Dinamik Yeteneklerin Mikro Temelleri Olarak Sosyal Bilişsel Teori

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 58 - 80, 31.03.2021

Mehmet Bağış

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı şu soruyu ele almaktır: "Sosyal Bilişsel Teori dinamik yeteneklerin mikro temellerine nasıl katkıda bulunur?" Sosyal Bilişsel Kuram kavramlarından; simgeleme yeteneği, geleceği görme yeteneği, dolaylı öğrenme yeteneği, öz düzenleme yeteneği ve kendini yansıtma yeteneği gibi kavramlardan yararlanan çalışma, dinamik yeteneklerin mikro temelleri için kavramsal bir model önermiştir. Böylelikle öz yeteneklere sahip yönetici ve çalışanların firmanın kolektif örgütsel yeteneklerine etkisi olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Ayrıca, Sosyal Bilişsel Kuram'ın insan doğası ile ilgili ortaya koyduğu bireysel yeteneklerin, dinamik yeteneklerin inşa edilmesi (öğrenme), koordinasyonu (bütünleşme) ve yeniden yapılandırılması (dönüşüm) olguları hakkında açıklamalar önereceği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dinamik Yetenekler, Mikro Temeller, Sosyal Bilişsel Teori, Temel İnsan Yetenekleri

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Proje Numarası

Yok

Teşekkür

Yok

Social Cognitive Theory as the Microfoundations of Dynamic Capabilities

Öz

The aim of this study is to address the following question: “How does Social Cognitive Theory contribute to the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities?” Benefiting from the concepts of Social Cognitive Theory, namely, symbolizing capability, forethought capability, vicarious learning capability, self-regulatory capability and self-reflective capability, the study suggested a conceptual model for the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Thus, it was put forward that the managers and employees with self-capabilities had effect on the collective organizational capabilities of the firm. Moreover, it was deduced that the individual capabilities which Social Cognitive Theory set forth in relation to human nature would suggest explanations on the building (learning), coordination (integration) and reconfiguration (transformation) phenomena of dynamic capabilities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dynamic Capabilities, Social Cognitive Theory, microfoundations, Fundamental Human Capabilities

