Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Fideleme Çeltik Üretiminde Farklı Yetiştirme Ortamlarının Fide Gelişimine Etkisi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3, 386 - 397, 12.10.2021
https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.908234

Öz

Dünya da iklimsel değişikliklerden dolayı; sulama suyundan tasarruf sağlamak, uzun vejatasyon süresine sahip çeşitler ile birim alan verimini artırmak ve hastalık zararlı mücadelesinde kimyasal girdileri azaltmak amacıyla fideleme ekim yöntemi ön plana çıkmaktadır. Fideleme çeltik üretiminde başarılı olmanın temel unsuru sağlıklı ve kaliteli fide yetiştirmektir. Makineli fideleme için, özel viyol ortamında yetiştiricilik yapılması gereklidir. Viyollerde çeltik fidesi için, bitki besin maddelerince zengin ve ekonomik özel harçların hazırlanması gerekmektedir. Bu araştırmada, 20 farklı harç ortamı ve 3 çeltik çeşidi (Baldo, Vasco ve Tosya Güneşi) kullanılmıştır. 2020 yılında Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tarımsal Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezine ait ısıtmasız polietilen serasında, tesadüf parsellerinde 4 tekerrürlü olarak yürütülmüştür. Fide kalitesinin belirlenmesi amacıyla fideler ekimden itibaren 21 gün sonra fide uzunluğu, fide gövdesi çapı, yaprak sayısı, kök uzunluğu, kök sayısı, toprak üstü ve kök yaş ağırlığı, toprak üstü ve kök kuru madde oranı değerleri incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, incelenen fide kalite özellikleri üzerine kullanılan farklı ortam haçlarının, çeşitlerin ve ortam x çeşit kombinasyonlarının etkisi istatistiki olarak çok önemli çıkmıştır. Fide uzunluğu 68.39 ile 218.19 mm, yaprak sayısı 2.0 ile 4.0 adet, kök uzunluğu 16.95 ile 98.35 mm, kök sayısı 4.25 ile 10.75 adet, gövde çapı 0.97 ile 2.64 mm, toprak üstü aksam yaş ağırlığı 5.40 ile 131.55 mg, kök yaş ağırlığı 3.03 ile 104.28 mg, toprak üstü aksam kuru madde oranı %5.95 ile 27.42 ve kök kuru madde oranı %1.37 ile 15.13 arasında değişmiştir. Yapılan biplot analiz sonucunda Vasco çeşidi ile 13 ve 18 numaralı ortamlar ön plana çıkmaktadır. Farklı materyaller, ekonomik ve ekolojik bakımdan yetiştirme ortamı olarak değerlendirildiğinde 20 ortam içerisinde en iyi fide kalitesi 13. ortamda ön plana çıkmıştır. Ayrıca 18. ve 19. ortamlar alternatif olarak kullanılabilecektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Abou-Khadrah, S.H., Abo-Youssef, M.I., Hafez, E.M. Rehan A.A., 2014. Effect of planting methods and sowing dates on yield and yield attributes of rice varieties under D.U.S. experiment. Scientia Agriculturae, 8(3): 133-139. https://doi.org/10.15192/2014.4.3.133139
  • Akay, H., Sezer, İ., Mut, Z., Sirat, A., 2013. Organik fideleme çeltik yetiştiriciliğinde fide gelişimi ve kalitesi üzerine yetiştirme ortamlarinin etkisi. Türkiye V. Organik Tarım Sempozyumu, Cilt 1, 343-347, 25-27 Eylül, Samsun.
  • Atak, M., Kaya, M.D., Kıllı, Y.G., Çiftçi, C.Y., 2006. Effects of NaCI on the Germination seedling growth and water uptake of triticale. Turkish Journal Agriculture Forestry, 30: 39-47.
  • Atılgan, N.G., Tolay, İ., 2008. Beş tritikale çeşidinde çinkonun bazi fide özelliklerine etkisi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1): 65-74.
  • Birhane, A., 2013. Effect of planting methods on yield and yield components of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in tahtay koraro wereda northern Ethiopia, Internatıonal Journal of Technology Enhancements and Emergıng Engıneerıng Research. 1(5): 2347-4289
  • Böhm, W., 1979. Methods of studying root systems. Springer D. Verlag. Berlin.
  • Davies, W.J., Mansfield, T.A., Hetherington, A.M. 1990. Sensing of soil water status and the regulation of plant growth and development. Plant Cell Environ. 13: 709-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13653040.1990.tb01085.x
  • De Datta, S.K. 1981. Principles and practise of rice production. The İnt. Rice Research Institute. The Philippines.
  • Elekçioğlu, İ.H., Tülek, A. 2009. Çeltik beyaz uç nematodu. 1. Çeltik Sempozyumu. s. 39-48 24 – 25 Eylül. Tekirdağ.
  • Faghani, R., Mobasser, H.R., Dehpor, A.A., Kochaksarai, S.T., 2011. The effect of planting date and seedling age on yield and yield components of rice (Oryza sativa l.) varieties in north of iran. African Jour. of Agr. Res., 6(11): 2571-2575.
  • Farmia, A. 2008. Development of organic rice farming in a rural area, bantul regency, yogyakarta special region province. Indonesia. Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture. 3: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.11178/jdsa.3.135
