A RESEARCH ON MODULAR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN WEDDING GOWN PRODUCTION

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1, 80 - 88, 31.03.2018

Seda Kuleli Zümrüt Bahadır Ünal

Öz

Recent developments in production management gave way
to the “mass customization” strategies, by which companies claim to solve the
dilemma of meeting customer’s unique needs still benefiting from scale
economies.Delayed product differentiation (DPD) as a design strategy is
implemented in agile manufacuring systems. Modularity is one of the key
strategies in mass customization as it enables component commonality of
products, thus differentiation of the products can be postponed to the assembly
stage.In this research, production process of wedding gown is examined in this
aspect and possibility of applying platform based modularity in wedding gown
production is tested. The process flow and processing times of most basic
wedding gowns were recorded to determine the stage in which the customization
will take place. It had been tested whether there will be parts that can be
standardized as modules or not. According to this preliminary examination, it
will be possible to decide if the customization can be postponed to a later
stage.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Wedding gown, agile manufacturing, customization, delayed product differentiation, modular design, bus (platform) modularity

GELİNLİK ÜRETİMİNDE MODÜLER ÜRÜN GELİŞTİRME ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Üretim
yönetimindeki son gelişmeler, şirketlerin müşterinin özel taleplerini tam
karşılarken ölçek ekonomilerinden de hala yararlanabilmesini mümkün kılan
"kişiye özel seri üretim" stratejilerinin yolunu açmıştır. Çevik
üretim sistemleri içerisinde, ertelenmiş ürün farklılaştırması (DPD), bir
tasarım stratejisi olarak uygulanmaktadır. Modülerlik, ürünler arasında ortak
bileşenlerin sayısını arttırdığı için kişiye özel ürünlerin seri üretiminde en
önemli stratejilerden biridir. Bu nedenle ürünlerin farklılaşması, montaj
aşamasına ertelenebilmektedir. Bu araştırmada, gelinlik üretim süreci bu açıdan
incelenmiş ve gelinlik üretiminde platform tabanlı modülerlik uygulama imkânı
test edilmiştir. En temel gelinliklerin süreç akışı ve işleme süreleri,
özelleştirmenin hangi aşamada gerçekleşeceğini belirlemek için kaydedilmiştir.
Modül olarak standardize edilebilecek parçaların olup olmayacağı test edilmiştir.
Bu ön incelemeye göre, özelleştirmenin sonraki bir aşamaya ertelenip
düzenlenemeyeceğine karar vermek mümkün olabilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gelinlik, çeviküretim, kişiyeözelleştirme, ertelenmişürünçeşitlendirme, modülertasarım, platform modülarite

Kaynakça

• 1. Ehrman, E., 2011, The Wedding Dress: 300 Years of Bridal Fashion, V&A Publishing, London
• 2. Ada, E., Erol, C., Baklacı, H.F., Kazançoğlu, Y. Sağnak, M., 2013, UluslararsıRekabetçiliğinGeliştirilmesiProjesi, İhtiyaçAnaliziGelinlikAbiyeSektörü- SektörRaporuhttp://phoenix.ieu.edu.tr/betanix/uploads/cms/ekokent.ieu.edu.tr/3979_1394627435.pdf,Accesed 19.06.2016
• 3. EGSD, 2016, İzmir International IF Wedding Statistics, numbers given by EGSD secretary , İzmir
• 4. ISEID, 2012, GelinlikSanayicileriveİhracatçılarıDerneğiİstatistikler, ISEID http://www.gelinlik.org.tr/?menu_id=7, Accesed 21.01.2015
• 5. Gülsoy, E., 2011, Bridal Wear in Turkey, IGEME Export Promotion Center of Turkey. http://www.ibp.gov.tr/Assets/sip/san/10STB012.pdf, Accessed 7.7.2016
• 6. Choy, R., and Loker, S., 2004, Mass Customization of Wedding Gowns: Design Involvement for Prospective Brides on The Internet, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 22 (1), pp:1–9.
• 7. Duray, R., 2011, Process Typology of Mass Customizers in Mass Customization:Engineering and Managing Global Operations,Springer,New York, pp :29-44
• 8. Hayes, R. C. and Wheelwright, S.C.,1979, Link Manufacturing Process and Product Life Cycles, https://hbr.org/1979/01/link-manufacturing-process-and-product-life-cycles Accessed: 2.8.2017
• 9. Ulrich, K. & Tung, K., 1991, Fundamentals of Product Modularity, Issues in Design/Manufacture Integration, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Design Engineering Division (Publication), vol. 39, New York, pp:73-79.
• 10. Duray, R., Ward, P., Milligan, G., and Berry, W., 2000, Approaches to Mass Customization; Configurations and Empirical Validation, Journal of Operations Management, 2 (2), New York pp: 605–625.
• 11. Üreten, S., 2006, Üretim/İşlemlerYönetimi, StratejikKararlarveKararModelleri, GaziKitabevi, Ankara, pp:168-195.
• 12. Lampel, J., Mintzberg, H., 1996, ‘Customizing Customization’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 38 (1), 1996, Massachusetts, pp: 21–32
• 13. Elgård, P., Miller, T., 1998, Designing Product Families, Design for Integration in Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 13th IPS Research Seminar, Fuglsoe, Aalborg University, Aalborg.
• 14. Senanayake, M. M.,Little, T.J., 2010, Mass Customization: Points and Extent of Apparel Customization, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol: 14 (2), California, pp: 282-299.
• 15. Anderson, D. M., 2004, Build to Order & Mass Customization, CIM Press, California, pp: 4-12.
• 16. He, D. BABAYAN, A., 2002, SchedulingManufacturingSystems for Delayed Product Differentiation in Agile Manufacturing,International Journal of Production Research 2002, vol. 40, no. 11, pp :2461-2481.
• 17. Huang, C., and Kusiak, A., 1997, Modularity in Design of Products and Systems. Proceedings of the 6th Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Miami Beach, Florida, pp:748–753.
• 18. Kratochvil, M. & Carson, K., 2005, Growing Modular, Springer Berlin &Heidlberg, pp:12-36.
• 19. Pine, B.J., 1993, Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
• 20. Salvador, F., Forza, C., Rungtusanatham, M., 2002, Modularity, Product Variety, Production Volume, and Component Sourcing: Theorizing Beyond Generic Prescriptions, Journal of Operations Management 20, pp: 549–575.
• 21. He, D. W., Kusiak, A., 1996, Performance Analysis of Modular Products, International Journal of Production Research, 34 (1), New York, pp: 253-272.