Son 10 Yılda Yarık Dudak ve Damak Yayınlarında Güncel Eğilimler: Bibliyometrik Analiz

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 777 - 784, 26.12.2022

Gökhan Serhat Duran , Ebru Yurdakurban , Rüveyda Doğrugören , Serkan Görgülü

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1005295

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, son 10 yılda yayınlanan yarık dudak damak (YDD) araştırmalarındaki belirgin eğilimleri araştırmak ve çalışmaların etkinliğini değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) verileri, ortodonti, pedodonti, genel diş hekimliği, konuşma terapisi, klinik genetik, pediatri, plastik estetik ve rekonstrüktif cerrahi ve ağız cerrahisi alanlarının her birinde yüksek SJR göstergesi olan dergileri seçmek için kullanılmıştır. Clarivate Analytics'e ait Web of Science üzerinden erişilen veri tabanlarında YDD ile ilgili çalışmalar tespit edildi. Makaleler, yayın yılı, dergi başlığı, uzmanlık alanı, makale konusu, yazarların bağlantıları, atıf ilişkileri ve menşe ülke/bölge açısından değerlendirildi. Son 10 yılda YDD ile ilgili yayınlanmış toplam 2.696 makale, arama kriterlerimize göre belirlendi.
Bulgular: Analiz, tedavi prosedürleri arasında en öne çıkan anahtar kelimelerin “palatoplasti”, “alveolar kemik grefti”, “distraksiyon osteogenezi” ve “ortognatik cerrahi” olduğunu ortaya koydu. Makaleler arasında en yaygın WoS kategorileri diş hekimliği, ağız cerrahisi & tıp ve cerrahi idi. Son on yılda en çok atıf alan yayınlar arasında “çevresel risk faktörü”, “GRHL3”, “FGFR2”, “loci”, “aday gen” ve “BMP” gibi terimler yer almıştır.
Sonuç: Literatürdeki son YDD makaleleri esas olarak tedavi prosedürlerine odaklanmıştır ve en çok alıntı yapılan makaleler genellikle YDD ve genetik arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirmelerini içerir. Daha yeni yöntemler sadece sınırlı sayıda çalışmada tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yarık Dudak, Yarık Damak, Trendler, Bibliometri

Current Trends in Cleft Lip and Palate Publications During the Last 10 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis

Öz

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the apparent trends in cleft lip and palate (CLP) studies published over the last 10 years, and assesses the effectiveness of the studies.
Materials and Methods: The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) data were utilized to select the journals with a high SJR indicator in each of the orthodontics, pedodontics, general dentistry, speech therapy, clinical genetics, pediatrics, plastic esthetic and reconstructive surgery and oral surgery areas. CLP-related studies were identified in the databases accessed through Web of Science owned by Clarivate Analytics. The articles were assessed in terms of year of publication, journal title, specialty, article subject matter, affiliations of the authors, citation relationships and countries/regions of origin. A total of 2,696 CLP-related articles published over the last 10 years were identified based on our search criteria.
Results: The analysis revealed that the most prominent keywords were “palatoplasty”, “alveolar bone grafting”, “distraction osteogenesis” and “orthognathic surgery” among the treatment procedures. The most common WoS categories among the articles were dentistry, oral surgery & medicine, and surgery. The most cited publications over the last decade have included such terms as “environmental risk factor”, “GRHL3”, “FGFR2”, “loci”, “candidate gene” and “BMP”.
Conclusion: Recent CLP articles in the literature have focused mainly on treatment procedures, with the most-cited articles generally containing evaluations of the relationship between CLP and genetics. More recent methods have been discussed in only a limited number of studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cleft lip, Cleft palate, Trends, Bibliometrics

