Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SINIZM ON ACADEMIC STAFF

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 808 - 814, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.662

Öz

The aim of this study was to determine the level of
organizational sinizm which means working staff grow away from loyalty and have
negative thoughts. For that, a research was conducted on the academic staff of
Kafkas University. A moderate level of general sinizm was observed based on the
results. The  organizational sinizm level
was also determined to be moderate as well. It has been observed that
particalarly, the stayment of ' the similarity between the things said to be
done and things done in reality was low' had the highest mean. 

Kaynakça

  • ABRAHAM, R. (2000). “Organizational Cynicism: Bases and Consequences”, Eneric, Social And General Psychology Monographs, Vol; 126(3), 269‐292.
  • ANDERSON, L.M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a Contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49 (11), 1395-1418. ss.
  • ARSLAN, B. S., ŞAHİN, S., DEĞER, B. D. “Psikolojik Sözleşmenin Büro Çalışanlarının Sinik Davranışlarına Etkisi”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi: 11.Ulusal Büro Yönetimi ve Sekreterlik Kongresi, 2012.
  • BATEMAN, T.S., SAKANO, T., FUJITA, M.(1992). “Roger, me, and my attitude: Film propaganda and cynicism toward corporate leadership”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 11 (5), 768-77l.ss.
  • BYRNE, Z. S. and HOCHWARTER, Wayne. A. (2007). “Perceived Organizational Support and Performance Relationships Across Levels of Organizational Cynicism”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol; 23(1), 54-72.
  • CANDAN, H. “Örgütsel Sinizm ve İşgören Performansına Olası Etkileri”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. Sayı 1, (2013): 181-194.
  • ÇEKMECELİOĞLU, H; (2006), “İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Tutumlarının İşten Ayrılma Niyeti ve Verimlilik Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Araştırma”, İş, Güç - Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, Haziran, 8(2), ss. 153-168.
  • DEAN, J.W., BRANDES P., DHARWADKAR, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341-352. ss.
  • DERİN, N. “İşletmelerde Geride Kalan Sendromu ve Örgütsel Güven.”, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 2011.
  • DELKEN, M. (2004). Organizational cynicism: A study among call centers. Unpublished master thesis, University of Maastricht.
  • JAMES, S. M. (2005). “Antecedents and Consequences of Cynicism in Organizations: An Examination of Potantial Positive and Negative Effects on School Systems”. Doktora Tezi. College of Business The Florida State University.
  • KALAĞAN G. ve GÜZELLER, C. O. (2010). “Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Sinizm Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. (27), 83-97.
  • KUTANİS, R. Ö. ve E. ÇETİNEL, (2010), “Adaletsizlik Algısı Sinisizmi Tetikler mi?”, Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi SBE. Dergisi, Cilt: 12 (2), s. 186-195.
  • JAMES, M. S. L., (2005), “Antecedents and Consequences of Cynicism in Organizations: An Examination of the Potential Positive and Negative effects on school Systems”. Doktora tezi. College Of Business The Florida State University.
  • MCCLOUGH, A.C., ROGELBERG, S.G., FISHER, G.G., BACHIOCHI, P.D. (Summer 1998). “Cynicism and the quality of an individual’s contribution to an organizational diagnostic survey”. Organization Development Journal, 16 (2), 31-42. ss.
  • ÖNCER, A.Z. (2009). “An overview of organizational cynicism and a cure suggestion: Teamwork”. 2009 EABR & TLC Conference Proceedings, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • ÖZDAMAR, K. (2002). Paket Programlar İle İstatistiksel Veri Analizi 1, Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
  • ÖZGENER, Ş., ÖĞÜT, A., KAPLAN, M. (2008). “İşgören-işveren ilişkilerinde yeni bir paradigma: Örgütsel sinizm”. M. ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, H. KARADAL (ed.), Örgütsel davranışta seçme konular organizasyonların karanlık yönleri ve verimlilik azaltıcı davranışlar içinde. Ankara, ilke Yayınevi.
  • PARKER, S.K., A. JOHNSON, C. COLLINS ve H. NGUYEN (2013), “Making The Most of Structural Support: Moderating Influence of Employees’ Clarity And Negative Affect”, Academy of Management Journal, 56 (3), 867–892.
  • PORTER L.W., R.M. STEERS, R.T. MOWDAY ve P. V. BOULIAN (1979), “Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Among Psychiatric Technicians”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (5), 603-609
  • TURAN, Ş. “Küreselleşme Sürecinde Örgütsel Değişimi Etkileyen Bir Unsur Olarak Örgütsel Sinizm ve Karaman ili Kamu Kurumlarında Bir Çalışma”, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karaman: 2011.
Yıl 2017, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 808 - 814, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.662

