Demokratik ve Otokratik Liderlik Tarzlarının Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışına Etkisinde İşe Yabancılaşmanın Aracı Rolü: Ankara OSTİM Sanayi Bölgesinde Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 34, 873 - 902, 28.02.2021

Ahmet Tuncay Erdem

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.839136

Cited By: 3

Öz

Yanlış örgütsel yönetim algısı, özellikle iş yaşamında işe yabancılaşma ile birleşince önemli çalışma faaliyetleri sorunlarına yol açabilmektedir. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, örgütlerde yönetim biçimleri olan demokratik liderlik ile otokratik liderlik tarzlarının sebep olabileceği üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışına etkisinde “işe yabancılaşmanın” aracı bir işlev görüp görmediğini belirlemektir. Araştırmada “demokratik ve otokratik liderlik tarzlarının üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışında “işe yabancılaşma” algısının aracı bir rolü var mıdır” sorusu cevaplandırılmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırma yöntemi nicel araştırma yöntemine göre tasarlanmış ve genel tarama modellerinden yola çıkılarak ilişkisel tarama modeline doğru desenlenen bir araştırmadır. Araştırma verileri basit tesadüfi örnekleme yöntemine göre Ankara OSTİM Sanayi Bölgesindeki ağır makine üretim faaliyetleri gösteren dört işletmeden toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS ve AMOS programlarıyla analiz edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde betimsel analizlerin yanında fark ve ilişki testleri yapılmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin analizinden elde edilen bulgulara göre demokratik liderliği işe yabancılaşma üzerinde pozitif yönlü etkisi bulunurken, üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışına etkisi bulunmamıştır. Otokratik liderliğin işe yabancılaşma ve üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışına etkisi bulunmuştur. Demokratik liderliğin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışına etkisinde işe yabancılaşmanın aracı etkisi bulunurken otokratik liderliğin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışına etkisinde işe yabancılaşmanın aracı etkisi bulunamamıştır. Katılımcı ve serbestlik tarzıyla yönetilen çalışanlarda olumlu örgütsel davranışlar beklenirken, baskıcı ve katılımı sağlamayan yönetimlerin çalışanlarında işe karşı olumsuz davranışları teşvik ederek çalışanların işlerine yabancılaşmalarına yol açabilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Demokratik liderlik, otokratik liderlik, işe yabancılaşma, üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı, aracı etki

The Mediating Role of Work Alienation in the Effect of Democratic and Autocratic Leadership Styles on Counterproductive Behaviors: A Study in Ankara OSTİM Industrial Zone

Öz

Incorrect perception of organizational management, especially when combined with work alienation in business life, can lead to essential work activities problems. This study's primary purpose is to determine whether "alienation from work" functions as a mediator in the effect of counterproductive behavior that can be caused by the forms of democratic leadership and autocratic leadership in organizations. In the research, "do democratic and autocratic leadership styles have a mediating role in the perception of work alienation in counterproductive behaviors." The question has been tried to be answered. The research method is designed according to the quantitative research method, and it is research patterned towards the relational scanning model based on general scanning models. According to the simple random sampling method, research data were collected from four enterprises operating heavy machinery production in Ankara OSTIM Industrial Zone. The obtained data were analyzed with SPSS and AMOS programs. In the analysis of the data, besides descriptive analysis, difference and relationship tests were performed. According to the findings obtained from the research data analysis, while democratic leadership has a positive effect on work alienation, it has not affected counterproductive behavior. Autocratic leadership has been found to have an impact on work alienation and counterproductive behavior. While work alienation had a mediating effect on the effect of democratic leadership on counterproductive behavior, no mediating effect of work alienation was found in the effect of autocratic leadership on counterproductive behavior. While positive organizational behaviors are expected from employees who are managed with a participatory and liberal style, oppressive and non-participatory management encourages negative behaviors towards their employees, leading to alienation from their jobs

Anahtar Kelimeler

Democratik leadership, autocratic leadership, counterproductive behaviour, work alienation, mediating effect

