The Role of Knowledge Sharing in the Effects of Intellectual Capital and Innovativeness on Firm Performance

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 29 Ekim Özel Sayısı, 3274 - 3301, 31.10.2020

Mustafa Emre Civelek , Pınar Başar

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.742309

Cited By: 1

Öz

The aim of this paper is to examine the role of knowledge sharing in the effects of intellectual capital and innovativeness on firm performance. Partial least square structural equation modeling method was used. This method is variance-based and non-parametric method since it does not have any distributional assumption. This method is preferred in the small sample size and non-normal distribution. According to the findings of this research, knowledge sharing plays mediator roles in the relationships between intellectual capital and firm performance. But knowledge sharing does not have any mediating effect in the relationships between innovativeness and firm performance. The most important limitation of this research is small sample size. Therefore, PLS-SEM is preferred in this research. This study reveals the importance of knowledge sharing on Intellectual capital and business performance. Main premise of this study is that the knowledge sharing would play mediator role in the relationship among intellectual capital and innovativeness and firm performance. This mediator role constitutes the research question of this study. In this context, therefore, the study contributes toward the literature for better understanding of the role of knowledge sharing.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Firm Performance, Intellectual Capital, Innovativeness, Knowledge Sharing

Entelektüel Sermaye ve Yenilikçiğin Firma Performansına Etkilerinde Bilgi Paylaşımının Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, entelektüel sermaye ve yenilikçiliğin firma performansı üzerindeki etkilerinde bilgi paylaşımının rolünü incelemektir. Kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu yöntem varyans temelli ve parametrik olmayan bir yöntemdir, çünkü herhangi bir dağılımsal varsayım yoktur. Bu yöntem küçük örneklemlerde ve normal olmayan dağılımda tercih edilir. Bu araştırmanın bulgularına göre, bilgi paylaşımı entelektüel sermaye ile firma performansı arasındaki ilişkide ara değişken rolü oynamaktadır. Ancak bilgi paylaşımının yenilikçilik ve firma performansı arasındaki ilişkide ara değişken rolü yoktur. Bu araştırmanın en önemli kısıtı küçük örneklem büyüklüğüdür. Bu nedenle bu araştırmada PLS-SEM tercih edilmiştir. Bu çalışma Entellektüel sermayenin firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde bilgi paylaşımının önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel dayanağı, bilgi paylaşımının entelektüel sermaye ile yenilikçilik ve firma performansı arasındaki ilişkide aracı rolü oynayacağı yönündedir. Aracı rolü, bu çalışmanın araştırma sorusunu oluşturmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma, bilgi paylaşımının rolünün daha iyi anlaşılması için literatüre katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Firma Performansı, Entelektüel Sermaye, Yenilikçilik, Bilgi Paylaşımı