  • Horie, T., Shiraiwa, T., Homma, K., Maeda, Y., Yoshida, H. 2005. Can yields of lowland rice resume the increases that they showed in the 1980s? Plant Production Science. 8: 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.259
  • Inayatullah, A., Aliza, H.K., Chaundhry, F.M. 1989. Comparative study of direct seeding and transplanting methods on the grain yield of rice. Rice Abs.. 1992. 17:3.
  • IRRI. 2002. Rice almanac. 3rd end. LS Baños. Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
  • JMP. 2007. JMP User Guide. Release 7 Copyright© 2007. SAS Institute Inc. Cary. NC.
  • Karaköy, T., Baloch, F.S., Toklu, F., Özkan, H. 2014. Variation for selected morphological and quality-related traits among 178 faba bean landraces collected from Turkey. Plant Genetic Resources. 12(1): 5-13.
  • Kim, C.K., Chol, M.G., Lee, S.Y., Jun, B.T. 1991. Studies on direct sowing rice in dry paddy in honam area. 2. effect of sowing methods on growth and yield of rice. Rice Abs. 1992. 15: 4.
  • Kitagawa, H., Shiratsuchi, H., Ogura, A.2004. Effect of seeding rate on the growth and quality of rice seedlings in the long-mat seedling culture system. In: 4th International Crop Science Congress, 132-138, 26 Sep - 1 Oct., Australia.
  • Kumar, R., Bhushan, B., Pal, R., Gaurav, S.S. 2014. correlation and path coefficient analysis for quantitative traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under normal condition. Annals of Agri-Bio Research. 19(3): 447-450.
  • Kundu, D.K., Rao, K.V., Pillai, K.G. 1993. Comparative yield and n uptake in six transplanted and direct seeded lowland rices. Rice Abs., 17:3.
  • Manjunatha, M.V., Masthana, R.B.G., Shashidhar, S.D., Joshi, V.R. 2009. Studies on the performance of self-propelled rice transplanter and its effect on crop yield. Karnataka J. Agric. Science. 22 (2): 385-387.
  • Matsuo, T., Hoshikawa, K. 1993. Science of the rice plant: Morphology. Food and Agriculture Policy Research Centre. Tokyo. 123–132.
  • Matsushima, S. 1980. Rice cultivation for the millions. Japan Scientific Societies Press. Tokyo. 1-276.
  • McKee, J.M.T. 1981. Physiological aspects of transplanting vegetables and other crops. I. Factors which influence re-establishment. Hort. Abst. 51:265-272.
  • Mitchell, J., Fukai, S., Basnayake, J. 2004. Grain yield of direct seeded and transplanted rice in rainfed lowlands of South East Asia. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, 958-963. 26 Sep-1 Oct, Australia.
  • Mut, Z., Akay, H. 2010. Effect of seed size and drought stress on germination and seedling growth of naked oat (Avena sativa L.). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 16(4): 459-467.
  • Pın, S., Chuon, S., Sok, V., Len, T. 2012. Effects of transplanting methods on yield of different rice varieties under sandy soil conditions. International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development. 3(1): 122-132.
  • Pirdashti, H., Sarvestani, Z.T., Mohammad, A.B. 2009. Comparison of physiological responses among four contrast rice cultivars under drought stress conditions. Research Gate. 1-6.
  • Randriamiharisoa, R., Uphoff, N. 2002. Factorial trials evaluating the separate and combined effects of sri practices. In assessments of the system of rice intensification (SRI): Proceedings of an Int. Conference, 40–46, 1–4 April, China.
  • Sezer, İ., Akay, H., Mut, Z., Öner, F. 2011. Karadeniz Bölgesinde çeltik tarımı ve sorunları. I. Ulusal Ali Numan Kıraç Tarım Kongresi ve Fuarı, Cilt III, 2317-2325, 27-30 Nisan,Eskişehir.
  • Sezer, İ., Şenocak, H., Akay, H. 2017. Bazı çeltik çeşitlerinde fideleme ve serpme ekim yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi. 20: 292-296. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksudobil.349263
  • Sistani, K.R., Reddy, K.C. 1997. Effect of rice hull ash silicon on rice seedling growth. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 20(1): 195 – 201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169709365242
  • TeKrony, D.M., Egli, D.B. 1991. Relationship of seed vigour to crop yield: a review. Crop Science. 31: 816–822.
  • Yamamoto, Y., Ikejir,i A., Nitta, Y. 1995. Characteristics of rooting and leaf emergence rate. early growth and heading date of rice seedlings with different plant age in leaf number. Japanese Journal of Crop Science. 64: 556–564.
  • Yan, W. Tinker, N.A. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environ¬ment trial data: principles and applications. Journal Plant Science. 86: 623–645.