Kaynakça

• Adekeye, D. S. and Ajayi, O. A. (2020). Work environment and workplace deviant behavior in Nigerian Public Hospitals. Rev. Universitara Sociologie, 24-326.
• Agarwal, S. (1993). Influence of formalization on role stress, organizational commitment, and work alienation of salespersons: A cross-national comparative study. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 715- 739.
• Al Hosani, Y.Jabeen, R, Paul, J. and Stachowicz-Stanusch, A. (2020), "Antecedents of employee alienation and its impact on individual work performance during post-merger integration (PVII)", Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(6), 1085-1110.
• Allafchi, N. (2017). Effect of democratic leadership style on management of communication with customers in Melli Banks of Hamedan. Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (UKSAD), 3(2), 168-179.
• Amarat, M., Akbolat, M., Ünal, Ö. and Güneş Karakaya, B. (2019). The mediating role of work alienation in the effect of workplace loneliness on nurses' performance. Journal of nursing management, 27(3), 553-559.
• Appelbaum, S. H., Iaconi, G. D. and Matousek, A. (2007). Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviors: causes, impacts, and solutions. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society.
• Bademci, V. (2001). Türkiye’deki okullar ne işe yarar. Düzenleyen: Ankara Türk Telekom Anadolu Teknik L. Ankara: Başkent Öğretmenevi Konferans Salonu, 9.
• Bajaj, P. (1982). Alienation as related to perception of organizational climate. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(4), 563-572.
• Bakan, İ. ve Büyükbeşe, T. (2010). Liderlik “türleri” ve “güç kaynakları” na ilişkin mevcut-gelecek durum karşılaştırması: eğitim kurumu yöneticilerinin algılarına dayalı bir alan araştırması. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomi̇k Araştırmalar Dergi̇si, 12(19), 73-84, 2010 ISSN: 1309-9132
• Banai, M., Reisel, W. D. and Probst, T. M. (2004). A managerial and personal control model: predictions of work alienation and organizational commitment in Hungary. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 375-392.
• Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
• Baş, T. (2003). Anket: anket nasıl hazırlanır?: anket nasıl uygulanır?: anket nasıl uygulanır? : Seçkin Yayıncılık. Ankara.
• Bennett, R. J. and Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(3), 349.
• Bentler, P. M. and Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
• Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H. and Anderson, H. J. (2016). The dark side of proactive behavior: When being proactive may hurt oneself, others, or the organization. In Proactivity at work (p. 517-547): Routledge.
• Chen, L. F. and Khuangga, D. L. (2020). Configurational paths of employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag, 1–15.
• Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P. and Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89-117.
• Çalışkan, A. ve Pekkan, N. Ü. (2017). Psikolojik sermayenin işe yabancılaşmaya etkisinde örgütsel desteğin aracılık rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 4(1), 17-33.
• Dajani, M. A. Z. ve Mohamad, M. S. (2017). Perceived organizational injustice and counterproductive behavior. The mediating role work alienation evidence from the Egyptian public sector. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(5), 192-198.
• Dal, S. ve Malkoc, N. (2020). The effects of work exclusion on work alienation and collegaue support on private sport enterprises trainers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(3), 288-297.
• Demir, M. ve Tütüncü, Ö. (2010). Ağırlama işletmelerinde örgütsel sapma ile işten ayrılma eğilimi arasındaki ilişki. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21(1), 64-74.
• DiPietro, R. B. and Pizam, A. (2008). Employee alienation in the quick service restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32(1), 22-39.
• Doğan, A. ve Deniz, N. (2017). Algılanan liderlik tarzının üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışlarının ortaya çıkmasındaki etkisinde örgüt kültürünün rolü. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(52), 1014-1024.
• Durrah, O. (2020). Injustice perception and work alienation: Exploring the mediating role of employee's cynicism in healthcare sector. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(9), 811-824.
• Erdem, O. ve Dikici, A. M. (2009). Liderlik ve kurum kültürü etkileşimi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(29), 198-213.
• Erdoğan, İ. (1991). İşletmelerde davranış. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Eryılmaz, A. ve Burgaz, B. (2011). Özel ve resmi lise öğretmenlerinin örgütsel yabancılaşma düzeyleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(161), 271-285.
• Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
• Fox, S., Spector, P. E. and Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of vocational behavior, 59(3), 291-309.
• Goodnight, R. (2011). Laissez-faire leadership. Encyclopedia of Leadership. In: London, UK: Sage Publications.
• Gozukara, I., Mercanlı, A., Çapuk, S. ve Yıldırım, O. (2017). Impact of turnover intention on loneliness and the mediating effect of work alienation. Business Management and Strategy, 8(1), 18-38.
