Predictive Role of Attachment Styles and Personality Traits in Marital Adjustment

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 43, 6091 - 6118, 07.11.2021

Özlem Çakmak Tolan

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.926516

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to examine the predictive role of attachment styles and personality traits on marital adjustment. 247 married individuals (127 women, 120 men) participated in the study. The Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Experiences in Close Relationships Inventory, Five Factor Personality Scale and Personal Information Form prepared by the researcher were used as data collection tools. The obtai-ned data were analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficient, one-way MANOVA and multiple regression analysis methods. Neuroticism and insecure forms of attachment (anxious and avoidant) were found to be significant predictors of marital adjustment. It was determined that women had a higher level of anxious attachment style. In addition, there was a negative relationship between anxious attachment style and neuroticism and marital adjustment, while a positive significant relationship was found between avoidant attachment style and marital adjustment. The results obtained contribute to a better understanding of the relationships between marital adjustment, attachment and personality traits. Once again, the effect of attachment style on emotional relationship has been revealed. Those working in the field of family and marriage counseling may benefit from these results. While working with couples or married clients, considering their attachment patterns and personality traits can contribute significantly to the therapeutic process. In studies with parents, awareness studies can be conducted on how to develop secure attachment in children.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Marital Adjustment, Attachment Styles, Personality Traits

Bağlanma Biçimleri ve Kişilik Özelliklerinin Evlilik Uyumunu Yordayıcı Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmada, bağlanma biçimleri ve kişilik özelliklerinin evlilik uyumunu yordama rolünün incelenme-si amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya 247 evli birey (127 kadın, 120 erkek) katılmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Çift Uyum Ölçeği, Yakın İlişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri, Beş Faktör Kişilik Ölçeği ve araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan Kişisel Bilgi Formu kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler Pearson korelasyon katsayısı, tek yönlü MANOVA ve çoklu regresyon analizi yöntemleri ile incelenmiştir. Nörotiklik özelliği ile kaygılı ve kaçınmacı bağlanma biçimlerinin evlilik uyumunun anlamlı yordayıcı-ları olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Kadınların daha yüksek düzeyde kaygılı bağlanma biçimine sahip oldukları saptanmıştır. Ayıca, kaygılı bağlanma biçimi ve nörotiklik ile evlilik uyumu arasında negatif ilişki bulunurken, kaçınmacı bağlanma biçimi ile evlilik uyumu arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı ilişki bulunmuştur. Elde edilen sonuçlar, evlilik uyumu ile bağlanma ve kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkilerin daha iyi anlaşılmasına katkı sağlamaktadır. Bir kez daha bağlanma biçiminin duygusal ilişki üzerindeki etkisi ortaya konulmuştur. Bu sonuçlardan aile ve evlilik danışmanlığı alanında çalışanlar yararlanabilirler. Çiftlerle veya evli danışanlarla çalışırken onların bağlanma örüntülerinin ve kişilik özelliklerinin dikkate alınması terapötik sürece önemli katkı sağlayabilir. Anne-babalarla yapılan çalışmalarda çocuk-larda güvenli bağlanmayı nasıl geliştirebileceklerine dair farkındalık çalışmaları yapılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evlilik Uyumu, Bağlanma Biçimleri, Kişilik Özellikleri

