borins S.(2001). ”Encouraging innovation in the public sector.” Journal of Intellectual Capital. Vol. 2(3). s. 310-319.
• Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
• Brettel, M., Chomik, C., ve Flatten, T. C. (2015). How organizational culture influences innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk‐taking: Fostering entrepreneurial orientation in SMEs. Journal of small business management, 53(4), 868-885.
• Casanueva, C. ve Gallego, Á. (2010). Social capital and individual innovativeness in university research networks. Innovation, 12(1), 105-117.
• Chang, S. C., Chiang, C. Y., Chu, C. Y. ve Wang, Y. B. (2006). The study of social capital, organizational learning, innovativeness, intellectual capital, and performance. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning.
• Crespell, P. J. (2007). Organizational climate and innovativeness in the forest products industry. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/3f462765v (14/06/2021).
• Cubuk S.B.E., Karkin N. ve Yavuz N. (2019). “Public sector innovativeness and public values through information and communication technologies”. dg.o 2019: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. June 2019. ss. 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325112.3325215
• Currie G., Humphreys M., Ucbasaran D. ve McManus S. (2008). “Entrepreneurial Leadership in the English Public Sector: Paradox or Possibility?”. Public Administration. Vol: 86(4). Pp. 987-1008
• Damanpour F., ve Schneider M. (2009). “Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Vol: 19. ss. 495-522.
• Dai, L., Maksimov, V., Gilbert, B. A. ve Fernhaber, S. A. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation and international scope: The differential roles of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 511-524.
• De Vries H., Bekkers V. ve Tummers L. (2015). “Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda”. Public Administration. ss. 1-21
• Denhardt, R. B., Denhardt, J. V. ve Blanc, T. A. (2013). Public administration: An action orientation. Cengage Learning.
• Denhardt, R. B. (2014). Theories of public organization. Cengage Learning.
• Deshpandé, R. ve Farley, J. U. (2004). Organizational culture, market orientation, innovativeness, and firm performance: an international research odyssey. International Journal of research in Marketing, 21(1), 3-22.
• Diefenbach, F. E. (2011). Entrepreneurship in the public sector. In Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector (pp. 31-64). Gabler.
• Dolfsma, W. ve Van der Velde, G. (2014). Industry innovativeness, firm size, and entrepreneurship: Schumpeter Mark III?. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(4), 713-736.
• Europen Commission (AB Komisyonu). (2020). European Innovation Scoreboard https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/innovation/scoreboards_en . (15/05/2021).
• European Commission. (2003). Innobarometer 2002: innovative European business managers build on skills and dynamic markets. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_03_373. (15/04/2020).
• Feiock R. C. ve West J. P. (1993). “Testing Competing Explanations For Policy Adoption: Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Programs.” Political Research Quarterly Vol:46(2). ss. 399-419.
• Feller I. (1981). “Public-sector Innovation as “Conspicuous Consumption””. Policy Analysis. Vol: 7(1). ss. 1–20.
• Ferrari, F. (2019). Does too much love hinder innovation? Family involvement and firms’ innovativeness in family-owned Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs). European Journal of Family Business, 9(2), 115-127.
• Ferraris A., Santoro G. ve Pellicelli C.A. (2020). “”Openness” of public governments in smart cities: removing the barriers for innovation and entrepreneurship”. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00651-4
• Fuglsang, L. (2010). Bricolage and invisible innovation in public service innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics. 1(5), 67-87.
• Gadot V.A. , Shoham A., Schwabasky N. ve Ruvio A. (2005). “Public Sector Innovation for the Managerial and the Post- Managerial Era: Promises And Realities in a Globalizing Public Administration”. International Public Management Journal. Vol: 8(1), ss. 57-81
• Gadot E. V-., Shoham A., Ruvio A. ve Schwabsky N. (2006). Report on the Publin surveys . Publin Report No. D17. Oslo: NIFU STEP. www.aviana.com/step/publin/reports/d17wp3survey.pdf (05/04/2020)
• Garcia R. ve Calantone R. (2002). “A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review”. The Journal of Product Innovation Management Vol: 19. ss. 110-132
• Gray V. (1973). “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study”. The American Political Science Review. Vol: 67(4). s. 1174-1185
• Grady O.D. (1992). “Promoting innovations in the public sector”. Public Productivity and Management Review. Vol: XVI(2). ss. 157-171
• Green L., Howells J., Miles I. (2001). Services and Innovation: Dynamics of Service Innovation in the European Union. Final Report. PREST and CRIC University of Manchester
• Goldsmith, R. E. ve Foxall, G. R. (2003). The measurement of innovativeness. The international handbook on innovation, 321-330.
