Successful School Principals in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Schools: A Grounded Theory Research from Turkish Context

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 4, 77 - 98, 07.07.2024

Ali Duran , Necati Cemaloğlu

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.50.11.4

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to delve into the characteristics, professional competencies, leadership attitudes, and behaviors of successful school principals (SSPs) in socioeconomically disadvantaged schools. Utilizing a systematic grounded theory method (SGTM), we conducted research in the provinces of Amasya, Çorum, Samsun, and Tokat in Türkiye. Purposeful and theoretical sampling methods were employed to recruit successful school principals, deputy principals, teachers, students, and parents from secondary schools affiliated with the Ministry of National Education (MoNE). The data draws on unstructured individual and focus group interviews, as well as documents and observations. All the data obtained were inductively analyzed through open, axis, and selective coding stages. Based on the codes, sub-categories, categories, themes, and dimensions from the analyses, we designed the Contextual Successful School Principalship Model (CSSPM), which falls into four dimensions as follows: individual, managerial, organizational, and instructional. SSPs in this study mostly tend to display paternalistic leadership attitudes and behaviors in terms of dedication and self-sacrifice, serving, intrinsic motivation, and influencing stakeholders. They exhibit almost all the attitudes and behaviors of servant leadership, act according to some national and moral values, and experience national attitudes such as patriotism and nationalism intensely. By giving importance to the academic socialization of students' mothers, successful school principals exhibit transformational and instructional leadership behaviors. They act strategically to directly involve mothers in enhancing student achievement, demonstrating their commitment to fostering an inclusive and supportive educational environment.

Keywords

successful school principalship, social justice leadership, paternalistic leadership, servant leadership, academic achievement