Kaynakça

• Adams, B. N. (1988). Fifty years of family research: What does it mean? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 5-17.
• Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E. and Wall, S. N. (2015). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. New York: Psychology Press.
• Baba, E. (2010). Evli çiftlerin duygusal zekâ düzeyleri ile evlilik uyumlarının karşılaştırılması. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İnönü Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Bilim Dalı, Malatya.
• Barelds, D. P. (2005). Self and partner personality in intimate relationships. European Journal of Personality, 19(6), 501-518.
• Bartholomew, K. and Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
• Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Sayers, S. L. and Sher, T. G. (1989). The role of cognitions in marital relationships: Definitional, methodological, and conceptual issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 31-38.
• Benet-Martinez, V. and John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750.
• Bouchard, G., Lussier, Y. and Sabourin, S. (1999). Personality and marital adjustment: Utility of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 651-660.
• Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. II. Some principles of psychotherapy. The fiftieth Maudsley Lecture. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 130(5), 421-431.
• Bradbury, T. N. and Fincham, F. D. (1993). Assessing dysfunctional cognition in marriage: A reconsideration of the Relationship Belief Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 5(1), 92-101.
• Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., ve Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson and W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (p.46-76). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
• Burgess, E. W., Locke, H. J. and Thomes, M. (1963). The family: From institution to companionship (3rd ed.). New York: American Book Company.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. and Demirel, D. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. and Demirel, F. (2012). Örnekleme yöntemleri. Retrieved from: http://w3.balikesir.edu.tr/~msackes/wp/wpcontent/uploads/2012/03/BAY-Final-Konulari.pdf
• Chen, Z., Tanaka, N., Uji, M., Hiramura, H., Shikai, N., Fujihara, S. and Kitamura, T. (2007). The role of personalities in the marital adjustment of Japanese couples. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 35(4), 561-572.
• Claxton, A., O’Rourke, N., Smith, J. Z. and DeLongis, A. (2012). Personality traits and marital satisfaction within enduring relationships: An intra-couple discrepancy approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(3), 375-396.
• Cobb, R. J., Davila, J. and Bradbury, T. N. (2001). Attachment security and marital satisfaction: The role of positive perceptions and social support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1131-1143.
• Collins, N. L. and Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644-663.
• Craig, R. J. and Olson, R. E. (1995). 16 PF profiles and typologies for patients seen in marital therapy. Psychological Reports, 77(1), 187-194.
• Crowell, J. A. and Treboux, D. (1995). A review of adult attachment measures: Implications for theory and research. Social Development, 4(3), 294-327.
• Cundiff, J. M., Smith, T. W. and Frandsen, C. A. (2012). Incremental validity of spouse ratings versus self-reports of personality as predictors of marital quality and behavior during marital conflict. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 676.
• Denizci, M. (2015). Does emotional expressivity moderate pain severity/personality traits and depression/marital satisfaction relations in fibromyalgia patients?(Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Psikoloji Bilim Dalı, Ankara.
• Eidelson, R. J. and Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(5), 715-720.
• Erbek, E., Beştepe, E., Akar, H., Eradamlar, N. and Alpkan, R. L. (2005). Evlilik uyumu. Düşünen Adam, 18(1), 39-47.
• Erişti, A. (2010). Bağlanma stilleri, kişilik özellikleri ve evlilik uyumu arasındaki ilişki. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
• Feeney, J. A. (2002). Attachment, marital interaction, and relationship satisfaction: A diary study. Personal Relationships, 9(1), 39-55.
• Fincham, F. D. and Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(4), 797-809.
• Fisher, T. D. and McNulty, J. K. (2008). Neuroticism and marital satisfaction: The mediating role played by the sexual relationship. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(1), 112.
• Fışıloğlu, H. and Demir, A. (2000). Applicability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 214- 218.
• Fraley, R. C. and Davis, K. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4(2), 131-144.
• Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. E. and Christensen, A. (2004). Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(4), 564.
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
• Gottman, J. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidant in marital interaction: a longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 6-15.
• Hamamcı, Z. (2005). Dysfunctional relationship beliefs in marital satisfaction and adjustment. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33(4), 313-328.
• Hazan, C. and Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
• Hazan, C. and Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1-22.
• Heene, E., Buysse, A. and Van Oost, P. (2007). An interpersonal perspective on depression: The role of marital adjustment, conflict communication, attributions, and attachment within a clinical sample. Family Process, 46(4), 499-514.
• Kansız, M. and Arkar, H. (2011). Mizaç ve karakter özelliklerinin evlilik doyumu üzerine etkisi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12(1), 24-29.
• Karney, B. R. and Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3-34.
• Kelly, E. L. and Conley, J. J. (1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 27-40.
• Kirkpatrick, L. A. and Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 66(3), 502-512.
• Kitamura, T., Watanabe, M., Fujino, M., Aoki, M., Ura, C. and Fujihara, S. (1995). Factorial structure and correlates of marital adjustment in a Japanese population: A community study. Journal of Community Psychology, 23(2), 117-126.
• Kobak, R. R. and Hazan, C. (1991). Attachment in marriage: Effects of security and accuracy of working models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 861-869.
