Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

RELATION OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT, LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE, SELF EFFICACY AND CAREER SATISFACTION

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 53, 229 - 250, 28.10.2022

Nurdanur Tavlan Soydan , İbrahim Aksel , Serkan Dolma

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1119879

Öz

In this study, the direct effect of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange on career satisfaction and the indirect effect through self-efficacy has been investigated. The model of the research was set by utilizing social exchange theory and social cognitive career theory. In this context, both direct effects of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange and also indirect statistical effect on self-efficacy have been tested. The data of the research were collected through an online survey by reaching 524 employees of 28 companies that received education from a training and consultancy firm operating in Istanbul. According to the results of the analysis, it was seen that the perceived organizational support and leader-member iexchange had a direct effect on career satisfaction and an indirect effect on self-efficacy. Accordingly, the findings of the study support all the hypotheses of the study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Perceived Organizational Support Leader-Member Exchange Self Efficacy Career Satisfaction

Kaynakça

  • Abele, A. E., ve Spurk, D. (2009). “The Longitudinal Impact of Self-Efficacy And Career Goals On Objective And Subjective Career Success”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 53-62.
  • Ahmer, Z., Aamir, M., Ali, M., ve Usman, M. (2020). “Mechanism Between Organizational Support Factors and Motivation to Transfer: Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy”, Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 6(4), 1621-1630.
  • Akbaş, T. T., ve Çetin, A. (2015). “İş Tatmini ve Kişi-Örgüt Uyumunun Örgütsel Özdeşleşmeye Etkisi”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 16(1), 81-101.
  • Armstrong-Stassen, M., ve Ursel, N. D. (2009). “Perceived Organizational Support, Career Satisfaction, and The Retention Of Older Workers”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 201-220.
  • Arthur, M. B. (1994). “The Boundaryless Career: A New Perspective for Organizational Inquiry”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 295-306.
  • Atitumpong, A., ve Badir, Y. F. (2018). “Leader-Member Exchange, Learning Orientation and Innovative Work Behavior”. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(1), 32–47.
  • Azim, A., ve Dora, M.T. (2016). “Perceived Organizational Support and Organizatıonal Citizenship Behavıor: The Mediating Role Of Psychologıcal Capital”. Journal of Human Capital Development, 9, 99-118.
  • Avcı, U., ve Turunç, Ö. (2012). “Dönüşümcü Liderlik ve Örgüte Güvenin Kariyer Memnuniyetine Etkisi: Lider-Üye Etkileşiminin Aracılık Rolü”, Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), ss: 45-55.
  • Ballout, H. I. (2009). “Career Commitment And Career Success: Moderating Role Of Self-Efficacy”, Career Development International, 14(7), 655-670.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). “Self-Efficacy: Toward A Unifying Theory Of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review”, 84(2), 191.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency, American Psychologist, 37(2), 122.
  • Bandura, A., (1993) “Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning”, Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [ed.], Encyclopedia of Mental Health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998)
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control.: W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
  • Barnett, B. R., ve Bradley, L. (2007). “The Impact Of Organisational Support For Career Development On Career Satisfaction”, Career Development International, 12(7), 617-636.
  • Bhaskar, A. U., ve Mishra, B. (2019). “Putting Workplace Spirituality In Context Examining its Role In Enhancing Career Satisfaction And Reducing Turnover Intentions With Perceived Organizational Support As an Antecedent“, Personnel Review, 48(7), 1848-1865.
  • Bhatti, M. A., Juhari, A. S., ve Piararal, N. K., (2017). “Knowledge Workers Job Performance: An Examination of Career Values, Perceived Organizational Support and Career Satisfaction”, Business and Management Horizons, 5(2), 13-35.
  • Biao, L., ve Shuping, C. (2014). “Leader-Member Exchange, Efficacy and Job Performance: A Cognitive Perspective Interpretation”, Canadian Social Science, 10(5), 244-248.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange And Power in Social Life, John Wiley New York
  • Bogler, R., ve Nir, A. E. (2012). “The Importance of Teachers’ Perceived Organizational Support to Job Satisfaction What’s Empowerment Got To Do With it?” Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), pp:287-306.
  • Byrne, Z. S., Dik, B. J., ve Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). “Alternatives To Traditional Mentoring in Fostering Career Success”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 429-442.
  • Caesen, G., ve Stinglhamber, F. (2014). “The Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Support and Work Engagement: The Role of Self-Efficacy and its Outcomes”, Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 64(2014), 259-267.
  • Cao, L., Hirschi, ve A., Deller, J. (2014). “Perceived Organizational Support And İntention To Stay İn Host Countries Among Self-İnitiated Expatriates: The Role Of Career Satisfaction And Networks”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(14), 2013-2032.
  • Chang, W., ve Busser, J. A. (2020). “Hospitality Career Retention: The Role of Contextual Factors And Thriving at Work”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(1), 193-211.
  • Chen, Y. (2010). “The Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Salesman’s Career Satisfaction”, 2010 7th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Chen, Z., Eisenberger, R., Johnson, K. M., Sucharski, I. L., ve Aselage, J. (2009). “Perceived Organizational Support and Extra- Role Performance: Which Leads to Which?”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 119-124.
  • Cheng, L., Cui, Y., Chen, Q., Ye, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, F., Zeng, W., ve Hu, X. (2020). “Paediatric Nurses’ General Self-Efficacy, Perceived Organizational Support And Perceived Professional Benefits From Class A Tertiary Hospitals İn Jilin Province of China: The Mediating Effect of Nursing Practice Environment”, BMC Health Services Research, 20(12).
  • Cohen, J., (1992). “Statistical Power Analysis”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98-101.
  • Conley, S. C., Bacharach, S. B., ve Bauer, S. (1989). “The School Work Environment and Teacher Career Dissatisfaction”, Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(1), 58-81.
