Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 171 - 181, 01.12.2017

Abstract

References

  • Akbay, M., & Küçük, S. (2013). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin e-kitap kullanımına yönelik görüşleri. VII. International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium , Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Altın, H. M., & Kalelioğlu, F. (2015). FATIH projesi ile ilgili öğrenci ve öğretmen görüşleri. Başkent University Journal of Education, 2(1). Retrieved from http://buje.baskent.edu.tr/index.php/buje/article/download/62/49.
  • Batur, Z., Gulveren, H., & Balci, S. (2013). An empirical work about the attitudes of students receiving education under “Tablet PC pilot practice” towards use of technology in Turkish lectures. European Journal of Educational Studies, 5(1), 29-42
  • Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245.
  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29. Retrieved from http://web.uconn.edu/myoung/Clark.pdf.
  • Cope, C., & Ward, P. (2002). Integrating learning technology into classrooms: The importance of teachers’ perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 67-74. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/5_1/cope.html.
  • Çetinkaya, L., & Keser, H. (2014). Öğretmen ve öğrencilerin tablet bilgisayar kullanımında yaşadıkları sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 4(1).
  • Dündar, H., & Akçayır, M. (2014). Implementing tablet PCs in schools: Students’ attitudes and opinions. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 40-46.
  • Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ-, 42(1), 5-13. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic87187.files/Earle02.pdf.
  • Eren, E. (2015). Ortaokul ve lise öğrencilerinin eğitimde tablet bilgisayar kullanımına ilişkin algıları ile görüşleri. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty (KEFAD), 16(1), 409-428.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30221096.pdf.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30221207.pdf.
  • Isci, T. G., & Demir, S. B. (2015). The Use of Tablets Distributed within the Scope of FATIH Project for Education in Turkey (Is FATIH Project a Fiasco or a Technological Revolution?). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(7), 442-450.
  • Kenar, I., Balcı, M., & Gökalp, M. S. (2013). The Effects of Tablet Computer Assisted Instruction on Students’ Attitude toward Science and Technology Course. Kamla-Raj: Int J Edu Sci, 5(3), 163-171.
  • Kırali, F. N. (2013). FATIH projesi kapsaminda dağitilan tablet-pc uygulamalarina ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Bahçeşehir University, Turkey.
  • Kleiman, G. M. (2000). Myths and realities about technology in K-12 schools. Leadership and the New Technologies, 14(10), 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/educ260/documents/myths.pdf.
  • Kucukaydin, Z., Bozdogan, A. E., & Ozturk, P. (2014). Secondary school students’ views in a village school about the use of tablet computers in science course. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 4(2), 52-58.
  • Lan, J. (2000). Leading teacher educators to a new paradigm: Observations on technology integration. AACTE Briefs, 21(10), 4-6.
  • Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4624911.pdf.
  • Leggett, W. P., & Persichitte, K. A. (1998). Blood, sweat, and TEARS: 50 years of technology implementation obstacles. TechTrends, 43(3), 33-36.
  • Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Sheffield Excellence in Cities Partnership.
  • Lim, K. Y. (2011). What does the Tablet PC mean to you? A phenomenological research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(3), 323-333. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14703297.2011.593708?needAccess=true.
  • MEB (2016a), Tablet Bilgisayar. Retrieved from http://FATIHprojesi.meb.gov.tr/tablet/.
  • MEB (2016b), Etkileşimli Tahta. Retrieved from http://FATIHprojesi.meb.gov.tr/etkilesimli-tahta/.
  • Öner, G., & Kırkbeş, H. (2016). Öğretmenlerin akıllı tahta kullanımı ve öğrencilere verilen tablet PC hakkındaki algıları (Gaziantep). Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(3). Retrieved from http://www.turkishstudies.net/Makaleler/395220047_98%C3%96nerG%C3%BCzide-vd-egt-1797-1812.pdf.
  • Pamuk, S., Çakır, R., Ergun, M., Yılmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). Öğretmen ve öğrenci bakış açısıyla tablet PC ve etkileşimli tahta kullanımı: FATIH Projesi değerlendirmesi. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 13(3), 1799-1822.
  • Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163-178.
  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112.
  • Sommerich, C. M., Ward, R., Sikdar, K., Payne, J., & Herman, L. (2007). A survey of high school students with ubiquitous access to tablet PCs. Ergonomics, 50(5), 706-727.
  • Somyürek, S., Atasoy, B., & Özdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart?. Computers & Education, 53(2), 368-374.
  • Soykan, E. (2015). Views of students’, teachers’ and parents’ on the tablet computer usage in education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(3), 228-244.
  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144.
  • Tekerek, M., Altan, T., & Gündüz, İ. (2014). FATIH Projesinde Tablet PC Kullanımına Yönelik Öğrenci Tutumlarının İncelenmesi. International Journal of Informatics Technologies, 7(2).
  • Usluel, Y. K., Mumcu, F. K., & Demiraslan, Y. (2007). Öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri: Öğretmenlerin entegrasyon süreci ve engelleriyle ilgili görüşleri. Hacettepe University Journal of Education ,32(32).

