Çağdaş Sanatta Paradigma Kayması: Hegemonya, Karşı Hareketler ve Uyum Sağlayan Sanatçılar

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 33, 534 - 557, 04.07.2024

Hanife Neris Yüksel , Taner Çamsarı

https://doi.org/10.21602/sduarte.1462602

Öz

Makale, 1960 sonrası sanat dünyasında meydana gelen dönüşümü ve bu dönemde ortaya çıkan hegemonik yapıları, bu yapılardan faydalanan ve karşı duruş sergileyen sanatçıları ve kolektifleri ele almaktadır. Özellikle 1980'lerin politik, ekonomik ve kültürel atmosferindeki değişimlere odaklanarak, sanatın bu dönemdeki ve sonrasındaki evrimi analiz edilmektedir. Hegemonyanın sanat alanında nasıl şekillendiği, sanat eserlerinin bu hegemonik yapılarla nasıl etkileşimde bulunduğu ve toplumsal normlara nasıl meydan okuduğu detaylı bir biçimde açıklanıyor. Makale aynı zamanda, bu hegemonik yapılarla çatışan ve alternatif bakış açıları sunan sanatçıları ve sanat hareketleri incelenmiştir. Sanatın, politik ve sosyal konulardaki gelişmelere nasıl duyarlılık gösterdiği ve bu bağlamda nasıl bir direniş gücü oluşturduğu vurgulanmıştır. Makale, çağdaş sanat sahnesindeki sanatçılar ve kolektif girişimler aracılığıyla, kültürel hegemonyaya karşı çıkan çeşitli sesleri ortaya çıkararak, sanatın potansiyel devrimci rolünü vurgularken; hegemonyanın sistemine uyan Jeff Koons ve Damien Hirst gibi sanatçıların duruşları sorgulanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sanat Kurumları, Karşı Duruş, Hegomanya, Kollektifler

PARADIGM SHIFT IN CONTEMPORARY ART: HEGEMONY AND COUNTER MOVEMENTS

Öz

The article examines the transformation that occurred in the art world after the 1960s, focusing on the hegemonic structures that emerged during this period, as well as the artists and collectives who benefited from these structures and those who exhibited resistance against them. Particularly emphasizing the changes in the political, economic, and cultural atmosphere of the 1980s, the evolution of art during this period and afterwards is analyzed. It elaborates on how hegemony took shape in the realm of art, how artworks interacted with these hegemonic structures, and how they challenged societal norms in detail. The article also examines artists and art movements that conflict with these hegemonic structures and offer alternative perspectives. It emphasizes how art demonstrates sensitivity to political and social developments and creates a resistance force within this context. By highlighting various voices that oppose cultural hegemony through contemporary artists and collective initiatives, the article underscores the potential revolutionary role of art, while questioning the stances of artists like Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst who conform to the hegemonic system.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Art Insitutions, Resistance, Hegemony

