Türk Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Romantik İlişkilerde Şiddete Yönelik Tutumlarının Risk Alma Davranışları, Duygu Düzenleme ve Duygusal Özerlikleriyle İlişkisi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 23, 1574 - 1600, 31.03.2020

Meltem Yıldız , Jale Eldeleklioğlu

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.640113

Öz

Bu araştırmada Türk üniversite öğrencilerinin romantik ilişkilerde şiddete yönelik tutumları ile risk alma davranışları, duygu düzenleme stratejileri ve duygusal özerklikleri arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Araştırma 18-25 yaş arası 519 (%79’u kız %21’i erkek) Türk üniversite öğrencisi üzerinde yapılmıştır. Araştırmada romantik ilişkilerde şiddete yönelik tutum, risk alma davranışları, duygu düzenleme stratejileri ve duygusal özerkliği ölçmek için sırasıyla Terzioğlu ve diğerleri (2016) tarafından geliştirilmiş Flört Şiddeti Tutum Ölçeği, Gençtanırım (2014) tarafından geliştirilmiş Riskli Davranışlar Ölçeği-Üniversite Formu, Gross ve John (2003) tarafından geliştirilmiş Eldeleklioğlu ve Eroğlu (2015) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanmış Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeği ve Steinberg ve Silverberg (1986) tarafından geliştirilmiş Tatar, Bildik, Yektaş, Hamidi & Özmen (2016) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanmış Duygusal Özerklik Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Hesaplanan korelasyonlar sonucunda Türk üniversite öğrencilerinin romantik ilişkilerde şiddete yönelik tutumları ile anti sosyal davranışlar, sigara kullanımı, okul terki, yeniden değerlendirme stratejisi, gizleme stratejisi, ebeveyni idealleştirmeme, ebeveyni bir insan olarak algılama arasında anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Yapılan Değişken Eklemeli Çoklu Doğrusal Regresyon analizi sonucunda ise üniversite öğrencilerinin romantik ilişkilerde şiddete yönelik tutumlarını anti sosyal davranışlar, okul terki, ebeveyni idealleştirmeme ve ebeveynin bir insan olarak algılanması değişkenlerinin anlamlı bir şekilde yordadığı bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Romantik İlişkilerde Şiddete Yönelik Tutum, Risk Alma Davranışları, Duygu Düzenleme, Duygusal Özerklik, Türk Üniversite Öğrencileri

The Relationship Between the Attitudes of Turkish University Students Towards Dating Violence with Risk-Taking Behaviors, Emotion Regulation and Emotional Autonomy

Öz

In this study, the relationship between the attitudes Turkish university students towards dating violence and risk-taking behaviors, emotion regulation strategies and emotional autonomy were investigated. The study was conducted on 519 Turkish university students aged 18-25 years (79% female, 21% male). In the present study, the Flirt Violence Attitude Scale, the Risk Behavior Scale -University Form, the Emotional Regulation Scale and the Emotional Autonomy Scale were used respectively in order to measure attitudes towards dating violence, risk taking behaviors, emotion regulation strategies and emotional autonomy. As a result of the calculated correlations, it turned out that there were significant relationships between Turkish university students' attitudes towards dating violence in and anti-social behaviors, smoking, school drop-out, re-evaluation strategy, hiding strategy, non-idealization of the parents, and perceiving the parents as a human. As a result of Forward Multiple Regression analysis, on the other hand, it was found that Turkish university students' attitudes towards dating violence were significantly predicted by anti-social behaviors, school drop-out, non-idealization of parents and perception of parents as a human being. As a result of the study, it was found that there are significant relationships between attitudes towards dating violence, risk taking, emotion regulation and emotional autonomy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Attitude towards Dating Violence, Risk-Taking Behaviors, Emotion Regulation, Turkish University Students, Emotional Autonomy