Examining Student Perceptions Regarding to Usage Purposes of Tablet Computers Distributed Under the Scope of in FATIH Project in the Course Processes and by Students

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 171 - 181, 01.12.2017

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to determine student
perceptions regarding students’ purposes of tablet computer usage and how
tablet computers are used during learning process, which were given to students
within the scope of FATIH Project. In this study, it was used a mixed method
using a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. The study
group consisted from the 10th and 11th grade students of two Anatolian High
School in Ankara and Çorum in 2015-2016 academic year. 58 students joined from
different grade levels to this study. The data were collected through the
"Tablet Usage Survey". According to the findings of the study, when
students’ purposes of tablet computer usage are analyzed, students mostly use
tablet computers for listening to music, making research for homework, playing
game and watching video. The most important problem encountered while using
tablet computers in the classroom and coming into prominence in student
perceptions is the opinion regarding that they affect attention of the students
negatively. It is determined that other important problems encountered while
using tablet computers result from infrastructure problem, charge problem and
technical problems. According to perceptions of the participants, it is
understood that using tablet computers during teaching learning process
provides advantages in terms of easy access and speed during the lessons.

References

  • Akbay, M., & Küçük, S. (2013). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin e-kitap kullanımına yönelik görüşleri. VII. International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium , Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Altın, H. M., & Kalelioğlu, F. (2015). FATIH projesi ile ilgili öğrenci ve öğretmen görüşleri. Başkent University Journal of Education, 2(1). Retrieved from http://buje.baskent.edu.tr/index.php/buje/article/download/62/49.
  • Batur, Z., Gulveren, H., & Balci, S. (2013). An empirical work about the attitudes of students receiving education under “Tablet PC pilot practice” towards use of technology in Turkish lectures. European Journal of Educational Studies, 5(1), 29-42
  • Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245.
  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29. Retrieved from http://web.uconn.edu/myoung/Clark.pdf.
  • Cope, C., & Ward, P. (2002). Integrating learning technology into classrooms: The importance of teachers’ perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 67-74. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/5_1/cope.html.
  • Çetinkaya, L., & Keser, H. (2014). Öğretmen ve öğrencilerin tablet bilgisayar kullanımında yaşadıkları sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 4(1).
  • Dündar, H., & Akçayır, M. (2014). Implementing tablet PCs in schools: Students’ attitudes and opinions. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 40-46.
  • Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ-, 42(1), 5-13. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic87187.files/Earle02.pdf.
  • Eren, E. (2015). Ortaokul ve lise öğrencilerinin eğitimde tablet bilgisayar kullanımına ilişkin algıları ile görüşleri. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty (KEFAD), 16(1), 409-428.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30221096.pdf.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30221207.pdf.
  • Isci, T. G., & Demir, S. B. (2015). The Use of Tablets Distributed within the Scope of FATIH Project for Education in Turkey (Is FATIH Project a Fiasco or a Technological Revolution?). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(7), 442-450.
