DIGITAL SOCIOLOGY AND DIGITAL WORKING CLASS STUDIES: NEW CONCEPTS

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 107 - 121, 30.11.2023

Özgür Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.38004/sobad.1266836

Öz

The study primarily addressed the phenomenon of "digital humanities", which emerged because of the increasing interest of the humanities in the relationship between digitalization and society. With the shift of digitalization and sociology's interests and subjects to the digital field, "digital sociology" has become possible to talk about as a sub-discipline. Digital labour studies, on the other hand, are generally built on discussions of digital labour. However, in the study, the idea that digital sociology and digital labour studies have many common interests is suggested. The main purpose of the study is to define the phenomenon of digital sociology as a sub-discipline of digital humanities and to create a dialogue between digital sociology and digital labour studies. To achieve this goal, process analysis based on secondary source data is used methodically. Neoliberal fatigue, insecurity of will, fear of missing out, absenteeism, presentism, unemployed growth, Kaizen, cyber hedonism, digital nomadism, cyber Balkanization and non-cooperation were determined as the concepts to be examined in this review process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Humanities, Digital Sociology, Digital Labour Studies

DİJİTAL SOSYOLOJİ VE DİJİTAL SINIF ÇALIŞMALARI: YENİ KAVRAMLAR

Öz

The study primarily addressed the phenomenon of "digital humanities", which emerged because of the increasing interest of the humanities in the relationship between digitalization and society. With the shift of digitalization and sociology's interests and subjects to the digital field, "digital sociology" has become possible to talk about as a sub-discipline. Digital labour studies, on the other hand, are generally built on discussions of digital labour. However, in the study, the idea that digital sociology and digital labour studies have many common interests is suggested. The main purpose of the study is to define the phenomenon of digital sociology as a sub-discipline of digital humanities and to create a dialogue between digital sociology and digital labour studies. To achieve this goal, process analysis based on secondary source data is used methodically. Neoliberal fatigue, insecurity of will, fear of missing out, absenteeism, presentism, unemployed growth, Kaizen, cyber hedonism, digital nomadism, cyber Balkanization and non-cooperation were determined as the concepts to be examined in this review process. The work is divided into three titles. Under the first title, the concepts of digital humanities, digital sociology and digital labour studies were discussed. After this discussion, a critical position was determined. The second part of the study is devoted to the examination of the aforementioned concepts. In the third and last part of the study, a general evaluation of the study was made, and suggestions were made to the researchers in the field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Humanities, Digital Sociology, Digital Labour Studies