Kaynakça

• Archer, J. and Graham-Kevan, N. (2003). Do beliefs about aggression predict physical aggression to partners? Aggressive Behavior, 29, 41-54. doi:10.1002/ab.10029
• Arriaga, X. B. and Foshee, V. A. (2004). Adolescent dating violence: Do adolescents follow in their friends’, or their parents’, footsteps? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 162-184. doi:10.1177/0886260503260247
• Baker, C. R. and Stith, S. M. (2008). Factors predicting dating violence perpetration among male and female college students. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 17(2) 227-244. doi:10.1080/10926770802344836.
• Balzarotti, S., John, O.P. and Gross, J.J. (2010). An Italian Adaptation of the EmotionRegulation Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 61–67. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000009
• Barnett, O.W., Miller-Perrin, C.L. and Perrin, R.D. (1997). Family violence across the lifespan: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Capaldi, D. M. and Clark, S. (1998). Prospective family predictors of aggression toward female partners for at risk young men. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1175–1188. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1175.
• Champion, H., Foley, K.L., Sigmon-Smith, K., Sutfin, E.L. and DuRant, R.H. (2008) Contextual factors and health risk behavior associated with date fighting among high school students. Women Health; 47(3), 1- 22. doi:10.1080/03630240802132286
• Chan, K.W. and Chan, S. M. (2008). Emotional autonomy versus susceptibility to peer pressure. Research in Education, 79(1), 38-52. doi: 10.7227/RIE.79.4.
• Chase, K., Treboux, D. and O’Leary, K. D. (2002). Characteristics of high-risk adolescents’ dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 33–49. doi:10.1177/0886260502017001003.
• Chen, Z. Y.(1994). The Positive and negative consequences of adolescent emotional autonomy: The relation of aspects of autonomy to academic achievement and socially disapproved behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, California.
• Chou, Z.Y.(2000). Emotional autonomy and depression among Chinese adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 161, 141-151 doi: 10.1080/00221320009596703.
• Chou, K.L. (2003). Emotional autonomy and problem behavior among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 473–80. doi:10.1080/00221320309597890.
• Cleveland, H., Herrera, V.M. and Stuewig, J. (2003). Abusive males and abused females in adolescent relationships: risk factor similarity and dissimilarity and the role of relationship seriousness. Journal of Family Violence, 18: 325–339. doi:10.1023/A:1026297515314
• Coker, A.L., Mckeown, R. E., Sanderson, M., Davis, K. E., Valois, R. F. and Huebner, E. S. (2000). Severe intimate partner violence and quality of life among South Carolina high school students. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 220–227. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00227-0.
• Cornelius, T.L. and Resseguie, N.(2007). Primary and secondary prevention programs for dating violence: a review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(3), 364–375. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.09.006
• Dating Violence Research Center (2002). Campus dating violence fact sheets, Retrieved from https://www.uvm.edu/police/public Downloads/Dating.Violence.pdf.
• De Puy, J., Hamby, S. and Lindemuth, C. (2014). Teen dating violence in French-speaking Switzerland: Attitudes and experiences. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 8(2), 305-315. doi: 10.4119/UNIBI/ijcv.380
• DeWall, N. C., Anderson, C. A. and Bushman, B.J. (2011). The general aggression model: theoretical extensions to violence. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 245–58. doi: 10.1037/a0023842
• Doğan, S. (2001). Farklı sosyo-ekonomik düzeylere mensup ergenlik çağındaki kız ve erkeklerin saldırgan davranışlarıyla ana-baba tutumları arasındaki ilişkiler. Master’ thesis, Available from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.(Thesis No.107116).
• Eldeleklioğlu, J. and Eroğlu, Y. (2015). A Turkish adaptation of the emotion regulation questionnaire. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 1157-1168. doi: 10.14687/ijhs.v12i1.3144.
• Erdem, A. and Şahin, R. (2017). Undergraduates’ attitudes toward dating violence: Its relationship with sexism and narcissism. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(6), 91-105. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v6n6p91
• Flood, M. and Pease, B. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 10(2), 125–142. doi:10.1177/1524838009334131
• Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Arriaga, X. B., Helms, R., Koch, G. G. and Linder, G. F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, and adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45–50. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bfe1/36f5377efaa2c972594fafd00dfa494a8f63.pdf
• Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Linder, F., Rice, J. and Wilcher, R. (2007). Typologies of adolescent dating violence: Identifying typologies of adolescent dating violence perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(5), 498–519. doi:10.1177/0886260506298829.
• Frank, S., Pirsch, L. and Wright, V.(1990). Late adolescents' perceptions of their relationships with their parents: Relationships among deidealization, autonomy, relatedness, and ınsecurity and ımplications for adolescent adjustment and ego ıdentity status.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19(57) 1-588. doi: 10.1007/BF01537177.
• Gençtanırım, D. (2014). Riskli davranışlar ölçeği üniversite formu: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(1), 24-34. doi: 10.21031/epod.67191.
• Gidycz, C. A., Warkentin, J. B. and Orchowski, L. M. (2007). Predictors of perpetration of verbal, physical, and sexual violence: a prospective analysis of college men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 8, 79–94. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.8.2.79
• Gover, A. R.(2004). Risky lifestyles and dating violence: a theoretical test of violent victimization. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 171-180. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2003.12.007
• Gover, A.R., Kaukinen, C. and Fox, K. A.(2008). The relationship between violence in the family of origin and dating violence among college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(12), 1667-1693. doi: 10.1177/0886260508314330
• Gratz, K.L., Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. doi:10.1007/s10862-008-9102-4.
• Gratz, K.L., Paulson, A., Jakupcak, M. and Tull, M. T. (2009). Exploring the relationship between childhood maltreatment and intimate partner abuse: gender differences in the mediating role of emotion dysregulation. Violence and Victims, 24(1) 68–82. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.24.1.68.
• Gross, J.J. and John, O.P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation process: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2) 348-362. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.
• Harper, F. W. K., Austin, A. G., Cencone, J. L. and Arias, I. (2005). The role of shame, anger, and affect regulation in men’s perpetration of psychological abuse in dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(12), 1648–1662. doi: 10.1177/0886260505278717
• Hill, J.P. and Holmbeck, G. (1986). Attachment and autonomy in adolescence. In G. Whitehurst (Ed.) Annals of child development (Vol. 3, p. 145-189). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Jackson, S. M., Cram, F. and Seymour, F. W. (2000). Violence and sexual coercion in high school students’ dating relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 23– 36. doi:10.1023/A:1007545302987
• Jaffe, P. G., Sudermann, M., Reitzel, D. and Killip, S. M. (1992). An evaluation of a secondary school primary prevention program on violence in intimate relationships. Violence & Victims, 7, 129-146. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.7.2.129
• Jessor, R. and Jessor, S. L. (1978). Theory testing in longitudinal research on marijuana use. In D. B. Kandel (Ed.) Longitudinal research on drug use: Empirical findings and methodological issues (pp.41-71). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
• Johnson, W. L., Giordano, P. C., Longmore, M. A. and Manning, W. D. (2014). Intımate partner vıolence and depressıve symptoms during adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55(1), 39–55. doi: 10.1177/0022146513520430.
• Kaukinen, C. (2014). Dating violence among college students: The risk and protective factors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(4), 283-296. doi: 10.1177/1524838014521321.
• Lavoie, F., Robitaille, L. and Hebert, M. (2000). Teen dating relationships and aggression: An exploratory study. Violence against Women, 6, 6-36. doi: 10.1177/10778010022181688
• Linz, D., Donnerstein, E. and Penrod, S. (1984). The effects of multiple exposure to filmed violence against women. Journal of Communication, 34, 130-147. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02180.x
• Locke, L. M., Richman, C. L. (1999). Attitudes toward domestic violence: Race and gender issues. Sex Roles, 40, 227-247. doi: 10.1023/A:1018898921560