  • Kenar, I., Balcı, M., & Gökalp, M. S. (2013). The Effects of Tablet Computer Assisted Instruction on Students’ Attitude toward Science and Technology Course. Kamla-Raj: Int J Edu Sci, 5(3), 163-171.
  • Kırali, F. N. (2013). FATIH projesi kapsaminda dağitilan tablet-pc uygulamalarina ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Bahçeşehir University, Turkey.
  • Kleiman, G. M. (2000). Myths and realities about technology in K-12 schools. Leadership and the New Technologies, 14(10), 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/educ260/documents/myths.pdf.
  • Kucukaydin, Z., Bozdogan, A. E., & Ozturk, P. (2014). Secondary school students’ views in a village school about the use of tablet computers in science course. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 4(2), 52-58.
  • Lan, J. (2000). Leading teacher educators to a new paradigm: Observations on technology integration. AACTE Briefs, 21(10), 4-6.
  • Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4624911.pdf.
  • Leggett, W. P., & Persichitte, K. A. (1998). Blood, sweat, and TEARS: 50 years of technology implementation obstacles. TechTrends, 43(3), 33-36.
  • Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Sheffield Excellence in Cities Partnership.
  • Lim, K. Y. (2011). What does the Tablet PC mean to you? A phenomenological research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(3), 323-333. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14703297.2011.593708?needAccess=true.
  • MEB (2016a), Tablet Bilgisayar. Retrieved from http://FATIHprojesi.meb.gov.tr/tablet/.
  • MEB (2016b), Etkileşimli Tahta. Retrieved from http://FATIHprojesi.meb.gov.tr/etkilesimli-tahta/.
  • Öner, G., & Kırkbeş, H. (2016). Öğretmenlerin akıllı tahta kullanımı ve öğrencilere verilen tablet PC hakkındaki algıları (Gaziantep). Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(3). Retrieved from http://www.turkishstudies.net/Makaleler/395220047_98%C3%96nerG%C3%BCzide-vd-egt-1797-1812.pdf.
  • Pamuk, S., Çakır, R., Ergun, M., Yılmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). Öğretmen ve öğrenci bakış açısıyla tablet PC ve etkileşimli tahta kullanımı: FATIH Projesi değerlendirmesi. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 13(3), 1799-1822.
  • Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163-178.
  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112.
  • Sommerich, C. M., Ward, R., Sikdar, K., Payne, J., & Herman, L. (2007). A survey of high school students with ubiquitous access to tablet PCs. Ergonomics, 50(5), 706-727.
  • Somyürek, S., Atasoy, B., & Özdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart?. Computers & Education, 53(2), 368-374.
  • Soykan, E. (2015). Views of students’, teachers’ and parents’ on the tablet computer usage in education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(3), 228-244.
  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144.
  • Tekerek, M., Altan, T., & Gündüz, İ. (2014). FATIH Projesinde Tablet PC Kullanımına Yönelik Öğrenci Tutumlarının İncelenmesi. International Journal of Informatics Technologies, 7(2).
  • Usluel, Y. K., Mumcu, F. K., & Demiraslan, Y. (2007). Öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri: Öğretmenlerin entegrasyon süreci ve engelleriyle ilgili görüşleri. Hacettepe University Journal of Education ,32(32).
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Mustafa Sarıtepeci

Hatice Durak

Publication Date December 1, 2017
Acceptance Date November 30, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Sarıtepeci, M., & Durak, H. (2017). Examining Student Perceptions Regarding to Usage Purposes of Tablet Computers Distributed Under the Scope of in FATIH Project in the Course Processes and by Students. Participatory Educational Research, 4(2), 171-181.