UNDERSTANDING EXPERIMENT-BASED SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP LITERATURE

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 161 - 166, 30.07.2023

Nurgül Keleş Taysır

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1771

Öz

Purpose- This study aims to analyze experimental methodology-based publications in social entrepreneurship, offering insights for researchers planning to undertake investigations in this area.
Methodology- A thorough content analysis was conducted on 39 articles related to social entrepreneurship research. These articles, which employed experimental design, were identified through comprehensive searches of the ISI and Scopus databases.
Findings- The findings reveal a growing interest in experimental design within social entrepreneurship research, focusing on topics such as donation and funding, sonsumer attitudes and behavior, intention and motivation and education and training.
Conclusion- This study contributes to a better understanding of the experimental design research landscape in social entrepreneurship, emphasizing the need for continued investigation and methodological advancements. Future research should address identified gaps and opportunities, such as the exploration of novel experimental techniques and the application of interdisciplinary perspectives to further enrich our understanding of social entrepreneurship.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social entrepreneurship, experimental design, content analysis

Kaynakça

• Achleitner, A. K., Lutz, E., Mayer, J., & Spiess-Knafl, W. (2013). Disentangling gut feeling: Assessing the integrity of social entrepreneurs. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24, 93-124.
• Baierl, R., Grichnik, D., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2014). Antecedents of social entrepreneurial intentions: The role of an individual's general social appraisal. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 123-145.
• Chandra, Y., & Jin, Q. (2022). Winning the Heart and Shaping the Mind with “Serious Play”: The Efficacy of Social Entrepreneurship Comics as Ethical Business Pedagogy. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-25
• Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37-57.
• Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., Paul, J., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2020). Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, 209-229.
• Lortie, J., Cox, K. C., & Roundy, P. T. (2022). Social impact models, legitimacy perceptions, and consumer responses to social ventures. Journal of Business Research, 144, 312-321.
• Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
• Muñoz, P., Cacciotti, G., & Ucbasaran, D. (2020). Failing and exiting in social and commercial entrepreneurship: The role of situated cognition. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14.
• Stevenson, R., Josefy, M., McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. (2020). Organizational and management theorizing using experiment-based entrepreneurship research: Covered terrain and new frontiers. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 759-796.
• Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2001). Research methods knowledge base (Vol. 2). Macmillan Publishing Company, New York: Atomic Dog Pub.
• Zahra, S. A., Newey, L. R., & Li, Y. (2014). On the frontiers: The implications of social entrepreneurship for international entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 137-158.