Kaynakça

• Abel, J. P., Buff, C. L., & Burr, S. A. (2016). Social media and the fear of missing out: Scale development and assessment. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 14(1), 33-44.
• Arjona, A. (2017). Civilian cooperation and non-cooperation with non-state armed groups: The centrality of obedience and resistance. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 28(4-5), 755-778.
• Bauman, Z. (2013). Modernite, Kapitalizm, Sosyalizm. Çev. F. Doruk Ergun. Say Yayınları: İstanbul.
• Bauman, Z. (2014). Azınlığın Zenginliği Hepimizin Çıkarına mıdır?. Çev. Hakan Keser. Ayrıntı: İstanbul.
• Belek, İ. (2018). Esnek Üretim Derin Sömürü. 3. Baskı. Yazılama: İstanbul.
• Bilir, Z. E. (2008). Duyguların ve bedenlerin ticarileşmesi: Ankara’daki alışveriş merkezlerinde çalışan kadın satış görevlileri. Emek Araştırma Dergisi, 1, 19-47.
• Casilli, A. A. (2017). Global digital culture| Digital labor studies go global: Toward a digital decolonial turn. International Journal of Communication, 11, 21.
• Chan, C. H., & Fu, K. W. (2018). The “mutual ignoring” mechanism of cyberbalkanization: triangulating observational data analysis and agent-based modeling. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(4), 378-387.
• Darr, W., & Johns, G. (2008). Work strain, health, and absenteeism: a meta-analysis. Journal of occupational health psychology, 13(4), 293.
• Das, R. J. (2017). Marxist Class Theory for a Skeptical World. Brill: Leiden.
• Daudi, A. (2022). Social Media Hedonism and the Case of ’Fitspiration’: A Nietzschean Critique. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 1-16.
• Davis, M. (2018). Eski Tanrılar, Yeni Bilmeceler Marx’ın Kayıp Teorisi. Çev. Şükrü Alpagut. Yordam: İstanbul. de Almeida, M. A., Correia, A., Schneider, D., & de Souza, J. M. (2021). COVID-19 as opportunity to test digital nomad lifestyle. In 2021 IEEE 24th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) (pp. 1209-1214). IEEE.
• Dejours, C. (2010). Christophe Dejours’la Söyleşi: Etik Acı, Ruhsal Acı, Acıların İnsanı. Bianet. https://m.bianet.org/biamag/emek/119480-etik-aci-ruhsal-aci-acilarin-insani Erişim Tarihi: 18.04.22.
• Entin, J. (2021). Reconceiving class in contemporary working-class studies. (Ed. Michele Fazio, Christie Launius & Tim Strangleman) Routledge International Handbook of Working-Class Studies. Routledge: Oxon.
• Fazio, M., Launius, C. & Strangleman, T. (2021). Introduction. (Ed. Michele Fazio, Christie Launius & Tim Strangleman) Routledge International Handbook of Working-Class Studies. Routledge: Oxon.
• Fisher, M. (2011). Kapitalist Gerçekçilik Başka Alternatif Yok mu?. Çev. Gül Çağalı Güven. Habitus: İstanbul.
• Fisher, M. (2020a). Acid Communism: Psikedelik Maddeler ve Sınıf Bilinci. Çev. Uraz Aydın. http://imdatfreni.org/acid-communism-psikedelik-maddeler-ve-sinif-bilinci-mark-fisher/ Erişim Tarihi: 25.09.22.
• Fisher, M. (2020b). Akıl Sağlığı Neden Politik Bir Meseledir?. Çev. Koray Kırmızısakal. https://terrabayt.com/dusunce/akil-sagligi-neden-politik-bir-meseledir/ Erişim Tarihi: 20.05.22.
• Ford, M. (2022). Robotların Yükselişi. 11. Baskı. Çev. Cem Duran. Kronik Kitap: İstanbul.
• Frantzen, M. K. (2021). Bugünü Özgürleştirmek: Depresyonun Politikası. Çev. Umut-Sen Çeviri Kolektifi. Los Angeles Review of Books. https://umutsen.org/index.php/ceviri-bugunu-ozgurlestirmek-depresyonun-politikasi-los-angeles-review-of-books/ Erişim Tarihi: 18.04.22.
• Fussey, P., & Roth, S. (2020). Digitizing sociology: Continuity and change in the internet era. Sociology, 54(4), 659-674.
• Gürcan, E. C. (2019). Küresel Kapitalizmin Krizi, Sınıflar ve “Yeni” Toplumsal Hareketler. Praksis Dört Aylık Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi: Sayı 50, 2019-2. 71-94. Dipnot: Ankara.
• Han, B. (2020). Yorgunluk Toplumu. (Çev. Samet Yalçın). Altıncı Basım. Açılımkitap: İstanbul.
• Han, B. (2021). Yorgunluk Virüsü. Çev. Özgür Umut Baz & Emir Aydoğan. https://textumdergi.net/pandemi-yorgunluk-virusu/ Erişim Tarihi: 03.02.23.
• Han, B. (2022). Enfokrasi Dijitalleşme ve Demokrasinin Krizi. Çev. Mustafa Özdemir. Ketebe Yayınları: İstanbul.
