Effects of Impregnation with Tanalith-E on the Compression Strength of Some Woods

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3, 711 - 716, 15.09.2017

Hakan Keskin , Nihat Dağlıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.339404

Cited By: 2

Öz

This study was
performed to determine the effects
of impregnation with Tanalith-E on compression strengths of Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky), European oak (Quercus petraea Liebl.), Black walnut (Junglans
nigra Lipsky), Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra Lipsky), Ash (Fraxinus exelsior Lipsky) and Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris Lipsky) woods. For this aim, the wood samples were
prepared according to TS 345 and impregnated with Tanalith-E by the method of
the vacuum according to ASTM D 1413 and producers’ definition. After
impregnation process, compression
strength was measured according to TS 2595. Consequently, compression
strengths of wood un-impregnated were found higher (approximately 6.63%) than
impregnated with Tanalith-E wood materials. Accordingly, the highest values of
compression strengths were obtained in impregnated Oriental beech and ash
woods, whereas the lowest values were obtained in the Lombardy poplar wood. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Compression strength, Tanalith E, impregnation, woods

Kaynakça

• 1. Ors Y., Keskin H., “Ağaç Malzeme Teknolojisi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Yayın no: 2000/352, 1-6, 144-155, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara (2008).
• 2. Atar M., “Effects of ımpregnation with imersol-aqua on the bending strength of some wood materials”, Materials & Design, 29(9): 1707-1712, (2008).
• 3. Kollman F., “Die eigenschaftanderung von gruben holz nach schutzsalzimpragnie-rung, Forschungsber”, Des Landes Nordhrhein, Westfalen, Germany, 54: (1959).
• 4. Stabnikov V.M., “Puti uviliczenia sroka sluschby dreviesinyw konstrukcjach”, Leningrad, 19–25, (1957).
• 5. Wazny J., “Investigations of the influence of wood preservatives on strength”, Dreviesiny Sreda, 3: 181, (1973).
• 6. Bentsen B.A., “Mechanical properties of longleaf pine treated waterborne salt preservatives”, USDA For Serv., 2: 434, (1984).
• 7. Temiz A., “Physcal and mechanical properties of wood–polymer composites prepared from alder wood (Alnus glutinosa Lipsky)”, 32nd Annual Meeting Nara, Japan, (2001).
• 8. Tetjamer L., “Methoden und resultate der prufung schweizerischen bahnholzer, material pru fungsaf”, schweizerischen polytechnikum.Zurich: Paul Paray Verlac, (1986).
• 9. Keskin H., Atar M., Togay A., “Impacts of impregnation with imersol-aqua on the compression strength of some solid wood materials”, Construction and Building Materials, 22(7): 1402-1408, (2008).
• 10. Hemel-Hickson’s Timber Impregnation Co. (GB), Into the 21st. century, “Imersol-Aqua brochure”, Datasheet, 4(2): 6214, (2000).
• 11. TS 2595, “Odunun Liflere Paralel Doğrultuda Basınç Dayanımının Tayini”, TSE, Ankara (1977).
• 12. ASTM D 1413-76, “Standard Test Method of Testing Wood Preservatives by Laboratory Soil Blocks Cultures”, ASTM Standards, USA, (1976).
• 13. TS 344, “Ahşap Koruma Genel Kuralları”, TSE, Ankara, (1981).
• 14. TS 345, “Ahşap Emprenye Maddeleri Etkilerinin Muayene Metotları, TSE, Ankara, (1974).
• 15. Ors Y., Atar M., Keskin, H., Yavuzcan H.G., “Impacts of impregnation with imersol-aqua on the modulus of elasticity in bending”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 99(6): 3210, (2006).