Mobile assisted language learning: investigating English speaking performance and satisfaction

Yıl 2023, Sayı: Ö13, 1305 - 1317, 23.10.2023

Sibel Ergün Elverici

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1379355

Öz

With their growing popularity, mobile technologies can be seen as having the capacity to enhance language learning by offering learners a flexible and dynamic learning environment that is not limited by time or location. While the integration of technology in foreign language education has demonstrated overall success, including enhanced language learning outcomes through mobile technologies, it is important to acknowledge that there is also research highlighting potential drawbacks. Therefore, conducting further studies in this area remains crucial for a comprehensive understanding. This is more significant when speaking is considered as a skill of paramount importance compared to others and student satisfaction which can lead to overall success of the course. Therefore, the primary goal of this descriptive study is to investigate the potential advantages and consequences of integrating mobile technologies into blended learning language classes. Within this framework, the study focuses on examining the utilization of a recognized Web 2.0 tool, specifically Voki, to assess its effects on the English speaking proficiency and satisfaction perceptions of preparatory school students in blended learning settings. The results of the study reveal that the implementation of Voki leads to a significant enhancement in students' speaking skills, accompanied by a noticeable increase in their satisfaction levels. These findings suggest that intentional integration of mobile technologies into language education, particularly through the utilization of a Web 2.0 tool like Voki with its multimedia capabilities, holds the potential to serve as a valuable educational asset.

Anahtar Kelimeler

educational technology, mobile technologies, English speaking, satisfaction, technology integration, Web 2.0, Voki