  • Dansereau, F., Graen, G., ve Haga, W.J. (1975). “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
  • Dansereau, F., Cashman, J., ve Graen, G. (1973). “Instrumentality Theory and Equity Theory as Complementary Approaches in Predicting the Relationship of Leadership and Turnover among Managers”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 10, 184-200.
  • Dawis, R. V., ve Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A Psychological Theory of Work Adjustment, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Decenzo, D. A., ve Robbins, S. P. (2007). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management, John Wiley, Hoboken
  • Dienesch, R. M., ve Liden, R. C. (1986). “Leader-Member Exchange Model Of Leadership: A Critique And Further Development”. Academy of Management Review. 11: 618-634
  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. B., ve Ferris, G. R. (2011). “A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange: Integrating the Past With an Eye Toward the Future”, Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759.
  • Düzgün, E., ve Yeşiltaş, M. (2019). “Otel İşletmelerinde Algılanan Örgütsel Destek ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Arasındaki İlişkide Psikolojik Sermayenin Aracılık Etkisinin İncelenmesi”, Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 16(3), ss: 533-552.
  • Dolma, Ö, ve Dolma, S. (2018). “Assessing Measurement Invariance of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS): Paper-and-Pencil vs. Online Administrations”, Journal of Internet Applications and Management, 9(2), 21-34.
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, ve S., Sowa, D. (1986). “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
  • Erdogan, B., ve Liden, R. C. (2002). Social Exchanges in The Workplace. Leadership, 65–114.
  • Gerstner, C. R., Day, D. V. (1997). “Meta-Analytic Review Of Leader–Member Exchange Theory: Correlates And Construct Issues”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.
  • Gouldner, A. (1960). “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
  • Graen, G. (1976). Role-Making Processes Within Complex Organizations, Handbook Of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1201–1245.
  • Graen, G. B., ve Scandura, T. A. (1987). “Toward A Psychology of Dyadic Organizing”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
  • Graen, G. B., ve Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). “Relationship-Based Approach To Leadership: Development Of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: Applying A Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective”, The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., ve Wormley, W. M. (1990). “Effects of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Performance Evaluations and Career Outcomes” Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). “Circumscription and Compromise: A Developmental Theory Of Occupational Aspirations”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545–579.
  • Gün, G. (2018). “Örgüt Kültürü Tı̇plerı̇nı̇n Karı̇yer Tatmı̇nı̇ne Etkı̇sı̇nde Lı̇der-Üye Etkı̇leşı̇mı̇nı̇n Aracılık Etkı̇sı̇: Tekstı̇l İşletmelerı̇nde Bı̇r Uygulama”, Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 18(35), 78-88.
  • Han, G. (2010). “Trust and Career Satisfaction: The Role of LMX”, Career Development International, 15(5), 437-458.
  • Hashemi, S. M. K., Nadi, H. K., ve Rezvanfar, A. (2012). “Agricultural Personnel’s Proactive Behavior: Effects of Self Efficacy Perceptions and Perceived Organizational Support”, International Business and Management, 4(1), 83-91.
  • Holland, J. L. (1985). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory Of Vocational Personalities And Work Environments (2nd ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  • Hughes, E. C. (1937). “Institutional Office and The Person”, American Journal of Sociology, 43, 404-414.
  • Jena, L., Nayak, U. (2020). “Theories of Career Development: An Analysis”, Indian Journal of Natural Sciences, 10(60), 23515-23523.
  • Joo, B. K., ve Lee, I. (2017). “Workplace Happiness: Work Engagement, Career Satisfaction, And Subjective Well-Being”, A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 5(2), 206-221.
  • Joo, B. K., ve Ready, K. (2012). “Career Satisfaction The Influences of Proactive Personality, Performance Goal Orientation Organizational Learning Culture, and Leader-Member Exchange Quality”, Career Development International, 17(3), 276-295.
  • Jung, Y., ve Takeuchi, N. (2018). “A Lifespan Perspective For Understanding Career Self- Management and Satisfaction: The Role of Developmental Human Resource Practices And Organizational Support”, Human Relations, 71(1), pp:73-102
  • Karatepe, O. (2012). “Perceived Organizational Support, Career Satisfaction An Performance Outcomes: A Study of Hotel Employees in Cameroon”, International Journal of Contemprorary Hospitality Management, 24(5), 735-752.
  • Khorakian, A., ve Sharifirad, M. S. (2019). “Integrating Implicit Leadership Theories, Leader-Member Exchange, Self-Efficacy and Attachment Theory to Predict Job Performance”, Psychological Report, 122(3), 1117-1144.
  • Khurram, S. (2009). “Perceived Organizational Support, Antecedents and Consequences Proposing and Testing a Model in a Public Sector University of Pakistan”, South Asian Journal of Management, 16(1), 7-24.
  • Kırkbeşoğlu E., ve Özder E. H. (2015). “The Effects of Organizational Performanceon The Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Support and career Satisfaction: An Application on Insurance Industry”, Journal of Management Research, 7(3), 35‐50.
  • Kim, J., ve Jang, S. (2018). “Seafarers’ Quality of Life: Organizational Culture, Self-Efficacy, and Perceived Fatigue”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 1-11.
  • Kurtesis, J. N., ve Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., Adis, Cory. S. (2015). “Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory”, Journal of Management, 43(6), 1-31.
  • Lent, R. W., ve Brown, S. D. (2013). “Social Cognitive Model of Career Self-Management: Toward a Unifying View of Adaptive Career Behavior Across the Life Span”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 557-568.
  • Lent, R. W., ve Brown, S. D. (2008). “Social Cognitive Career Theory and Subjective Well-Being in the Context of Work”, Journal of Career Assessment, 16(1), 6-21.
  • Lent, R. W., ve Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating Person and Situation Perspectives on Work Satisfaction: A Social-Cognitive View, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 236-247.
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., ve Hackett, G. (1994). “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122.
  • Leung, S. A. (2008). The Big Five Career Theories. In J. A. Athanasou, R. Van Esbroeck (Eds.), International Handbook of Career Guidance (115-132). Philadelphia: Springer Science.
