The Moderating Effect of Core Self-Evaluation on The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Psychological Empowerment: A Research in Foreign Trade Companies

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 440 - 452, 30.11.2021

Aslıhan Turgut , Güler Sağlam Arı

https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.976203

Cited By: 1

Öz

Employee empowerment is an important variable for businesses operating in the international business environment to respond quickly to changes and provide competitive advantage. Revealing the antecedent variables that are effective in making employees feel empowered will guide the practices of businesses. In this study, the relationship between paternalistic leadership and psychological empowerment and the moderating effect of core self-evaluation on this relationship were investigated. The research data were obtained from 274 participants selected by stratified sampling from foreign trade companies operating in three different industrial zones operating in Kayseri. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, correlation, linear and hierarchical regression analysis. As a result of the research, a significant and positive relationship was found between paternalistic leadership and psychological empowerment, and it was determined that core self-evaluation had a moderating role in this relationship.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Paternalistic Leadership, Psychological Empowerment, Core Self-Evaluation, Foreign Trade Companies

Paternalist Liderlik ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme Arasındaki İlişkide Temel Benlik Değerlendirmesinin Düzenleyici Etkisi: Dış Ticaret Firmalarında Bir Araştırma

Öz

Uluslararası iş çevresinde faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin değişimlere hızlı tepki vermesi ve rekabet üstünlüğü sağlamasında personel güçlendirme önemli bir değişkendir. Çalışanların kendilerini güçlendirilmiş hissetmesinde etkili olan öncül değişkenleri ortaya koymak işletmelerin uygulamalarını yönlendirecektir. Bu çalışmada, paternalist liderlik ile psikolojik güçlendirme arasındaki ilişki ve bu ilişkide temel benlik değerlendirmesinin düzenleyici etkisi araştırılmıştır. Araştırma verileri Kayseri’ de üç farklı sanayi bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren dış ticaret firmalarından tabakalı örneklemle seçilen 274 katılımcıdan elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma, korelasyon, doğrusal ve hiyerarşik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda paternalist liderlik ile psikolojik güçlendirme arasında anlamlı ve pozitif ilişki bulunmuş, bu ilişkide temel benlik değerlendirmesinin düzenleyici rolü olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Paternalist Liderlik, Psikolojik Güçlendirme, Temel Benlik Değerlendirmesi, Dış Ticaret Firmaları