• Larson, J. H. and Holman, T. B. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43(2), 228-237.
• Lester, D., Haig, C. and Monello, R. (1989). Spouses' personality and marital satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(2), 253-254.
• Locke, K. D. (2008). Attachment styles and interpersonal approach and avoidant goals in everyday couple interactions. Personal Relationships, 15(3), 359-374.
• Lussier, Y., Sabourin, S. and Turgeon, C. (1997). Coping strategies as moderators of the relationship between attachment and marital adjustment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(6), 777-791.
• Mikulincer, M. and Erev, I. (1991). Attachment style and the structure of romantic love. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(4), 273-291.
• Mikulincer, M. and Florian, V. (2003). Attachment style and affect regulation: Implications for coping with stress and mental health. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal Processes, 535-557.
• Mondor, J., McDuff, P., Lussier, Y. and Wright, J. (2011). Couples in therapy: Actor-partner analyses of the relationships between adult romantic attachment and marital satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 39(2), 112-123.
• Nemechek, S. and Olson, K. R. (1999). Five-factor personality similarity and marital adjustment. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 27(3), 309-317.
• Noftle, E. E. and Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 179-208.
• Nye, F. I. (1988). Fifty years of family research, 1937-1987. Journal of Marriage and The Family, 50(2), 305-316.
• O’Rourke, N., Claxton, A., Chou, P. H. B., Smith, J. Z. and Hadjistavropoulos, T. (2011). Personality trait levels within older couples and between-spouse trait differences as predictors of marital satisfaction. Aging and mental health, 15(3), 344-353.
• Ozden, M. S. and Celen, N. (2014). The relationship between inherent and acquired characteristics of human development with marital adjustment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 48-56.
• Öner, D. Ş. (2013). Evli bireylerin evlilik çatışması, çatışma çözüm stilleri ve evlilik uyumlarının incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aile Eğitimi ve Danışmanlığı Bilim Dalı, İzmir.
• Özaydınlık,Ş.(2014). Evli çiftlerin evlilik uyumu ile kişilik özellikleri ve romantik ilişkilerindeki sosyal ilginin incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Özen, A. (2006). Value similarities of wives and husbands and conflict resolution styles of spouses as predictors of marital adjustment. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Middle East Technical University, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitü, Psikoloji Bilim Dalı, Ankara.
• Pollard, S. E., Riggs, S. A. and Hook, J. N. (2014). Mutual influences in adult romantic attachment, religious coping, and marital adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(5), 615.
• Saavedra, M. C., Chapman, K. E. and Rogge, R. D. (2010). Clarifying links between attachment and relationship quality: Hostile conflict and mindfulness as moderators. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(4), 380.
• Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R. and Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 173-212.
• Selcuk, E., Zayas, V. and Hazan, C. (2010). Beyond satisfaction: The role of attachment in marital functioning. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2(4), 258-279.
• Senchak, M. and Leonard, K. E. (1992). Attachment styles and marital adjustment among newlywed couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(1), 51-64.
• Shaver, P. R. and Brennan, K. A. (1992). Attachment styles and the" Big Five" personality traits: Their connections with each other and with romantic relationship outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), 536-545.
• Sığırcı, A. (2010). Evli bireylerde bağlanma biçimleri ve evliliğe dair inançların evlilik doyumu ile ilişkisinin incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İnönü Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitü, Psikolojik Danışmanlık ve Rehberlik Bilim Dalı, Malatya.
• Snyder, D. K. and Regts, J. M. (1990). Personality correlates of marital dissatisfaction: A comparison of psychiatric, maritally distressed, and nonclinic samples. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 16(1), 34-43.
• Solmuş, T. (2010). Bağlanma evlilik ve aile psikolojisi. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
• Somer, O., Korkmaz, M. and Tatar, A. (2002). Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri’nin geliştirilmesi-I: Ölçek ve alt ölçeklerin oluşturulması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17(49), 21-33.
• Sümer, N. (2006). Yetişkin bağlanma ölçeklerinin kategoriler ve boyutlar düzeyinde karsılaştırılması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 21(57), 1.
• Sümer, N. and Güngör, D. (1999). Yetişkin bağlanma stilleri ölçeklerinin Türk örneklemi üzerinde psikometrik değerlendirmesi ve kültürlerarası bir karşılaştırma. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14(43), 71-106.
• Sümer, N., Lajunen, T. ve Özkan, T. (2005). Big Five Personality Traits as the distal predictors of road accident involvement. G. Underwood (Ed.), Traffic and Transport Psychology, 18, 215-227.
• Trinke, S. J. and Bartholomew, K. (1997). Hierarchies of attachment relationships in young adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(5), 603-625.
• Tulum, S. (2014). The effects of attachment on marital adjustment in newly married individuals: Testing the mediator role of conflict resolution styles. (Yayımlanmamış Lisans Tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitü, Psikoloji Bilim Dalı, Ankara.
• Tuzcu, A. (2017). Evli bireylerde kişilik özelliklerinin evlilik uyumu ve evlilik doyumu üzerine etkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Arel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Young, M., Riggs, S. and Kaminski, P. (2017). Role of marital adjustment in associations between romantic attachment and coparenting. Family Relations, 66(2), 331-345.
• Waring, E., Patton, D., Neron, C. A. and Linker, W. (1986). Types of marital intimacy and prevalence of emotional illness. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 31(8), 720-726.
• Zoby, M. M. (2005). The association between personality and marital and relationship outcome. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Regent University, Faculty of the Doctoral Psychology Program, Psychology, London.