Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

MULTI-CYCLE WASHING OF COTTON AND THE RESULTS IN MANNER OF DP

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4, 311 - 318, 29.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.493100

Öz

Washing processes,
detergant agents, washing cycles and temperatures can often cause damage on
fabrics. The aim of this work was to determine chemical and physical changes on
cotton fabrics with different washing conditions. A Box–Bhenken statistical
design was used to evaluate the effect of washing temperature (40 -50-60°C),
number of washing (10, 30, 50) and washing agent (only water, base detergent,
detergent with bleaching agent) on the average degree of polymerization. The
effect of multiple washes on cotton fabrics was evaluated by means of average
polymerization degree, tensile strength, whiteness index and scanning electron
microscopy. Whiteness index decreased significantly using with base detergent
and bleaching agent containing detergent, 
whereas washing with only water did not affect significantly to
whiteness index, with increasing number of washing. However, temperature (p
> 0.05) individually were not found statistically significant for whiteness
index. As number of washing and temperature increased, tensile strength values
decreased. Also, washing agent (p > 0.05) individually were not found
statistically significant for tensile strength. When evaluated in terms of
average polymerization degree values, after the washings with base detergent
and bleaching agent containing detergent, there is a greater decrease in the
average polymerization degree relative to the only water washings. While the
temperature increased in washing process, the average polymerization degree
decreased and the lowest average polymerization degree was obtained at 60 ˚C
and 50 washes. SEM images indicate that number of washing and the content of
detergent is an important parameter in the washing process. The worst image in
this study was obtained with 50 washes using detergent containing bleach.
Washing processes cause undesirable results on the surface of fabrics.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Anand, S. C., . Brown, K. S. M., . Higgins, L. G , Holmes, D. A. ,. Hall, M. E and D. Conrad, 2002, “Effect Of Launderıng On The Dımensıonal Stabılıty And Dıstortion Of Knıtted Fabrıcs”, AUTEX Research Journal, 2(2): 85- 99.
  • 2. Gündüz Balpetek, F.,. Seventekin, N., Özdoğan, E., Gülümser, T., Demir, A. 2011, “Challenges And Recommendations In The Evaluation Of Performances Of Home Type Laundry Detergents”, Surfactant, Soap and Detergent Symposium and Exhibition (International Participant), Izmir, Turkey.
  • 3. Raheel, M., Lien, M. D., “Effect Of Detergents On Wear And Appearance Characteristics Of Cotton Broadcloth”, Textile Chemist and Colorist, 14(6): 27-31.
  • 4. Smulders, E., Rybinski , W., Nordskog, A., 2011, “Laundry Detergents”, https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a08_315.pub3
  • 5. Toshıkj, E., Jordanov, I., Demboski, G., Mangovska, B., 2016,”Influence of Multiple Laundering On Cotton Shirts Properties”, Tekstil Ve Konfeksiyon 26(4): 393-399.
  • 6. Pušıć, T., Soljačıć, I., Dekanıć, T.,”Cumulative effects of washing on properties of cotton fabrics and their blends”, 2014, Household and Personal Care Today, 9(4).
