HAZARD AND RISK ANALYSIS FOR RING SPINNING YARN PRODUCTION PROCESS BY INTEGRATED FTA-FMEA APPROACH

Year 2019, Volume: 29 Issue: 3, 208 - 218, 30.09.2019

Nazli Gülüm Mutlu , Serkan Altuntas

https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.482167

Cited By: 15

Abstract

The hazard analysis and management is vital in textile industry to avoid losing customers and wasting resources caused by the failures in production systems. Risk analysis is also very significant to decrease possible hazards and to avoid possible damage in production systems. In this study, an approach based on Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is proposed to analyze the ring spinning yarn production process in a textile industry.  First, the possible hazards in the production line, yarn production system, in an integrated company operating in the textile sector are analyzed by FTA method. Then, FMEA is applied to ring spinning yarn production process in a textile industry to rank all possible risks corresponding to hazards in descending order with respect to both occupational health and safety. It is very important to remove all possible hazards in textile industry to decrease the number of risks related to occupational health and safety. Therefore, in total of 57 hazard root causes are determined in the yarn production department. Subsequently, the faults related to the hazard root causes are examined by FTA and then risk corresponding to these hazards are prioritized by FMEA. The results obtained from the proposed FTA-FMEA approach show that decision makers and engineers can easily decrease the number of hazards and risks with respect to both occupational health and safety in practice. 

Keywords

FMEA, FTA, Risk and hazard analysis, Production system, Ring spinning yarn, Textile industry