Kaynakça

• Akgün, A.E. and Keskin, H. (2003). Sosyal bir etkileşim süreci olarak bilgi yönetimi ve bilgi yönetimi süreci. Gazi Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 175-188.
• Akman, G. (2003). Bilişim sektöründe pazar odaklılık, yenilik stratejileri ve yenilik kabiliyeti arasındaki ilişkiler ve bunların şirket performansı üzerindeki etkileri. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi,Gebze İleri Teknoloji Ecoinnstitüsü, Kocaeli.
• Akman, G., Özkan, C. and Eriş, H. (2008). Strateji odaklılık ve firma stratejilerinin firma performansına etkisinin analizi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (13), 93-115.
• Aksel, İ. (2010). İşletmelerde inovasyon ve inovasyonu destekleyen örgüt kültürünün belirleyicileri ve bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, İşletme Yönetimi ve Organizasyon Bilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, Istanbul
• Alameeri, A., Ajmal, M. M., Hussain, M., andHelo, P. T. (2017). Sustainability practices in the aviation sector: a study of UAE-based airlines. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 9(2), 119-147.
• Aldrich, H.E. , Wiedenmayer, G. , Katz, J.A. ve Brockhaus, R.H., Sr. (1993). From traits to rates: an ecological perspective on organizational findings. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press , 1, 145-195
• AlShamsi, O. M., and Ajmal, M. M. (2018) "Knowledge sharing in technology-intensivemanufacturing organizations: Analytic hierarchy process approach. Business Process Management Journal, https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2017-0194
• Anderson, J., and Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin.
• Artie W. Ng, (2006). Reporting intellectual capital flow in technology-based companies Case studies of Canadian wireless technology companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(4), 492-510 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1469-1930, DOI 10.1108/14691930610709130
• Baron, R., and Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator - Mediator variable distinction in social phychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical consideration. The Moderator - Mediator Variable distinction in Social Phychological ResearchJournal of Personality and Social Phychology, 1173-1182.
• Becerra-Fernandez, I., and Sabherwal , R. (2010). Knowledge management: systems and processes. New York: Sharpe.
• Buckley, M., Halbesleben, R., and Wheeler , A. (2016). Research in personnel and human resources management. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Çamlıca Z.. and Akar, GS (2014). Lojistik sektöründe sürdürülebilirlik uygulamaları. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 11, 100-120.
• Chakravarthy Balaji, S. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(5), s. 437-458.
• Chau Ngoc D., Long L., and Soo-Yong, K., (2018) Impact of knowledge enabling factors on organizational effectiveness in construction companies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 759-780
• Chen, C. J., ve Huang, J. W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance—The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of business research, 62(1), 104-114.
• Civelek, M. (2018). Comparison of covariance-based and partial least square structural equation modeling methods under non-normal distribution and small sample size limitations. Eurasian Econometrics, Statistics & Empirical Economics Journal, 10, 39-50.
• Civelek, M. (2018). Essentials of structural equation modeling. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Lincoln-Zea Books.
• Civelek, M. (2018). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi metodolojisi. İstanbul: Beta.
• Civelek, M., Çemberci, M., Kibritci Artar, O., and Nagehan, U. (2015). Key factors of sustainable firm performance: A strategic approach. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Lincoln-Zea Books.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Daft, Ri. L. (1997). Management. Dryden Press, Orlando.
• Darroch, J., and McNaughton, R. (2002). Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. Journal of intellectual capital, 3(3), 210-222.
• Dehong, L., Jun L., Wentian, C., and Yanjun Q., (2018) The trade-off between knowledge exploration and exploitation in technological innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 781-801, https://doi.org/10.1108/
• Dinçer, Ö. ve Tatoğlu, E. (2003). Formel stratejik planlama ve şirket performansı. 11. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Afyon, 191-205.
• Doğan, D. (2018). SmartPLS ile veri analizi. Charleston: CreateSpace.
• Drejer, I. and Jørgensen, B. H. (2004). Public-private collaboration on knowledge generation and application in new product development projects. In Christensen, J.and Lundvall, B. (Ed.) Product Innovation, Interactive Learning and Economic Performance(Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, Vol. 8), (p. 285-308) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-1071(04)08012-6
• Easterby-Smith, M., ve Lyles, M. (2011). Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management . Chichester: Wiley.
• Egbu C. O., (2004). Engineering. Construction and Architectural Management, 11(5), 301–315.
• Egbu, C, O, (2004). Managing knowledge and intellectual capital for improved organizational innovations in the construction industry: an examination of critical success factors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(5), 301 – 315
• Ekşi, E.(2008). Intellectual capıtal based innovatıon capabılıty model proposition. Istanbul Technıcal University, Institute of Scıence and Technology, Department: Management Engineering, Programme: Management Engineering, Management Engineering M.Sc. Thesis
• Erkuş, A. (2006). Entelektüel sermaye: Bir uygulama. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi SBE, Erzurum.
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
• García‐Morales, V. J., Lloréns‐Montes, F. J., and Verdú‐Jover, A. J. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British journal of management, 19(4), 299-319.
• Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrika, 61, 101-107.
• Gerdin, Jonas ve Greve, Jan (2004). Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research – a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29 (3-4), 303-326.
• Gloet, M., and Terziovski, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of manufacturing technology management, 15(5), 402-409.
• Gunasekaran , A. (2001). Agile manufacturing: The 21st century competitive strategy. New York: Elsevier Science.
• Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., and Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling PLS-SEM. Los Angeles: SAGE.