Kaynakça

• Ahmed, Nisar ve Malik, Beenish, (2019) “Impact of Psychological Empowerment on Job Performance of Teachers: Mediating Role of Psychological Well-being”, Review of Economics and Develpments Studies (READS), 5 (3), s. 451-460.
• Amabile, Teresa M., (1988) “A model of creativity and innovation in organizations”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), s. 123-167.
• Avolio Bruce J., Zhu, Weıchun, Koh, Wıllıam ve Bhatia, Puja, (2004) “Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), s. 951‐68. Aycan, Zeynep, (2006a) Paternalism, In Indigenous and cultural psychology (s. 445-466), Springer, Boston, MA.
• Aycan, Zeynep, (2001), “Paternalizm: Liderlik Anlayışına İlişkin Üç Görgül Çalışma”, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), s. 11-33.
• Aycan, Zeynep, (2006b) Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization, In K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, ve U. Kim (Eds.), Scientific advances in indigenous psychologies: Empirical, philosophical, and cultural contributions (s. 445-466). London: Sage Ltd.
• Aycan, Zeynep, Kanungo, Rabindra N., Mendonca, Manuel, Yu, Kaicheng, Deller, Jürgen, Stahl, Günter, ve Kurshid, Aanwar, (2000) “Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10‐country comparison”, Applied Psychology, 49(1), s.192-221.
• Aycan, Zeynep, Schyns, Birgit, Sun, Jian M., Felfe, Jörg, ve Saher, Noreen, (2013) “Convergence and divergence of paternalistic leadership: A cross-cultural investigation of prototypes”, Journal of International Business Studies, 44(9), s.962-969.
• Bayazıt, Mahmut, (2003) “Core self-evaluations scale adaptation study”, Unpublished manuscript, İstanbul, Koç University, Department of Psychology.
• Bedi, Akanksha, (2020) “A meta‐analytic review of paternalistic leadership”, Applied Psychology, 69(3), s. 960-1008.
• Cheng, Bor, S., Chou, Li ,F. ve Farh, Jiing, L., (2000) “A Triad Model of Paternalistic Leadership: Constructs and measurement”, Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, s.3-64.
• Conger, Jay, A. ve Kanungo, Rabındra, N., (1988) “The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice”, Academy of Management Review, 13(3), s. 471–82.
• Dedahanov, Alisher, T., Bozorov, Faridun, ve Sung, Sanghyun, (2019) “Paternalistic leadership and innovative behavior: Psychological empowerment as a mediator”, Sustainability, 11(6), s.1770.
• Demirer, Petek, (2012) “Is Paternalistic Leadership Empowering: A Contingency Framework”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Koç Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Dust, Scott, B., Resick, Christian, J., Margolis, Jaclyn, A., Mawritz, Mary, B., ve Greenbaum, Rebecca, L, (2018) “Ethical leadership and employee success: Examining the roles of psychological empowerment and emotional exhaustion”, The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), s. 570-583.
• Erben, Gül Selin ve Güneşer, Ayşe Begüm, (2008) “The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), s. 955-968.
• Ergeneli, Azize, Arı, Sağlam, G., ve Metin, Selin, (2007) “Psychological empowerment and its relationship to trust in immediate managers”, Journal of Business Research, 60(1), s. 41-49.
• Farh, Jiing, L., ve Cheng, Bor, S., (2000) A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations, in Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, eds J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, and E. Weldon (London, UK: Palgrave), s. 84–127.
• Goodell, Grace E., Aronoff, Myron, J., Austin, Diane J., Cadeliña, Rowe, V., Emmerson, Donald, K., Hansen, Karen, T… ve Wiseman, John A., (1985) “Paternalism, Patronage, and Potlatch: The Dynamics of Giving and Being Given To [and Comments and Reply]”, Current Anthropology, 26(2), s. 247-266.
• Gouldner, Alvin, W., (1960) “The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement”, American Sociological Review, s. 161-178.
• Grošelj, Matej, Černe, Matej , Penger, Sandra ve Grah, Barbara, (2021) "Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of psychological empowerment", European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), s.677-706.
• Hechanova, Ma R. M., Alampay, Ramon B. A., ve Franco, Edna P., (2006) “Psychological empowerment, job satisfaction and performance among Filipino service workers”, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(1), s. 72-78.
• Henry, Paul,C., (2005) “Social Class, Market Situation, and Consumers’ Metaphors of (Dis)empowerment”, Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), s.766-778.
• Hiller, Nathan, J., Sin, Hock, P., Ponnapalli, Ajay, R., ve Ozgen, Sibel, (2019) “Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies”, The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), s.165-184.
• Hu, Jia, Wang, Zhen, Liden, Robert, C. ve Sun, Jianmin, (2012) “The influence of leader core self-evaluation on follower reports of transformational leadership”, The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), s.860–868.
