Restorations of Endodontically Treated Teeth

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 86 - 89, 26.04.2024

Şevval Sena Ak , Hale Cimilli

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1250382

Öz

Endodontically treated teeth are fragile compared to vital teeth. The reason for the decrease in fracture resistance and hardness is related to the deterioration of the structural integrity as a result of caries, trauma and cavity preparation. Restorations in endodontically treated teeth are applied considering the remaining tooth structure and functional status. For many years, post core systems that require additional preparation in the root canal, as well as the loss of most of the coronal tooth structures, are used for the final restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Endocrowns are monoblock restorations that attach to the pulp chamber and its walls, providing macro-mechanical and cementation with micro-mechanics, thus requiring no additional preparation. The first study written on ceramic endocrown was published in 1995. In this study, it is defined as a ceramic monoblock production technique for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. This procedure was later named "endocrown" in 1999.

Anahtar Kelimeler

endodontics, dental restoration, ceramics

Etik Beyan

This study was carried out by Prof. Dr. It was prepared based on the literature review made in the master's thesis titled "Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth: Endocron" prepared under the supervision of Zühre Hale Cimilli. It is declared that during the preparation process of this study, scientific and ethical principles were followed and all the studies benefited are stated in the bibliography.

Endodontik Tedavili Dişlerde Restorasyonlar

Öz

Endodontik tedavi görmüş dişler vital dişlere göre daha kırılgandır. Kırılma direnci ve sertliğindeki azalma, çürük, travma ve kavite preparasyonuna bağlı olarak yapısal bütünlüğün bozulması ile ilişkilidir. Endodontik tedavi görmüş dişlere restorasyon uygulanmadan önce kalan diş yapısı ve fonksiyonel durum göz önünde bulundurulur. Uzun yıllardır endodontik tedavi görmüş dişler, ek kök kanal hazırlığı ve koronal diş yapılarının çoğunun çıkarılmasını gerektiren post-kor sistemleriyle restore edilmiştir. Endokronlar, pulpa odasına ve duvarlarına bağlanan, makro mekanik ve mikro mekanik destek sağlayan, dolayısıyla ek bir hazırlık gerektirmeyen monoblok restorasyonlardır. Seramik endokron üzerine yazılan ilk çalışma 1995 yılında yayınlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada endodontik tedavi görmüş dişlerin restorasyonu için seramik monoblok üretim tekniği olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu prosedür daha sonra 1999'da "endokron" olarak adlandırıldı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

endodonti, dental restorasyon, seramik

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, Prof. Dr. Zühre Hale Cimilli danışmanlığında hazırlanan "Endodontik Tedavili Dişlerde Restorasyonlar: Endokron" başlıklı yüksek lisans tezinde yapılan literatür taraması esas alınarak hazırlanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın hazırlanma sürecinde bilimsel ve etik ilkelere uyulduğu ve yararlanılan tüm çalışmaların kaynakçada belirtildiği beyan olunur.

