Investigation of the Gifted Students’ Education Based on Its Cost

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 677 - 698, 01.09.2021

Figen Çam Tosun , Sema Tan

https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.773728

Öz

Introduction: The purpose of this research was to investigate the cost parents paid for their gifted and non-gifted children, the type of expenses they made for their children’s education and their opinions regarding the financial demands of their gifted children.
Method: In this qualitative study with a phenomenological approach, the data were collected from 20 parents of gifted and non-gifted students using structured interview forms. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.
Findings: The findings indicated that the parents spent the most on school supplies for both gifted and non-gifted children for in-school environment. However, for out-of school expenditures parents spent the most on books, movies, and intelligence games for their gifted children while they spent the most on field trips and movies for their non-gifted children.
Discussion: Parents could not fully support the development of their children (especially gifted ones) due to their financial conditions. Also, parents reported that opportunities in regular schools were not enough to help their children realize and fulfill their own potential. It was concluded that gifted children needed environments enriched with more materials, sources, mentors, and facilities to reveal their true potential.

Anahtar Kelimeler

cost, expenditure, gifted children, parental income, potential

Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Eğitiminin Maliyet Açısından İncelenmesi

Öz

Giriş: Bu araştırmanın amacı, özel yetenekli ve tipik gelişim gösteren çocukların eğitimleri için ebeveynlerin yaptığı harcamaların türü, maliyeti ve özel yetenekli çocuklarının finansal talepleri hakkındaki görüşlerini incelemektir.
Yöntem: Bu çalışma nitel araştırma modellerinden fenomenoloji kullanılarak tasarlanmıştır. Çalışmada veriler özel yetenekli tanısı konmuş ve tipik gelişim gösteren çocuğu olan 20 ebeveynden yapılandırılmış görüşme formu ile toplanmıştır. Çalışmada analiz yöntemi olarak betimsel istatistik ve içerik analizi tercih edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Bulgulara göre okul içi kategorisinde ebevynlerin hem özel yetenekli hem de tipik gelişim gösteren çocukları için en çok harcamayı okul malzemeleri alanında yaptıkları belirlenmiştir. Okul dışı harcamalarda ise özel yeteneklli çocuklar için en çok kitaplar, filmler ve zeka oyunlarında harcama yapılırken tipik gelişim gösteren çocuklar için geziler ve filmler alanında harcama yapmışlardır.
Tartışma: Çalışmada, ebeveynlerin finansal koşulları nedeniyle özel yetenekli çocuklarının gelişimini tam olarak destekleyemedikleri ortaya konulmuştur. Ayrıca, ebeveynler okullarda sağlanan fırsatların özel yetenekli çocuklarının kendi potansiyellerini fark etmeleri ve gerçekleştirmelerine yardımcı olmak için yeterli olmadığını düşünmektedirler. Özel yetenekli çocukların potansiyellerini gerçekleştirmek için daha fazla malzeme, kaynak, rehber ve tesislerle zenginleştirilmiş ortamlara ihtiyaç duydukları sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

