SOSYAL MEDYADA TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET TEMELLİ TRAFİK SÖYLEMİ

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 41-42, 145 - 161, 26.11.2021

Esra Gedik , Ezgi Pehlivanlı Kadayıfçı Samet Talha Turgut , Mehmet Bulut

Öz

2000’li yıllardan itibaren sosyal medya, bireylerin yaşamlarında önemli bir yere sahip olmaya başlamıştır. Bununla birlikte günlük hayatta karşımıza çıkan cinsiyet rolleri ve toplumsal cinsiyet algıları bu mecralarda da etkisini sürdürmektedir. Sosyal medya ortamlarında bulunan topluluklar, günümüzde farklı kesimden birçok bireyi bir araya getirerek bireylerin kendilerini kültürel, politik, sanatsal, eğlence ve sosyal olarak ifade etme imkânı bulduğu bir alandır. Bu özelliğinden dolayı dünyanın en büyük sosyal paylaşım sitesi olan Facebook grupları ve Türkiye özelinde Ekşi Sözlük, çalışmanın veri evrenini oluşturmaktadır. Sözü edilen veri seti kapsamında, Türkiye’de üzerine çok fazla tartışma yapılan “kadın sürücü” konusu ve toplumsal cinsiyet temelli söylemleri içeren 10 farklı otomobil Facebook grubundan ve Ekşi Sözlük iletilerinden 5014 yorum eleştirel bakış açısıyla, içerik analizi yöntemiyle taranmıştır. 2015 yılından 2020 yılına kadar kullanıcıların yaptığı tüm yorumlar incelenmiştir. Bu kapsamda gruplarda yapılan paylaşımların yorumlarında ve Ekşi Sözlük paylaşımlarında geleneksel cinsiyet rollerinin ön planda olduğu gözlemlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Medya, Kadın Sürücü, Trafik, Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Toplumsal Cinsiyet Temelli Söylem, İçerik Analizi

Gendered Traffic Discourse in the Social Media

Öz

Since the 2000s, social media has begun to have an important place in the lives of individuals. However, gender roles and gender perceptions that we encounter in daily life continue to be influential in these media as well. Communities in social media environments are an area where individuals have the opportunity to express themselves culturally, politically, artistically, entertainmently and socially by bringing together many individuals from different walks of life. Due to this feature, Facebook groups, the world's largest social networking site and Ekşi Sözlük particularly in Turkey, constitute the data universe of the study. Within the scope of the aforementioned data set, 5014 comments from 10 different automobile Facebook groups and Ekşi Sözlük messages, which contain the subject of "female driver", “male driver”, “traffic” were scanned with a critical perspective and content analysis method. All comments made by users from 2015 to 2020 and the user profiles that made these comments were examined. In this context, it has been observed that traditional gender roles are at the forefront in the comments of the posts made in the Facebook groups and the posts of Ekşi Sözlük.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Media, Female Driver, Traffic, Gender, Gendered Discourse, Content Analysis

