POSTMODERN SİNEMADA METİNLERARASILIK, PASTİŞ VE PARODİ

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 49, 261 - 274, 02.03.2022

Metin Çolak

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.995987

Cited By: 1

Öz

Postmodernizm 1960’lı yılların ikinci yarısında ortaya çıkmış bir kuramdır. Postmodernizm modernizme ve onun ideallerine bir tepki olarak ortaya çıktı. 1970’li yıllara gelindiğinde postmodern kuramın üzerinde yükseldiği postmodern estetik mimarlıktan resime, edebiyattan sinemaya kadar sanatın hemen her alanda hissedilir oldu. Bu estetik, modern estetikten kökten bir kopuşu vaat ediyordu ve bu kopuş en çok görsel sanatlarda, özellikle de sinemada, belirginlik kazandı. Postmodern estetiğin sinemadaki yansımalarına baktığımızda bu estetiğin özellikle şu üç öğe üzerinde yükseldiğini görüyoruz: Metinlerarasılık, pastij ve parodi. Bu çalışma bu üç öğeyi belirli filmler ve yönetmenler üzerinden ele almaktadır. Çalışma postmodern sinemada metinlerarasılık, pastiş ve parodi olgularını tanımlayıcı yöntem kullanarak eleştirel bir perspektif içerisinde incelemektedir. Makalede pastiş ve parodi ayrımı ile birlikte metinlerarasılığın modern ve postmodern sinemada nasıl kullanıldığı da analiz edilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Postmodernizm, Sinema, Metinlerarasılık, Pastiş, Parodi

INTERTEXTUALITY, PASTICHE AND PARODY IN POSTMODERN CINEMA

Öz

Postmodern theory is a theory that emerged in the second half of the 1960s. This theory was born as a reaction to modernity and its ideals. By the 1970s, postmodern aesthetics, on which postmodern theory was based, began to be felt in almost every field of art, from architecture to painting, from literature to cinema. This aesthetic promised a fundamental break with modern aesthetics, and this break was most evident in the visual arts, especially in cinema. When we look closely at the reflections of postmodern aesthetics in cinema, we see that this aesthetic has developed especially with the following three elements: Intertextuality, pastiche, and parody. This study deals with these elements through specific films and directors. The study examines intertextuality, pastiche and parody in postmodern cinema using descriptive research methodology in a critical perspective. While examining the difference between pastiche and parody, it will be studied how intertextuality along with pastiche and parody are used in both modern and postmodern cinema.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Postmodernism, Cinema, Intertextuality, Pastiche, Parody

Kaynakça

• Adorno, T. W. (1984). “The Essay as Form”. New German Critique. 32 (Spring-Summer), 151-171.
• Bakhtin, M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Trans. and Ed. by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
• Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Trans. by Vern W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.
• Barthes, R. (1990). S/Z. Trans. by Richard Miller. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulations. Trans. by Sheila Faria Glaser. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
• Cervantes, M. de (2003). The Ingenious Hidalgo: Don Quixote. Trans. by John Rutherford. London: Penguin Books.
• Connor, S. (1997). Postmodernist Culture: An Introduction to Theories of the Contemporary. Cambridge, Oxford: Blackwell.
• Denzin, N. K. (1992). “Blue Velvet: Postmodern Contradictions”, The Postmodern Reader. Ed. Charles Jencks. London and New York: Academy Editions.
• Gasset, O. Y. (1972). The Dehumanization of Art –And Other Essays on Art, Culture, and Literature. Trans .: Helene Weyl, 2nd Edition, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Gibson, W. (1993). Neuromancer. London: Harper Collins Publisher.
• Harvey, D. (1992). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, Oxford: Blackwell.
• Hassan, I. (1983). The Dismemberment of Orpheus: Toward a Postmodern Literature. 2nd Ed. Wisconsin and London: The University of Wisconsin Press.
• Jameson, F. (1998). The Cultural Turn: Selected Writings on the Postmodern 1983-1998. London, New York: Verso.
• Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Jameson, F. (1974). The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Kristeva, J. (1981). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Arts. Translated by: Thomas Gora, Alice Jardine and Leon S. Roudiez. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
• Mandel, E. (1980). Late Capitalism. Trans. by Joris De Bres. London: Verso.
• Orr, John (1993). Cinema and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Youngblood, D. J. (1996). “Andrei Rublev: The Medieval Epic as Post-Utopian History”. The Persistence of History. Ed.: Vivian Sobchack., London: Routledge.