• Machado, C., Caridade, S. and Martins, C. (2010). Violence in juvenile dating relationships self-reported prevalence and attitudes in a Portuguese sample.Journal of Family Violence,25, 43-52. doi:10.1007/s10896-009-9268-x
• Markowitz, F. E. (2001). Attitudes and family violence: Linking intergenerational and cultural theories. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 205-218. doi:10.1023/A:1011115104282
• Marusak, H. A., Thomason, M. E., Sala-Hamrick, K., Crespo, L. and Rabinak, C.A. (2018). What's parenting got to do with it: Emotional autonomy and brain and behavioral responses to emotional conflict in children and adolescents. Developmental Science, 21(4), 1-11. doi: 10.1111/desc.12605.
• McBride Chang, C. and Chang, L. (1998). Adolescent-parent relations in Hong Kong: Parenting styles, emotional autonomy, and school achievement. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159(4), 421-436. doi: 10.1080/00221329809596162.
• Mıhçıokur S. and Akın, A. (2015). Flört şiddeti- şiddet’li sevgi. Sağlık ve Toplum, 25(2), 9-15. Retrieved from https://docplayer.biz.tr/32437282-Flort-siddeti-siddet-li-sevgi.html
• Murray C. and Kardatzke, K. N.(2007). Dating violence among college students: Key issues for collage counselors. Journal of College Counseling, 10, 79-89. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1882.2007
• Nabors, E. L., Dietz, T. L. and Jasinski, J. L. (2006). Domestic violence beliefs and perceptions among college students. Violence & Victims, 21, 783-799. doi: 10.1891/vv-v21i6a007
• O’Keefe, N.K., Brockopp, K. and Chew, E. (1986). Teen dating violence. Social Work, 31(6), 465-468. doi:10.1093/sw/31.6.465
• O’Keefe, M. (1997). Predictors of dating violence among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 546-568. doi:10.1177/088626097012004005
• O’Keefe, M. (2005). Teen dating violence: A review of risk factors and prevention efforts. Retrieved from http://new.vawnet.org/Assoc_Files_VAWnet/AR_TeenDatingViolence.pdf
• Powers, J. and Kerman, E. (2006). Research facts and findings: Teen dating violence. Act for Youth Family Life Development Center. Retrieved from http://www.actforyouth.net/documents/Feb06.pdf
• Pradubmook-Sherer, P. (2011). Youth attitudes toward dating violence in Thailand. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(2), 182-206. doi: 10.1177/0306624X09360659.
• Reitzel-Jaffe, D. and Wolfe, D. A. (2001). Predictors of relationship abuse among young men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(2), 99-115. doi: 10.1177/088626001016002001
• Riggs, D. and O’Leary, K. (1996). Aggression between heterosexual dating partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 519-540. doi: 10.1177/088626096011004005
• Roth, G., Assor, A., Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2009). The emotional and academic consequences of parental conditional regard: Comparing conditional positive regard, conditional negative regard, and autonomy support as parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1119-1142.
• Ryan, R.M. and Lunch, J. H.(1989). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child Development, 60: 340–356. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1130981.pdf
• Schwartz, J. P., Kelley, F. A. and Kohli, N. (2012). The development and initial validation of the dating attitudes inventory: A measure of the gender context of dating violence in men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(10), 1959–1986. doi:10.1177/0886260511431432.
• Schumacher, J. A. and Slep, A. M. S. (2004). Attitudes and dating aggression: A cognitive dissonance approach. Prevention Science, 5, 231-243. doi: 10.1023/B:PREV.0000045357.19100.77
• Shook, N.J., Gerrity, D.A., Jurich, J. and Segrist, A.E. (2000). Courtship violence among college students: A comparison of verbally and physically abusive couples. Journal of Family Violence, 15(1), 1-22. doi: 10.1023/A:1007532718917
• Shorey, R. C., Cornelius, T. L. and Bell, K. M. (2008). Behavior theory and dating violence: A framework for prevention programming. Journal of Behavior Analysis of Offender and Victim Treatment and Prevention, 1(4), 298–311. doi:10.1037/h0100452
• Shorey, R. C., Meltzer, C. and Cornelius, T. L. (2010). Motivations for self-defensive aggression in dating relationships. Violence and Victims, 25(5), 662-676. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.5.662
• Shorey, R.C., Stuart, G.L. and Cornelius, T. L. (2011). Dating violence and substance use in college students: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 541-550. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2011.08.003.