Kaynakça

• 1. Scalzone A, Flores-Mir C, Carozza D, d’Apuzzo F, Grassia V, Perillo L. Secondary alveolar bone grafting using autologous versus alloplastic material in the treatment of cleft lip and palate patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod 2019;20:1-10.
• 2. Liang H-N. Overview of the Health Informatics Research Field: A Bibliometric Approach. Takeda H, editor. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. p. 37–48.
• 3. Wilson V. Research Methods: Bibliometrics. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract 2012;7:121–3.
• 4. Gómez-Núñez AJ, Vargas-Quesada B, de Moya-Anegón F, Glänzel W. Improving SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) subject classification through reference analysis. Scientometrics 2011;89:741.
• 5. Guz AN, Rushchitsky JJ. Analysis of various bibliometric indicators for the evaluation of scientific journals and scientists. Int Appl Mech 2013;49:266–92.
• 6. Christou P, Antonarakis GS. The 100 Most-Cited Human Cleft Lip and Palate-Related Articles Published in Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Medicine Journals. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J 2015;52:437– 46
• 7. Mahon NA, Joyce CW. A bibliometric analysis of the 50 most cited papers in cleft lip and palate. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2015;49:52–8.
• 8. Zhang Q, Yue Y, Shi B, Yuan Z. A Bibliometric Analysis of Cleft Lip and Palate-Related Publication Trends From 2000 to 2017. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J 2019;56:658–69.
• 9. Suomalainen A, Aberg T, Rautio J, Hurmerinta K. Cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of alveolar bone grafting in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36:603–11.
• 10. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. Ding Y, Rousseau R, Wolfram D, editors. Measuring Scholarly Impact. Switzerland: Springer; 2014. p. 285–320.
• 11. Roldan-Valadez E, Salazar-Ruiz SY, Ibarra-Contreras R, Rios C. Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics. Ir J Med Sci 2019;188:939–51.
• 12. Falagas ME, Kouranos VD, Arencibia-Jorge R, Karageorgopoulos DE. Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. FASEB J 2008;22:2623–8.
• 13. Yu Q, Gong X, Wang GM, Yu ZY, Qian YF, Shen G. A novel technique for presurgical nasoalveolar molding using computer-aided reverse engineering and rapid prototyping. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:142–6.
• 14. Zheng J, He H, Kuang W, Yuan W. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding with 3D printing for a patient with unilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;156:412– 9.
• 15. Grill FD, Ritschl LM, Dikel H, Rau A, Roth M, Eblenkamp M, et al. Facilitating CAD/CAM nasoalveolar molding therapy with a novel click-in system for nasal stents ensuring a quick and user-friendly chairside nasal stent exchange. Sci Rep 2018;8:1–9.
• 16. Leslie EJ, Taub MA, Liu H, Steinberg KM, Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, et al. Identification of Functional Variants for Cleft Lip with or without Cleft Palate in or near PAX7, FGFR2, and NOG by Targeted Sequencing of GWAS Loci. Am J Hum Genet 2015;96:397–411.
• 17. Sun Y, Huang Y, Yin A, Pan Y, Wang Y, Wang C, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a new susceptibility locus for cleft lip with or without a cleft palate. Nat Commun 2015;6:1–7.
• 18. Durhan MA, Topcuoglu N, Kulekci G, Ozgentas E, Tanboga I. Microbial Profile and Dental Caries in Cleft Lip and Palate Babies Between 0 and 3 Years Old. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2019;56:349–56.
• 19. Rodrigues R, Fernandes MH, Monteiro AB, Furfuro R, Silva CC, Mendes J, et al. Oral hygiene of children with cleft lip and palate: Efficacy of the cleft toothbrush - A designed add-on to regular toothbrushes. Int J Paediatr Dent 2019;29:213–20.
• 20. Fowler P V, Corbett A, Lee M, Thompson JMD. A retrospective nationwide study of the dental caries experience of New Zealand children with orofacial cleft. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2020;48:42–8.
• 21. Bugaighis I, O’Higgins P, Tiddeman B, Mattick C, Ben Ali O, Hobson R. Three-dimensional geometric morphometrics applied to the study of children with cleft lip and/or palate from the North East of England. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:514–21.
• 22. Meyer-Marcotty P, Alpers GW, Gerdes ABM, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Impact of facial asymmetry in visual perception: A 3-dimensional data analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2010;137:168-e1.
• 23. Xuan Z, Zhongpeng Y, Yanjun G, Jiaqi D, Yuchi Z, Bing S, et al. Maternal active smoking and risk of oral clefts: a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016;122:680–90.
• 24. Morgan AR, Bellucci CC, Coppersmith J, Linde SB, Curtis A, Albert M, et al. Language Development in Children With Cleft Palate With or Without Cleft Lip Adopted From Non-English-Speaking Countries. Am J Speech-Language Pathol 2017;26:342-54.
• 25. Zhou LQ, Wang JY, Yu SY, Wu GG, Wei Q, Deng Y Bin, et al. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging of the liver. World J Gastroenterol 2019;25:672–82.
• 26. Fong ELS, Watson BM, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. Building bridges: leveraging interdisciplinary collaborations in the development of biomaterials to meet clinical needs. Adv Mater 2012;24:4995– 5013.
• 27. Yang C, Wang X, Tang X, Bao X, Wang R. Research trends of stem cells in ischemic stroke from 1999 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020;192:105740.
• 28. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF, AbuTaha AS, Zyoud SH. Bibliometric analysis of medicine-related publications on poverty (2005–2015). Springerplus 2016;5:1-13.
• 29. Helmy M, Awad M, Mosa KA. Limited resources of genome sequencing in developing countries: Challenges and solutions. Appl Transl Genomics 2016;9:15–9.
• 30. Rahman M, Fukui T. Biomedical Research Productivity.Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:249–52.