  • 7. Pakula, C. , Stamminger, R., 2010, “Electricity and water consumption for laundry washing by washing machine worldwide”, Energy Efficiency,3:365–382.
  • 8. Gooijer, H., Stamminger, R., 2016, “Water and Energy Consumption in Laundering Wordwide-A Review”, Tenside Surfactant Detergent, 53:402-409.
  • 9. Kirsi, L., Boks, C., Klepp, I.G., 2011,“Potential for environmental improvements in laundering”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35: 254–264
  • 10. Cılız, N., Mammadov, A., Turhan N., 2010, Life Cycle Assessment of Powder and Liquid Laundry Detergents”, Boğaziçi University, Sustainable Development and Cleaner Production Center.
  • 11. Fijan, S., Turk, S. Š., Neral, B., 2007, “The Influence of Industrial Laundering of Hospital Textiles on the Properties of Cotton Fabrics”, Textile Research Journal, 77(4): 247–255.
  • 12. ASTM E313:2010, Standard Practice for Calculating Yellowness and Whiteness Indices from Instrumentally Measured Color Coordinates
  • 13. ISO 13934-1:2013, Textiles -Tensile properties of fabrics -Part 1: Determination of maximum force and elongation at maximum force using the strip method
  • 14. AATCC 82-2016, Fluidity of Dispersions of Cellulose from Bleached Cotton Cloth
  • 15. Eduard Smulders; et al. (2007), "Laundry Detergents", Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (7th ed.), Wiley, pp. 1–184, doi:10.1002/14356007.a08_315.pub2
  • 16. Fernandes G. E., Valenti D. J., Stenger P. C., Miracle G. S., Moon A. P., McDonnell M., Laundry Detergent Composition Comprising A Particle Having Hueing Agent and Clay”, Patent No: US2013/0303428 A1, 2013, https://www.google.ch/patents/US20130303428?hl=de&cl=en
  • 17. Perincek, S., Duran, K., ,2016, “Optimization of enzymatic & ultrasonic bio-scouring of linen fabrics by aid of Box-Behnken Experimental Design”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 135(1):1179-1188.
  • 18. Collins L.M., Dziak J.J., Li R., 2009, “Design of Experiments with Multiple Independent Variables: A Resource Management Perspective on Complete and Reduced Factorial Designs”, Psychol Methods, 14(3): 202–224.
  • 19. Giovanni, M., 1983, “Response-surface methodology and product optimization”, Food Technology, 37 (11): 41–45.
  • 20. Ferreira, S.L.C., Bruns, R.E., Ferreira, H.S., Matos, G.D. , David, J.M., Brandao G.C., Silva, E.G.P., Portugal, LA, Reis, P.S., Souza, AS, Santos WNL, 2007, “Box–Bhenken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods”, Analytica Chimica Acta, 597: 179–186
  • 21. Luijkx, G. C. A., Hild, R., Krijnen, E. S., Lodewick, R., Rechenbach, T., Reinhardt , G., 2004, “Testing of the Fabric Damage Properties of Bleach Containing Detergents”, Tenside Surfactants Detergents, 41(4): 164-168.
  • 22. Singh, J. S., Ching, K. Y. C., Abdullah, L. C., Ching, K.Y., Razali, S., Neon, S. ,2018, “Optimization of Mechanical Properties for Polyoxymethylene/Glass Fiber/Polytetrafluoroethylene Composites Using Response Surface Methodology”, Polymers, 10:338.
  • 23. Cesa, F.S., Turra, A., Baruque-Ramos, J., 2017, “Synthetic fibers as microplastics in the marine environment: A review from textile perspective with a focus on domestic washings”, Science of The Total Environment, 598: 1116–1129
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4, 311 - 318, 29.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.493100