Kaynakça

• Kaynakça Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso.
• Crane D. (2009). “Reflectıons on The Global Art Market: Implications For The Sociology of Culture”, Sociedade e Estado, Brasília, Sayı15/2, s. 331-362.
• Çelik, Z. (2012). “Neoliberalizmin Kısa Tarihi”, İdeal Kent, Sayı 7, s. 187-193.
• Dre, J. (2017). “The Collective Camcorder in Art”, “Collectivism After Modernism The Art of Social Imagination after 1945”, London: edBlake Stimson & Gregory Sholette University of Mınnesota Press Minneapolis, s.95-113.
• Duncan, C. (1995). Civilizing Rituals: Inside Public Art Museums. London: Routledge.
• Erdoğan, M. (2015). “Küresel Çağda Çağdaş Sanat ve Küresel Sanat Pazarı”. Anadolu Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Eskişehir, Sayı 15/1, s.75-98. Galenson, D. (2007). “Artists and the Market: From Leonardo and Titian to Andy Warhol and Damien Hirst”, NBER Working Paper No. 13377, JEL No. J01, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w13377/w13377, Erişim tarihi: 05.06.2023.
• Gaspard, T. (2004). A Political Economy of Lebanon 1948–2002: The Limits of Laissez-faire, Boston: Brill, Print PAD/D, 1st Issue.
• Gorman E. (2012). Art is Money-Sexy: The Corporatization of Contemporary Art, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Fairfax, VA: Philosophy at George Mason Üniversitesi.
• Green, A. (2011). “Citizen Artists: Group Material. Afterall”, A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry, Sayı 26, s.17-25.
• Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
• Holden, S. (2000). "Crıtıc's Notebook; When and How AIDS Activism Finally Found Its Voice and Power", The New York Times, 01 Aralık 2000, https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/01/movies/critic-s-notebook-when-and-how-aids-activism-finally-found-its-voice-and-power.html. Erişim tarihi: 15.01.2023.
• Horowitz, N. (2014). Art of the Deal Contemporary Art in a Global Financial Market, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Jacobs, D. (2005). “Internet Activism and the Democratic Emergency in the U.S.”, Eohemera Theory&Politics in Organization, Sayı 5 (1), s.68-77.
• Juhasz, A. (1995). “So Many Alternatives: The Alternative Aıds Video Movement”, Cinéaste, Sayı 21, No. 1/2, s. 37-39.
• Küçük C. (2016). Gregory Sholette’le Söyleşi, 13/11/2016/ skopdergi- Sayı 10, Çeviri: Derya Yılmaz, https://www.e-skop.com/skopdergi/gregory-sholettele-soylesi/3152, Erişim tarihi 05.08.2023.
• Lippard, L.R. (1970). "The Art Workers' Coalition: Not a History", Studio International, Cilt 180, Sayı 927, s. 171-174.
• Moore, A. W. (2014). “Art Workers Want to Know”, Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, Cilt 14, Sayı 3, s.465-473.
• Moore, A. W. (2017). “Artists’ Collectives Focus on New York, 1975–2000”, “Collectivism After Modernism The Art of Social Imagination after 1945”, ed. Blake Stimson ve Gregory Sholette, Minneapolis: London University of Mınnesota Yayınları, s.193-223.
• Morgan T. (2014). Art in the 1980s: The Forgotten History of PAD/D, https://hyperallergic.com/117621/art-in-the-1980s-the-forgotten-history-of-padd/, Erişim tarihi 11.09.2023.
• Nadarajan, G. (2006). Between production and exhibition: Medial arts biennials, http://www.acca.cat/downloads/sympo_06_11.pdf. Macba: Barcelona Museum for Contemporary Art and Associació Catalana de Crítics d'Art.
• PAD/D, (1981) PAD: Waking Up In NYC. UPFRONT, 1: 1-4.
• Peters, C. (2015). “Re-imagining spaces, collectivity, and the political dimension of contemporary art”, Policy Futures in Education, Cilt 3, Sayı 1, s.149–159.
• Piper, Adrian M.S. (1985), “Critical Hegemony and Aesthetic Acculturation,” Noûs, Wiley, A. P. A. Western Division Meetings, Sayı.19, No. 1, s.29–40.
• Pritchard S. (2019). “More Today Than Yesterday” Nuart Journal, Cilt 2, Sayı 1, s.10–12.
• Sak. B. (2019). Çağdaş Sanat Balonu. https://youtu.be/rz4w_WC9B-s, Erişim tarihi 21.07.2023.
• Sarısu, M. (2020). “Protestonun Sebebi ve Enstrümanı Olarak Güncel Sanat”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sanat Yazıları, Sayı 42, s.183-198.
• Schramm, S. (2015). “The People’s Choice: Transcultural Collectivity and the Art of Shared Knowledge Production”, The Journal of Transcultural Studies, Cilt 6, Sayı 2, s. 70–85.
• Seeliger, M., & Sevignani, S. (2022). “A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere? An Introduction”, Theory, Culture & Society, Cilt 39, Sayı 4, s. 3-16.
• Sember, R., Gere, D. (2006). "Let the record show . . .: art activism and the AIDS epidemic”. American Journal of Public Health, Cilt 96, Sayı 6, s.967–969.
• Sholette, G. (2011). Dark Matter: Art and Politics in the Age of Enterprise Culture, London: Pluto Press.
• Smith, N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City, London: Routledge.
• Stimson B., Sholette G. (2017). “Collectivism After Modernism The Art of Social Imagination after 1945”, London: Editors University of Mınnesota Press.
• Tang, J. (2011). Biennalization and its discontents. In Negotiating values in the creative industries: Fairs, festivals and competitive events, eds. Brian Moeran and Jesper S. Pedersen, 73-93. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Thompson D. (2020). Sanat Mezat, çev. Renan Akman, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Thompson, D. (2008). The $12 Million Stuffed Shark: The Curious Economics of Contemporary Art. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Thornton, S. (2008). Seven Days in the Art World. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
• Wu, T. C. (2002). Prıvatısıng Culture Corporate Art Intervention since the 1980s, London, New York: Verso V.