References

• Abrams, E. R. (1998). Perceptions of successful elementary school principals of effective school leadership practices: A portrait of school leadership (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
• Ağaoğlu, E., Şimşek, Y., Ceylan, M., & Kesim, E. (2012). The characteristics of successful Turkish principals: Three cases. Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 7(2), 812-822.
• Agnew, B. D. (2014). Mid-career middle school principals’ perceptions of school improvement and school reform initiative (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation).
• Akbaba-Altun, S. A. (2011). Başarılı ilköğretim okulu müdürlerinin zaman yönetimi stratejileri [Successful elementary school principals’ time management strategies]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 17(4), 491-507.
• Alqahtani, A. S., Noman, M., & Kaur, A. (2020). Core leadership practices of school principals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1-15. doi:10.1177/1741143220901857
• Asiedu-Kumi, A. O. (2013). Model leadership: Discovering successful principals’ skills, strategies, and approaches for student success (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
• Barnes, J. K. (2011). Leadership styles of principals in successful middle schools in Tennessee (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Lincoln Memorial University, Harrogate, TN, United States.
• Belchetz, D., & Leithwood, K. (2007). Successful leadership: Does context matter and if so, how?. In C. Day and K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change (pp. 117-138). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Bonomo, J. (2016). How successful female elementary principals effectively balance their personal and professional lives (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana.
• Brinkerhoff, R. (2003). The success case method: Find out quickly what's working and what's not. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.
• Bush, T. & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. doi:10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
• Bush, T. & Jackson, D. (2002). A preparation for school leadership: International perspectives. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 30(4), 417–429. doi:10.1177/0263211x020304004.
• Çelik, H. & Ekşi, H. (2015). Gömülü kuram [Grounded Theory]. İstanbul: EDAM.
• Cemaloğlu, N. & Duran, A. (2020). Fark yaratan başarılı okul müdürleri [Successful school principals who make a difference]. Ankara: PEGEM
• Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32), 1-20. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/ 2014.1028
• Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Copland, M. A., & Knapp, M. S. (2006). Connecting leadership with learning: A framework for reflection, planning, and action. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, Conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc
• Day, C. (2007). What being a successful principal really means: An international perspective. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 19, 13-24.
• Day, C. W. (2022). Commentary – Research on successful school principalship: Progress on a secure front. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(1), 118-123. doi:10.1108/JEA-02-2022-268
• Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolley, H., & Beresford, J. (2000). Successful leadership in times of change. Buckingham: Open University.
• Druetzler-Katz, J. (2011). A tale of two schools: A comparative case study of charter school leaders (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
• Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124. doi:10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
• Flint, D. J., Woodruff, R. B., & Gardial, S. F. (2002). Exploring the phenomenon of customers' desired value change in a business-to-business context. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 102-117. doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.4.102.18517
• Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine
• Goode, H., Drysdale, L., & Gurr, D. (2023). What We Know about Successful School Leadership from Australian Cases and an Open Systems Model of School Leadership. Education Sciences, 13(11),1-20. doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111142
• Gordon, M. F., & Hart, H. (2022). How strong principals succeed: improving student achievement in high-poverty urban schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(3), 288-302. doi:10.1108/JEA-03-2021-0063
• Gregory, R. W. (2010). Design science research and the grounded theory method: Characteristics, differences, and complementary uses. Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Information Systems, 111-127.
• Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of leadership. Human Relations, 58(11), 1467–1494. doi:10.1177/0018726705061314
• Grissom, J. A., & Loeb, S. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1091–1123. doi:10.3102/0002831211402663
• Gu, Q., & Johansson, O. (2013). Sustaining school performance: School contexts matter. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(3), 301-326. doi:10.1080/13603124.2012.732242
• Gu, Q., Day, C., Walker, A., & Leithwood, K. (2018). How successful secondary school principals enact policy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(3), 327–331. doi:10.1080/15700763.2018.1496343
• Gurr, D. (1996). On conceptualising school leadership: Time to abandon transformational leadership? Leading and Managing, 2(3),221–239. doi/10.3316/aeipt.76662
• Gurr, D. (2014). Successful school leadership across contexts and cultures. Leading and Managing, 20(2), 75-88. doi:10.3316/informit.036841514593192
• Gurr, D. (2017). A model of successful school principalship from the International Successful School Principalship Project. In K. Leithwood, J. Sun, & K. Pollock (Eds.), How school leaders contribute to student success (pp. 15–29). Dordrecht, Springer
• Gurr, D., & Drysdale, L. (2008). Reflections on twelve years of studying the leadership of Victorian schools. International Studies in Educational Administration, 36(2), 22-37.
• Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., Clarke, S., & Wildy, H. (2014). High-need schools in Australia: The leadership of two principals. Management in Education, 28(3), 86-90.
• Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221-239. doi:10.1080/15700760500244793
• Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142. doi: 10.1108/09578231111116699
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1999). Can leadership enhance school effectiveness. In T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, & R. Glatter (Eds.). Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice, (pp.178-190). London: SAGE.
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Leadership for learning: does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654-678. doi:10.1177/1741143210379060
• Hooker, K. O. (2000). Superintendents' perspectives on the recruitment and selection of building level administrators. Planning and Changing, 31(3/4), 182-205.
• Jacobson, S. L., Johnson, L., Ylimaki, R., & Giles, C. (2005). Successful leadership in challenging US schools: enabling principles, enabling schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 607-618. doi: 10.1108/09578230510625700
• Jacobson, S. L., Johnson, L., Ylimaki, R., & Giles, C. (2009). Sustaining success in an American school: A case for governance change. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(6), 753–764. doi:10.1108/09578230910993131