maliyet, harcamalar, özel yetenekli, ebeveynlerin geliri, potansiyel

Kaynakça

• Afat, N., & Koksal-Konik, A. (2018). Awareness of gifted parents: A scale development study. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 220, 79-104.
• Arthaud, K., (2008). Household expenditure for children’s education. Retrieved from http://libdcms.nida.ac.th/thesis6/2008/b158764.pdf .
• Author, (2016). Author, (2018a). Author, (2018b).
• Bakioglu, A., & Levent, F. (2013). Suggestions for gifted education in Turkey. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 1(1), 31-44.
• Ballam, N. (2009). Gifted and growing up in a low income family: Mindsets, resilience, and interventions. Teachers and Curriculum, 11, 17-20.
• Bilgili, A. E. (2000). Üstün yetenekli çocukların eğitimi sorunu-sosyal sorumluluk yaklaşımı [Problem of education of gifted children: social responsibility approach]. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(12), 59-74.
• Brumbaugh, F. N., & Roshco, B. (1959). Your gifted child: A guide for parents. NY: Holt.
• Cetinkaya, C., & Doner, I. (2012). Investigation of right of gifted and talented education in Turkey. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(3), 7-20.
• Cetinkaya, C., & Kincal, R. Y. (2015). Üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli cocuklarin demokrasi eğitimi [Democracy education of gifted and talented children]. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 3(1), 1-22.
• Davis, G.A., Rimm, S. B., Siegle, D. B. (2014). Education of the gifted and talented. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
• Eris, B., Seyfi, R., & Hanoz, S. (2009). Perceptions of parents with gifted children about gifted education in Turkey. Gifted and Talented International, 24 (1), 55-65. DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2009.11674861
• Eristi, B. (2012). Gifted students’ perceptions about learning, teaching, teacher characteristics and teaching as a profession. Turkish Journal of Giftedness & Education, 2(1), 18-36.
• French, L.R., Walker, C. L., & Shore, B. M. (2011). Do gifted students really prefer to work alone? Roeper Review, 33(3), 145-159. DOI:10.1080/02783193.2011.580497
• Hahn Young M. & Balli, S.J. (2014). Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) student and parent perspectives, Gifted Child Today, 37(4), 236-246.
• Hesapçıoğlu, M. & Taymaz, H. (1998). Türkiye’de eğitim yönetimi [Education management in Turkey]. İstanbul: Kültür Koleji Eğitim Vakfı Yayınları.
• Jang, Y., G. (1995). Expenditure on education for female-headed and married-couple households, Journal of the Family Economics and Resource Management Division of AAFCS. 33(42), 45-50
• Johnsen, S. K. (Ed.). (2011). Identifying gifted students: A practical guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press
• State Planning Organization (SPO). (2013). Tenth development plan (2014-2018), Retrieved from http://www.kalkinma.gov.tr/Pages/KalkinmaPlanlari.aspx
• Karakuş, F. (2010). Difficulties that families of gifted students face, Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 6(1),127-144.
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. CA: Sage Publications Inc.
• Kurul, N. (2012). Eğitim finasmani [Financing education]. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Levent, F. (2011). Üstün yetenekli çocuklara devletin sunması gereken haklar [The rights that the state must offer to gifted children]. Paper presented at the I. Çocuk Hakları Kongresi [Children’s Rights Congress], Çocuk Vakfı yayınları, İstanbul. Retrieved from http://www.faruklevent.com/dosyalar/ kongre.pdf
• McMillan, J. H. (2008). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (5th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
• Ministry of Education (MOE). (2018). Ozel egitim hizmetleri yonetmeligi [Special Education Services Policy]. Retrieved from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/07/ 20180707-8.htm .
• National Association of Gifted Children (NAGC). (2008). What is giftedness? Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/resources/what-giftedness?id=574
• No Child Left Behind Act. (2002). P.L.. 107-110 (Title IX, Part A, Definition 22)
• OECD. (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-en.
• OECD, (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2018_eag-2018-en#page1
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2008). The role of the family in talent development. In S.I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psycho-educational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 53-70). New York, NY: Springe
• Ozbay, Y. (2013). Üstün yetenekli çocuklar ve aileleri [Gifted children and their families]. Ankara: T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı.
• Patton M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Plucker, J. A., & Callahan, C. M. (Eds.). (2014). Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press
• Sak, U., Ayas, B., Bal-Sezerel, B., Öpengin, E., Özdemir, N. N., & Demirel-Gürbüz, Ş. (2015). Gifted and talented education in Turkey: Critics and prospects. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 5(2), 110-132.
• Saranli, A., G. (2011). Investigation of the effectiveness of parent guidance programs developed for gifted child parents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
• Seward, K. & Gaesser, A. H. (2018). Career decision-making with gifted rural students: Considerations for school counselors and teachers. Gifted Child Today, 41(4), 217-225.
• Shore, B. M., Rejskind, F. G., & Kanevsky, L. S. (2003). Cognitive research on giftedness: A window on creativity and teaching for creativity. In D. Ambrose, L.M. Cohen, & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.) Creative intelligence: Towards theoretic integration (pp. 181-210). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
• Sidar, R. 2011. The effect of creativity of problem solving skills on students attending in science and arts resource centers (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Niğde University: Social Sciences Institute, Niğde, Turkey.
• Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Explorations in giftedness. Cambridge University Press.
• Turkish Statistic Institute (TSI). (2017a). Shares of quintiles ordered by income in expenditure types. Retrieved from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1012
• Turkish Statistic Institute (TSI). (2017b). Distribution of household consumption expenditures in Turkey. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1012
• Ulusoy, B., (2013). Families’ education expenses in primary school level (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kastamonu University, Institute of Social Science, Kastamonu, Turkey.
• Uzun, A. (2006). Attitudes of gifted or special ability student toward the social studies and their academic achievements (Unpublished master’s thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, Educational Sciences Institute, İzmir, Turkey.
• VanTassel - Baska, J., (2005) Gifted programs and services: What are the nonnegotiables? Theory in to Practice, 44(2), 90-97, DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4402_3
• Webb, J. T., Gore, J. L., Amend, E.R., & DeVries, A. R. (2007). A parent's guide to gifted children. AZ: Great Potential Press Inc.