KÖTÜ İDAREDEN İDARİ KÖTÜLÜĞE: İDAREDE KÖTÜLÜĞE MANİ OLMANIN İMKANI ÜZERİNE

Yıl 2018, Sayı: 1, 57 - 79, 31.12.2018

Oktay Koç

Öz

Özce insanların yanlış bir şeyler yaptıklarının “farkında
olmadan” kötücül davranışlara kalkışmaları olarak tanımlanabilecek idari kötülük
(administrative evil) olgusunu merkezine alarak bu çalışma, idari kötülüğe mani
olmanın imkanını mevcut literatürün taranmasına dayanarak tartışmak üzere hazırlanmıştır.
Yapılan incelemede aktif ve pesi olmak üzere idari kötülüğün iki farklı tipi
olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Neticede idari kötülüğe mani olmak açısından, güçlü ve
diyaloğu geliştiren bir liderlik modeline gereksinim olduğu, cesaretin ve konuşmanın
teşvik edilmesi gerektiği, normatif ve sosyal baskıların yumuşatılması gerektiği,
aşırı profesyonelleşmenin risklerinin farkında olunması gerektiği, aktif yurttaşlığın
ve dürüst medyanın desteklenmesi gerektiği belirlenmiştir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kötü idare, İdari kötülük, bürokrasi, İdari kötülüğe mani olma