  • Liao, S. H., Hu, D. C., Chung, Y. C., ve Chen, L. W. (2017). “LMX and Employee Satisfaction: Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital”, Leadership Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 433-449.
  • Lichtenstein, B. M. B., ve Mendenhall, M. (2002). “Non-Linearity And Response-Ability: Emergent Order in 21st Century Careers”, Human Relations, 55(1), 5–32.
  • Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., Wayne, S. J. (1997). “Leader-Member Exchange Theory: The Past and Potential For The Future”, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15, 47-119.
  • Liu, L., Hu, S., Wang, L., Sui, G., ve Ma, L. (2013). “Positive Resources For Combating Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese Male Correctional Officers: Perceived Organizational Support and Psychological Capital” Bio Medical Central Psychiatry, 13(89), 1-9.
  • Luszczynska, A. Scholz, U. ve Schwarzer, R. (2005). “The General Self Efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies”, The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439- 457.
  • Maddux, J. E., ve Stanley, M. A. (1986). “Self-Efficacy Theory in Contemporary Psychology: An Overview”, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4,(3), 249-255.
  • Mondy, R. W., Martocchio, J. J. (2016). Human Resources Management, Pearson, England.
  • Naktiyok, A., ve Kızıl, S. (2018). “Örgütsel Destek ve Öz Yeterlik Algısının Akademik Erteleme Davranışı Üzerine Etkisi: Araştırma Görevlileri Üzerinde Bir İnceleme”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4), 267-285.
  • Ng, T. W.H., ve Feldman, D. C. (2014). “Subjective Career Success: A Meta-Analytic Review”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(2), 169–179.
  • Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., ve Feldman, D. C. (2005). “Predictors Of Objective And Subjective Career Success: A Meta-Analysis”, Personal Psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
  • Ngo, H. Y., ve Hui, L. (2017). “Individual Orientations and Career Satisfaction: The Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Self-Efficacy”, Journal of Career Development, 20(10), 1-15.
  • Özkoç, A. G., ve Bektaş, T. (2016). “Organizational Support and Self-Efficacy as the Predictors of Dissenter Behavior among Hotel Employees”, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(5), 285-305.
  • Pajares, F. (1997). Current Directions in Self-Efficacy Research. In M. Maehr, P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Pelenk, S. E. (2020). “Lider-Üye Etkileşimin Kariyer Memnuniyetine Etkisinde Algılanan Güç Mesafesinin Aracılık Rolü”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(3), ss: 22-45.
  • Peng, Z., Gao, B., ve Zhao, H. (2019). “Coaching Leadership and Subordinates’ Career Success: The Mediating Role of Leader Member Exchange”, Social Behavior And Personality, 47(11), 1-8.
  • Priyatama, A. N., Zainudin, M., ve Handoyo, S. (2018). “Predicting Faculty Member’s Work Engagement In Indonesia: Testing The Role of Optimism, Perceived Organizational Support and Self Efficacy”, The 6th ASEAN Regional Union Psychological Society (ARUPS) Congress, 1-28.
  • Rhoades, L., ve Eisenberger, R. (2002). “Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of The Literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.
  • Rigotti, T., Korek, S., ve Otto, K. (2020). “Career-Related Self-Efficacy, its Antecedents and Relationship to Subjective Career Success in A Cross- Lagged Panel Study”. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(20), 2645-2672.
  • Seibert, S. E., ve Kraimer, M. L. (2001). “The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Career Success”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 1-21.
  • Scandura, T. A., ve Graen, G. B. (1984). “Moderating Effects of Initial Leader-Member Exchange Status on the Effects of a Leadership Intervention”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(3), 428-426
  • Schwarzer, R., ve Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
  • Sherer, M., ve Maddux, J. E. (1982). “The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation”, Psychological Report, 51, 663-671.
  • Sparrowe, R. T., ve Liden, R. C. (1997). “Process and Structure in Leader–Member Exchange”, Academy of Management Review, 22, 522–552.
  • Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., ve Dries, N. (2018). “Antecedents and Outcomes of Objective Versus Subjective Career Success: Competing Perspectives and Future Directions”, Journal of Management, 45(1), 35-69.
  • Sullivan, S. E. (1999). “The Changing Nature of Careers: A Review and Research Agenda”, Journal of Management, 25(3), 457-484.
  • Super, D. E. (1963). Toward Making Self-Concept Theory Operational, In D. E. Super, R. Starishewsky, N. Matlin, J. P. Jordaan (Eds.), Career Development SeIf-Consept Theory. N. Y.: Teachers College, Columbia University
  • Tripathi, P., ve Singh, S. (2020). “Work-life Benefits and Employee Well-being: Role of Perceived Organizational Support Self- Efficacy”, The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations A Review of Economic Social Development, 56(2), 304-319.
  • Türe, A., ve Akkoç, İ. (2020). “The Mediating Role of Social Support in The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support and Psychological Empowerment on Career Satisfaction in Nurses”, Perspect Psychiatric Care, 1-9.
  • Wang, H., Chen, X., ve Lu, C. (2020). “When Career Dissatisfaction Leads To Employee Job Crafting The Role of Job Social Support And Occupational Self-Efficacy”, Career Development International, 25(4), 337-354.
  • Wang, X., Liu, L., Zou, F., Hao, J., ve Wu, H. (2017). “Associations of Occupational Stressors, Perceived Organizational Support, and Psychological Capital with Work Engagement among Chinese Female Nurses” Hindawin BioMed Research International, 2017, 1-11. Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., ve Graf, I. K. (1999). “The Role of Human Capital, Motivation, and Supervisor Sponsorship in Predicting Career Success”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 577–595.
  • Wayne, S. J., ve Green, S. A. (1993). “The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange on Employee Citizenship and Impression Management Behavior”, Human Relations, 46, 1431–1440.
  • Yalalova, J., ve Zhang, L. (2017). “Self-Efficacy And Career Satısfaction: The Mediating Role of Work Effort”, Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (AEBMR), 37, 252-265.
  • Yalalova, J., L. Zhang, ve Durrani, D. K. (2017). “Emotional Intelligence Could Forge Self-Efficacy, Work Effort and Career Satisfaction”, Human Systems Management, 36, 141-149.
  • Zhou, T. Guan, R., ve Sun, L. (2021). “Perceived Organizational Support and PTSD Symptoms of Frontline Healthcare Workers in The Outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan: The Mediating Effects Of Self-Efficacy And Coping Strategies”, International Association of Applied Psychology, 1-16.