Kaynakça

• 1. Richard T. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: Criteria and technique considerations. Quintessence international. 2014;45:557-67.
• 2. Pontius O, Nathanson D, Giordano R, Schilder H, Hutter JW. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems and endodontically treated incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement. J Endod. 2002;28(10):710-5.
• 3. Vârlan C, Dimitriu B, Vârlan V, Bodnar D, Suciu I. Current opinions concerning the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: basic principles. J Med Life. 2009;2(2):165-72.
• 4. Soliman M, Alshamrani L, Yahya B, Alajlan G, Aldegheishem A, Eldwakhly E. Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(11):6523-31.
• 5. Salehrabi R, Rotstein I. Endodontic treatment outcomes in a large patient population in the USA: an epidemiological study. J Endod. 2004;30(12):846-50.
• 6. Chang C-Y, Kuo J-S, Lin Y-S, Chang Y-H. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2009;4(3):110-7.
• 7. Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia HP, Giannini M, Magne P. Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns. Oper Dent. 2016;41(1):76-82.
• 8. Khalighinejad N, Aminoshariae A, Kulild JC, Wang J, Mickel A. The Influence of Periodontal Status on Endodontically Treated Teeth: 9-year Survival Analysis. J Endod. 2017;43(11):1781-5.
• 9. Ng CC, Dumbrigue HB, Al-Bayat MI, Griggs JA, Wakefield CW. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(4):290-6.
• 10. Perdigao J. Restoration of Root-Canal Treated Teeth: An Adhesive Dentistry Perspective. 2016.
• 11. Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;87(3):256-63.
• 12. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J. 2011;44(7):583-609.
• 13. Rosenstiel SF LM, Fujimoto J. . Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. . The CV Mosby Co, St Louis. 1995;2nd edition.
• 14. Baba N, White S, Bogen G. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth. 2017. p. 161-92.
• 15. Smith CT, Schuman N. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a guide for the restorative dentist. Quintessence Int. 1997;28(7):457-62.
• 16. Gopikrishna V. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry - South Asian Edition2013.
• 17. Strub JR, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(2):120-4.
• 18. Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival of extensive amalgams and posterior crowns. J Dent. 1997;25(3-4):225-7.
• 19. Nandini S. Indirect resin composites. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. 2010;13(4):184-94.
• 20. Loguercio AD, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Reis A, Grande RH. In vitro microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations. Quintessence Int. 2004;35(1):29-34.
• 21. Yokesh CA, Hemalatha P, Muthalagu M, Justin MR. Comparative Evaluation of the Depth of Cure and Degree of Conversion of Two Bulk Fill Flowable Composites. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(8):ZC86-ZC9.
• 22. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holz J. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int. 1995;26(2):127-38.
• 23. Jackson RD, Morgan M. The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131(3):375-83.
• 24. Touré B, Faye B, Kane AW, Lo CM, Niang B, Boucher Y. Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: a prospective study. J Endod. 2011;37(11):1512-5.
• 25. Zadik Y, Sandler V, Bechor R, Salehrabi R. Analysis of factors related to extraction of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106(5):e31-5.
• 26. Felton DA, Webb EL, Kanoy BE, Dugoni J. Threaded endodontic dowels: effect of post design on incidence of root fracture. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(2):179-87.
• 27. Lambjerg-Hansen H, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24(12):882-7.
• 28. Jamani KD, Aqrabawi J, Fayyad MA. A radiographic study of the relationship between technical quality of coronoradicular posts and periapical status in a Jordanian population. Journal of Oral Science. 2005;47(3):123-8.
• 29. Moshonov J, Slutzky-Goldberg I, Gottlieb A, Peretz B. The effect of the distance between post and residual gutta-percha on the clinical outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2005;31(3):177-9.
• 30. Ozkurt Z, Kayahan MB, Sunay H, Kazazoğlu E, Bayirli G. The effect of the gap between the post restoration and the remaining root canal filling on the periradicular status in a Turkish subpopulation. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 2010;110(1):131-5.
• 31. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent. 2012;37(2):130-6.
• 32. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years--preliminary results. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(3):255-65.
• 33. Lander E, Dietschi D. Endocrowns: a clinical report. Quintessence Int. 2008;39(2):99-106.
• 34. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1995;7(5):83-94.
• 35. Zogheib LV. Resistance to Compression of Weakened Roots Subjected to Different Root Reconstruction Protocols. Journal of Applied Oral Science 2011;19(6):648-54.
• 36. Einhorn M, DuVall N, Wajdowicz M, Brewster J, Roberts H. Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):e237-e42.
• 37. Forberger N, Göhring TN. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(4):264-73.
• 38. Jotkowitz A, Samet N. Rethinking ferrule--a new approach to an old dilemma. Br Dent J. 2010;209(1):25-33.
• 39. Magne P, Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia HP, Giannini M. Influence of no-ferrule and no-post buildup design on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM crowns. Oper Dent. 2014;39(6):595-602.
• 40. Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Roig M, Krejci I. Composite vs ceramic computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing crowns in endodontically treated teeth: analysis of marginal adaptation. Oper Dent. 2013;38(6):663-73.
• 41. Aktas G, Yerlikaya H, Akca K. Mechanical Failure of Endocrowns Manufactured with Different Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(4):340-6.
• 42. Pedrollo Lise D, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Umeda Suzuki TY, Cardoso Vieira LC, Van Meerbeek B. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. J Dent. 2017;59:54-61.
• 43. Kanat-Ertürk B, Saridağ S, Köseler E, Helvacioğlu-Yiğit D, Avcu E, Yildiran-Avcu Y. Fracture strengths of endocrown restorations fabricated with different preparation depths and CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(2):256-65.
• 44. Tammam R. Clinical evaluation of monolithic Zirconia (5Y), Lithium Disilicate and modified PEEK CAD-CAM endocrown materials,3-year clinical prospective study. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2021;67:635-50.
• 45. Munoz-Sanchez ML, Linas N, Decerle N, Nicolas E, Hennequin M, Cousson PY. A Combination of Full Pulpotomy and Chairside CAD/CAM Endocrown to Treat Teeth with Deep Carious Lesions and Pulpitis in a Single Session: A Preliminary Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17).