The Effect of Different Growing Environments on Seedling Development in Transplanting Paddy Production

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3, 386 - 397, 12.10.2021
https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.908234

Öz

In the world, the seedling planting method comes into prominence to save on irrigation water due to climatic changes, to increase the yield per unit area with lengthy vegetation varieties, and to reduce chemical input in pest and disease control. The basic element of being successful in transplanting paddy production is to grow healthy and quality seedlings. For machine transplanting, it is necessary to grow in a special viol environment. For paddy seedlings in trays, it is required to prepare special mortars rich in plant nutrients and economical. In this research, four replications were carried out in an unheated polyethylene greenhouse of Ondokuz Mayıs University Agricultural Research and Application Center in 2020 with 20 different mortar media and three paddy varieties (Baldo, Vasco and Tosya Güneşi). To determine the seedling quality, seedling length, seedling stem diameter, leaf number, root length, root number, above ground and root wet weight, above ground, and root dry matter ratio values were examined 21 days after planting. According to the research results, the effect of different medium crosses, cultivars, and environment x cultivar combinations used on the seedling quality characteristics was statistically significant. The results showed that seedling length was 68.39-218.19 mm, seedling stem diameter was 0.97-2.64 mm, number of leaves was 2.0-4.0, root length was 16.95 - 98.35, number of roots was 4.25-10.75, shoot wet weight 5.40-131.55 mg, root wet weight 3.03-104.28, shoot dry weight ratio was 5.95-27.42%, and root dry weight ratio was 1.37-15.13%. The biplot analysis results showed that the Vasco variety had the best quality of seedlings in growth media numbers 13 and 18. The evaluation of growth media's quality, economically and ecologically, showed that growth media number 13 was the best media, and media numbers 18 and 19 could be used as alternatives.