• Gruys, M. L. and Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International journal of selection and assessment, 11(1), 30-42.
• Güner, Ş. (2002). Dönüşümsel liderliğin güç kaynakları ve silahlı kuvvetler organizasyonunun dönüşümsel liderliğe uygunluk açısından değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle River. In: NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Heyde, A., Miebach, J. and Kluge, A. (2014). Counterproductive work behavior in a simulated production context: An exploratory study with personality traits as predictors of safety-related rule violations. J Ergonomics, 4(130), 2-9
• Hirschfeld, R. R. and Feild, H. S. (2000). Work centrality and work alienation: Distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 21(7), 789-800.
• Hirschfeld, R. R., Feild, H. S. and Bedeian, A. G. (2000). Work alienation as an individual‐difference construct for predicting workplace adjustment: A test in two samples 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(9), 1880-1902.
• Hussain, A., Yang, X., Yali, L., Ibrahim, A. and Hussain, S. (2020). the impact of autocratic leadership on disruptive political behavior, moderating the relationship of abusive supervisory behavior and mediating the relationship of employees perception of job insecurity. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(6), 1-57.
• İbicioğlu, H., Özmen, H. İ. ve Taş, S. (2009). Liderlik davranışı ve toplumsal norm ilişkisi: Ampirik bir çalışma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 1-23.
• Jacobson, R. P., Marchiondo, L. A., Jacobson, K. J. and Hood, J. N. (2020). The synergistic effect of descriptive and injunctive norm perceptions on counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of business ethics, 162(1), 191-209.
• Jiang, H., Chen, Y., Sun, P. and Li, C. (2019). Authoritarian leadership and employees' unsafe behaviors: The mediating roles of organizational cynicism and work alienation. Current Psychology, 38(6), 1668-1678.
• Kanten, P. ve Ülker, F. (2014). Yönetim tarzının üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışlarına etkisinde işe yabancılaşmanın aracılık rolü. Mugla Sitki Kocman University Journal of Social Sciences, 32, 16-40.
• Karimi, F., Hosseinzadeh, D. and Azizi, G. (2011). Relationship between management style and productivity of employees in Islamic Azad University-Islamshahr Unit. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12(10), 1685-1690.
• Kelloway, E. K., Francis, L., Prosser, M. and Cameron, J. E. (2010). Counterproductive work behavior as protest. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 18-25.
• Khan, M. A. S., Du Jianguo, A. M., Saleem, S., Boamah, K. B., Javed, U. and Usman, M. (2019). Rejuvenating the concept of work alienation through job demands-resources model and examining its relationship with emotional exhaustion and explorative and exploitative learning. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 931-941.
• Kim, H. and Qu, H. (2020). The mediating roles of gratitude and obligation to link employees' social exchange relationships and prosocial behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
• Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis: Routledge.
• Köksal, O. (2011). Bir kültürel liderlik paradoksu: Paternalizm/a cultural leadership paradox: Paternalism. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15). 101-122.
• Li, S. and Chen, Y. (2018). The relationship between psychological contract breach and employees' counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating effect of organizational cynicism and work alienation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1273, 1-9.
• Lian, H., Lance Ferris, D. and Brown, D. J. (2012). Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.003.
• Liao, E. Y., Wang, A. Y. and Zhang, C. Q. (2020). Who influences employees' dark side: A multi-foci meta- analysis of counterproductive workplace behaviors. Organizational Psychology Review, 1-47.
• Linstead, S., Maréchal, G. and Griffin, R. W. (2014). Theorizing and researching the dark side of organization. Organization Studies, 35(2), 165-188.
• Liu, X., Wang, X., Zhao, Y., Xia, N. and Guo, S. (2020). Solving Workplace Deviant Behavior in Construction by Leader–Member Exchange and Leader–Member Guanxi. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6), 04020061.
• Luqman, R., Fatima, S., Ahmed, S., Khalid, I. and Bhatti, A. (2019). The Impact of Autocratic Leadership Style on Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Mediating role of Employee Commitment and Moderating role of Emotional Exhaustion. Pollster j. acad.res. 06(01), 22-47.
• MacKenzie, S. B. and Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of retailing, 88(4), 542-555.
• MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J. and Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 593-614.
• Malik, S. Z., Saleem, M. and Naeem, R. (2016). Effect of leadership styles on organizational citizenship behavior in employees of telecom sector in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 54(2), 385-406.
• Mansor, N. A., Wai, C. M., Mohamed, A. and Shah, I. M. (2012). The relationship between management style and employees' well-being: A case of non-managerial staffs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 521-529.