Kaynakça

• Albayrak, M., Topal, K., & Altıntaş, V. (2017). Sosyal Medya Üzerinde Veri Analizi: Twitter. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(Kayfor 15 Özel Sayısı), 1991-1998.
• Balkmar, D., & Mellström, U. (2018). Masculinity and Autonomous Vehicles. Transfers, 8(1).
• Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., & Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1-14.
• Bengry-Howell, A. And Grıffın, C. (2007) ‘Self-Made Motormen: The Material Construction of Working-Class Masculine Identities through Car Modification’, Journal of Youth Studies 10(4): 439-58. [doi:10.1080/13676260701360683]
• Best, H., & Lanzendorf, M. (2005). Division of labour and gender differences in metropolitan car use: An empirical study in Cologne, Germany. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(2), 109-121.
• Bridges, J. (2017). Gendering metapragmatics in online discourse: “Mansplaining man gonna mansplain…”. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 94-102.
• Borgoni, R., Ewert, U. C., & Prskawetz, A. (2002). How important are household demographic characteristics to explain private car use patterns? A multilevel approach to Austrian data (No. WP-2002-006). Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
• Brandth, B. (1995). Rural masculinity in transition: gender images in tractor advertisements. Journal of rural studies, 11(2), 123-133.
• Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technical know-how. London; Dover, NH: Pluto Press.
• Connell, R. W. (1995). Politics of changing men. Radical Society, 25(1), 135.
• Elander, J., West, R., & French, D. (1993). Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: an examination of methods and findings. Psychological bulletin, 113(2), 279.
• Elgezdi, E. (2003). Vosvos efsanesi. Epsilon.
• Gaylin, W (1992), The Male Ego, Viking, New York.
• Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., & Wahlström, B. (1998). Why do older drivers give up driving?. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30(3), 305-312.
• Hastrup, K. (2005). Social anthropology. Towards pragmatic enlightenment?. Social Anthropology, 13(2), 133-149.
• Howe, A., & O'Connor, K. (1982). Travel to work and labor force participation of men and women in an Australian metropolitan area. The Professional Geographer, 34(1), 50-64.
• Kabeer, N. (2001). Bangladeshi women workers and labour market decisions: The power to choose. University Press.
• Kadayifci, E. P., & Gedik, E. (2016, July). More girls to choose engineering as a major: Perspectives from “Honey Bees are Becoming Engineers”. Project. In 2nd International Conference on Lifelong Education and Leadership for All, 21-24.
• Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 32, 127-140.
• Lezotte, C. (2012). The evolution of the “chick car” or: what came first, the chick or the car?. The Journal of Popular Culture, 45(3), 516-531.
• Lie, M., & Sørensen, K. H. (Eds.). (1996). Making technology our own?: domesticating technology into everyday life. Scandinavian University Press.
• Manderscheid, K. (2018). From the Auto-mobile to the Driven Subject? Transfers, 8(1).
• Mellström, U. (1999) Technology and Masculinity: Men and their machines, In: ErvØ, S. & Johansson, T. (eds.) Moulding Masculinities. Oxon: Ashgate Publishing, UK.
• Mellström, U. (2002). Patriarchal machines and masculine embodiment. Science, technology, & human values, 27(4), 460-478.
• Mellström, U. (2004). Machines and masculine subjectivity: Technology as an integral part of men’s life experiences. Men and masculinities, 6(4), 368-382.
• Nobis, C., & Lenz, B. (2005). Gender differences in travel patterns. Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation, 2, 114-123.
• Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2006). What causes the differences in driving between young men and women? The effects of gender roles and sex on young drivers’ driving behaviour and self-assessment of skills. Transportation research part F: Traffic psychology and behaviour, 9(4), 269-277.
• Pain, R. (1991). Space, sexual violence and social control: integrating geographical and feminist analyses of women's fear of crime. Progress in human geography, 15(4), 415-431.
• Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 27, 252-263.
• Perry, G., & Rossington, M. (Eds.). (1994). Femininity and masculinity in eighteenth-century art and culture. Manchester university press.
• Peters, D. (2001). Gender and transport in less developed countries: A background paper in preparation for CSD-9. In London, Paper Commissioned by UNED Forum.
• Pickup, L. (1988). Hard to get around: a study of women’s travel mobility. In Women in cities. Palgrave, London.
• Redshaw, S. (2018). Combustion, Hydraulic, and Other Forms of Masculinity. Transfers, 8(1).
• Rosenbloom, S., & Burns, E. (1993). Gender differences in commuter travel in Tucson: implications for travel demand management programs.
• Siddiqi, D. M. (2003). The sexual harassment of industrial workers: strategies for intervention in the workplace and beyond. CPD-UNFPA publication series no, 26, 40.
• Siren, A., Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., & Lindeman, M. (2004). Driving cessation and health in older women. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 23(1), 58-69. Sumer, N. (2001). The role of driving skills, errors, and violations. I. Traffic and Road Safety Congress, April 2001. Ankara, Turkey: Gazi University.
• Valentine, G. (1989). The geography of women's fear. Area, 385-390.
• Walker, L. (1999). Hydraulic sexuality and hegemonic masculinity: Young working-class men and car culture. In R. White (Ed.), AustralianYouth subcultures: On the margins and in the mainstream. Hobart: Australian Clearing House for Youth Studies
• Wajcman, J. (2009) Feminist theories of technology, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1 of 10.
• Whitzman, C. (2007). Stuck at the front door: gender, fear of crime and the challenge of creating safer space. Environment and Planning A, 39(11), 2715-2732.