Öz

Kaynakça

  • ABRAHAM, R. (2000). “Organizational Cynicism: Bases and Consequences”, Eneric, Social And General Psychology Monographs, Vol; 126(3), 269‐292.
  • ANDERSON, L.M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a Contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49 (11), 1395-1418. ss.
  • ARSLAN, B. S., ŞAHİN, S., DEĞER, B. D. “Psikolojik Sözleşmenin Büro Çalışanlarının Sinik Davranışlarına Etkisi”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi: 11.Ulusal Büro Yönetimi ve Sekreterlik Kongresi, 2012.
  • BATEMAN, T.S., SAKANO, T., FUJITA, M.(1992). “Roger, me, and my attitude: Film propaganda and cynicism toward corporate leadership”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 11 (5), 768-77l.ss.
  • BYRNE, Z. S. and HOCHWARTER, Wayne. A. (2007). “Perceived Organizational Support and Performance Relationships Across Levels of Organizational Cynicism”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol; 23(1), 54-72.
  • CANDAN, H. “Örgütsel Sinizm ve İşgören Performansına Olası Etkileri”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. Sayı 1, (2013): 181-194.
  • ÇEKMECELİOĞLU, H; (2006), “İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Tutumlarının İşten Ayrılma Niyeti ve Verimlilik Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Araştırma”, İş, Güç - Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, Haziran, 8(2), ss. 153-168.
  • DEAN, J.W., BRANDES P., DHARWADKAR, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341-352. ss.
  • DERİN, N. “İşletmelerde Geride Kalan Sendromu ve Örgütsel Güven.”, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 2011.
  • DELKEN, M. (2004). Organizational cynicism: A study among call centers. Unpublished master thesis, University of Maastricht.
  • JAMES, S. M. (2005). “Antecedents and Consequences of Cynicism in Organizations: An Examination of Potantial Positive and Negative Effects on School Systems”. Doktora Tezi. College of Business The Florida State University.
  • KALAĞAN G. ve GÜZELLER, C. O. (2010). “Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Sinizm Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. (27), 83-97.
  • KUTANİS, R. Ö. ve E. ÇETİNEL, (2010), “Adaletsizlik Algısı Sinisizmi Tetikler mi?”, Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi SBE. Dergisi, Cilt: 12 (2), s. 186-195.
  • JAMES, M. S. L., (2005), “Antecedents and Consequences of Cynicism in Organizations: An Examination of the Potential Positive and Negative effects on school Systems”. Doktora tezi. College Of Business The Florida State University.
  • MCCLOUGH, A.C., ROGELBERG, S.G., FISHER, G.G., BACHIOCHI, P.D. (Summer 1998). “Cynicism and the quality of an individual’s contribution to an organizational diagnostic survey”. Organization Development Journal, 16 (2), 31-42. ss.
  • ÖNCER, A.Z. (2009). “An overview of organizational cynicism and a cure suggestion: Teamwork”. 2009 EABR & TLC Conference Proceedings, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • ÖZDAMAR, K. (2002). Paket Programlar İle İstatistiksel Veri Analizi 1, Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
  • ÖZGENER, Ş., ÖĞÜT, A., KAPLAN, M. (2008). “İşgören-işveren ilişkilerinde yeni bir paradigma: Örgütsel sinizm”. M. ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, H. KARADAL (ed.), Örgütsel davranışta seçme konular organizasyonların karanlık yönleri ve verimlilik azaltıcı davranışlar içinde. Ankara, ilke Yayınevi.
  • PARKER, S.K., A. JOHNSON, C. COLLINS ve H. NGUYEN (2013), “Making The Most of Structural Support: Moderating Influence of Employees’ Clarity And Negative Affect”, Academy of Management Journal, 56 (3), 867–892.
  • PORTER L.W., R.M. STEERS, R.T. MOWDAY ve P. V. BOULIAN (1979), “Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Among Psychiatric Technicians”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (5), 603-609
  • TURAN, Ş. “Küreselleşme Sürecinde Örgütsel Değişimi Etkileyen Bir Unsur Olarak Örgütsel Sinizm ve Karaman ili Kamu Kurumlarında Bir Çalışma”, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karaman: 2011.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Erdogan Kaygin

Onur Kavak

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Kaygin, E., & Kavak, O. (2017). DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SINIZM ON ACADEMIC STAFF. PressAcademia Procedia, 3(1), 808-814. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.662
AMA Kaygin E, Kavak O. DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SINIZM ON ACADEMIC STAFF. PAP. Haziran 2017;3(1):808-814. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.662
Chicago Kaygin, Erdogan, ve Onur Kavak. “DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SINIZM ON ACADEMIC STAFF”. PressAcademia Procedia 3, sy. 1 (Haziran 2017): 808-14. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.662.
EndNote Kaygin E, Kavak O (01 Haziran 2017) DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SINIZM ON ACADEMIC STAFF. PressAcademia Procedia 3 1 808–814.
IEEE E. Kaygin ve O. Kavak, “DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SINIZM ON ACADEMIC STAFF”, PAP, c. 3, sy. 1, ss. 808–814, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.662.
ISNAD Kaygin, Erdogan - Kavak, Onur. “DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SINIZM ON ACADEMIC STAFF”. PressAcademia Procedia 3/1 (Haziran 2017), 808-814. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.662.
JAMA Kaygin E, Kavak O. DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SINIZM ON ACADEMIC STAFF. PAP. 2017;3:808–814.
MLA Kaygin, Erdogan ve Onur Kavak. “DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SINIZM ON ACADEMIC STAFF”. PressAcademia Procedia, c. 3, sy. 1, 2017, ss. 808-14, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.662.
Vancouver Kaygin E, Kavak O. DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SINIZM ON ACADEMIC STAFF. PAP. 2017;3(1):808-14.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.