Kaynakça

  • Abou-Khadrah, S.H., Abo-Youssef, M.I., Hafez, E.M. Rehan A.A., 2014. Effect of planting methods and sowing dates on yield and yield attributes of rice varieties under D.U.S. experiment. Scientia Agriculturae, 8(3): 133-139. https://doi.org/10.15192/2014.4.3.133139
  • Akay, H., Sezer, İ., Mut, Z., Sirat, A., 2013. Organik fideleme çeltik yetiştiriciliğinde fide gelişimi ve kalitesi üzerine yetiştirme ortamlarinin etkisi. Türkiye V. Organik Tarım Sempozyumu, Cilt 1, 343-347, 25-27 Eylül, Samsun.
  • Atak, M., Kaya, M.D., Kıllı, Y.G., Çiftçi, C.Y., 2006. Effects of NaCI on the Germination seedling growth and water uptake of triticale. Turkish Journal Agriculture Forestry, 30: 39-47.
  • Atılgan, N.G., Tolay, İ., 2008. Beş tritikale çeşidinde çinkonun bazi fide özelliklerine etkisi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1): 65-74.
  • Birhane, A., 2013. Effect of planting methods on yield and yield components of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in tahtay koraro wereda northern Ethiopia, Internatıonal Journal of Technology Enhancements and Emergıng Engıneerıng Research. 1(5): 2347-4289
  • Böhm, W., 1979. Methods of studying root systems. Springer D. Verlag. Berlin.
  • Davies, W.J., Mansfield, T.A., Hetherington, A.M. 1990. Sensing of soil water status and the regulation of plant growth and development. Plant Cell Environ. 13: 709-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13653040.1990.tb01085.x
  • De Datta, S.K. 1981. Principles and practise of rice production. The İnt. Rice Research Institute. The Philippines.
  • Elekçioğlu, İ.H., Tülek, A. 2009. Çeltik beyaz uç nematodu. 1. Çeltik Sempozyumu. s. 39-48 24 – 25 Eylül. Tekirdağ.
  • Faghani, R., Mobasser, H.R., Dehpor, A.A., Kochaksarai, S.T., 2011. The effect of planting date and seedling age on yield and yield components of rice (Oryza sativa l.) varieties in north of iran. African Jour. of Agr. Res., 6(11): 2571-2575.
  • Farmia, A. 2008. Development of organic rice farming in a rural area, bantul regency, yogyakarta special region province. Indonesia. Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture. 3: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.11178/jdsa.3.135
  • Horie, T., Shiraiwa, T., Homma, K., Maeda, Y., Yoshida, H. 2005. Can yields of lowland rice resume the increases that they showed in the 1980s? Plant Production Science. 8: 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.259
  • Inayatullah, A., Aliza, H.K., Chaundhry, F.M. 1989. Comparative study of direct seeding and transplanting methods on the grain yield of rice. Rice Abs.. 1992. 17:3.
  • IRRI. 2002. Rice almanac. 3rd end. LS Baños. Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
  • JMP. 2007. JMP User Guide. Release 7 Copyright© 2007. SAS Institute Inc. Cary. NC.
  • Karaköy, T., Baloch, F.S., Toklu, F., Özkan, H. 2014. Variation for selected morphological and quality-related traits among 178 faba bean landraces collected from Turkey. Plant Genetic Resources. 12(1): 5-13.
  • Kim, C.K., Chol, M.G., Lee, S.Y., Jun, B.T. 1991. Studies on direct sowing rice in dry paddy in honam area. 2. effect of sowing methods on growth and yield of rice. Rice Abs. 1992. 15: 4.
  • Kitagawa, H., Shiratsuchi, H., Ogura, A.2004. Effect of seeding rate on the growth and quality of rice seedlings in the long-mat seedling culture system. In: 4th International Crop Science Congress, 132-138, 26 Sep - 1 Oct., Australia.
  • Kumar, R., Bhushan, B., Pal, R., Gaurav, S.S. 2014. correlation and path coefficient analysis for quantitative traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under normal condition. Annals of Agri-Bio Research. 19(3): 447-450.
  • Kundu, D.K., Rao, K.V., Pillai, K.G. 1993. Comparative yield and n uptake in six transplanted and direct seeded lowland rices. Rice Abs., 17:3.
  • Manjunatha, M.V., Masthana, R.B.G., Shashidhar, S.D., Joshi, V.R. 2009. Studies on the performance of self-propelled rice transplanter and its effect on crop yield. Karnataka J. Agric. Science. 22 (2): 385-387.
  • Matsuo, T., Hoshikawa, K. 1993. Science of the rice plant: Morphology. Food and Agriculture Policy Research Centre. Tokyo. 123–132.
  • Matsushima, S. 1980. Rice cultivation for the millions. Japan Scientific Societies Press. Tokyo. 1-276.
  • McKee, J.M.T. 1981. Physiological aspects of transplanting vegetables and other crops. I. Factors which influence re-establishment. Hort. Abst. 51:265-272.
  • Mitchell, J., Fukai, S., Basnayake, J. 2004. Grain yield of direct seeded and transplanted rice in rainfed lowlands of South East Asia. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, 958-963. 26 Sep-1 Oct, Australia.
  • Mut, Z., Akay, H. 2010. Effect of seed size and drought stress on germination and seedling growth of naked oat (Avena sativa L.). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 16(4): 459-467.
  • Pın, S., Chuon, S., Sok, V., Len, T. 2012. Effects of transplanting methods on yield of different rice varieties under sandy soil conditions. International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development. 3(1): 122-132.
  • Pirdashti, H., Sarvestani, Z.T., Mohammad, A.B. 2009. Comparison of physiological responses among four contrast rice cultivars under drought stress conditions. Research Gate. 1-6.
  • Randriamiharisoa, R., Uphoff, N. 2002. Factorial trials evaluating the separate and combined effects of sri practices. In assessments of the system of rice intensification (SRI): Proceedings of an Int. Conference, 40–46, 1–4 April, China.
  • Sezer, İ., Akay, H., Mut, Z., Öner, F. 2011. Karadeniz Bölgesinde çeltik tarımı ve sorunları. I. Ulusal Ali Numan Kıraç Tarım Kongresi ve Fuarı, Cilt III, 2317-2325, 27-30 Nisan,Eskişehir.
  • Sezer, İ., Şenocak, H., Akay, H. 2017. Bazı çeltik çeşitlerinde fideleme ve serpme ekim yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi. 20: 292-296. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksudobil.349263
  • Sistani, K.R., Reddy, K.C. 1997. Effect of rice hull ash silicon on rice seedling growth. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 20(1): 195 – 201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169709365242
  • TeKrony, D.M., Egli, D.B. 1991. Relationship of seed vigour to crop yield: a review. Crop Science. 31: 816–822.
  • Yamamoto, Y., Ikejir,i A., Nitta, Y. 1995. Characteristics of rooting and leaf emergence rate. early growth and heading date of rice seedlings with different plant age in leaf number. Japanese Journal of Crop Science. 64: 556–564.
  • Yan, W. Tinker, N.A. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environ¬ment trial data: principles and applications. Journal Plant Science. 86: 623–645.
Toplam 35 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
Yazarlar