• Gökçe S.G. (2015). “Kamuda İnovasyon ve Türkiye’deki Uygulamaları”. Journal of International Management and Social Researches. 2(3) ss. 28-37
• Güngör G. ve Göksu A. (2013). “Kamu Kurumlarında İnovasyon Uygulaması: Türkiye Örneği”. https://www.isites.info/PastConferences/ISITES2013/ISITES2013/papers/ISITES13246.pdf
• Hall J. L. (2007). “Informing State Economic Development Policy in the New Economy: A Theoretical Foundation and Empirical Examination of State Innovation in the United States.”. Public Administration Review. Vol:67(4). ss. 630-645.
• Halvorsen, T., Hauknes, J., Miles, I., ve Roste, R. (2005). On the differences between public and private sector innovation. Publin Report No. D9. Oslo: NIFU STEP. www.aviana.com/step/publin/reports/d9differences.pdf (05/04/2020)
• Herbig, P. A. ve Miller, J. C. (1991). The effect of culture upon innovativeness: A comparison of United States and Japan sourcing capabilities. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 3(3), 7-53.
• Hjelmar U. (2019). “The institutionalization of public sector innovation”. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1665702
• Hollanders H., Arundel A., Buligescu B., Peter V., Roman L., Simmonds P. ve Es-Sadki N. (2013). European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard 2013 - A pilot exercise -. European Union: Belgium
• Hughes A., Moore K. ve Kataria N. (2011). Innovation in Public Sector Organisations: A pilot survey for measuring innovation across the public sector. NESTA Index report. London: NESTA
• Hurley R.F. ve Hult G.T.M. (1998). “Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: integration and empirical examination". Journal of Marketing. Vol: 62 (3). ss. 42-54.
• Hyrsky, K. ve Tuunanen, M. (1999). Innovativeness and risk-taking prospensity: A cross-cultural study of Finnish and US entrepreneurs and small business owners. Liiketaloudellinen aikakauskirja, 238-256.
• Innovation Barometer. (2020). Cophenagen Manual. https://www.innovationbarometer.org/copenhagen-manual/ (14/05/2021).
• Kreiser, P. M. Ve Davis, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The unique impact of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. Journal of small business & entrepreneurship, 23(1), 39-51.
• Kelly G., Mulgan G. ve Muers S. (2002). Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. Discussion paper prepared by the Cabinet Office Strategy Unit. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100407164622/http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/strategy/seminars/public_value.aspx (11/04/2020)
• Kim Y. (2010). “Stimulating Entrepreneurial Practices in the Public Sector: The Roles of Organizational Characteristics”. Administration & Society. Vol: 42(7). ss. 780–814
• Kim S.E. ve Chang W.G. (2009). “An empirical analysis ıf innovativeness in government: findings and implications”. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol: 75(2). Ss. 293-310
• Kimberly J. R. ve Evanisko M. J. (1981). “Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations”. The Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 24(4). ss. 689-713
• Kobylinska, U. ve Biglieri, J.V. (2015). Public sector innovativeness in Poland and in Spain–comparative analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 14(2).
• Koch P. ve Hauknes J. (2005). On innovation in the public sector – today and beyond. Publin Report No. D20. Oslo: NIFU STEP. www.aviana.com/step/publin/reports/d20-innovation.pdf (05/04/2020)
• Koch P., Cunningham P., Schwabsky N. ve Hauknes J. (2006). Summary and policy recommendations. Publin Report No. D24. Oslo: NIFU STEP. www.aviana.com/step/publin/reports/d24-summary-final.pdf (05/04/2020)
• Kozuch B. ve Malyjurek-S. K. (2013). “Inter-organizational collaboration and the public sector innovativeness-the case of Polland”. International Journal of Contemporary Management. Vol: 12(3). ss. 8-25
• Lekhi R. (2007). Public Service Innovation: A Research Report for The Work Foundation’s Knowledge Economy Programme. Manchester: Research Republic LLP
• Leon L.R., Simmonds P. ve Roman L. (2012). “Trends and Challenges in Public Sector Innovation in Europe”. http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/13181/attachments/1/translations?ref=publicdesignvault (05/04/2020)
• Lienert, I. (2009). Where does the public sector end and the private sector begin?. IMF Working Papers, 1-30.
