Sosyolojik Düşüncenin Kavşağında Bir Sentez: Bourdieu’nün Marx, Weber ve Durkheim ile Entelektüel Dansı

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 46, 191 - 220, 26.11.2023

Gürhan Özpolat , İbrahim Arap

https://doi.org/10.59572/sosder.1335308

Öz

Pierre Bourdieu’nün sosyolojik düşüncesi karşıt teoriler arasında diyalog kurmanın öneminin vurgulandığı metodolojik ve düşünümsel bir eklektizm ile karakterize edilegelmiştir. Bu eleştirel eklektizm pratiği, onun farklı epistemolojiler arasındaki sınırları aşmasına ve yeni bir sosyolojik geleneğin gelişimine katkıda bulunmasına olanak tanımıştır. Ancak Bourdieu’nün sosyolojik teorisini inşa ederken farklı düşünce gelenekleriyle olan ilişkisi salt eklektizmin ötesine geçmektedir. Bu makalede Bourdieu’yü sentetik bir düşünür olarak konumlandırıyor ve onun sosyolojik düşüncenin kurucu isimleri (Marx, Weber, Durkheim) ile olan ilişkisinin bazı veçhelerine odaklanıyoruz. Bourdieu’nün hangi kuramcıya daha çok şey borçlu olduğunu belirlemekten ziyade, odak noktamızı onun özgün sosyolojik çerçevesini şekillendiren çeşitli etkileri anlamak oluşturuyor.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bourdieu, Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Sosyolojik Düşünce

A SYNTHESIS AT THE CROSSROADS OF SOCIOLOGICAL THOUGHT: BOURDIEU’S INTELLECTUAL DANCE WITH MARX, WEBER AND DURKHEIM

Öz

Pierre Bourdieu’s sociological thought has been characterized by methodological and reflexive eclecticism, emphasizing the importance of establishing a dialogue between opposing theories. This practice of critical eclecticism allowed him to transcend the boundaries between different epistemologies and contribute to the development of a new sociological tradition. However, Bourdieu’s relationship with various traditions of thought in constructing his sociological theory goes beyond mere eclecticism. In this article, we position Bourdieu as a synthetic thinker and focus on some aspects of his relationship with the founding figures of sociological thought (Marx, Weber, Durkheim). Rather than identifying which theorist Bourdieu owes more to, our focus is on understanding the various influences that shaped his distinctive sociological framework.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bourdieu, Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Sociological Thought