Proje Numarası

Yok

Kaynakça

• Abell, P., Felin, T., & Foss, N. (2008). Building Micro‐foundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(6), 489-502.
• Argote, L., & Ren, Y. (2012). Transactive Memory Systems: A Microfoundation of Dynamic Capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1375-1382.
• Arndt, F., & Pierce, L. (2018). The Behavioral and Evolutionary Roots of Dynamic Capabilities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(2), 413-424.
• Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2008). Strategy as Evolution with Design: The Foundations of Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in the Economic System. Organization Studies, 29(8-9), 1187-1208.
• Bağış, M. (2020). A Longitudinal Analysis on the Micro-foundations of Strategic Management: Where are Micro-foundations Going? Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(2), 1310-1333.
• Bağış, M., & Hızıroğlu, M. (2018). Stratejik Yönetim’in Kaynaklara Dayalı Yaklaşımı-Ekonomik, Sosyolojik, Psikolojik Temeller. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık Tic. Ltd. Şti., Ankara.
• Bağış, M., & Öztürk, O. (2020). Stratejik Yönetim Araştırmalarının Evrimi: Yaklaşımlar ve Mikro Görüşler Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirme. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 347-370.
• Barca, M. (2017). Economic foundations of strategic management. Routledge.
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Blyler, M., & Coff, R. (2003). Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 677-686.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Bandura, A. (1989). Social Cognitive Theory. In R. Vasta (Editor), Annals of Child Development. Vol. 6. Six Theories of Child Development (pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287.
• Bandura, A. (1988a). Organisational Applications of Social Cognitive Theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2), 275-302. Bandura, A. (1988b). Self-efficacy Conception of Anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1(2), 77-98.
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social Cognitive Theory of Self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287.
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self‐efficacy. Wiley Online Library.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York. Freeman.
• Bandura, A. (1999a). Social Cognitive Theory of Personality. Handbook of Personality, 2, 154-196.
• Bandura, A. (1999b). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21-41.
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
• Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: MA: Belknap.
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
• Dibella, A. J., Nevis, E. C. & Gould, J. M. (1996a). Organizational Learning Style as a Core Capability. Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage, 38-55.
• Dibella, A. J., Nevis, E. C. & Gould, J. M. (1996b). Understanding Organizational Learning Capability. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3), 361-379.
• Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.
• Eysenck, H. (1976). The Learning Theory Model of Neurosis a New Approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14(4), 251-267.
• Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118.
• Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H., & Madsen, T. L. (2012). Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1351-1374.
• Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2013). Microfoundations for Strategy: A Goal-Framing Perspective on the Drivers of Value Creation. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 85-102.
• Gavetti, G. (2005). Cognition and Hierarchy: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Capabilities’ Development. Organization Science, 16(6), 599-617.
• Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge‐Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
• Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2014). Structural Microfoundations of Innovation: The Role of Relational Stars. Journal of Management, 40(2), 586-615.
• Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial Cognitive Capabilities and the Microfoundations of Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831-850.
• Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. (2011). Psychological Foundations of Dynamic Capabilities: Reflexion and Reflection in Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1500-1516.
• Hodgson, G. M. (2012). The Mirage of Microfoundations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1389-1394.
• Johnston, J., & DiNardo, J., (1972). Econometric Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.
• Lindenberg, S., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Managing Joint Production Motivation: The Role of Goal Framing and Governance Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500-525.
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990a). A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990b). Work Motivation and Satisfaction: Light at the End of the Tunnel. Psychological Science, 1(4), 240-246.
• Makadok, R., Burton, R., & Barney, J. (2018). A Practical Guide for Making Theory Contributions in Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1530-1545.
• McCloskey, D. N., Ziliak, S. T., (1996). “The Standard Error of Regressions”, Journal of Economic Literature, 34(1), 97-114.
• McCormick, M. J. (2001). Self-efficacy and Leadership Effectiveness: Applying Social Cognitive Theory to Leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), 22-33.
• Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
• Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an Attention‐Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 187-206.
• Oswick, C., Fleming, P., & Hanlon, G. (2011). From Borrowing to Blending: Rethinking the Processes of Organizational Theory Building. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 318-337.
• Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditional Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. Translated and edited by Anrep, GV. Oxford University Press. London.
• Peng, M. W. (2002). Towards an Institution-Based View of Business Strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2-3), 251-267.
• Pousa, C., & Mathieu, A. (2015). Is Managerial Coaching a Source of Competitive Advantage? Promoting Employee Self-Regulation Through Coaching. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 8(1), 20-35.
• Schoemaker, P. J., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. (2018). Innovation, Dynamic Capabilities, and Leadership. California Management Review, 61(1), 15-42.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Routledge. London and New York.
• Schwarz, J. O., Rohrbeck, R., & Wach, B. (2020). Corporate Foresight as a Microfoundation of Dynamic Capabilities. Futures & Foresight Science, 2(2), 1-11.
• Skinner, B. F. (1963). Operant behavior. American Psychologist, 18(8), 503-515.
• Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998a). Social Cognitive Theory and Self-efficacy: Going Beyond Traditional Motivational and Behavioral Approaches. Organizational Dynamics, 26(4), 62-75.
• Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998b). Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261.
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
• Vromen, J. (2010). Micro-foundations in Strategic Management: Squaring Coleman’s Diagram. Erkenntnis, 73(3), 365-383.
• Wacker, J. G., (2008). “A Conceptual Understanding of Requirements for Theory‐Building Research: Guidelines for Scientific Theory Building”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(3), 5-15.
• Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind. In Theories of Group Behavior (pp. 185-208). Springer, New York.
• Whetten, D. A., Felin, T., & King, B. G. (2009). The Practice of Theory Borrowing in Organizational Studies: Current Issues and Future Directions. Journal of Management, 35(3), 537-563.
• Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as Practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731-735.
• Wolpe, J. (1958). Reciprocal Inhibition Therapy. Stanford University Press. Stanford, California.
• Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989a). Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
• Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989b). Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-regulatory Mechanisms and Complex Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407-415.
• Zahra, S. A., & Newey, L. R. (2009). Maximizing the Impact of Organization Science: Theory‐Building at the Intersection of Disciplines and/or Fields. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1059-1075.