• Lövnord A. (2015). “Innovation networks in the public sector” UMEA Universitet. Yayınlanmamış Master Tezi.
• Luk, C. L., Yau, O. H., Sin, L. Y., Alan, C. B., Chow, R. P. ve Lee, J. S. (2008). The effects of social capital and organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 589-612.
• Luke B., Verreyne L-M. ve Kerins K. (2010). “Innovative and entrepreneurial activity in the public sector: The changing face of public sector institutions”. Innovation. Vol. 12(2). ss. 138-153
• Lumpkin G. T. ve Dess G. G. (1996). “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance”. The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 21(1). s. 135-172
• Maroto A. ve Rubalcaba L. (2005). The structure and size of the public sector in an enlarged Europe. Publin Report No. D14. Oslo: NIFU STEP. www.aviana.com/step/publin/reports/d14Size.pdf (05/04/2020)
• Miles I. ve Nugrobo Y. (2013). “Microfinance and Innovation”. Innovation Policy Challenges for the 21st Century içinde Rigby J. ve Cox D.(ed.). Routledge: New York
• Moore M. H. (1995) Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. London: Harvard University Press
• Moussa M., McMurray A. ve Muenjohn N. (2018). “Innovation and Leadership in Public Sector Organizations”. Journal of Management. Vol. 10(3). ss. 14-30
• Mulgan, G. ve D. Albury (2003). “Innovation in the Public Sector” http://www.sba.oakland.edu/faculty/mathieson/mis524/ resources/readings/innovation/innovation_in_the_public_sector.pdf Normann R. (1971). “Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation”. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 16 (2). ss. 203-215
• Nystrom, P. C., Ramamurthy, K. ve Wilson, A. L. (2002). Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology. Journal of engineering and technology management, 19(3-4), 221-247. OECD (2012). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012. OECD Publishing: Paris
• OECD (2015) The Innovation Imperative in the Public Sector: Setting and Agenda for Action. OECD Publishing: Paris
• Osborne, D. (1993). “Reinventing government”. Public Productivity & Management Review. Vol. 16(4). ss. 349-356.
• Ossi P., Shoham A., Wincent J. ve Ruvio A.A. (2013). “How a learning orientation affects drivers of innovativeness and performance in service delivery”. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. Vol: 30. ss. 169-187
• Pandey S., Pandey S. K ve Miller L. (2016). “Measuring Innovativeness of Public Organizations: Using Natural Language Processing Techniques”. International Public Management Journal. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1143424
• Pater, R. ve Lewandowska, A. (2015). Human capital and innovativeness of the European Union regions. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(1), 31-51.
• Perry, J. L. ve Buckwalter, N. D. (2010). The public service of the future. Public Administration Review, 70, s238-s245.
• Pucetaite R. ve Novelskaite A. (2014). “The Effect of Leader-Member Exchange on Organizational Innovativeness: Findings a Lithuanian Public Sector Organization”. Economy&Business. Vol: 8. ss. 159-171
• Rice, T. M. ve A. F. Sumberg. (1997). “Civic Culture and Government Performance in the American States.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism. Vol: 27(1). ss. 99-114. Riivari E., Lamsa M.-A., Kujala J. Ve Heiskanen E. (2012). ”The ethical culture of organisations and organisational innovativeness”. European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol: 15(3). ss. 310-331
• Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
• Roste R. (2005). Studies of innovation in the public sector, a theoretical framework. Publin Report No: D16, Oslo: NIFU STEP. http://www.aviana.com/step/publin/reports/d16litteraturesurvey.pdf (05/04/2020)
• Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements. Journal of business research, 57(6), 671-677.
• Roessner J. D. (1977). “Incentives to Innovate in Public and Private Organizations”. Administration and Society. Vol: 9 (3). s. 341-365
• Ruvio A. A., Shoham A., Gadot V. E., ve Schwabsky N. (2013). “Organizational Innovativeness: Construct Development and Cross-Cultural Validation”. Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol: 31(5). ss. 1-19
• Salge O.T. ve Vera A. (2009). “Hospital innovativeness and organizational performance: Evidence from English public acute care”. Health Care Management Review. Vol: 34(1). Ss. 54-67
• Santos-Rodrigues, H., Dorrego, P. F. ve Jardon, C. F. (2010). The influence of human capital on the innovativeness of firms. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 9(9).