• Hu, Yixin, Zhu, Liping, Zhou, Mengmeng, Li, Jie, Maguire, Phil, Sun, Haichao ve Wang, Dawei, (2018) “Exploring the influence of ethical leadership on voice behavior: how leader-member exchange, psychological safety and psychological empowerment influence employees’ willingness to speak out”, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, s. 1718.
• Joo, Baek, K., ve Lim, Taejo, (2013) “Transformational leadership and career satisfaction: The mediating role of psychological empowerment”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(3), s.316-326.
• Judge, Timothy, A. ve Bono, Joyce, E., (2001) “Relationship of core self-evaluations traits–self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability–with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), s. 80–92.
• Judge, Timothy, A., Erez, Amır, Bono Joyce, E., Thoresen, Carl, J., (2003) “The core self-evaluations scale: development of a measure”, Pers Psychol, 56 (2), s.303–331.
• Judge, Timothy, A., Locke, Edwin, A., Durham, Cathy, C. ve Kluger, Avraham, N., (1998) “Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations”, J. Appl. Psychol. 83(1), s.17–34.
• Khuwaja, Uzair, Ahmed, Kaleem, Abid, Ghulam ve Adeel, Ahmad, (2020) “Leadership and employee attitudes: The mediating role of perception of organizational politics”, Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), s.1-21.
• Kisbu, Yasemin, (2006) “Influences Of Regulatory Focus, Core Self Evaluatıons And Age On Bıases In Perceptıon and Choıce”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Koç Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Krishnan, Venkat, R., (2012) "Transformational leadership and personal outcomes: empowerment as mediator", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33 (6), s.550-563.
• Lau, Wai, K., Pham, Loan, N., ve Nguyen, Lam, D., (2019) “Remapping the construct of paternalistic leadership”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(7), s.764-776.
• Lee, Kyootai, Scandura, Terri, A. ve Sharif, Monica, M., (2014) “Cultures have consequences: A configural approach to leadership across two cultures”, The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), s.692-710.
• Li, Chenwei, Wu, Keke, Johnson, Diane E. ve Wu, Min, (2012) “Moral leadership and psychological empowerment in China”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(1), s. 90-108.
• Li, Xiufeng ve Lin, Congcong, (2020), "The influence of high-commitment work system on work well-eing: the mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of leader trust", Personnel Review, 50 (4), s. 1128-1147.
• Lin, Cai, H. V. ve Sun, Jian, M. J., (2018) “Chinese employees’ leadership preferences and the relationship with power distance orientation and core self-evaluation”, Frontiers of Business Research in China, 12(1), s.1-22.
• Lin, Chun, P., Lin, Mei, Z. ve Li, Yi, B., (2015) “An empirical study on the effect of paternalistic leadership on employees’ voice behaviors–the intermediary role of psychological empowerment”, Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 18(6), s. 789-810.
• Mansur, Juliana, Sobral, Filipe ve Goldszmidt, Rafael, (2017) “Shades of paternalistic leadership across cultures”, Journal of World Business, 52(5), s.702-713.
• Marta, Iman, A., Supartha, I Wayan Gede, Dewi, I, G. A. M ve Wibawa, I Made Artha, (2021) “Job Enrichment, Empowerment, and Organizational Commitment: The Mediating Role of Work Motivation and Job Satisfaction”, The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(1), s.1031-1040.
• Maynard, Travis, M. Gilson, Lucy, L. ve Mathieu, John, E., (2012) “Empowerment—fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research”, Journal of Management, 38(4), s.1231-1281.
• Meyerson, Shauna, L. ve Kline, Theresa, J.B., (2008) "Psychological and environmental empowerment: antecedents and consequences", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(5), s. 444-460.
• Mubarak, Fozia, ve Noor, Ayesha, (2018) “Effect of authentic leadership on employee creativity in project-based organizations with the mediating roles of work engagement and psychological empowerment”, Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), s.1-14.
• Mussolino, Donata ve Calabrò, Andrea, (2014) “Paternalistic leadership in family firms: Types and implications for intergenerational succession”, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(2), s. 197-210.
• Newman, Alexander, Schwarz, Gary, Cooper, Brian ve Sendjaya, Sen, (2017) “How servant leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior: The roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality”, Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), s.49-62.
• Nübold, Annika, Muck, Peter, M. ve Maier, Güntar, W., (2013) “A new substitute for leadership? Followers' state core self-evaluations”, The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), s.29-44.
