Why Geography Learning: Candidate Teachers’ Views for Geography

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 557 - 576, 31.12.2019

Taner Çifçi Yurdal Dikmenli

https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.672979

Öz

The aim of this study is to reveal the status of the geography course among other courses as perceived by teacher candidates, the way they use their geographic knowledge in daily life, what their expectations are from geography courses, and to determine their opinions about the necessity of learning geography and their suggestions for teaching geography. The phenomenology design, one of the qualitative research methods, was adopted in the study. The study group consisted of 94 preservice teachers studying in the Social Studies Education and Primary Education Program of the Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Education in the 2017-2018 academic year. While determining the study group, maximum diversity, which is one of the purposive sampling methods, was used and care was taken to make this selected group of interviewed participants to be representative of the department, age and gender proportion of the preservice teachers. Content analysis and descriptive analysis were used together in the interpretation of the data obtained from the interviews with the preservice teachers. The collected data revealed that the majority of the teacher candidates place the geography courses among the top level/important and necessary courses. According to the preservice teachers, learning geography is necessary for the effective national administration and homeland defense, instilling the love for the homeland, associating phenomena with daily life, gaining knowledge about the near and far environments, creating an awareness of co-existence, gaining a general culture, loving and preserving the natural environment, establishing links between natural and human-made formations and between their causes and consequences.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Geography, Geography Course, Teaching Geography, Preservice Teachers, Learning Necessity

Kaynakça

• Akınoğlu, O. (2005). The effectiveness and problems of geography education. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi [Marmara Geography Journal], 12, 77-97.
• Aydın, F. (2011). Secondary school students’ opinions about geography course: a qualitative study. Archives of Applied Science Research, 3(1), 297-305.
• Aydın, F. (2012). Socıal scıences hıghschool students opinions toward steaching of geography course. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi/ Kastamonu Education Journal, 20(3), 1035-1050.
• Aydın, F., Kaya, H. & Coşkun, M. (2011). The role of geography course in building environmental conscious. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12(6), 822-829.
• Bakan, U. & Bakan, U. (2017). A content analysis forthe investıgation of family relation ships and social media engagement on facebook, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(20), 54-68.
• Barth, J. L. & Demirtaş, A. (1997). Primary school social studies teaching. Ankara: YÖK/Dünya Bankası Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi Yayınları.
• Bent, G., Bakx, A., & Brok, P. D. (2016). Comparison between primary teacher educators’ and primary school teachers’ beliefs of primary geography education quality. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(7). 110-131.
• Büyükkaragöz, S., Muşta, M., Yılmaz H. & Pilten, Ö. (1997). Introduction to Education. Konya: Günay Ofset.
• Coşkun, M. (2004). Cooperative (collaborative) learning ın geography teaching. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi/Kastamonu Education Journal, 12(1), 235-237.
• Demirci, A. (2004). Importance and method of using geographical information systems in primary and secondary geography courses: physical geography; gis-based example course on earthquake and volcanoes. Coğrafi Bilgi Sitemleri Bilişim Günleri, 6-9 Ekim: İstanbul.
• Demirci, A. (2005). The purpose of the globalized world in geography in turkey, methods and tools as self-questioning: what to do in geography education reform. Ulusal Coğrafya Kongresi, İstanbul.
• Demirci, A., Sekin, S. & Ünlü, M. (2002). The importance of geography in terms of occupation and lts usage in Turkey. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 5, 171-185.
• Dikmenli, Y. & Çifçi, T. (2016). High school students’ views about geography course. Turkısh Studıes-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 11(3), 911-928.
• Doğanay, H. (1993). Methodology in geography. İstanbul: MEB Yayınları.
• Doğanay, H. (2002). Teaching methods of geography. Erzurum: Aktif Yayınevi.
• Doğanay, H. & Doğanay, S. (2015). General geography. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
• Doğanay, H. & Zaman, S. (2002). The objectıves- strategies and goals within secondary education geography teaching. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 7(8),7-25.
• Doğanay, H., (1989). Geography and geography teaching programs in our high schools. Coğrafya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 7-25.
• Elibüyük, M. (2000). Mathematical geography. Ankara: Ekol Yayıncılık.
• Eyles, J. (1989). The geography of everyday life. D. Gregory et al. (eds.), In Horizons in human geography (102-117). London: Palgrave. Girgin, M. (2001). Why we learn geography. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi/ Eastern Geographical Review, 7(5), 127-143.
• İzbırak, R. (1992). Dictionary of geography terms. MEB. Yayınları, İstanbul: Öğretmen Kitapları Dizisi:157.
• Johnston, R. J. (1985). Introduction: Exploring the future of geography. In the Future of Geography Ed. Johnston, R J, (Methuen, London) 3–26.
• Karasar, N. (2015). Scientific research method - concepts, principles, techniques. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Kenger, G. (2010). Determination of the level of association between geography concepts and everyday life that students in the 9th grade students learn in geography class. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Ens¬titüsü.
• Kesten, A. & Özdemir, N. (2010). Evaluation of Social Studies Curriculum Assessment Part According to Opinions of Teachers: Case of Samsun. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 223-236.
• Kızılçaoğlu, A. (2006). Geographic education in elementary schools. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 14, 81-106.
• Kocalar, A. O. & Demirkaya, H. (2014). Why is geography ımportant to learn? Perception of high school students. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi/ Eastern Geographical Review, 19(32), 123-144.
• Lacoste, Y. (1998). Geography is for fighting. (Çev. A. Ertan), İstanbul: Doruk Yayınları.
• MEB. (2017). Geography Course Curriculum. T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Ortaöğretim Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Ortaylı, İ. (2013). We are ignorant of geography. Tarihin Arka Odası Programı. (www.haberturk.com, 20.04.2018).
• Öztürk Demirbaş, Ç. & Dikmenli, Y. (2016). Geography teacher candidates’ perceptions of being a geographer- II: physical properties. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 7(24), 75-98.
• Reinfried, S. & Hertig, P. (2011). Geographical Education: How Human Environment-Society Processes Work. In UNESCO-EOLSS Joint Committee (Ed.), Geography, encyclopedia of life supportsystems (EOLSS). Oxford.Erişim Tarihi: 11 June 2018. www.eolss.net.
• Sack, D. & Peterson, J. F. (1998). Children’sattitudes towards geograph: A Texas casestudy. Journal of Geograph, 97, 123-131.
• Sharp, L. B. (1943). Outside the classroom. The Educational Forum, 7(4), 361-368.
• Slater, F. (1994). Education through geography: Knowledge, Understanding, values and culture. Geography, 79 (2), 147-63.
• Şahin, C. (2013). General geography. Ankara: Gündüz Eğitim Yayıncılık.
• Şencan, H. (2005). Reliability and validity in social and behavioural measures. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Tanrıkulu, M. (2018). Geography and culture. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Taşlı Keçeci, Ö. (2010). Evaluation of the role of secondary education geography courses in creating environmental awareness to student topinions (Aydın province example). Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Tomal, N. (2009). Application of the knowledge acquıred ın geography lessons in dailylife. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi/Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(1), 229-240.
• Ünlü, M., & Alkış, S. (2006). Examining the necessity of geography instruction ın the programs of pre school education departments. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 14,17-27.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. (9. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yetim, A. A., & Göktaş, Z. (2004). Teacher’s occupational and personal qualifications. Kastamonu University Kastamonu Education Journal, 12(2), 541-550.