• Schneider M. (2007). “Do Attributes of Innovative Administrative Practices Influence Their Adoption?: An Exploratory Study of U.S. Local Government”. Public Performance & Management Review. Vol. 30(4). ss. 598-622
• Schneider M. (2007). “Do Attributes of Innovative Administrative Practices Influence Their Adoption?: An Exploratory Study of US Local Government.”. Public Performance & Management Review. Vol: 30(4). ss. 598-622.
• K. (2012). “Public Sector Innovation in Austria Contribution to the INNO Policy Trendchart: Trends and Challenges in Public Sector Innovation in Europe”. www.researchgate.net/publication/281371436_Public_Sector_Innovation_in_Austria_Contribution_to_the_ INNO_Policy_Trendchart_Trends_and_Challenges_in_Public_Sector_Innovation_in_Europe (05/04/2020)
• Schultz, C., Zippel-Schultz, B. ve Salomo, S. (2012). Hospital innovation portfolios: Key determinants of size and innovativeness. Health care management review, 37(2), 132-143.
• Schwabsky N., Gadot V. E., Shoham A. ve Ruvio A. (2004). “Towards a Performance Orientation Measurement Grid: The Impact of Innovativeness and Organizational Learning on Organizational Performance in the Public Sector”. European Group of Public Administration (EGPA) Meeting. Ljubljana-Slovenia
• Schwartz, M. S. (2002). A code of ethics for corporatecode of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1), 27-43.
• Seaden G. ve Manseau A. (2001). “Public policy and construction innovation”. Building Research & Information. Vol: 29(3). ss. 182-196
• Staniewski, M. (2011). Management of human resources in the aspect of innovativeness. Contemporary Economics, 5(1).
• Staronova K. ve Malikova L. (2008). “Learning to innovate in a transition country: developing quality standards for elderly residential care in Slovakia”. Innovation in Public Sector Services içinde (Windrum P. ve Koch P. Ed). Glos: Edward Elgar
• Strumpf S.K. (2002). “Does Government Decentralization Increase Policy Innovation?”. Journal of Public Economic Theory. Vol: 4(2). ss. 207–241.
• Shoham A. Ruvio A. Vigoda E. ve Schwabasky N. (2003). Organizational innovativeness in the public sector: towards a nomological network. European Group of Public Administration (EGPA) Meeting. Oeiras, Portugal
• Subramanian A. ve Nilakanta S. (1996). “Organizational Innovativeness: Exploring the Relationship Between Organizational Determinants of Innovation, Types of Innovations, and Measures of Organizational Performance”. Omega, International Journal of Management Science. Vol: 24 (6). ss. 631-647
• Şengül R. (2015). Yerel Yönetimler. Umuttepe Kitapevi: Kocaeli
• Tajeddini K. (2014). “Analyzing the influence of learning orientation and innovativeness on performance of public organizations”. Journal of Management Development. Vol: 36(2). ss. 134-153
• Tavits M. (2006). “Making Democracy Work More? Exploring the Linkage between Social Capital and Government Performance.”. Political Research Quarterly. Vol: 59(2). ss.211-225.
• Terry L. D. (1998). “Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement”. Public Administration Review. Vol. 58 (3). pp. 194-200
• Virtanen P. ve Tammeaid M. (2020). “Complex Society as a Framework of the New Public Sector Leadership Rationale”. Developing Public Sector Leadership içinde (Virtanen P. ve Tammeaid M. Ed.). Cham: Springer
• Wang L.C. ve Ahmad K. P. (2004). “The Development and Validation of the Organizational Innovativeness Construct Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis”. European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol: 7(4). ss. 303-313.
• Walker J.L. (1969). “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States”. The American Political Science Review. Vol. 63(3). ss. 880-899
• Walker R., Jeanes E. ve Rowlands R. (2002). “Measuring Innovation- Applying the Literature-Based Innovation Output Indicator to Public Services”. Public Administration Vol. 80(1). ss. 201–214
• Walker R.M. (2006). “Innovation Type And Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis Of Local Government”. Public Administration.Vol: 84(2). ss. 311-335
• Windrum P. ve Koch P. (2008) Innovation in Public Sector Services: Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management. Edward Elgar Publishing: Chethenham
• Zaheer, A. ve Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic management journal, 26(9), 809-825.