• Ölçer, Ferit ve Florescu, Margareta,S., (2015) “Mediating effect of job satisfaction in the relationship between psychological empowerment and job performance”, Theoretical and Applied Economics, 22(3), s.111-136.
• Paşa, Selda, F., Kabasakal, Hayat veBodur,Muzaffer, (2001) “Society, organizations, and leadership in Turkey”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50 (4), s.559-589.
• Pellegrini, Ekin, K. ve Scandura, Terri, A., (2006) “Leader–member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation”, Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2), s. 264-279.
• Pellegrini, Ekin, K., ve Scandura, Terri, A., (2008) “Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research”, Journal of Management, 34(3), s. 566-593.
• Pieterse, Anne, N., Van Knippenberg, Daan, Schippers, Michaela ve Stam, Daan, (2010) “Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), s. 609-623.
• Pradhan, Rabindra, K., Panda, Madhusmita ve Jena, Lalatendu, K., (2017) "Transformational leadership and psychological empowerment: The mediating effect of organizational culture in Indian retail industry", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(1), s.82-95.
• Sağlam, Arı, G., (2014) “Örgütlerde Fiziksel Semboller ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme İlişkisi Üzerine Kavramsal Bir Çalışma”. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(2), s. 1-25.
• Silin, Robert, H., (1976) Leadership and Values: The Organization of Large-Scale Taiwanese Enterprises. Harvard Univ Asia Center.
• Spreitzer, Gretchen, M., (1995) “Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation”, Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), s.1442-1465.
• Spreitzer, Gretchen, M., (1996) “Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment”, Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), s.483-504 .
• Sürgevil, Olca, Tolay, Ebru, Topoyan, Mert, (2013) “Yapısal Güçlendirme ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme Ölçeklerinin Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Analizleri”, Journal of Yasar University, 8(31), s. 5371-5391.
• Taştan, Bal S., (2013) “The relationship between psychological empowerment and psychological well being: the role of self-efficacy perception and social support”. Öneri Dergisi, 10(40), s.139-154.
• Thomas, Kenneth, W. ve Velthouse, Betty, A., (1990) “Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An "Interpretive" Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation”, The Academy of Management Review, 15(4), s. 666-681.
• Tuuli, Martin, M., ve Rowlinson, Steve, (2009) “Performance consequences of psychological empowerment”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(12), s.1334-1347.
• Usman, Muhammad, Liu, Yuxin, Li, Haihong, Zhang, Jianwei , Ghani, Usman, ve Gul, Habib, (2020) “Enabling the engine of workplace thriving through servant leadership: The moderating role of core self-evaluations”, Journal of Management & Organization, s. 1-19.
• Wagstaff, Maria, F., Collela, Adrienne, Triana, Maria, D.C., Smith, Alexis, N. ve Watkins, Marla, B., (2015) “Subordinates’ perceptions of supervisor paternalism: A scale development.” . Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(6), s. 659–674.
• Wang, An, C. ve Cheng, Bor, S., (2010) “When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), s.106-121.
• Wei, Feng, Yuan, Xin ve Di, Yang, (2010) “Effects of transactional leadership, psychological empowerment and empowerment climate on creative performance of subordinates: A cross-level study”, Frontiers of Literary Studies in China, 4(1), s. 29-46.
• Wu, Melien, Zhuang, Wen, L., ve Hung, Chao, C. (2014) “The effects of mentoring functions on repatriate adjustment–Moderating role of core self-evaluations”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, s.177-188.
• Yazıcıoğlu, Yahşi ve Erdoğan, Samiye, (2004) SPSS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Zhang, Jing, Song, Lynda, J., Wang, Yue ve Liu, Guangjian, (2018) “How authentic leadership influences employee proactivity: the sequential mediating effects of psychological empowerment and core self-evaluations and the moderating role of employee political skill”. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 12(1), s. 1-21.
• Zhang, Yan, Huai, Ming, Y. ve Xie, Yun, H., (2015) “Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model”, The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1),s. 25-36.
• Zhi-Hua, D. E. N. G., (2016) “Comparative study of servant leadership and paternalistic leadership on employee’s performance”, DEStech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, (ssme-ist).
• Zimmerman, Marc, A., (1995) “Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations”, American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), s. 581-599.