• Silverman, J.G., Raj, A., Mucci, L.A. and Hathaway, J. E. (2001). Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 572–579.
• Simons R.L., Lin, K. and Gordon, L.C. (1998). Socialization in the family of origin and male dating violence: A prospective study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 467-478. doi:10.2307353862.
• Slep, A. M. S., Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S. and O’Leary, K. D. (2001). Two new measures of attitudes about the acceptability of teen dating aggression. Source Psychological Assessment, 13, 306-318.
• Smetana, J. G. (1995). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66(2), 299-316. doi: 10.2307/1131579.
• Stappenbeck, C. A., Fromme, K. (2014). The effects of alcohol, emotion regulation, and emotional arousal on the dating aggression intentions of men and women. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(1), 10-19.
• Steinberg, L. (2007). Ergenlik. (F. Çok Trans.). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
• Steinberg, L. and Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841-851. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1130361.pdf.
• Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B. and Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 10, 65-98. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2003.09.001
• Straus, M.A. (2010). Thirty years of denying the evidence on gender symmetry in partner violence: ımplications for prevention and treatment. Partner Abuse, 1(3), 332-363. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.1.3.332
• Tagay, Ö., Ünüvar, P. and Çalışandemir, F. (2018). Romantik ilişkilerde algılanan istismarın yordayıcıları olarak temas engelleri ve benlik saygısı. International Journal of Human Sciences, 15(2), 707-716. doi: 10.14687/jhs.v15i2.4996.
• Tatar, A., Bildik, T., Yektaş, Ç., Hamidi, F. and Özmen, H. E. (2016). The adaptation of emotional autonomy scale into Turkish and examination of emotional autonomy in non-clinical adolescence sample. Nobel Medicus, 12(1), 39-48. Retrieved from https://toad.edam.com.tr/sites/default/files/pdf/duygusal-ozerklik-olcegi-toad.pdf
• Temple, J.R., Shorey, R. C., Fite, P., Stuart, G. L. and Le, V. D. (2013). Substance use as a longitudinal predictor of the perpetration of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42: 596–606. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9877-1.
• Terzioğlu, F., Gönenç, İ. M., Özdemir, F., Güvenç, G., Kök, G. N., Sezer N.Y. and Demirtaş Hiçyılmaz, B. (2016). Flört şiddeti tutum ölçeği geçerlilik ve güvenirlilik çalışması. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(4), 225-232. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/275548.
• Tilley, D. S. and Brackley, M. (2004). Violent lives of women: Critical points for intervention– Phase I focus groups. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 40, 157-168. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6163.2004.tb00013.x
• Tontodonato, P. and Crew, B. K. (1992). Dating violence, social learning theory, and gender: A multivariate analysis. Violence & Victims, 7, 3-13. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/df06/885cc474a72dcb5d37156dd8fb88a1f09302.pdf
• Turner, R. A., Irwin, C. E. and Millstein, S. G.(1991). Family structure, family processes, and experimenting with substances during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1(1), 93-106.
• Tyler, K. A., Brownridge, D. A. and Melander, L. A (2011). The effect of poor parenting on male and female dating violence perpetration and victimization. Violence and Victims, 26(2), 218-30. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.26.2.218.
• Whitaker, D. J., Morrison, S., Lindquist, C., Hawkins, S. R., O’Neil, J. A., Nesius, A. M., Mathew, A. and Reese, L.R.(2006). A critical review of interventions for the primary prevention of perpetration of partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(2), 151–166. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2005.07.007.
• Yektaş, Ç. (2013). Depresyon tanılı kız ergenlerde intihar davranışının doğası ve gelişimsel bağlamı: Kimlik duygusu, ergen-ebeveyn ilişkileri ve duygusal özerklik. Master’ thesis. Available from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.(Thesis No.334101).
• Yıldız, M. and Eldeleklioğlu, J. (2018). Relationships between violence in romantic relationships of university students, parental attitudes and self-respect In (R. Efe, I. Koleva, and E. Atasoy Eds.) Recent research in education (p. 495-513). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.