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Anand, S. C., . Brown, K. S. M., . Higgins, L. G , Holmes, D. A. ,. Hall, M. E and D. Conrad, 2002, “Effect Of Launderıng On The Dımensıonal Stabılıty And Dıstortion Of Knıtted Fabrıcs”, AUTEX Research Journal, 2(2): 85- 99.
  • 2. Gündüz Balpetek, F.,. Seventekin, N., Özdoğan, E., Gülümser, T., Demir, A. 2011, “Challenges And Recommendations In The Evaluation Of Performances Of Home Type Laundry Detergents”, Surfactant, Soap and Detergent Symposium and Exhibition (International Participant), Izmir, Turkey.
  • 3. Raheel, M., Lien, M. D., “Effect Of Detergents On Wear And Appearance Characteristics Of Cotton Broadcloth”, Textile Chemist and Colorist, 14(6): 27-31.
  • 4. Smulders, E., Rybinski , W., Nordskog, A., 2011, “Laundry Detergents”, https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a08_315.pub3
  • 5. Toshıkj, E., Jordanov, I., Demboski, G., Mangovska, B., 2016,”Influence of Multiple Laundering On Cotton Shirts Properties”, Tekstil Ve Konfeksiyon 26(4): 393-399.
  • 6. Pušıć, T., Soljačıć, I., Dekanıć, T.,”Cumulative effects of washing on properties of cotton fabrics and their blends”, 2014, Household and Personal Care Today, 9(4).
  • 7. Pakula, C. , Stamminger, R., 2010, “Electricity and water consumption for laundry washing by washing machine worldwide”, Energy Efficiency,3:365–382.
  • 8. Gooijer, H., Stamminger, R., 2016, “Water and Energy Consumption in Laundering Wordwide-A Review”, Tenside Surfactant Detergent, 53:402-409.
  • 9. Kirsi, L., Boks, C., Klepp, I.G., 2011,“Potential for environmental improvements in laundering”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35: 254–264
  • 10. Cılız, N., Mammadov, A., Turhan N., 2010, Life Cycle Assessment of Powder and Liquid Laundry Detergents”, Boğaziçi University, Sustainable Development and Cleaner Production Center.
  • 11. Fijan, S., Turk, S. Š., Neral, B., 2007, “The Influence of Industrial Laundering of Hospital Textiles on the Properties of Cotton Fabrics”, Textile Research Journal, 77(4): 247–255.
  • 12. ASTM E313:2010, Standard Practice for Calculating Yellowness and Whiteness Indices from Instrumentally Measured Color Coordinates
  • 13. ISO 13934-1:2013, Textiles -Tensile properties of fabrics -Part 1: Determination of maximum force and elongation at maximum force using the strip method
  • 14. AATCC 82-2016, Fluidity of Dispersions of Cellulose from Bleached Cotton Cloth
  • 15. Eduard Smulders; et al. (2007), "Laundry Detergents", Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (7th ed.), Wiley, pp. 1–184, doi:10.1002/14356007.a08_315.pub2
  • 16. Fernandes G. E., Valenti D. J., Stenger P. C., Miracle G. S., Moon A. P., McDonnell M., Laundry Detergent Composition Comprising A Particle Having Hueing Agent and Clay”, Patent No: US2013/0303428 A1, 2013, https://www.google.ch/patents/US20130303428?hl=de&cl=en
  • 17. Perincek, S., Duran, K., ,2016, “Optimization of enzymatic & ultrasonic bio-scouring of linen fabrics by aid of Box-Behnken Experimental Design”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 135(1):1179-1188.
  • 18. Collins L.M., Dziak J.J., Li R., 2009, “Design of Experiments with Multiple Independent Variables: A Resource Management Perspective on Complete and Reduced Factorial Designs”, Psychol Methods, 14(3): 202–224.
  • 19. Giovanni, M., 1983, “Response-surface methodology and product optimization”, Food Technology, 37 (11): 41–45.
  • 20. Ferreira, S.L.C., Bruns, R.E., Ferreira, H.S., Matos, G.D. , David, J.M., Brandao G.C., Silva, E.G.P., Portugal, LA, Reis, P.S., Souza, AS, Santos WNL, 2007, “Box–Bhenken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods”, Analytica Chimica Acta, 597: 179–186
  • 21. Luijkx, G. C. A., Hild, R., Krijnen, E. S., Lodewick, R., Rechenbach, T., Reinhardt , G., 2004, “Testing of the Fabric Damage Properties of Bleach Containing Detergents”, Tenside Surfactants Detergents, 41(4): 164-168.
  • 22. Singh, J. S., Ching, K. Y. C., Abdullah, L. C., Ching, K.Y., Razali, S., Neon, S. ,2018, “Optimization of Mechanical Properties for Polyoxymethylene/Glass Fiber/Polytetrafluoroethylene Composites Using Response Surface Methodology”, Polymers, 10:338.
  • 23. Cesa, F.S., Turra, A., Baruque-Ramos, J., 2017, “Synthetic fibers as microplastics in the marine environment: A review from textile perspective with a focus on domestic washings”, Science of The Total Environment, 598: 1116–1129
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Giyilebilir Malzemeler
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Fatma Gündüz Balpetek Bu kişi benim

Ebru Bozacı Bu kişi benim

Pelin Seçim Karakaya Bu kişi benim

Esen Özdoğan Bu kişi benim

Aslı Demir

Tülay Gülümser Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 3 Temmuz 2018
Kabul Tarihi 13 Kasım 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Gündüz Balpetek, F., Bozacı, E., Seçim Karakaya, P., Özdoğan, E., vd. (2018). MULTI-CYCLE WASHING OF COTTON AND THE RESULTS IN MANNER OF DP. Textile and Apparel, 28(4), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.493100

No part of this journal may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated in any forms or by any means without prior written permission of the Editorial Board. The views and opinions expressed here in the articles are those of the authors and are not the views of Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon and Textile and Apparel Research-Application Center.