Süreklilik ve Değişim Arasında Post-Otoriter Şili Parti Sistemi

Yıl 2023, , 368 - 385, 27.12.2023

Uğur Tekiner

https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1352076

Öz

Bu makale, post-otoriter Şili parti sisteminin 1973 darbesi öncesine kıyasla ne ölçüde değiştiğini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. 1990'dan 2010'a kadar olan dönemin, 1973 öncesi dönem ve askeri diktatörlük (1973-1990) arka planında analizine dayanan bu makalenin temel savı, post-otoriter Şili parti sisteminin süreklilik ve değişim arasında gidip geldiğidir. Süreklilik, diktatörlük öncesi dönem ve Şili'nin uzun yıllara dayanan demokratik geleneğinden ileri gelirken, değişim, bilhassa askeri hükümetin anti-demokratik uygulamaları tarafından dayatılmıştır. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma, post-otoriter parti sistemini karakterize eden süreklilik ve değişim arasında birbiriyle ilişkili üç gerilim saptamıştır: partilerin merkezi konumuna karşı halkın siyasete dair büyüyen hayal kırıklığı, otoriterlik yanlısı/karşıtı ayrımına karşı partiler arası uzlaşmaya dayalı ilişkiler ve üçlü parti sistemine karşı iki kutuplu koalisyon siyaseti. Bu gerilim, iktidardaki Concertación bloğu başta olmak üzere, bu dönemde faaliyet gösteren tüm siyasi parti ve partiler arası koalisyonları derinden etkilemiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Şili Siyaseti, Augusto Pinochet, Askeri Diktatörlük, Demokrasiye Geçiş, Concertación

The Post-Authoritarian Chilean Party System between Continuity and Change

Öz

This article aims to examine to what extent the post-authoritarian Chilean party system changed in comparison to the period prior to the 1973 coup. Based on an analysis of the period from 1990 until 2010 against the background of the pre-1973 period and the military dictatorship (1973-1990), the main argument of this article is that the post-authoritarian Chilean party system oscillated between continuity and change. Whilst continuity found its roots in the pre-authoritarian period and Chile’s long-running democratic tradition, change was particularly enforced by the anti-democratic practices of the military government. As such, this study has pinpointed three interrelated tensions between continuity and change that characterised the post-authoritarian party system: the centrality of parties vs. the growing public disillusionment with politics; the pro-/anti-authoritarian cleavage vs. the consensus-based relations between parties; and the tripartite party system vs. the bipolar coalition politics. This tension profoundly influenced all the political parties and inter-party coalitions that functioned during this period, not least the ruling Concertación bloc.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Chilean Politics, Augusto Pinochet, Military Dictatorship, Transition to Democracy, Concertación

