Should we try closed reduction and casting treatment first for cases with developmental dysplasia of the hip beyond 18 months of age?
Year 2025,
Volume: 42 Issue: 1, 20 - 25, 28.03.2025
Şafak Sayar
,
Necdet Demir
,
Özcan Kaya
,
Hasan Ceylan
,
Cengiz Şen
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of closed reduction and casting in patients older than 18 months with developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) and to assess the success of this technique. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of DDH patients treated between March 2011 and June 2014. A total of 20 hips from 13 patients (2 boys, 11 girls) aged 18 months or older were included. Among them, 4 had right unilateral involvement, 2 had left unilateral involvement, and 7 had bilateral involvement. The mean age at treatment initiation was 19.4 months. Radiographic evaluations included the acetabular index (AI) using the Hilgenreiner method, Wiberg’s center-edge (CE) angle, acetabular angle (AA), and femoral neck-shaft angle. Hips were classified as normal, slightly dysplastic, or severely dysplastic based on Tönnis’ acetabular index table. Stable reduction was achieved in 12 hips (60%) of 8 patients with closed reduction and casting. However, 8 hips (40%) of 5 patients required acetabular osteotomy due to persistent dysplasia. Our findings suggest that closed reduction and hip spica casting should be considered for DDH in patients older than 18 months based on radiographic outcomes. However, our study is limited by a short follow-up period and a relatively small sample size. Further studies with larger cohorts and long-term follow-ups are necessary for more definitive conclusions.
References
- 1. Herring J. Developmental dysplasia of the hip. In: Tachdjian's Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2008.
- 2. Ceylan HH, Paksoy Y. İstanbul Sultangazi Bölgesi Yenidoğan Gelişimsel Kalça Displazisi Görülme Sıklığı. Med Bull Haseki. 2018;56(1):68-73.
- 3. Albinana J, Dolan LA, Riley PM, Armstrong PD, Campbell J. Acetabular dysplasia after treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Implications for secondary procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(6):876-86.
- 4. Chen IH, Kuo KN, Lubicky JP. Prognosticating factors in acetabular development following reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(1):3-8.
- 5. Weinstein SL, Mubarak SJ, Wenger DR. Developmental hip dysplasia and dislocation: Part I. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:523-30.
- 6. Song KM, Lapinsky A. Determination of hip position in the Pavlik harness. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(3):317-9.
- 7. Köse N, Ömeroğlu H, Dağlar B. Gelişimsel Kalça Displazisi Ulusal Erken Tanı ve Tedavi Programı. 2010;2-19.
- 8. Ayanoğlu S. 6-18 Ay Arası Çocuklarda Gelişimsel Kalça Displazisi ve Tedavisi. TOTBİD Dergisi. 2014;13:403-11.
- 9. Ayas MS. Gelişimsel Kalça Displazisi. Pediatrik Ortopedi-Pediatrik Kalça. İstanbul: Derman Tıbbi Yayıncılık; 2015.
p.393-400. DOI: 10.4328/DERMAN.3543
- 10. Tachdjian MO. Congenital deformities. In: Tachdjian MO, editor. Pediatric Orthopedics. Chicago: Saunders Comp; 1990. p.297-549.
- 11. Tachdjian MO. Treatment after walking age. In: Tachdjian MO, editor. Congenital dislocation of the hip. New
York: Churchill Livingstone; 1982. p.339-65.
- 12. Blockey NJ. Derotation osteotomy in the management of CDH. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66(4):485-90.
- 13. Tönnis D. Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;(119):39-47.
- 14. Berkeley M, Dickson JH, Cain TE, Donovan MM. Surgical therapy for CDH in patients who are 12-36 months old. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(3):412-20.
- 15. Ryder CT. CDH in the older child: Surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;48(7):1404-13.
- 16. Salter RB. Role of osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip in the older child. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48(7):1413-39.
- 17. Tümer T. DKÇ’de cerrahi redüksiyon. In: Ege R, editor. Kalça cerrahisi ve sorunları. Ankara: THK Basımevi; 1994. p.257-78.
- 18. Smith SW, Arborr A. CDH in the older child. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48(7):1390-1.
- 19. Gore DR. Iatrogenic AVN of the hip in young children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(3):493-501.
- 20. Salter RB, Kostuik J, Dallas S. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head as a complication of treatment for congenital dislocation of the hip in young children. Can J Surg. 1969;12:44-62.
- 21. Vitale MG, Skaggs DL. Developmental dysplasia of the hip from six months to four years of age. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9(6):401-11.
- 22. Ganger R, Radler C, Petje G, Manner HM, Kriegs-Au G, Grill F. Treatment options for developmental dislocation of the hip after walking age. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14(3):139-50.
- 23. Rampal V, Sabourin M, Erdeneshoo E, Seringe R, Wicart P. Closed reduction with traction for developmental dysplasia of the hip in children aged between one and five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(7):858-63.
- 24. Bolland BJ, Wahed A, Al-Hallao S, Culliford D, Clarke NM. Late reduction in congenital dislocation of the hip and the need for secondary surgery: radiologic predictors and confounding variables. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(7):676-82.
- 25. Bian Z, Guo Y, Tian W. [Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children: results of closed reduction and immobilization in hip spica cast]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;47(13):1017-9.
- 26. Marchetti PG. Open reduction of CDH. In: Tachdjian MO, editor. Congenital dislocation of the hip. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1982. p.401-7.
- 27. Klisic P. Open reduction with femoral shortening and pelvic osteotomy. In: Tachdjian MO, editor. Congenital dislocation of the hip. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1982. p.417-27.
- 28. Murray T, Weinstein SL, Spratt KF. Closed reduction for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007;36(2):82-4.
- 29. Bennett JT, MacEwen GD. CDH. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(247):15-21.
- 30. Zionts LE, MacEwen GD. Treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in children between the age of one and
three years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;68:829-46.
- 31. Tümer Y, Ağuş H, Biçimoğlu A. When should secondary procedures be performed in residual hip dysplasia?. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2007;41 Suppl 1:60-7.
- 32. Ömeroğlu H, Uçar DH, Köse N. Acetabular development in developmental dysplasia of the hip. A radiographic study in anatomically reduced and uncomplicated hips. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007;65(4):276-9.
- 33. Tanaka T, Yoshihashi Y, Miura T. Changes in soft tissue interposition after reduction of developmental dislocation of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:16-23.
- 34. Hattori T, Fujii T, Watanabe H, Matsui N. Soft-tissue interposition after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip. The long-term effect on acetabular development and avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(3):385-91.
- 35. Studer K, Bixby SD, Spencer SA, Kim YJ. Obstacles to reduction in infantile developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Child Orthop. 2017;11(5):358-66.
- 36. Fredensborg N. The CE angle of normal hips. Acta Orthop Scand. 1976;47(4):403-5.
- 37. Thomas IH, Scott S, Smith D. Avascular necrosis after open reduction for congenital dislocation of the hip: analysis of causative factors and natural history. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9(5):525-31.