ALGILANAN KURUMSAL DESTEK, LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ, ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ve KARİYER TATMİNİ İLİŞKİSİ

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 53, 229 - 250, 28.10.2022

Nurdanur Tavlan Soydan , İbrahim Aksel , Serkan Dolma

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1119879

Öz

Bu çalışmada çalışanlarda algılanan kurumsal destek ve lider-üye etkileşiminin kariyer tatminine olan doğrudan ve öz-yeterlilik üzerinden dolaylı etkileri araştırılmıştır. Araştırmanın modeli sosyal değişim teorisi ve sosyal bilişsel kariyer teorisinden faydalanılarak oluşturulmuştur. Algılanan kurumsal destek ve lider üye etkileşiminin kariyer tatmini üzerinde hem doğrudan hem de öz-yeterlilik üzerinden dolaylı istatistiksel etkisi test edilmiştir. Araştırmanın verileri çevrim içi anket yoluyla İstanbul’da faaliyet gösteren bir eğitim ve danışmanlık firmasından eğitim almış 28 işletmenin 524 çalışana ulaşılarak toplanmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre algılanan kurumsal destek ve lider üye etkileşiminin kariyer tatmini üzerinde doğrudan ve öz-yeterlilik üzerinden dolaylı istatistiksel etkisi olduğu görülmüştür. Buna göre araştırmanın bulguları çalışmanın tüm hipotezlerini destekler niteliktedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Algılanan Kurumsal Destek Lider-Üye İlişkisi Öz-yeterlilik Kariyer Tatmini