Kaynakça

• Aktaş, E. (2023). The effect of web 2.0 based technology applications on speaking skills and speaking anxiety in teaching Turkish as a foreign language: Voki example. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1183037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183037
• Amoush, K. H., & Mizher, R. A. (2023). Interaction as a Predicator for EFL Undergraduate University Students’ Satisfaction With Online English Language Courses. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(4), 927-937. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1304.14
• Anderson, J. K., Page, A. M., & Wendorf, D. M. (2013). Avatar-assisted case studies. Nurse educator, 38(3), https://doi.org/106-109. 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31828dc260
• Aziz, A. A., & Kashinathan, S. (2021). ESL learners’ challenges in speaking English in Malaysian classroom. Development, 10(2), 983-991. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i2/10355
• Bunting, L., Af Segerstad, Y. H., & Barendregt, W. (2021). Swedish teachers’ views on the use of personalised learning technologies for teaching children reading in the English classroom. International Journal of Child–Computer Interaction, 27(2), 100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100236
• Castro, R. Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Educ Inf Technol 24, 2523–2546 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3
• Cremades, R., Onieva-López, J. L., Maqueda-Cuenca, E., & Ramírez-Leiton, J. J. (2019). The influence of mobile instant messaging in language education: perceptions of current and future teachers. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612451
• Demir, S. (2021). Öğrencilerin Çevrimiçi Ortamda Öğrenmeye Hazır-Bulunuşluk, Memnuniyet ve Akademik Başarı Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eskişehir.
• Demirel, Ö. (2014). Yabancı dil öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem.
• Dharmadjaja, P., & Tiatri, S. (2021). The Effect of Online Interaction Types and Acceptance of Technology Factors on Student Satisfaction with Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advances in Social Science, Education and HumanitiesResearch, Vol. 570 https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210805.148
• Elliot, K. M., & Healy M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10, 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v10n04_01
• Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1), 1920090. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090
• Eppard, J., Hojeij, Z., Ozdemir-Ayber, P., Rodjan-Helder, M., & Baroudi, S. (2019). Using mobile learning tools in higher education: A UAE Case. International Association of Online Engineering. Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216634/
• FLICINSKA-TURKIEWICZ, J., BECZKOWSKA, A., & SKROBACKI, R. (2022). Key Factors of Student Satisfaction with Distance Learning in the Situation of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Example of a Polish University. https://doi.org/10.5171/2022.268774
• Gamji, M. B. U., Kara, N., Nasidi, Q. Y., & Abdul, A. I. (2022). The challenges of digital divide and the use of web 2.0 platforms as knowledge sharing tools among Nigerian academics. InformationDevelopment, 38(1), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920981669
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update—Fourth edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Gülbahar, Y. (2012). E-öğrenme ortamlarında katılımcıların hazır bulunuşluk ve memnuniyet düzeylerinin ölçülmesi için ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(2), 119-137 https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001256
• Hao, Y., Lee, K. S., Chen, S. T., & Sim, S. C. (2019). An evaluative study of a mobile application for middle school students struggling with English vocabulary learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 208-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.013
• Hong, K. S. (2002). Relationships between students’ and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00105-7
• Jadhav, P., Gaikwad, H., & Patil, K. S. (2022). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 1(1), 33-40. Retrieved from: https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed/article/view/33
• Kacetl, J., & Klímová, B. (2019). Use of smartphone applications in english language learning—A challenge for foreign language education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030179
• Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., & Jefferis, H. (2014). Social presence in online learning communities: The role of personal profiles. Research in Learning Technology, 22, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.19710
• Keser, S. (2018). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde konuşma becerisinin geliştirilmesinde karşılaşılan güçlükler. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Kuimova, M., Burleigh, D., Uzunboylu, H., & Bazhenov, R. (2018). Positive effects of mobile learning on foreign language learning. TEM journal, 7(4), 837-841. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM74-22
• Klímová, B., & Pražák, P. (2019). Mobile blended learning and evaluation of its effectiveness on students’ learning achievement. In Blended Learning: Educational Innovation for Personalized Learning: 12th International Conference, ICBL 2019, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, July 2–4, 2019, Proceedings 12 (pp. 216-224). Springer International Publishing.
• Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
• Lai, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). University students’ use of mobile technology in self-directed language learning: Using the integrative model of behavior prediction. Computers & Education, 179, 104413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104413
• Liu, C., Hwang, G. J., Tu, Y. F., Yin, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). Research advancement and foci of mobile technology-supported music education: A systematic review and social network analysis on 2008-2019 academic publications. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1974890
• Malkawi, E., Bawaneh, A. K., Bawa'aneh, M. S. (2021). Campus off, education on: UAEU students’ satisfaction and attitudes towards e-learning and virtual classes during COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(1), ep283. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8708
• Muzammil, M., Sutawıjaya, A. & Harsası, M. (2020). Investigating student satisfaction in online learning: the role of student interaction and engagement in distance learning university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE. 21(Special)88-96. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770928
• Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
• Nguyen Thi Kieu, D., and Nguyen, V. L. (2021). Effects of Voki-supported self-practice on high school students’ English speaking performance. Can Tho Univ. J. Sci. 13, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jen.2021.039 Nikolopoulou, K., Gialamas, V., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2021b). Teachers’ readiness to adopt mobile learning in classrooms: A study in Greece. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(1), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09453-7
• Novikova, I. A., Bychkova, P. A., & Novikov, A. L. (2022). Attitudes towards digital educational technologies among Russian university students before and during the COVID-19pandemic. Sustainability, 14(10), 6203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106203
• Panagiotidis, P., Krystalli, P., & Arvanitis, P. (2023). Technology as a motivational factor in foreign language learning. European Journal of Education, 6(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejed.v1i3.p43-52
• Papadaki, A., Karagianni, E., & Driga, A. M. (2023). Foreign language collaborative writing through the use of Web 2.0 tools. A Wiki assisted-Writing Lesson in the EFL/ESL class. TechHub Journal, 6, 52-77. Retrieved from: http://techhubresearch.com/index.php/journal/article/view/98
• Parmawati, A., & Inayah, R. (2019). IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH ENGLISH MOVIE IN SCOPE OF SPEAKING FOR GENERAL COMMUNICATION. Eltin Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 7(2), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.22460/eltin.v7i2.p43-53
• Polakova, P., & Klimova, B. (2022). Vocabulary mobile learning application in blended English language learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 869055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869055
• Ramalingam, S., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Blended learning strategies for sustainable English as a second language education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(13), 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138051
• Ramdani, A. S. (2018). The use of Voki as a media to support the enhancement of first grade students speaking skills at SMPN 4 Tambun Selatan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan MH Thamrin 2, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.37012/jipmht.v2i1.32
• Rezaei, A., Mai, N., & Pesaranghader, A. (2014). The effect of mobile applications on English vocabulary acquisition. Jurnal Teknologi, 68(2), 73-83. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261246911
• Riadil, I. G. (2020). EFL students in speaking skill: identifying english education students’ perceptions of the psychological problems in speaking. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic, 2(1), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v2i1.266
• Svendsen, L. P., Mondahl, M., & Faizi, A. Z. (2014). Using Photostory, MovieMaker and Voki to Motivate Danish Upper Secondary Students to Learn German Language and Culture: An Empirical Qualitative Study of Students’ Perceived Intrinsic Motivation. Læring og Medier, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v7i12.16404
• Şahan, Ö., Çoban, M., & Razı, S. (2016). Students learn English idioms through WhatsApp: Extensive use of smartphones. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 1230-1251. https://doi.org/10.17556/jef.72045
• Sahin I., Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 216-223. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.11.3.216
• Schrock, B. (2012). Educational technology for K-12 teachers. Maryville College.
• Ur, P. (2012). A course in English language teaching. Cambridge University Press
• Wang, J., Tigelaar, D. E., Zhou, T., & Admiraal, W. (2023). The effects of mobile technology usage on cognitive, affective, and behavioural learning outcomes in primary and secondary education: A systematic review with meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12759
• Whyley, D. (2018). Barriers to mobile learning advancements in the United Kingdom. In J. Voogt (Ed.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1–10). Springer International Handbooks of Education.
• Wu, W. C. V., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 142-157. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90002170
• Yalçin, C. (2020). Yabanci Dil Olarak Almanca Öğreniminde Web 2.0 Araçlarinin Kullanimi. International Journal of Language Academy, 8(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ijla.43170
• Yang, Y. F., & Kuo, N. C. (2021). Blended learning to foster EFL college students’ global literacy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36:1-2, 81-102 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1900874
• Yu, Z., Yu, L., Xu, Q., Xu, W., & Wu, P. (2022). Effects of mobile learning technologies and social media tools on student engagement and learning outcomes of English learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(3), 381-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2045215
• Yeşilbağ, S., and Korkmaz, Ö. (2021). The effect of Voki application on students’ academic achievements and attitudes towards English course. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26, 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10264-7
• Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2022). Types, purposes, and effectiveness of state-of-the-art technologies for second and foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 696-742. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744666
• Ziegler, N. (2016). Taking technology to task: Technology-mediated TBLT, performance, and production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 136-163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000039