Hasan Akay 0000-0003-1198-8686

Dursun Kurt 0000-0001-6697-3954

İsmail Sezer 0000-0002-8407-7448

Elif Öztürk Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-9723-6092

Yayımlanma Tarihi 12 Ekim 2021
Kabul Tarihi 17 Ağustos 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Akay, H., Kurt, D., Sezer, İ., Öztürk, E. (2021). The Effect of Different Growing Environments on Seedling Development in Transplanting Paddy Production. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(3), 386-397. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.908234
AMA Akay H, Kurt D, Sezer İ, Öztürk E. The Effect of Different Growing Environments on Seedling Development in Transplanting Paddy Production. ANAJAS. Ekim 2021;36(3):386-397. doi:10.7161/omuanajas.908234
Chicago Akay, Hasan, Dursun Kurt, İsmail Sezer, ve Elif Öztürk. “The Effect of Different Growing Environments on Seedling Development in Transplanting Paddy Production”. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 36, sy. 3 (Ekim 2021): 386-97. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.908234.
EndNote Akay H, Kurt D, Sezer İ, Öztürk E (01 Ekim 2021) The Effect of Different Growing Environments on Seedling Development in Transplanting Paddy Production. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 36 3 386–397.
IEEE H. Akay, D. Kurt, İ. Sezer, ve E. Öztürk, “The Effect of Different Growing Environments on Seedling Development in Transplanting Paddy Production”, ANAJAS, c. 36, sy. 3, ss. 386–397, 2021, doi: 10.7161/omuanajas.908234.
ISNAD Akay, Hasan vd. “The Effect of Different Growing Environments on Seedling Development in Transplanting Paddy Production”. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 36/3 (Ekim 2021), 386-397. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.908234.
JAMA Akay H, Kurt D, Sezer İ, Öztürk E. The Effect of Different Growing Environments on Seedling Development in Transplanting Paddy Production. ANAJAS. 2021;36:386–397.
MLA Akay, Hasan vd. “The Effect of Different Growing Environments on Seedling Development in Transplanting Paddy Production”. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 36, sy. 3, 2021, ss. 386-97, doi:10.7161/omuanajas.908234.
Vancouver Akay H, Kurt D, Sezer İ, Öztürk E. The Effect of Different Growing Environments on Seedling Development in Transplanting Paddy Production. ANAJAS. 2021;36(3):386-97.
Online ISSN: 1308-8769