Kaynakça

  • Abele, A. E., ve Spurk, D. (2009). “The Longitudinal Impact of Self-Efficacy And Career Goals On Objective And Subjective Career Success”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 53-62.
  • Ahmer, Z., Aamir, M., Ali, M., ve Usman, M. (2020). “Mechanism Between Organizational Support Factors and Motivation to Transfer: Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy”, Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 6(4), 1621-1630.
  • Akbaş, T. T., ve Çetin, A. (2015). “İş Tatmini ve Kişi-Örgüt Uyumunun Örgütsel Özdeşleşmeye Etkisi”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 16(1), 81-101.
  • Armstrong-Stassen, M., ve Ursel, N. D. (2009). “Perceived Organizational Support, Career Satisfaction, and The Retention Of Older Workers”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 201-220.
  • Arthur, M. B. (1994). “The Boundaryless Career: A New Perspective for Organizational Inquiry”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 295-306.
  • Atitumpong, A., ve Badir, Y. F. (2018). “Leader-Member Exchange, Learning Orientation and Innovative Work Behavior”. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(1), 32–47.
  • Azim, A., ve Dora, M.T. (2016). “Perceived Organizational Support and Organizatıonal Citizenship Behavıor: The Mediating Role Of Psychologıcal Capital”. Journal of Human Capital Development, 9, 99-118.
  • Avcı, U., ve Turunç, Ö. (2012). “Dönüşümcü Liderlik ve Örgüte Güvenin Kariyer Memnuniyetine Etkisi: Lider-Üye Etkileşiminin Aracılık Rolü”, Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), ss: 45-55.
  • Ballout, H. I. (2009). “Career Commitment And Career Success: Moderating Role Of Self-Efficacy”, Career Development International, 14(7), 655-670.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). “Self-Efficacy: Toward A Unifying Theory Of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review”, 84(2), 191.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency, American Psychologist, 37(2), 122.
  • Bandura, A., (1993) “Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning”, Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [ed.], Encyclopedia of Mental Health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998)
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control.: W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
  • Barnett, B. R., ve Bradley, L. (2007). “The Impact Of Organisational Support For Career Development On Career Satisfaction”, Career Development International, 12(7), 617-636.
  • Bhaskar, A. U., ve Mishra, B. (2019). “Putting Workplace Spirituality In Context Examining its Role In Enhancing Career Satisfaction And Reducing Turnover Intentions With Perceived Organizational Support As an Antecedent“, Personnel Review, 48(7), 1848-1865.
  • Bhatti, M. A., Juhari, A. S., ve Piararal, N. K., (2017). “Knowledge Workers Job Performance: An Examination of Career Values, Perceived Organizational Support and Career Satisfaction”, Business and Management Horizons, 5(2), 13-35.
  • Biao, L., ve Shuping, C. (2014). “Leader-Member Exchange, Efficacy and Job Performance: A Cognitive Perspective Interpretation”, Canadian Social Science, 10(5), 244-248.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange And Power in Social Life, John Wiley New York
  • Bogler, R., ve Nir, A. E. (2012). “The Importance of Teachers’ Perceived Organizational Support to Job Satisfaction What’s Empowerment Got To Do With it?” Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), pp:287-306.
  • Byrne, Z. S., Dik, B. J., ve Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). “Alternatives To Traditional Mentoring in Fostering Career Success”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 429-442.
  • Caesen, G., ve Stinglhamber, F. (2014). “The Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Support and Work Engagement: The Role of Self-Efficacy and its Outcomes”, Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 64(2014), 259-267.
  • Cao, L., Hirschi, ve A., Deller, J. (2014). “Perceived Organizational Support And İntention To Stay İn Host Countries Among Self-İnitiated Expatriates: The Role Of Career Satisfaction And Networks”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(14), 2013-2032.
  • Chang, W., ve Busser, J. A. (2020). “Hospitality Career Retention: The Role of Contextual Factors And Thriving at Work”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(1), 193-211.
  • Chen, Y. (2010). “The Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Salesman’s Career Satisfaction”, 2010 7th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Chen, Z., Eisenberger, R., Johnson, K. M., Sucharski, I. L., ve Aselage, J. (2009). “Perceived Organizational Support and Extra- Role Performance: Which Leads to Which?”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 119-124.
  • Cheng, L., Cui, Y., Chen, Q., Ye, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, F., Zeng, W., ve Hu, X. (2020). “Paediatric Nurses’ General Self-Efficacy, Perceived Organizational Support And Perceived Professional Benefits From Class A Tertiary Hospitals İn Jilin Province of China: The Mediating Effect of Nursing Practice Environment”, BMC Health Services Research, 20(12).
  • Cohen, J., (1992). “Statistical Power Analysis”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98-101.
  • Conley, S. C., Bacharach, S. B., ve Bauer, S. (1989). “The School Work Environment and Teacher Career Dissatisfaction”, Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(1), 58-81.
  • Dansereau, F., Graen, G., ve Haga, W.J. (1975). “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
  • Dansereau, F., Cashman, J., ve Graen, G. (1973). “Instrumentality Theory and Equity Theory as Complementary Approaches in Predicting the Relationship of Leadership and Turnover among Managers”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 10, 184-200.
  • Dawis, R. V., ve Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A Psychological Theory of Work Adjustment, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Decenzo, D. A., ve Robbins, S. P. (2007). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management, John Wiley, Hoboken
  • Dienesch, R. M., ve Liden, R. C. (1986). “Leader-Member Exchange Model Of Leadership: A Critique And Further Development”. Academy of Management Review. 11: 618-634
  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. B., ve Ferris, G. R. (2011). “A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange: Integrating the Past With an Eye Toward the Future”, Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759.