Kaynakça

• Angermuller, J. (2004). Why there is no poststructuralism in France: The making of an intellectual generation. Bloomsbury Academic.
• Aron, R. (1967). Les étapes de la pensée sociologique. Gallimard.
• Barrett, T. (2015). Storying Bourdieu: Fragments toward a bourdieusian approach to “Life histories.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621399
• Bonnewitz, P. (2002). Premières leçons sur la sociologie de Pierre Bourdieu (2nd ed.). Presses Universitaires de France.
• Bourdieu, P. (1968). Structuralism and theory of sociological knowledge. Social Research, 35(4, Focus—Conservative Approaches in the Human Sciences (Winter)), 681–706.
• Bourdieu, P. (1988). Vive la crise!: For heterodoxy in social science. Theory and Society, 17(5), 773–787.
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology (M. Adamson, Trans.; 1st ed.). Stanford University Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (1991a). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (1991b). The political ontology of Martin Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question (R. Nice, Trans.). SAGE Publications. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Rethinking the State: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/202032
• Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power (L. C. Clough, Trans.). Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination (R. Nice, Trans.). Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (2006). Legitimation and structured interests in Weber’s sociology of religion. In S. Whimster & S. Lash (Eds.), Max Weber, rationality and modernity (pp. 119–136). Routledge.
• Bourdieu, P. (2008). Sketch for a self-analysis (R. Nice, Trans.). The University of Chicago Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (2013). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.; 28th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the state: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989-1992 (D. Fernbach, Trans.). Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P., Accardo, A., Balazs, G., Beaud, S., Bonvin, F., Bourdieu, E., Bourgois, P., Broccolichi, S., Champagne, P., Christin, R., Faguer, J.-P., Garcia, S., Lenoir, R., Œuvrard, F., Pialoux, M., Pinto, L., Podalydès, D., Sayad, A., Soulié, C., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1999). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (Pricila Parkhust Ferguson, S. Emanuel, & S. T. Waryn, Trans.). Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P., & Darbel, A. (1991). The love of art: European art museums and their public (Caroline Beattie & N. Merriman, Trans.). Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction: In education, society and culture (R. Nice, Trans.). SAGE Publications.
• Bourdieu, P., Schultheis, F., & Pfeuffer, A. (2011). With Weber against Weber: In conversation with Pierre Bourdieu. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical essays (pp. 111–124). Anthem Press.
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation of reflexive sociology. Polity Press. Braz, A. (2017). Bourdieu. Ellipses Édition.
• Brubaker, R. (1985). Rethinking classical theory : The sociological vision of Pierre Bourdieu. Theory and Society, 14(6), 745–775.
• Burawoy, M. (2012). Marx meets Bourdieu. In Conversations with Bourdieu: The Johannesburg moment (pp. 31–46). Wits University Press.
• Burawoy, M. (2019). Symbolic violence: Conversations with Bourdieu. Duke University Press.
• Champagne, P., & Christin, O. (2019). Pierre Bourdieu: Une initiation (2nd ed.). Presses universitaires de Lyon.
• Cornoy, M. (1984). The state and political theory (1st ed.). Princeton University Press. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2000). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia.
• DiMaggio, P. (1979). On Pierre Bourdieu. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1460–1474. https://doi.org/10.1086/226948
• Fabiani, J.-L. (2019). Bourdieu fut-il durkheimien? https://www.college-de- france.fr/video/pierre-michel-menger/2019/07-col-compagnon-menger-fabiani- 20190607.mp4
• Fabiani, J.-L. (2022). Bourdieu fut-il durkheimien? L’Année Sociologique, 72(2), 365– 386. https://doi.org/10.3917/anso.222.0365
• Ferry, L., & Renaut, A. (1990). French philosophy of the sixties: An essay on antihumanism (M. H. S. Cattani (trans.); 1st ed.). The University of Massachusetts Press.
• Fournier, M. (2010). Durkheim, Mauss et Bourdieu: Une filiation?. Revue Du MAUSS, 36(2), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.3917/rdm.036.0473
• Fowler, B. (2011). Pierre Bourdieu: Unorthodox Marxist? In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays (pp. 33–57). Anthem Press.
• Garnham, N., & Williams, R. (1980). Pierre Bourdieu and the sociology of culture: An introduction. Media, Culture & Society, 2(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344378000200302
• Gilles, É. (2014). Marx dans l’œuvre de Bourdieu. Approbations fréquentes, oppositions radicales. Actuel Marx, 56, 147–163.
• Göker, E. (2001). Durkheim’ın sol eli: Pierre Bourdieu’nün muhalefeti. Praksis, 3, 228– 251.
• Harker, R., Mahar, C., & Wilkes, C. (1990). Conclusion: Critique. In R. Harker, C. Mahar, & C. Wilkes (Eds.), An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu: The practice of theory (1st ed., pp. 195–225). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Inglis, F. (1979). Good and bad habitus: Bourdieu, Habermas and the condition of England. The Sociological Review, 27(2), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 954X.1979.tb00339.x
• Jourdain, A., & Naulin, S. (2016). Pierre Bourdieu’nün kuramı ve sosyolojik kullanımları (Öykü Elitez (trans.); 1st ed.). İletişim Yayınları.
• Lebaron, F. (2017). The craft of sociology. Epistemologial preliminaries. Praktiske Grunde - Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kultur- Og Samfundsvidenskab, 1(2), 7–16.
• Mannheim, K. (1954). Ideology and utopia. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
• Mauss, M. (1991). Marcel Mauss. In Dirk Käsler (Ed.), Sociological adventures: Earle Edward Eubank’s visits with European sociologists (pp. 139–147). Transaction Publishers.
• Miliband, R. (1965). Marx and the State. The Socialist Register, 2, 278–296. Özpolat, G. (2018). Revolutionary desire in Deleuze and Guattari. ETHOS: Dialogues
• Özpolat, G. (2020). Bringing Althusser and Foucault together: A brief overview of the question of the State. Possible Journal of Philosphy, 9(18), 7–16.
• Poulantzas, N. (2000). State, power, socialism (P. Camiller, Trans.; 1st ed.). Verso. Riley, D. (2015). The new Durkheim: Bourdieu and the State. Critical Historical Studies, 2(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1086/683641
• Robbins, D. (2003). Durkheim through the eyes of Bourdieu. Durkheimian Studies, 9(1), 23–39.
• Schirato, T., & Roberts, M. (2020). Bourdieu: A critical introduction. Routledge.
• Simon Susen, & Turner, B. S. (2011). Introduction: Preliminary reflections on the legacy of Pierre Bourdieu. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical essays (pp. xiii–xxix). Anthem Press.
• Sulkunen, P. (1982). Society made visible - on the cultural sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Acta Sociologica, 25(2), 103–115.
• Susen, S. (2011). Afterword: Concluding reflections on the legacy of Pierre Bourdieu. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical essays (pp. 367–409). Anthem Press.
• Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. The University of Chicago Press.
• Swartz, D. (2013). Metaprinciples for sociological research in a bourdieusian perspective. In P. S. Gorski (Ed.), Bourdieu and Historical Analysis (pp. 19–35). Duke University Press.
• Ünsaldı, L. (2013). Takdim. In Bilimin toplumsal kullanımları: bilimsel alanın klinik bir sosyolojisi için (1st ed., pp. 11–51). Heretik Yayıncılık.
• Vandenberghe, F. (1999). “The real is relational”: An epistemological analysis of Pierre Bourdieu’s generative structuralism. Sociological Theory, 17(1), 32–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00064
• Wacquant, L. (2011). Durkheim and Bourdieu: The common plinth and its cracks. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical essays (pp. 91–109). Anthem Press.
• Webb, J., Schirato, T., & Danaher, G. (2002). Understanding Bourdieu (1st ed.). Allen & Unwin.
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
• Yair, G. (2009). Pierre Bourdieu: The last musketeer of the French revolution. Lexington Books.