• Hermann, I., & Paris, C. M. (2020). Digital Nomadism: the nexus of remote working and travel mobility. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(3), 329-334.
• Kardaş, S. (2018). Dijital Sosyoloji ya da Yeni Toplumsallıklar. Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• Linkon, S. L. (2021). Class analysis from the inside Scholarly personal narrative as a signature genre of working-class studies. (Ed. Michele Fazio, Christie Launius & Tim Strangleman) Routledge International Handbook of Working-Class Studies. Routledge: Oxon.
• Lupton, D. (2012) Digital Sociology: An Introduction. University of Sydney: Sydney.
• Lupton, D. (2015). Digital Sociology. Routledge: Oxon.
• Maarof, M. G., & Mahmud, F. (2016). A review of contributing factors and challenges in implementing kaizen in small and medium enterprises. Procedia economics and Finance, 35, 522-531.
• Mandıracıoğlu, A. (2013). Presentizm olgusu. Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Halk Sağlığı Ana Bilim Dalı, 3(2), 9-17.
• Mongomery, N. & bergman, c. (2022). Neşeli Militanlık Toksik Zamanlarda Direnişi Örmek. Çev. Gülnur Elçik. İletişim: İstanbul.
• Müller, A. (2016). The digital nomad: Buzzword or research category?. Transnational Social Review, 6(3), 344-348.
• Neilson, D. (2018). In-itself for-itself: Towards second-generation neo-Marxist class theory. Capital & Class, 42(2), 273-295. Odman, A. (2022). Çalışma Acısı ve İntiharlar - 1 Sınıf Mücadelesinin Ruhsal Alanı (Söyleşi: Bekir Avcı). 1+1 Express. https://birartibir.org/sinif-mucadelesinin-ruhsal-alani/ Erişim Tarihi: 18.04.22.
• Orel, M. (2019). Coworking environments and digital nomadism: Balancing work and leisure whilst on the move. World Leisure Journal, 61(3), 215-227.
• Pencolé, M. (2021). Dijital Emek. (Ed. KRISIS (Journal for Contemporary Philosophy) Yayın Kurulu) Kıyıdan Köşeden Marksizm Kılavuzu içinde. Dipnot: Ankara.
• Prashad, V. (2019). Esmer Milletler Halkların Üçüncü Dünya Tarihi. Çev. Çağdaş Sümer & Senem Erdoğan. Yordam: İstanbul.
• Prilyantinasari, P., & Mulyana, A. (2020). The effect of instagram exposure of hedonic lifestyle on dissonance rates for digital native. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 5(2), 396-402.
• Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in human behavior, 29(4), 1841-1848.
• Sauer, B. (2021). Kesişimsellik. (Ed. KRISIS (Journal for Contemporary Philosophy) Yayın Kurulu) Kıyıdan Köşeden Marksizm Kılavuzu içinde. Dipnot: Ankara.
• Serpa, S. (2021). Digital Society and Digital Sociology: One Thing Leads to the Other. Science Insights, 38(3), 314-316.
• Singh, J., & Singh, H. (2009). Kaizen philosophy: a review of literature. IUP journal of operations management, 8(2), 51.
• Standing, G. (2009). Work after Globalization Building Occupational Citizenship. Edward Elgard Publishing: Cheltenham.
• Strangleman, T. (2008). Sociology, social class and new working class studies. Antipode, 40(1), 15-19.
• Svensson, P. (2010). The landscape of digital humanities. Digital humanities quarterly, 4(1).
• Svensson, P. (2012). The digital humanities as a humanities project. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11(1-2), 42-60.
• Taylor, M. (2017). Who Works for Globalisation? The challenges and possibilities for international labour studies. (Ed. Marcus Taylor) Renewing International Labour Studies. Routledge: Oxon.
• Taylor, M. & Rioux, S. (2018). Global Labour Studies. Polity Press: Cambridge.
• Yılmaz, Ö. (2022). Emeğin Bireyselleşmesi ve Freelance Gazetecilik. (Ed. Aslı Yapar Gönenç & Gülsün Bozkurt) İletişim ve Medya içinde. Der Yayınları: İstanbul.
• Yücesan-Özdemir, G. (2017). Sınıf Çalışmaları: Akademik Alana Marksist Müdahale. (Ed. Alper Dizdar) Anaakım Bilime Marksist Müdahale içinde. İleri Kitaplığı Yayınevi: İstanbul.
• Yücesan-Özdemir, G. (2021). İnatçı Köstebek Çağrı Merkezlerinde Gençlik, Sınıf ve Direniş. 2. Baskı. İmge: Ankara.
• Zhang, Z., Jiménez, F. R., & Cicala, J. E. (2020). Fear of missing out scale: A self‐concept perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 37(11), 1619-1634.