References

• 1. Mikulak RJ, McDermott R, Beauregard M. 2008. The basics of FMEA. New York:CRC Press.
• 2. Küçük M, Güner M. 2014. The determination of 2nd quality and export surpluses evaluation efficiency of apparel companies with the methods of performance matrix and fuzzy logic. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 24(4), 386-392.
• 3. Küçük M, Güner M. 2015. Bir konfeksiyon işletmesinde süreç analizi yolu ile verimlilik artırma çalışması. Tekstil ve Mühendis 22(98), 33-41.
• 4. Güner M, İşler M. 2013. The effect of model change processes on the overall equipment effectiveness in clothing production. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 23(3), 297-302.
• 5. Burduk A, Krenczyk D. 2017. June, Risk assessment in a parallel production system with the use of FMEA method and linguistic variables, In IFIP International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management, Cham.:Springer, 10244, 379-390.
• 6. Press D. 2003. Guidelines for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), for Automotive, Aerospace, and General Manufacturing Industries. USA:CRC Press.
• 7. Peddada K. 2014. Risk Assessment and Control, Governance & Control in Finance & Banking: A New Paradigm for Risk & Performance”, pp:95-112.
• 8. Hiles A. 2010. The definitive handbook of business continuity management. UK:John Wiley & Sons.
• 9. Sette S, Van Langenhove L. 2002. Optimising the fibre-to-yarn production process: finding a blend of fibre qualities to create an optimal price/quality yarn. Autex Research Journal 2(2), 257-263.
• 10. Militký J, Kovačič V, Rubnerova J. 2002. Influence of thermal treatment on tensile failure of basalt fibers. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 69(9), 1025-1033.
• 11. Sette S, Boullart L, Van Langenhove L, Kiekens P. 1997. Optimizing the fiber-to-yarn production process with a combined neural network/genetic algorithm approach. Textile Research Journal 67(2), 84-92.
• 12. Arain FA, Tanwari A, Hafiz-Ur-Rehman S. 2012. Statistical modeling for the effect of rotor speed, yarn twist and linear density on production and quality characteristics of rotor spun yarn. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 31(1), 119-128.
• 13. Özgüney AT, Dönmez Kretzschmar S, Özçelik G, Özerdem A. 2008. The comparison of cotton knitted fabric properties made of compact and conventional ring yarns before and after the printing process. Textile Research Journal 78(2), 138-147.
• 14. Dönmez Kretzschmar S, Özgüney AT, Özçelik G, Özerdem A. 2007. The comparison of cotton knitted fabric properties made of compact and conventional ring yarns before and after the dyeing process. Textile Research Journal 77(4), 233-241.
• 15. van der Werf HM, Turunen L. 2008. The environmental impacts of the production of hemp and flax textile yarn. Industrial Crops and Products 27(1), 1-10.
• 16. Şahin D. 2015. Türkiye ve Çin’in tekstil ve hazır giyim sektöründe rekabet gücünün analizi. Akademik Bakış 47, 155-171.
• 17. Uğurlu AA, Tuncer İ. 2017. Türkiye’de sanayi ve hizmet sektörlerinin büyüme ve istihdama katkıları: girdi çıktı analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 32(1), 131-165.
• 18. Wu X, Chen L, Zhou Y, Ding X. 2016. Research in risk assessment for textile and apparel and propose a future research agenda with a conceptual framework. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management 17(3), 273-288.
• 19. Malik N, Maan AA, Pasha TS, Akhtar S, Ali T. 2010. Role of hazard control measures in occupational health and safety in the textile industry of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 47(1), 72-76.
• 20. Khan WA, Mustaq T, Tabassum A. 2014. Occupational health, safety and risk analysis. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 3(4), 1336-1346.
• 21. Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis. 2009. 2nd ed., CCPS, American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
• 22. Lees FP, Mannan S. 2005. Lees' loss prevention in the process industries: hazard identification, assessment and control, vol. 1. UK:Elsevier, 234.
• 23. Wells G, Wardman M, Whetton C. 1993. Preliminary safety analysis. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 6(1), 47-60.
• 24. Ericson CA. 2015. Hazard analysis techniques for system safety. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons.
• 25. IEC 60812:2006: Analysis techniques for system reliability - Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), Retrieved from https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/3571, (Date of access: 10 July 2018).
• 26. Flaus JM. 2013. Risk analysis: socio-technical and industrial systems. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, 153-309.
• 27. Beyene TD, Geremew Gebeyehu S, Mengistu AT. 2018. Application of failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) to reduce downtime in a textile share company. Journal of Engineering, Project & Production Management 8(1), 40-46.
• 28. Küçük M, İşler M, Güner M. 2016. An application of the FMEA method to the cutting department of a clothing company. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 26(2), 205-212.
• 29. Paired E, Swadeshi AH, Shokohyar S. 2017. Analyzing the enhancement of production efficiency using FMEA through simulation-based optimization technique: A case study in apparel manufacturing. Cogent Engineering 4(1), 1284373.
• 30. Kumar G. 2015. March, Cycle time reduction for T-shirt manufacturing in a textile industry using lean tools. In Innovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (ICIIECS), IEEE, 1-6.
• 31. Kaewsom P, Rojanarowan N. 2014. The application of FMEA to reduce defective rate from broken filament defects in the direct spin drawing process. IOSR Journal of Engineering 4(5), 55-58.
• 32. Özyazgan V. 2014. FMEA analysis and ımplementation in a textile factory producing woven fabric. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 24(3), 303-308.
• 33. Liu HC, Liu L, Liu N. 2013. Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications 40(2), 828-838.
• 34. De Queiroz Souza R, Álvares AJ. 2008. FMEA and FTA analysis for application of the reliability centered maintenance methodology: case study on hydraulic turbines. In ABCM Symposium Series in Mechatronics, 803-812.
• 35. Khaiyum S, Kumaraswamy YS. 2014. An effective method for the identification of potential failure modes of a system by integrating FTA and FMEA. In ICT and Critical Infrastructure: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Convention of Computer Society of India, Springer, Cham., Vol:1, 679-686.
• 36. Khaiyum S, Kumaraswamy YS. 2014. Integration of FMEA and FTA for effective failure management in real time embedded projects. Integrated Journal of British 1(3), 12-25.
• 37. Zhang YF, Zhou RB, Yang JM, Zhang Z. 2014. Application of FTA-FMEA method in fault diagnosis of tracked vehicle. Advanced Materials Research 940, 112-115.
• 38. Martins LE, Gorschek T. 2017. Requirements engineering for safety-critical systems: overview and challenges. IEEE Software 34(4), 49-57.
• 39. IEC 61025:2006, Fault tree analysis (FTA), Retrieved from https:// webstore.iec.ch/publication/4311, (Date of access: 10 July 2018).