Cointegration and Causality between Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: Case of Kyrgyzstan

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 19 - 34, 15.01.2017

Raziye Abdıyeva , Hakan Çetintaş

https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.285056

Cited By: 12

Öz

According to
Wagner’s law there is unidirectional relationship from economic growth to
public expenditure. Wagner’s states that increase of national income leads to
faster growth of public expenditure. In other words, out of economic and social
development in the country, people will demand more public goods and it will
increase public expenditure at a faster rate than national income. 

This study is analyzing the long term and causality
relationship between public expenditure and economic growth in Kyrgyzstan and
tests the validity of Wagner's law in Kyrgyz economy by using an ARDL and Error
Correction models over the period 1995 to 2014. Empirical results showed that
there is an unidirectional causality relationship between economic growth and
public expenditure in long term. Empirical evidence is support the validity of
Wagner’s law in Kyrgyz economy. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Economic Growth, Public Expenditure, Wagner’s Law

Kamu Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: Kırgızistan Örneği

Öz

Wagner kanununa göre
ekonomik büyüme ile kamu harcamaları arasında tek yönlü bir ilişki bulunmaktadır.
Milli gelirin artması kamu harcamalarının daha büyük bir oranda artmasına neden
olacaktır. Diğer bir ifadeyle, ülkede ortaya çıkan sosyal ve ekonomik gelişme birlikte
kişilerin kamusal mallara olan talebi de artmakta, bu da kamu harcamalarının
milli gelirin artış hızından daha da yüksek oranda artması ile
sonuçlanmaktadır.

Bu çalışmada Kırgızistan’da ekonomik büyüme
ile kamu harcamaları arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişki ve nedensellik
incelenmiştir. ARDL ve Hata Düzeltme modelleri yardımıyla Kırgızistan
ekonomisinde Wagner kanununun geçerliliği test edilmiştir. Çalışmada 1995-2014
dönemini kapsayan yıllık veriler kullanılmıştır. Ampirik bulgular Kırgızistan’da
ekonomik büyüme ile kamu harcamaları arasında uzun dönemde tek yönlü bir
nedensellik ilişkinin bulunduğunu ve Wagner kanununun Kırgız ekonomisi için geçerli
olduğunu göstermektedir.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekonomik Büyüme, Kamu Harcamaları, Wagner Kanunu

Kaynakça

• Abizadeh, S. & Gray, J. (1985). Wagner’s Law: a Pooled Time-Series Cross-Section Comparison, National Tax Journal, 88, 209-18.
• Antonis A., K. Constantinos & Persefoni T. (2013). Wagner’s Law versus Keynesian Hypothesis: Evidence from pre WWII Greece. Panoeconomicus, 4, 457-472.
• Bagdigen M. & H. Çetintaş. (2004). Causality between Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: The Turkish Case. Journal of Economics and Social Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 53-72.
• Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. & Mestre, R., (1998). Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19, 267–283.
• Bayrak, M. & Esen, Ö. (2014). Examining the Validity of Wagner’s Law in the OECD Economies, Research in Applied Economics, Volume 6, No 4, http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/rae/article/view/5354/5017
• Bayrak, M. ve Esen Ö. (2015). Kamu Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Buyume İlişkisi: Geciş Surecindeki Turk Cumhuriyetleri Uzerine Bir Uygulama, Bilig, Bahar, Sayı 73, 231-248
• Bojanic A.N. (2013). Testing the Validity of Wagner’s Law in Bolivia: A Cointegration and Causality Analysis with Disaggregated Data, Revista de Análisis Económico, Vol. 28, No.1, 25-45
• Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious Regressions ın Econometrıcs. Journal of Econometrics 2, 111-120.
• Henrekson, M. (1993). Wagner’s Law a spurious relationship, Public Finance, 48, 406-415.
• IMF, 2002. IMF Country Report No: 02/150
• IMF, 2016. IMF County Report No 16/56
• Jaen-Garcia, M. (2011). Empirical Analysis of Wagner's Law for the Spain's Regions, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences. 1(1): 1–17.
• Kırgız Cumhuriyeti Milli İstatistik Komitesi, www.stat.kg
• Kuckuck, J. (2012). Testing Wagners's Law at Different Stages of Economic Development A Historical Analysis of Five Western European Countries. Istitute of Empirical Economic Research, Working Paper 91, Germany.
• Mahdavi, S. (2009). A Re-examination of Wagner’s Law Based on Disaggregated U.S. State-Local Government Expenditure. Working Paper 0101ECO-090-2009, The University of Texas at San Antonio, College of Business.
• Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests. Applied Economics. 37, 1979-1990.
• Oktayer, A. & N. Oktayer. (2013). Testing Wagner’s Law For Turkey: Evidence From A Trivariate Causality Analysis, Prague Economic Papers, S.2, p.284-301
• Permana Y.H & Vika, G.S.J. J. (2014). Testing the Existence of Wagner Law and Government Expenditure Volatility in Indonesia Post-Reformation Era, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(2), 130-139.
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.
• Peters A. C. (1996). An Application of Wagner’s “Law” of Expanding State Activity to Totally Diverse Countries. ECCB Staff Research Paper, Eastern Caribbean Central Bank.
• Ram, R. (1986). Causality Between Income and Government Expenditure: A Broad International Perspective. Public Finance, 41, 393-413.
• Richter, Ch. & Dimitrios, P. (2012) The Validity of Wagner’s Law in the United Kingdom for the Period 1850-2010. Working Paper. International Network for Economic Research, Bonn, Germany.
• Sentr sotsialno-ekonomiçeskih issledovaniy (Центр социально-экономических исследований в Кыргызстане). (2011). Анализ государственных расходов на социальный сектор в Кыргызской Республике, ЮНИСЕФ, Бишкек.
• Sideris, D. (2007). Wagner’s Law in 19th century Greece: a cointegration and causality analysis. Bank of Greece working paper No. 64, Bank of Greece.
• Thornton, J. (1999). Cointegration, Causality and Wagner’s Law in 19th Century Europe. Applied Economics Letters, 6(7): 413-16.
• Verma, S. & Arora, R. (2010). Does the Indian Economy Support Wagner’s Law? An Econometric Analysis, Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 3 (5), 77-91.
• World Bank. (2014). Kyrgyz Republic - Public expenditure review policy notes: strategic setting. Public Expenditure Review (PER). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24607685/kyrgyz-republic-public-expenditure-review-policy-notes-strategic-setting
• Yamak, N. ve Küçükkale, Y. (1997). Türkiye’de Kamu Harcamaları Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 12(131), 5-14.
• Zheng, Y., Li,J., Wang, X. & Li Ch. (2010). An Empirical Analysis of the Validity of Wagner’s Law in China A Case Study Based on Gibbs Sampler. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 5, No. 6, 161-168.