  • Düzgün, E., ve Yeşiltaş, M. (2019). “Otel İşletmelerinde Algılanan Örgütsel Destek ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Arasındaki İlişkide Psikolojik Sermayenin Aracılık Etkisinin İncelenmesi”, Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 16(3), ss: 533-552.
  • Dolma, Ö, ve Dolma, S. (2018). “Assessing Measurement Invariance of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS): Paper-and-Pencil vs. Online Administrations”, Journal of Internet Applications and Management, 9(2), 21-34.
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, ve S., Sowa, D. (1986). “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
  • Erdogan, B., ve Liden, R. C. (2002). Social Exchanges in The Workplace. Leadership, 65–114.
  • Gerstner, C. R., Day, D. V. (1997). “Meta-Analytic Review Of Leader–Member Exchange Theory: Correlates And Construct Issues”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.
  • Gouldner, A. (1960). “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
  • Graen, G. (1976). Role-Making Processes Within Complex Organizations, Handbook Of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1201–1245.
  • Graen, G. B., ve Scandura, T. A. (1987). “Toward A Psychology of Dyadic Organizing”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
  • Graen, G. B., ve Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). “Relationship-Based Approach To Leadership: Development Of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: Applying A Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective”, The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., ve Wormley, W. M. (1990). “Effects of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Performance Evaluations and Career Outcomes” Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). “Circumscription and Compromise: A Developmental Theory Of Occupational Aspirations”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545–579.
  • Gün, G. (2018). “Örgüt Kültürü Tı̇plerı̇nı̇n Karı̇yer Tatmı̇nı̇ne Etkı̇sı̇nde Lı̇der-Üye Etkı̇leşı̇mı̇nı̇n Aracılık Etkı̇sı̇: Tekstı̇l İşletmelerı̇nde Bı̇r Uygulama”, Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 18(35), 78-88.
  • Han, G. (2010). “Trust and Career Satisfaction: The Role of LMX”, Career Development International, 15(5), 437-458.
  • Hashemi, S. M. K., Nadi, H. K., ve Rezvanfar, A. (2012). “Agricultural Personnel’s Proactive Behavior: Effects of Self Efficacy Perceptions and Perceived Organizational Support”, International Business and Management, 4(1), 83-91.
  • Holland, J. L. (1985). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory Of Vocational Personalities And Work Environments (2nd ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  • Hughes, E. C. (1937). “Institutional Office and The Person”, American Journal of Sociology, 43, 404-414.
  • Jena, L., Nayak, U. (2020). “Theories of Career Development: An Analysis”, Indian Journal of Natural Sciences, 10(60), 23515-23523.
  • Joo, B. K., ve Lee, I. (2017). “Workplace Happiness: Work Engagement, Career Satisfaction, And Subjective Well-Being”, A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 5(2), 206-221.
  • Joo, B. K., ve Ready, K. (2012). “Career Satisfaction The Influences of Proactive Personality, Performance Goal Orientation Organizational Learning Culture, and Leader-Member Exchange Quality”, Career Development International, 17(3), 276-295.
  • Jung, Y., ve Takeuchi, N. (2018). “A Lifespan Perspective For Understanding Career Self- Management and Satisfaction: The Role of Developmental Human Resource Practices And Organizational Support”, Human Relations, 71(1), pp:73-102
  • Karatepe, O. (2012). “Perceived Organizational Support, Career Satisfaction An Performance Outcomes: A Study of Hotel Employees in Cameroon”, International Journal of Contemprorary Hospitality Management, 24(5), 735-752.
  • Khorakian, A., ve Sharifirad, M. S. (2019). “Integrating Implicit Leadership Theories, Leader-Member Exchange, Self-Efficacy and Attachment Theory to Predict Job Performance”, Psychological Report, 122(3), 1117-1144.
  • Khurram, S. (2009). “Perceived Organizational Support, Antecedents and Consequences Proposing and Testing a Model in a Public Sector University of Pakistan”, South Asian Journal of Management, 16(1), 7-24.
  • Kırkbeşoğlu E., ve Özder E. H. (2015). “The Effects of Organizational Performanceon The Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Support and career Satisfaction: An Application on Insurance Industry”, Journal of Management Research, 7(3), 35‐50.
  • Kim, J., ve Jang, S. (2018). “Seafarers’ Quality of Life: Organizational Culture, Self-Efficacy, and Perceived Fatigue”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 1-11.
  • Kurtesis, J. N., ve Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., Adis, Cory. S. (2015). “Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory”, Journal of Management, 43(6), 1-31.
  • Lent, R. W., ve Brown, S. D. (2013). “Social Cognitive Model of Career Self-Management: Toward a Unifying View of Adaptive Career Behavior Across the Life Span”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 557-568.
  • Lent, R. W., ve Brown, S. D. (2008). “Social Cognitive Career Theory and Subjective Well-Being in the Context of Work”, Journal of Career Assessment, 16(1), 6-21.
  • Lent, R. W., ve Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating Person and Situation Perspectives on Work Satisfaction: A Social-Cognitive View, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 236-247.
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., ve Hackett, G. (1994). “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122.
  • Leung, S. A. (2008). The Big Five Career Theories. In J. A. Athanasou, R. Van Esbroeck (Eds.), International Handbook of Career Guidance (115-132). Philadelphia: Springer Science.
  • Liao, S. H., Hu, D. C., Chung, Y. C., ve Chen, L. W. (2017). “LMX and Employee Satisfaction: Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital”, Leadership Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 433-449.
  • Lichtenstein, B. M. B., ve Mendenhall, M. (2002). “Non-Linearity And Response-Ability: Emergent Order in 21st Century Careers”, Human Relations, 55(1), 5–32.
  • Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., Wayne, S. J. (1997). “Leader-Member Exchange Theory: The Past and Potential For The Future”, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15, 47-119.