Kaynakça

• ADAMS, B. Guy ve Danny L. Balfour (1998). “Unmasking Administrative Evil”, Sage: Thousand Oaks
• ADAMS, B. Guy ve Danny L. Balfour (2005). “Public service ethics and administrative evil: prospects and problems”, Ethics in Public Management, ss. 114-137
• ADAMS, B. Guy, Danny L. Balfour ve George E. Reed (2006). “Abu Gharib, Administrative Evil, and Moral Inversion: The Value of “Putting Cruelty First””, Public Administration Review, September-October 2006, ss. 680-693
• ADAMS, B. Guy (2011). “The Problem of Administrative Evil in a Culture of Technical Rationality”, Public Integrity, S.13(3), ss. 275-286
• ARGRYIS, Chris (1977). “Double Loop Learning in Organizations”, https://hbr.org/1977/09/double-loop-learning-in-organizations (19/XI/2018)
• ATKINSON, L. Christopher (2013). “reflections on Administrative Evil, Belief, and Justification in Khemer Rouge Cambodia”. SAGE Open, S. I(II), ss. 1-11
• BELLE, Nicola ve Cantarelli Paola (2017). “What Causes Unethical Behavior? A Meta-Analysis to Set an Agenda for Public Administration Research”, Public Administration Review, C.77(3), ss. 327-339
• BENTON, Mark (2018). “”Saving” the City: Harland Bartholomew and Administrative Evil in St. Louis”, Public Integrity, S. 20, ss. 194-206
• BISEL, S. Ryan ve Elissa N. Arterburn (2012). “Making Sense of Organizational Members’ Silence: A Sensemaking-Resource Model”, Communication Research Reports, C.29(3), ss. 217-226
• BOWDEN, Edgar (1976). “Maladministration: A Thematic Analysis of Nigerian Case Studies in the Context of Administrative Initiative”, Human Organization, C.35, ss. 391-394
• CAIDEN, E. Gerald (1991). “What Really Is Public Maladministration?”, Public Administration Review, C. 51(6). ss. 486-493
• CAIDEN, E. Gerald (2017). “Maladministration Revisited”, International Journal of Civil Service Reform and Practice, C.2(1), ss. 1-20
• DILLARD, F. Jesse, Linda Ruchala ve Kristi Yuthas (2005). “Enterprise resource planning systems: A physical manifestation of administrative evil”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, S: 6, ss. 107-127
• DILLARD, F. Jesse ve Linda Ruchala (2005). “The rules are no game: From instrumental rationality to administrative evil”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, C. 18(5), ss.608-630
• DILLARD, F. Jesse ve Linda Ruchala (2011). “Veblen’s Placebo: Another Historical Perspective on Administrative Evil”. The Accounting Historians Journal, C. 38(1), s. 1-29
• DIMOCK, E. Marshall (1937). “The Study of Administration”, The American Political Science Review, C. 3(1), ss.28-40
• DRUCKER, Peter (1980). “The Deadly Sins in Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, C.40 (2), ss. 103-106
• DUBNICK, J. Melvin (2000). “Spirited Dialogue: The Case for Administrative Evil: A Critique”, Public Administration Review, C.60(5), ss.464-482
• EKEN, Musa ve Ferruh Tuzcuoğlu (2005). “Kötü Yönetimi Tedavi Etmek”, www.etiksempozyumu.sakarya.edu.tr/tammetin.htm (18/XI/2018)
• FINER, Herman (1941). “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government”, Public Administration Review, C. 1(4). ss. 335-350
• FRIEDLAND, Roger ve Roger F. Alford (1991). “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions”, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Editör: W.W. Powel ve P.J. DIMAGGIO, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
• GOULDNER, W. Alvin (1955). “Metaphysical Pathos and the Theory of Bureaucracy”, The American Political Science Review, C. 49(2), ss. 496-507
• Habertürk (2018). www.haberturk.com/kizil-kmerler-40yil-sonra-soykirimdan-suclu-bulundu-2223331 (18/XI/2018)
• HALL, H. Richard (1963). “The Concept of Bureaucracy: An Empirical Assessment”, American Journal of Sociology, C.69(1), ss.32-40
• ISTWANY, Muji, Abdul Razak, Slamet Sampurno ve Hamzah Halim (2017). “Maladministration as Doctor Medical Malpractice: A Health Law Perspective in Indonesia”, Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, C.67, ss.167-173
• MARSHALL, Geoffrey (1975). “Technique of Maladministration”, Political Studies, C. XXIII (2-3), ss. 305-310
• MILLEY, Peter (2017). “Maladministration in Education: Towards a Typology Based on Public Records in Canada”, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, May 2016, ss. 1-18
• MILLIKEN, J. Frances ve Wolfe E. Morrison (2003). “Shades of Silence: Emerging Themes and Future Directions for Research on Silence in Organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, C.40(6), ss.1563-1568
• MORENO-RIANO, Gerson (2001). “The Etiology of Administrative Evil”. American Review of Public Administration, C. 31, ss. 296-312
• MORRISON, E. Wolfe ve Frances J. Milliken (2000). “Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World”, Academy of Management Review, C.25(4), ss.706-725
• MORRISON, E. Wolfe ve Frances J. Milliken (2003). “Speaking Up, Remaining Silent: The Dynamics of Voice and Silence in Organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, C.40(6), ss.1353-1358
• OLSEN, P. Johan (2005). “Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, C:16, ss.1-24
• PONCE, Juli (2005). “Good Administration and Administrative Procedures”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, C.12(2), ss. 551-588
• PRESTON-SHOOT, Michael (2011). “On administrative evil-doing within social work policy and services: law, ethics and practice”, European Journal of Social Work, C.14(2), ss.177-194
• PRESSLEY, L. Cindy ve Noel E. Michael (2014). “Emotional Labor as Carnivalesque Behavior: Avoiding Administrative Evil in the Public Space”, International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, C.17(2), ss. 199-216
• REED, E. George (2012). “Leading Questions: Leadership, ethics, and administrative evil”. Leadership, C.8(2), ss. 187-198
• SAMIER, Eugene (2008). “The Problem of Passive Evil in Educational Administration: Moral Implications of Doing Nothing”, ISEA, C. 36(1), ss. 2-21
• SYKES, J.B. (1982). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• ŞENGÜL, Ramazan (2005). “Ombudsman Kurumu Kötü Yönetime Çare Olabilir mi?”, www.etiksempozyumu.sakarya.edu.tr/tammetin.htm (18/XI/2018)
• THOMAS, Sheena (2016). “A Critical Analysis of Controls on Maladministration and Corruption in India”, International Journal of Legal Insight, C.I(1), ss.31-46
• TSCHUDI, Finn (2008). “A Comment on Adams and Balfour: Dignity Violations, an Alternative View of ‘Administrative Evil’”, Public Administration, C.86(4), ss. 895-903
• UDY, H. Jr. Stanley (1959). “”Bureaucracy” and “Rationality” in Weber’s Organization Theory: An Empirical Study”, American Sociological Review, C.24, ss.791-795
• VIEG, A.John (1946). “Bureaucracy-Fact and Fiction” in Elements of Public Administration, Editör: Fritz Morstein Marx, New York
• WHEARE, K.C. (1973). Maladministration and Its Remedies. Stevens&Sons: London
• WILSON, Woodrow (1887). “The Study of Administration”, Political Science Quarterly, C. 2(2), ss. 197-222
• ZANETTI, A. Lisa ve Guy B. Adams (2000). “In Service of the Leviathan: Democracy, Ethics and the Potential for Administrative Evil in the New Public Management”, Administrative Theory&Praxis, S. 22(3), ss. 534-554
• www.ombudsman.europa.eu (18/XI/2018)