Kaynakça

• Aleman, E., Cabezas, J. M., & Calvo, E. (2021). Coalition incentives and party bias in Chile. Electoral Studies, 72(102362), 1-8.
• Aleman, E., & Saiegh, S. M. (2007). Legislative preferences, political parties, and coalition unity in Chile. Comparative Politics, 39(3), 253-272.
• Angell, A. (2003). Party change in Chile in comparative perspective. Revista De Ciencia Politicia, 23(2), 88-108.
• Angell, A., & Pollack, B. (1990). The Chilean elections of 1989 and the politics of the transition to democracy. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 9(1), 1-23.
• Barrett, P. S. (2000). Chile’s transformed party system and the future of democratic stability. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42(3), 1-32.
• Burnett, B. G. (1970). Political groups in Chile: The dialogue between order and change. Austin: University of Texas Press.
• Carey, J. M. (2002). Parties, coalitions and the Chilean congress in the 1990s. In S. Morgenstern, & B. Nacif, Legislative politics in Latin America (pp. 222-253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Carey, J. M., & Siavelis, P. M. (2005). Insurance for good losers and the survival of Chile’s Concertacion. Latin American Politics and Society, 47(2), 1-22.
• Carreras, M. (2012). Party systems in Latin America after the third wave: A critical re-assessment. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 4(1), 135-153.
• Caviedes, C. (1979). The politics of Chile: A sociogeographical assessment. London and New York: Routledge.
• Fernandez, A., & Vera, M. (2012). The Bachelet presidency and the end of Chile’s Concertacion era. Latin American Perspectives, 39(4), 5-18.
• Fitch, J. S. (1998). The armed forces and democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Garreton, M. A. (1989). The Chilean political process. Boston, MA: Unwin and Hyman.
• Hira, A., & Sanghera, A. (2004). Chilean democracy: At historical crossroads. Centre for Global Political Economy.
• Hudson, R. A. (1994). Chile: A country study. Washington DC: Washington GPO for the Library of the Congress.
• Karl, T. L. (1990). Dilemmas of democratization in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 23(1), 1-21.
• Luna, J. P., & Altman, D. (2011). Uprooted but stable: Chilean parties and the concept of party system institutionalization. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(2), 1-28.
• Luna, J. P., & Mardones, R. (2010). Chile: Are the parties over? Journal of Democracy, 21(3), 107-121.
• Mainwaring, S., & Valenzuela, A. (eds.). (1997). Politics, society, and democracy: Latin America. Boulder and London: Westview Press.
• Maira, G., Casas, L., & Vivaldi, L. (2019). Abortion in Chile: The long road to legalization and its slow implementation. Health and Human Rights Journal, 21(2), 121-131.
• Montes, J. E., Mainwaring, S., & Ortega, E. (2000). Rethinking the Chilean party systems. Journal of Latin American Studies, 32, 795-824.
• Montes, R. (2015, 01 21). Chile reforms Pinochet’s voting system. Retrieved from El Pais: https://english.elpais.com/elpais/2015/01/21/inenglish/1421854633_536333.html
• Munck, G. L., & Bosworth, J. A. (1998). Patterns of representation and competition: Parties and democracy in post-Pinochet Chile. Party Politics, 4(4), 471-493.
• Navia, P., & Sandoval, J. M. (1998). Binomial electoral law and multi-party system: The Chilean contradiction. The 1998 Conference of the Latin American Studies Association. Chicago, Illinois, US.
• O'Brien, P. J., & Roddick, J. (1983). Chile: The Pinochet decade – The rise and fall of the Chicago Boys. London: Latin America Bureau.
• Pastor, D. (2004). Origins of the Chilean binominal election system. Revista de Ciencia Politica, 24(1), 38-57.
• Polga-Hecimovich, J., & Siavelis, P. M. (2015). Here's the bias! A (re-)reassessment of the Chilean electoral system. Electoral Studies, 40, 268-279.
• Ruiz-Rodriguez, L. M. (2005). Polarization in the Chilean party system: Changes and continuities, 1990-1999. Barcelona: Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials.
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sater, W. F., & Collier, S. (2022). A history of Chile 1808–2018. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Scott, S. D. (2001). Transition to democracy in Chile: Two factors. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations & Professional Papers. University of Montana.
• Scully, T. R. (1992). Rethinking the center: Party politics in nineteenth and twentieth century Chile. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Scully, T. R. (1995). Chile. In S. Mainwaring, & T. R. Scully, Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Shifter, M. (2011). A surge to the center. Journal of Democracy, 22(1), 107-121. Siavelis, P. (1997). Continuity and change in the Chilean party system: On the transformational effects of electoral reform. Comparative Political Studies, 30(6), 651-674.
• Siavelis, P. M. (2000). The president and congress in postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional constraints to democratic consolidation. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
• Siavelis, P. M. (2002). Coalitions, voters and party system transformation in post-authoritarian Chile. Government and Opposition, 37(1), 76-105.
• Siavelis, P. M. (2005). Electoral system, coalitional disintegration, and the future of Chile’s Concertacion. Latin American Research Review, 40(1), 56-82.
• Silva, P. (2002). Searching for civilian supremacy: The Concertacion governments and the military in Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 21(3), 375-395.
• Silva, P. (2004). Doing politics in a depoliticised society: Social change and political deactivation in Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23(1), 63-78.
• Valdes, J. G. (1995). Pinochet's economists: The Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Valenzuela, A. (1978). The breakdown of democratic regimes: Chile. (J. J. Linz, & A. Stepan, Eds.) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Valenzuela, A., & Constable, P. (1989). The Chilean plebiscite: Defeat of a dictator. Current History, 88(536), 129-132, 152-153.
• Valenzuela, J. S. (1995). The origins and transformations of the Chilean party system. Notre Dame, IN: The Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
• Valenzuela, J. S., & Scully, T. R. (1997). Electoral choices and the party system in Chile: Continuities and changes at the recovery of democracy. Comparative Politics, 29(4), 511-527.
• Valenzuela, J. S., Somma, N., & Scully, T. R. (2018). Resilience and change: The party system in redemocratized Chile. In S. Mainwaring (Ed.), Party systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, decay, and collapse (pp. 135-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Viola, E., & Mainwaring, S. (1985). Transitions to democracy: Brazil and Argentina in the 1980s. Journal of International Affairs, 38(Winter 1985).