  • Liu, L., Hu, S., Wang, L., Sui, G., ve Ma, L. (2013). “Positive Resources For Combating Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese Male Correctional Officers: Perceived Organizational Support and Psychological Capital” Bio Medical Central Psychiatry, 13(89), 1-9.
  • Luszczynska, A. Scholz, U. ve Schwarzer, R. (2005). “The General Self Efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies”, The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439- 457.
  • Maddux, J. E., ve Stanley, M. A. (1986). “Self-Efficacy Theory in Contemporary Psychology: An Overview”, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4,(3), 249-255.
  • Mondy, R. W., Martocchio, J. J. (2016). Human Resources Management, Pearson, England.
  • Naktiyok, A., ve Kızıl, S. (2018). “Örgütsel Destek ve Öz Yeterlik Algısının Akademik Erteleme Davranışı Üzerine Etkisi: Araştırma Görevlileri Üzerinde Bir İnceleme”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4), 267-285.
  • Ng, T. W.H., ve Feldman, D. C. (2014). “Subjective Career Success: A Meta-Analytic Review”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(2), 169–179.
  • Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., ve Feldman, D. C. (2005). “Predictors Of Objective And Subjective Career Success: A Meta-Analysis”, Personal Psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
  • Ngo, H. Y., ve Hui, L. (2017). “Individual Orientations and Career Satisfaction: The Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Self-Efficacy”, Journal of Career Development, 20(10), 1-15.
  • Özkoç, A. G., ve Bektaş, T. (2016). “Organizational Support and Self-Efficacy as the Predictors of Dissenter Behavior among Hotel Employees”, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(5), 285-305.
  • Pajares, F. (1997). Current Directions in Self-Efficacy Research. In M. Maehr, P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Pelenk, S. E. (2020). “Lider-Üye Etkileşimin Kariyer Memnuniyetine Etkisinde Algılanan Güç Mesafesinin Aracılık Rolü”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(3), ss: 22-45.
  • Peng, Z., Gao, B., ve Zhao, H. (2019). “Coaching Leadership and Subordinates’ Career Success: The Mediating Role of Leader Member Exchange”, Social Behavior And Personality, 47(11), 1-8.
  • Priyatama, A. N., Zainudin, M., ve Handoyo, S. (2018). “Predicting Faculty Member’s Work Engagement In Indonesia: Testing The Role of Optimism, Perceived Organizational Support and Self Efficacy”, The 6th ASEAN Regional Union Psychological Society (ARUPS) Congress, 1-28.
  • Rhoades, L., ve Eisenberger, R. (2002). “Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of The Literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.
  • Rigotti, T., Korek, S., ve Otto, K. (2020). “Career-Related Self-Efficacy, its Antecedents and Relationship to Subjective Career Success in A Cross- Lagged Panel Study”. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(20), 2645-2672.
  • Seibert, S. E., ve Kraimer, M. L. (2001). “The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Career Success”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 1-21.
  • Scandura, T. A., ve Graen, G. B. (1984). “Moderating Effects of Initial Leader-Member Exchange Status on the Effects of a Leadership Intervention”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(3), 428-426
  • Schwarzer, R., ve Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
  • Sherer, M., ve Maddux, J. E. (1982). “The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation”, Psychological Report, 51, 663-671.
  • Sparrowe, R. T., ve Liden, R. C. (1997). “Process and Structure in Leader–Member Exchange”, Academy of Management Review, 22, 522–552.
  • Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., ve Dries, N. (2018). “Antecedents and Outcomes of Objective Versus Subjective Career Success: Competing Perspectives and Future Directions”, Journal of Management, 45(1), 35-69.
  • Sullivan, S. E. (1999). “The Changing Nature of Careers: A Review and Research Agenda”, Journal of Management, 25(3), 457-484.
  • Super, D. E. (1963). Toward Making Self-Concept Theory Operational, In D. E. Super, R. Starishewsky, N. Matlin, J. P. Jordaan (Eds.), Career Development SeIf-Consept Theory. N. Y.: Teachers College, Columbia University
  • Tripathi, P., ve Singh, S. (2020). “Work-life Benefits and Employee Well-being: Role of Perceived Organizational Support Self- Efficacy”, The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations A Review of Economic Social Development, 56(2), 304-319.
  • Türe, A., ve Akkoç, İ. (2020). “The Mediating Role of Social Support in The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support and Psychological Empowerment on Career Satisfaction in Nurses”, Perspect Psychiatric Care, 1-9.
  • Wang, H., Chen, X., ve Lu, C. (2020). “When Career Dissatisfaction Leads To Employee Job Crafting The Role of Job Social Support And Occupational Self-Efficacy”, Career Development International, 25(4), 337-354.
  • Wang, X., Liu, L., Zou, F., Hao, J., ve Wu, H. (2017). “Associations of Occupational Stressors, Perceived Organizational Support, and Psychological Capital with Work Engagement among Chinese Female Nurses” Hindawin BioMed Research International, 2017, 1-11. Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., ve Graf, I. K. (1999). “The Role of Human Capital, Motivation, and Supervisor Sponsorship in Predicting Career Success”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 577–595.
  • Wayne, S. J., ve Green, S. A. (1993). “The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange on Employee Citizenship and Impression Management Behavior”, Human Relations, 46, 1431–1440.
  • Yalalova, J., ve Zhang, L. (2017). “Self-Efficacy And Career Satısfaction: The Mediating Role of Work Effort”, Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (AEBMR), 37, 252-265.
  • Yalalova, J., L. Zhang, ve Durrani, D. K. (2017). “Emotional Intelligence Could Forge Self-Efficacy, Work Effort and Career Satisfaction”, Human Systems Management, 36, 141-149.
  • Zhou, T. Guan, R., ve Sun, L. (2021). “Perceived Organizational Support and PTSD Symptoms of Frontline Healthcare Workers in The Outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan: The Mediating Effects Of Self-Efficacy And Coping Strategies”, International Association of Applied Psychology, 1-16.
Toplam 100 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Finans
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Nurdanur Tavlan Soydan 0000-0002-4320-2257