• Marsh, H. W. and Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological bulletin, 97(3), 562- 582.
• Marshall, O. I. (2012). Employee attitude to management style case: International equitable association Nigeria Limited. Degree programme in Business Administration, Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences.
• McDonald, R. P. and Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 247.
• Mitchell, T. R. (1982). People in organizations: An introduction to organizational behavior: New York: McGraw- Hill.
• Nair, N. and Vohra, N. (2009). Developing a new measure of work alienation. Journal of Workplace Rights, 14(3), 293-309.
• Ogunola, A. A., Kalejaiye, P. O. and Abrifor, C. A. (2013). Management style as a correlate of job performance of employees of selected Nigerian brewing industries. African Journal of Business Management, 7(36), 3714- 3722.
• Penney, L. M., Hunter, E. M. and Perry, S. J. (2011). Personality and counterproductive work behavior: Using conservation of resources theory to narrow the profile of deviant employees. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 58-77.
• Poon, P. S., Evangelista, F. U. and Albaum, G. (2005). A comparative study of the management styles of marketing managers in Australia and the People's Republic of China. International Marketing Review. 22(1), 34-47.
• Puni, A., Agyemang, C. B. and Asamoah, E. S. (2016). Leadership styles, employee turnover intentions and counterproductive work behaviors. International Journal of innovative research and development, 5(1), 1-7.
• Sabuncuoğlu, Z. ve Tokol, T. (2001). İşletme. Ezgi Yayınları.
• Scott, J. and Marshall, G. (2009). A dictionary of sociology. Oxford University Press, USA.
• Spector, P. E., Fox, S. and Domagalski, T. (2006). Emotions, violence and counterproductive work behavior. Handbook of workplace violence, 29-46.
• Sulu, S., Ceylan, A. and Kaynak, R. (2010). Work alienation as a mediator of the relationship between organizational injustice and organizational commitment: Implications for healthcare professionals. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(8), 27-38.
• Susan, B. and Whiteley, P. (2007). Kusursuz liderlik. Çev. Ü. Şensoy. İstanbul: Acar Basım.
• Tağraf, H. ve Çalman, İ. (2009). Ohio Üniversitesi liderlik modeline göre oluşan liderlik biçimlerinin işletmelerin ihracat performansı üzerine etkisi ve Gaziantep İlinde bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23(2), 135-154.
• Tanaka, J. S. and Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 38(2), 197-201.
• Telli, E., Ünsar, S. A. ve Adil, O. (2012). Liderlik davranış tarzlarının çalışanların örgütsel tükenmişlik ve işten ayrılma eğilimleri üzerine etkisi: konuyla ilgili bir uygulama. Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 2(2), 135-150.
• Tengilimoğlu, D. (2005). Kamu ve özel sektör örgütlerinde liderlik davranişi özelliklerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir alan çalişmasi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(14), 1-16.
• Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S. and Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79-92.
• Toker, F. (1978). Gruplarda katılım yoluyla tutumların değişmesi. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 11, 77-94.
• Tutar, H. (2010). Işgören yabancilaşmasi ve örgütsel sağlik ilişkisi: Bankacilik sektöründe bir uygulama. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65(1), 175-204.
• Tutar, H. ve Erdem, A. T. (2020). Örnekleriyle bilimsel araştirma yöntemleri ve spss uygulamaları. Seçkin Yayncılık, Ankara.
• Üstün, F. (2020). Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları üzerine etkisi: Psikolojik iyi oluşun aracı rolü. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 35(2), 357-374.
• Üzüm, B. ve Şenol, L. (2019). Yabancılaşma ve üretim karşıtı iş davranışları: Sağlık kurumlarında bir araştırma. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 2019, 7(2), 65-80.
• Weber, W. G., Unterrainer, C. and Höge, T. (2020). Psychological research on organisational democracy: A meta‐analysis of individual, organisational, and societal outcomes. Applied Psychology, 69(3), 1009-1071.
• Wiersema, M. F. ve Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management journal, 35(1), 91-121.
• Wilson, D. E. (2020). Moving toward democratic-transformational leadership in academic libraries. Library Management.
• Wong, C. A. and Laschinger, H. K. S. (2015). The influence of frontline manager job strain on burnout, commitment and turnover intention: A cross-sectional study. International journal of nursing studies, 52(12), 1824-1833.
• Woods, P. A. (2020). Democratic leadership. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
• Yen, C.-H. and Teng, H.-Y. (2013). The effect of centralization on organizational citizenship behavior and deviant workplace behavior in the hospitality industry. Tourism Management, 36, 401-410.
• Yıldız, B. ve Alpkan, L. (2015). A theoretical model on the proposed predictors of destructive deviant workplace behaviors and the mediator role of alienation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 330-338.
• Yörük, D., Dündar, S. ve Topçu, B. (2011). Türkiye'deki belediye başkanlarının liderlik tarzı ve liderlik tarzını etkileyen faktörler. Ege Academic Review, 11(1), 103-109.