Dezavantajlı gruplara dil öğretiminde açık ve uzaktan eğitim: Sistematik bir inceleme

Yıl 2023, Sayı: Ö13, 1242 - 1253, 23.10.2023

Nazife Şen Ersoy

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1379343

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu araştırma dezavantajlı gruplara İngilizce öğretimi üzerine gerçekleştirilen çalışmaların sistematik bir şekilde incelenmesi doğrultusunda söz konusu bireylere açık ve uzaktan eğitim yoluyla dil öğretimi üzerine literatürdeki eğilimlere ve eksikliklere dikkat çekmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda nitel araştırma yaklaşımının sistematik alanyazın inceleme modeli uygulanmıştır. İlk olarak ilgili alanyazın ayrıntılı olarak taranarak, dezavantajlı grupların kimler olduğu ve dil öğretimi bağlamında dezavantajlı grupların özellikleri incelenmiştir. Ardından Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Bankası’ndaki 1982 yılından Haziran 2023 tarihine kadar gerçekleştirilmiş yüksek lisans ve doktora tezleri arasından veri tabanının gelişmiş arama özelliği kullanılarak “dezavantajlı grup”, “dil öğretimi”, “EFL” ve “açık ve uzaktan eğitim” anahtar kelimeleri ve bunlarla ilişkili görülen “kapsayıcı eğitim” ve “açıköğretim” gibi kelimeler bir araya getirilip aramalar yapılmıştır. Bu aramalar tez adı, özet, konu ve dizin olmak üzere dört alanı kapsar şekilde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Aramalar sonucunda başlangıçta toplamda 1042 adet tez çalışması ile karşılaşılmıştır. Ancak, bu tezlerin özet kısımları ayrıntılı olarak incelendiğinde, dezavantajlı gruplara İngilizce öğretiminde açık ve uzaktan eğitim konusunda gerçekleştirilmiş hiçbir tez çalışmasının olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuç ışığında, bu konuda neden hiç çalışmanın yapılmadığı ve bu konuda çalışmalar gerçekleştirmenin gerekliliği ve önemi alanyazın ışığında tartışılmıştır. Bu çalışma ile elde edilen bilgilerin, dil öğretimi özelinde, daha kapsayıcı, adil ve eşit bir eğitim sistemi oluşturma konusunda alanyazına katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dezavantajlı gruplar, dil öğretimi, açık ve uzaktan eğitim

Kaynakça

• Anadolu Üniversitesi (2023). Tarihçe. Erişim adresi: https://www.anadolu.edu.tr/acikogretim/acikogretim-sistemi/tarihce
• Baker, C., Prys Jones, S., and Lüdi, G. (Eds.). (2018). Encyclopedia of bilingualism and bilingual education. Multilingual Matters.
• Barrera, I., and Corso, R. M. (2003). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: Research and the overwhelming presence of Whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(5), 386-398.
• Bates, T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning for a digital age. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
• Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
• Bialystok, E. (2007). Cognitive effects of bilingualism: How linguistic experience leads to cognitive change. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(3), 15-21.
• Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Green, D. W., and Gollan, T. H. (2012). Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10(3), 89-129.
• Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
• Burgstahler, S. (2002). Universal design in education: Principles and applications. In S. Burgstahler & R. Cory (Eds.), Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (pp. 3-16). Harvard Education Press.
• Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
• Chudgar, A., and Luschei, T. F. (2009). Rural-urban disparities in primary education: Real gaps, credible causes. World Development, 37(10), 1659-1673.
• Cummins, J., and Early, M. (2011). Identity texts: The imaginative construction of self through multiliteracies pedagogy. Language and Education, 25(2), 101-115.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309.
• Dewaele, J. M. (2018). Why focus on the multilingual individual? EuroSLA Yearbook, 18(1), 1-23.
• Duncan, G. J., and Murnane, R. J. (2014). Restoring opportunity: The crisis of inequality and the challenge for American education. Harvard Education Press.
• Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Escueta, M., Quince, T., and Weiss, D. (2017). Broadening the definition of disadvantaged students: Evidence from an asynchronous online course. AERA Open, 3(4), 1-18
• Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., and Behrend, M. B. (2022). A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1-24.
• García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
• García, O., and Sylvan, C. E. (2011). Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in pluralities. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 385-400.
• Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
• Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W., and Christian, D. (2006). English language learners in U.S. schools: An overview of research findings. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 11(1), 1-27.
• González, V. M. (2004). Envisioning multilingual education: What language minors can tell us. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 603-619.
• Gorski, P. C., and Pothini, S. G. (2018). Digital equity and social justice education. In S. E. Clements & D. Gornitzka (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Social (In)Justice (pp. 255-269). Springer.
• Grosse, C. U. (2004). International business and languages: A guide to resources for further study. Multilingual Matters.
• Heift, T., and Schulze, M. (2007). Errors and intelligence in computer-assisted language learning: Parsers and pedagogues. Routledge.
• Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2010). Challenges and potentials for research into open and distance learning and access to education for the poor and marginalized. In Proceedings of the 2nd International ODeL Conference, 3-5.
• Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., and Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91-109.
• King, J., and Mackey, A. (2007). The bilingual edge: Why, when, and how to teach your child a second language. HarperCollins.
• King, J., and Quirion, A. (2013). In-school and out-of-school use of minority languages: Cases from French Canada. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(4), 331-344.
• Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
• Kroll, J. F., and Bialystok, E. (2013). Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 497-514.
• Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). Learning Cultures on the Move: Where Are We Heading? Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 4-14.
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3-12.
• Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
• Lipsky, D. K., and Gartner, A. (1997). Inclusion and school reform: Transforming America's classrooms. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
• Menken, K., and Kleyn, T. (2009). The long-term impact of subtractive schooling in the educational experiences of secondary English language learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(3), 315-337.
• Moore, M. G., and Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250-260.
• Mtebe, J. S., and Raphael, C. (2019). Towards a framework for quality assurance in open and distance e-learning in Tanzania. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 159-180.
• OECD (2019a). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2019b). Bridging the digital divide: Include, upskill, innovate. OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 272, OECD Publishing.
• Paul, J., and Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
• Pavelescu, L. (2014). Access to education and the linguistic integration of adult migrants. International Migration, 52(2), 120-133.
• Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In R. Murnane and G. Duncan (Eds.), Whither Opportunity? (pp. 91-116). Russell Sage Foundation.
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Anchor Books.
• Sewart, D. (2013a). Massiveness + Openness = New literacies of participation? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 228-238.
• Sewart, D. (2013b). Open education practices: A user guide for organizations. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/score/files/score/file/SEDA_OpenEducationPracticesfinal.pdf
• Seyidoğlu, H. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma ve yazma el kitabı. Güzem Can Yayınları.
• Sharma, P., and Mishra, S. (2016). Open and distance learning for the marginalized: A case of Nepal. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 164-180.
• Shute, V. J., and Wang, L. (2016). Measuring problem-solving skills via stealth assessment in an engaging video game. Computers & Education, 100, 48-63.
• Singh, P., and Thurman, A. (2019). When local goes global: Taking stock of open education initiatives in the Global South. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 1-28.
• Teddlie, C. and Tashakkori, A. (2009) Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage, London.
• Toker, A. (2022). Bir araştırma metodolojisi olarak sistematik literatür incelemesi: Meta-sentez yöntemi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(Özel Sayı 2), 313-340.
• UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education- All means all. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
• Valdés, G. (2001). Learning and not learning English: Latino students in American schools. Teachers College Press.
• Warschauer, M. (2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. Teachers College Press