• Jacobson, S., Day, C. & Leithwood, K. (2005). Successful school principalship project [Special issue]. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 533-630.
• Johansson, O., & Ärlestig, H. (2022). Commentary–The ISSPP expedition to a greater understanding of principalship and new challenges for tomorrow's leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(1), 124-131. doi:10.1108/JEA-02-2022-269
• Johnson, L., Møller, J., Jacobson, S. L., & Wong, K. C. (2008). Cross‐national comparisons in the International Successful School Principalship Project (ISSPP): The USA, Norway and China. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 407–422. doi:10.1080/00313830802184582
• Johnson, L., Moyi, P., & Ylimaki, R. M. (2023). Successful School Leadership in the USA: The Role of Context in Core Leadership Practices. Education Sciences, 13(10), 968. doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100968
• Khalifa, M. (2012). A re-new-ed paradigm in successful urban school leadership: Principal as community leader. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3) 424-467. doi:10.1177/0013161X11432922.
• Klar, H. W. & Brewer, C. A. (2013). Successful leadership in high-needs schools: An examination of core leadership practices enacted in challenging contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5) 768–808. doi:10.1177/0013161X13482577.
• Leithwood, K. (2001). School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 217–235. doi:10.1080/13603120110057082
• Leithwood, K. (2012). The Ontario Leadership Framework 2012 with a Discussion of the Research Foundations. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Institute for Educational Leadership and the Ontario Ministry of Education.
• Leithwood, K., & Day, C. (2007). Starting with what we know. In C. Day and K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change, (pp.1–15). London: Springer.
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. doi:10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
• Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning (Report Number: RR800). Nottingham: National College for School Leadership/University of Nottingham.
• Leithwood, K., Seashore-Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How Leadership Influences Student Learning: Review of Research. New York NY: The Wallace Foundation.
• Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Pollock, K. (Eds.). (2017). How school leaders contribute to student success: The four paths framework. Dordrecht: SpringerLlorent-Bedmar, V., Cobano-Delgado, V., & Navarro-Granados, M. (2019). School leadership in disadvantaged contexts in Spain: Obstacles and improvements. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(1), 147-164. doi:10.1177/1741143217728084
• Mashayekhi, Z., Nadi, M. A., & Karimi, F. (2020). Provide a model for successful elementary school leadership based on grounded theory (GT). Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 11(44), 181-210.
• Mbokazi, Z. (2013). Successful school leadership practices in challenging contexts: Case studies of three township secondary schools (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
• Medina, V., Martinez, G., Murakami, E. T., Rodriguez, M., & Hernandez, F. (2014). Principals’ perceptions from within: Leadership in high-need schools in the USA. Management in Education, 28(3), 91-96. doi:10.1177/0892020614537664
• Meyers, C. V., & Hambrick-Hitt, D. (2017). School turnaround principals: What does initial research literature suggest they are doing to be successful?. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 22(1), 38-56. doi:10.1080/10824669.2016.1242070
• Michalak, J. M. (2009). Making a difference in challenging urban schools: Successful principals. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 387-396. doi:10.2304/eerj.2009.8.3.386
• Moos, L., & Johansson, O. (2009). The International Successful School Principalship Project: Success sustained? Journal of Educational Administration, 47(6), 765-780. doi:10.1108/09578230910993140
• Moos, L., Krejsler, J., & Kofod, K. K. (2008). Successful principals: telling or selling? On the importance of context for school leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(4), 341–352. doi:10.1080/13603120802183913
• Moral-Santaella, C., & Raso-Sánchez, F. (2023). The Meaning of successful school leadership in disadvantaged contexts in Spain: Approach from the International Successful School Principalship Project (ISSPP). Education Sciences, 13(10), 1-13. doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101007
• Mulford, B. (2007). Successful School Principalship in Tasmania. In C. Day & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful Principal Leadership in Times of Change (pp. 17–38). Dordrecht, Springer
• Murakami-Ramalho, E., Garza, E., & Merchant, B. (2010). Successful school leadership in socioeconomically challenging contexts: School principals creating and sustaining successful school ımprovement. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)), 38(3).
• Onoye, K. J. (2004). A case study of a successful urban school: Climate, culture and leadership factors that impact student achievement (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do, PISA. Paris: OECD.
• Özdemir, M. (2017). Eğitim yönetiminde epistemik bunalımın arkeolojisi [Archeology of epistemic crisis in educational administration]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 23(2), 281-304. doi:10.14527/kuey.2017.010
• Pashiardis, P., & Brauckmann, S. (2014). Leadership styles and school climate variables of the Pashiardis-Brauckmann holistic leadership framework: An intimate relationship? In P. Pashiardis (Ed.), Modeling school leadership across Europe (pp. 89-106). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Pashiardis, P., & Johansson, O. (2021). Successful and effective schools: Bridging the gap. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 690-707. doi:10.1177/1741143220932585
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Raihani, R. (2008). An Indonesian model of successful school principalship. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(4), 481-496. doi:10.1108/09578230810882018
• Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
• Santaella, C. M. (2018). A Comparative study of the professional identity of two secondary school principals in disadvantaged contexts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1-26. doi:10.1080/15700763.2018.1513152
• Smith, M. J. (2009). An analysis of one school district's implementation of professional learning communities in its elementary schools (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
• Steagall, F. (2012). From children of poverty to children of hope: Exploring the characteristics of high- poverty high-performing schools, teachers, leadership and the factors that help them succeed in increasing student achievement (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE.
• Tan, C. Y. (2016). Examining school leadership effects on student achievement: the role of contextual challenges and constraints. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 21–45. doi:10.1080/0305764x.2016.1221885
• Walker, A. D., & Dimmock, C. (2005). Educational leadership: Culture and diversity. Educational Leadership, 1-232.
• Ye, W., Strietholt, R., & Blömeke, S. (2021). Academic resilience: underlying norms and validity of definitions. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(1), 169-202. doi:10.1007/s11092-020-09351-7
• Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302-314. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805