• Hall, B. H., and Sena, V. (2017). Appropriability mechanisms, innovation, and productivity: evidence from the UK. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(1-2), 42-62.
• Hatjidis, D., Griffin, M., Younes, M., (2019). Linking universal network quality perception and change readiness: The mediating roles of tacit knowledge and organizational climate. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2018-1442 Permanent link to this document: HYPERLINK https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2018-1442.
• Ho, C. T. (2009). The relationship between knowledge management enablers and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(1), 98-117.
• Hubert Saint‐Onge, (1996) "Tacit knowledge the key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital. Planning Review, 24(2), 10-16, https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054547
• Kamasak, R., Yozgat, U., and Yavuz, M. (2017). Knowledge process capabilities and innovation: testing the moderating effects of environmental dynamism and strategic flexibility. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(3), 356-368.
• Karakılıç Yörük, N. (2008). Temel yeteneklerin stratejik ittifak oluşumundaki önemi ve stratejik performansa etkileri. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (İşletme), Afyonkarahisar.
• Liao, C., and Chuang, S. H. (2006, January). Exploring the role of knowledge management for enhancing firm's innovation and performance. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) 7, 158a-158a. IEEE.
• López-Nicolás, C., ve Meroño-Cerdán, Á. L. (2011). Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. International journal of information management, 31(6), 502-509.
• Lund, R. (2004), The managed interaction between innovation and learning and a complementary perspective. In Christensen, J. and Lundvall, B. (Ed.) Product Inovation, Interactive Learning and Economic Performance (Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, Vol. 8), (p.69-98) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley,. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-1071(04)08004-7
• Martínez-López , F. (2013). Handbook of Strategic e-Business Management . Berlin: Springer.
• Min, L., Huimin, L., and Zhou, J., (2018) "G-SECI model-based knowledge creation for CoPS innovation: the role of grey knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 887-911, https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2016- 0458
• Mouritsen, J., Thorsgaard Larsen, H., and Bukh, P. N. (2005). Dealing with the knowledge economy: intellectual capital versus balanced scorecard. Journal of intellectual capital, 6(1), 8-27.
• Nazari, J., Herremans, I. M., Isaac, R. G., Manassian, A.and Kline, T. J.B. (2011). Organizational Culture, Climate and IC: an Interaction Analaysis; Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2), 224- 248,https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/14691931111123403
• Oskarsson, G. (2003, February). The antecedents and process of innovation. In The IV Conference in Social Science, Iceland.
• Radaelli, G., Mura, M., Spiller, N., and Lettieri, E. (2011). Intellectual capital and knowledge sharing: the mediating role of organisational knowledge-sharing climate. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(4), 342-352.
• Rathore · R.P. Mohanty · A.C. Lyons · N. Barlow, (2005). Performance management through strategic total productivity optimisation Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 25, 1020–1028 DOI 10.1007/s00170-003-1936-z
• Rathore, A., Mohanty, R. P., Lyons, A. C., and Barlow, N. (2005). Performance management through strategic total productivity optimisation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25(9-10), 1020-1028.
• Ritala, P., Olander, H., Michailova, S., and Husted, K. (2015). Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: An empirical study. Technovation, 35, 22-31.
• Rossi, C., Cricelli, L., Grimaldi, M., and Greco, M. (2016) 'The strategic assessment of intellectual capital assets: An application within Terradue Srl'. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1598-1603. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.024" and its references.
• Schiuma, G., Andreeva, T., and Kianto, A. (2012). Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance. Journal of knowledge management, 617-636
• Sitkin, S., Cardinal, L., and Bijls, K. (2010). Organizational control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Spender, J.C.1996. Making Knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17.
• Tetik, S. (2003). İşletme performansını belirlemede veri zarflama analizi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 10 (2), s. 221–229.
• Tomlinson, M. (2004). Learning, knowledge and competence building at employee level in The U.K. In Christensen, J. And Lundvall, B. (Ed.) Product Inovation, Interactive Learning And Economic Performance (Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, Vol. 8), p. 211-228). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley,. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-1071(04)08009-6
• Turunç, Ö. (2006).Bilgi teknolojileri kullanımının işletmelerin örgütsel performansına etkisi: Hizmet sektöründe bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, SDÜ, SBE, Isparta.
• Umanath, N. (2003). The concept of contingency based beyond ‘it depends’ illustration from IS research stream. Information and Management, 40, 551–562.
• Wang, Z., and Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert systems with applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge . Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
• Yürüşen, S. (2011). Veri zarflama analizi ile bayi performansının hesaplanması: otomotiv sektöründe bir uygulama. Yayınlamamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İşletme Mühendisliği, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Zerenler, M. (2005). Performans ölçüm sistemleri tasarımı ve üretim sistemlerinin performansının ölçümüne yönelik bir araştırma. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1 (1), 1-36.
• Zhining W., Nianxin W., and Huigang L., (2014) Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance, Management Decision, Vol. 52 Issue: 2, pp.230-258, https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2013-0064 Permanent link to this document: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2013-0064
• Zou, C., Zhao, C., Wang, T., and Gu, X. (2017). Colloborative Governance of Innovation Network Based on the JM Model. In J. Xu, M. Gen, A. Hajiyev, & F. Cooke Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (p. 1762-1773). New York: Springer.