İbrahim Aksel 0000-0002-2994-6735

Serkan Dolma 0000-0002-3913-2225

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 10 Kasım 2022
Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Ekim 2022
Kabul Tarihi 23 Haziran 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Sayı: 53

Kaynak Göster

APA Tavlan Soydan, N., Aksel, İ., & Dolma, S. (2022). ALGILANAN KURUMSAL DESTEK, LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ, ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ve KARİYER TATMİNİ İLİŞKİSİ. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(53), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1119879
AMA Tavlan Soydan N, Aksel İ, Dolma S. ALGILANAN KURUMSAL DESTEK, LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ, ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ve KARİYER TATMİNİ İLİŞKİSİ. PAUSBED. Ekim 2022;(53):229-250. doi:10.30794/pausbed.1119879
Chicago Tavlan Soydan, Nurdanur, İbrahim Aksel, ve Serkan Dolma. “ALGILANAN KURUMSAL DESTEK, LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ, ÖZ-YETERLİLİK Ve KARİYER TATMİNİ İLİŞKİSİ”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, sy. 53 (Ekim 2022): 229-50. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1119879.
EndNote Tavlan Soydan N, Aksel İ, Dolma S (01 Ekim 2022) ALGILANAN KURUMSAL DESTEK, LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ, ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ve KARİYER TATMİNİ İLİŞKİSİ. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 53 229–250.
IEEE N. Tavlan Soydan, İ. Aksel, ve S. Dolma, “ALGILANAN KURUMSAL DESTEK, LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ, ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ve KARİYER TATMİNİ İLİŞKİSİ”, PAUSBED, sy. 53, ss. 229–250, Ekim 2022, doi: 10.30794/pausbed.1119879.
ISNAD Tavlan Soydan, Nurdanur vd. “ALGILANAN KURUMSAL DESTEK, LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ, ÖZ-YETERLİLİK Ve KARİYER TATMİNİ İLİŞKİSİ”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 53 (Ekim 2022), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1119879.
JAMA Tavlan Soydan N, Aksel İ, Dolma S. ALGILANAN KURUMSAL DESTEK, LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ, ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ve KARİYER TATMİNİ İLİŞKİSİ. PAUSBED. 2022;:229–250.
MLA Tavlan Soydan, Nurdanur vd. “ALGILANAN KURUMSAL DESTEK, LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ, ÖZ-YETERLİLİK Ve KARİYER TATMİNİ İLİŞKİSİ”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, sy. 53, 2022, ss. 229-50, doi:10.30794/pausbed.1119879.
Vancouver Tavlan Soydan N, Aksel İ, Dolma S. ALGILANAN KURUMSAL DESTEK, LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ, ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ve KARİYER TATMİNİ İLİŞKİSİ. PAUSBED. 2022(53):229-50.
 Kapak Resmi İndir